Amendment 0009.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Deign-Bid-Build, Construction of P447 Explosive Railcar Holding Yard, Crane, Indiana

SEE BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

POC: Michelle Corsino, michelle.a.corsino@navy.mil, 757-410-7887

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008520R0048

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-May-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-Jul-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008520R0048

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0009

The purpose of Amendment 0009 is to provide the following:

1. Responses to PPI 127 through 148. At this time the government is no longer accepting PPIs.

2.Update the PROPOSAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

1. Response to PPIs

Date

Submitted

LEAVE

BLANK

Reference

No. Page Section Paragraph Question Response

127 07/07/20 Amend ment

No. 3

Pg. 2 of 4, Amend ment No. 6

pg. 12 of 22

1.

Respon se to

PPIs

Response to PPI no. 2 in Amendment No. 3 and PPI

no. 55 in Amendment No. 6 state that the attached wage determination includes

Martin County, Indiana. I did not see the referenced attached wage Determination on the SAM site. Can you please send the referenced wage scale determination to us?

Please see Amendment 0007.

128 07/07/20 Bid

Solicita tion

Pgs. 55 of 96 thru 95 of 96, 00800 32 31 13.53 section 3.5

Can you please confirm if the

Davis Bacon Wage Act applies to MEC Clearance and Construction Support? If so, can you please provide the classification to use? If not can you please clarify if the SCA Wage Determination will apply for

MEC Clearance and

Construction? If SCA Wage Determination applies, can you please provide the wage scale to use?

SCA Wage Determination will not be issued.

129 07/07/20 8 32 31

13.53 section 3.5 c Can you please confirm that there are no mechanical operators on the fence gates (refer to Vol. 1-C5111 &

Vol. 2-C5072) which would require training and closeout information to be provided.

Can you also confirm that paragraph c under section 3.5 in specification section 32 31

13.53 (High-Security Chain

Link Fences and Gates) can be deleted?

No mechanical operators on fence for either site.

Specification 32 31 13.53, Section 3.5, Paragraph C can be deleted.

130 07/07/20 Please confirm that the contractor is responsible for paying sales and use taxes on all permanent and temporary materials and that a tax exemption certificate will not

A tax exemption certificate will not be issued to the contractor.

be issued to the contractor.

131 07/07/20 ESS

Draft

Report, 6.4.1

6.4.2

The ESS states that if MEC is recovered, MEC will be transferred to either CAAA or to EOD Mobile Unit

Two. The ESS also refers to a Type II magazine. If no MEC will be stored and no contractor demolition events will occur, is a MEC storage magazine required?

An ATF Type II magazine is not required.

132 07/07/20 ESS

Draft Report, Figure

1-2

Figure 1-2 of the ESS shows

“Excavated Areas” in a green hatch pattern. Are these areas to be remediated by the contractor, or are they areas that have been identified and remediated with by the Crane

Naval Base previously?

The areas identified on the ESS

Figure 1-2 in green hatch have been remediated by others.

133 07/07/20 PPI #

Respon se

The response to PPI # 48 states that "recovery and isolation of discovered radioactive commodities, casual excavation and isolation of continuous soils , and resurvey actions consistent with MARSSIM guidance should be considered within the scope of budgeted work". However until a scan of the area is performed and subsequent survey plan generated we are unable to quantify or price recovery and isolation of radioactive commodities or soils. Please provide an allowance for contractors to include in their bids.

Recovery and isolation of discovered radioactive commodities for disposal by the government is within the scope of budgeted work. Casual excavation and isolation of contiguous soils associated with commodities and resurvey actions consistent with discrete commodities should be considered within the scope of work. Otherwise, remediation of contaminated soils is outside the scope of work.

134 07/07/20 Addend um

As the Explosive Safety

Submission was just received in Addendum 0006, can a bid extension be granted?

The Soliciation is extended to

July 24, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

Please submit a complete proposal via DOD SAFE and a

Hard Copy of the proposal by 31 July 2020.

135 07/02/20 Dwg

C5042

33 40

Type 7 Storm Casting -

Drawing C5042 detail A1 / The Type "E" inlet with a

Type 7 casting would use a

Neenah 4215C casting. The detail calls out a R 3067 which is a curb inlet casting.

