J - 13 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 2 MB Posted

Attached to
USNS ARCTIC REGULAR OVERHAUL DRY DOCKING 2022 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N3220521R4207
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor. The questionnaire is being sent by the Military Sealift Command to references provided by a contractor bidding on Solicitation Number N3220521R4207 for regular overhaul and dry docking of the USNS ARCTIC in January 2022. The questionnaire requests ratings and comments on quality, timeliness, business relations, key personnel, and cost control (for cost contracts) regarding a past contract between the reference and the