We plan to use a Neenah 4215C or an East Jordan equal. Please confirm that this is desired casting.

Yes, Neenah 4215C or equal shall be used.

136 07/02/20 Dwg

C1322, 1332, 33 40

12" PVC Perforated

Underdrain Pipe - Drawings

C1322, C1332, C1342 / C5022 detail C4 / We are needing additional information on the 12" perforated PVC underdrain pipe. No class, perforation requirements, etc. are listed.

If they want PVC pipe, this would require a special production run and we would

HDPE substitute provided it meets ASTM D3350 as described in Specification 33 40 00, section 2.1.3 need to find a manufacturer willing to supply this pipe.

Would they allow ADS HP 12" HDPE perforated pipe as a substitute? This pipe is suited for railcar applications and has an AASHTO M330 rating and is stock material.

137 07/02/20 Dwg C

33 40

48" Manhole - Drawing

C5042 detail B1 / The 48" diameter manhole shows 8" thick side walls. I checked with the suppliers that we work with and they all follow

INDOT standards. These suppliers only have precast forms for 5" thick side walls.

Please note that the standard manhole side walls are rebar reinforced. Will they allow standard INDOT precast structures on this project.

INDOT Precast structures are allowable provided they meet the requirements is

Specification Section 33 40 00, Section 2.4

138 07/02/20 Dwg

P5011

33 40

Cleanout Casting - Drawing

P5011 detail A3 / The cleanout shows a cast iron ferrule with a countersunk bronze plug. Is this type of cleanout casting required for the cleanouts shown in the bioretention basin shown on drawings C1211, and C5021 detail C1? Would a PVC thread adapter and a PVC plug along with a monument box similar to an East Jordan

1574 be acceptable.

No, bioretention cleanout shall be PVC as called in the plans.

PVC plug with monument box is acceptable.

139 07/02/20 Dwg

C5041

33 40

4" Perforated PVC for the

Bioretention System -

Drawing C5041 detail A3 / I have been unable to find a PVC supplier that will manufacture 4" perforated pipe with 3/8" hole. The vendors we spoke with are only equipped to drill a 5/8" hole. We propose drilling this in the field. Please advise on how to proceed.

5/8" perforation is acceptable.

140 07/02/20 Dwg C5032

33 40

Need to know the structure diameter for the Nyloplast catch basins in the rail yard.

It doesn't appear to be listed anywhere. Drawing C5032 detail B1 is general reference only.

Catch basins shall be sized per the manufacturer's recommendation for the corresponding connected pipe sizes.

141 07/09/20 23 44

What data is currently in the

RSA to aid in the development of

DCGLs? Will the RSA be available during the RFP process?

DCGLs will be calculated based on ROCs listed in the specification and preliminary scoping surveys by the RSC according to MARSSIM 4.3.4.

142 07/09/20 23 44

Please confirm that we will need to derive site-specific

DCGLs. What is the intended future land use (RESRAD modeling for site-specific

DCGLs if needed)?

The intended future land use is a logistics facility undergoing construction work, which means that occupational exposure scenarios related to excavation and construction in contact with soil are appropriate.

143 07/09/20 23 44

Is there a specific reason for eliminating the Ludlum 2221 as a survey meter? It would be more likely that certain detectors would be eliminated based on detection capabilities rather than eliminating the meter.

Industry experience in the past few years has indicated that configuration control of the specific output chips available for the LM 2221 can be problematic. Numerous alternatives are commercially available. Therefore, there is no need to incur the risk of using the LM 2221.

144 07/09/20 23 44

Is there a preliminary classification of the Areas of

Interest within SWMU 21 other than the one area where a commodity was previously found?

The preliminary classification, other than the singleton Class 1 area, is Class 2 or Class 3, based on current information that one commodity was found and the results of RSC's scoping surveys.

145 07/09/20 23 44

Are background soil and surface areas already identified or is the RSC responsible for determining suitable locations?

The RSC is responsible to select specific instruments.

Background measurements specific to each media or surface type will be determined by the RSC and included in the survey and sampling plan in accordance with the specification.

146 07/10/20 N/A N/A Can the Bid date be extended past the current date of 21 July 2020?

The Soliciation is extended to

July 24, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

Please submit a complete proposal via DOD SAFE and a

Hard Copy of the proposal by 31 July 2020.

147 07/11/20 N/A N/A Can we have a second site visit?

At this time there is not a second site visit scheduled.

148 07/09/20 N/A N/A Could you please confirm that the Price Proposal and the Non Price/Price Proposal are due on July 21, 2020 at 2:00pm via the instructions as outlined in Amendment 6?

Yes, a complete proposal is due on 24 July 2020 at 2:00 p.m. via instructions outlined in the

Proposal Instructions. In addition, we must receive a hard copy of the complete proposal by 31 July 2020. The week difference is to allow additional time for the mail carrier.

2. Update the PROPOSAL DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

PROPOSAL delivery instructions

DOD Safe Site Information for Electronic Proposal Delivery

Contractors shall send their Electronic Proposal submission to Michelle Corsino through the DOD Safe Site (safe.apps.mil). Only DoD SAFE is authorized for the submission of the electronic original proposal in response to this solicitation. Further guidance is provided below for submission of hard copy submissions.

The contractor shall send the contract specialist, Michelle Corsino at michelle.a.corsino@navy.mil, the email address of the offeror’s point of contact who will be receiving the Drop-Off invitation to upload proposals to the DOD Safe Site no later than Tuesday, July 21, 2020 by 2:00 p.m.

EDT, unless that date and time are changed via Solicitation Amendment. It is the offeror’s responsibility to confirm that the Point of Contact information is received.

The Contract Specialist, Michelle Corsino, will “Request a Drop-Off” through DoD SAFE utilizing the provided offeror’s point of contact email address. The recipient will receive an automated email containing the information for the request and instructions for uploading. Requests from

DoD SAFE will be sent on Thursday, July 23, 2020 no later than 2:00 p.m. EDT. If you do not receive an email containing drop off instructions on that date, please contact the Contract Specialist, Michelle Corsino. Only the identified POC will be able to drop-off proposals or proposal revisions in DOD SAFE. Failure to provide accurate POC information will preclude the offeror from using DoD SAFE. Note: only two email addresses may be provided per Offeror.

To submit the proposal, the offeror will utilize the link provided in the automated email to take you to DoD SAFE at https://safe.apps.mil. The system will allow for inclusion of a short note to the Recipient and then the offeror will click to add files or drag and drop them.

Click “Drop-Off Files” to send the files to the recipient. You should receive a notification on the site “Drop-Off Completed” “Your files have been sent successfully.” Please keep this for your records. The file(s) are uploaded and an email will be sent to the recipient notifying them of the

“drop-off”. [Additional details can be viewed in the DoD SAFE User Guide available at https://safe.apps.mil]. Note that the submission of any proposal must be completed no later than the due date and time, unless the date and time are changed via Solicitation Amendment, using the link sent by the contract specialist via DOD Safe. The DoD SAFE system will record the date and time of package submittal. The date and time of package submittal recorded in DoD SAFE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission.

Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of offerors. The maximum file size of a package is 8 GB. Up to 25 packages may be uploaded per link.

It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from Opportunities (www.beta.sam.gov).

Mailed Hard Copies

In addition, one (1) original and one (1) copy of the hard copy proposal shall be delivered by mail on the date and time listed below, respectively, unless those dates are changed via Solicitation Amendment.

Proposal shall be labeled “PROPOSAL FOR RFP N4008520R0048, ATTN: Michelle Corsino; DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.

Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted.

Express Mail to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic

9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room

216 Norfolk, Virginia

23511 Attn: Michelle Corsino, ACQ22

Price Proposal Due Date

Electronic Copy of complete Proposal due: Friday, July 24, 2020, 2:00 p.m. EDT

Hard Copy of complete Proposal due: Friday, July 31, 2020, 12:00 p.m. EDT

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 21-Jul-2020 02:00 PM to 24-Jul-2020 02:00 PM.

(End of Summary of Changes)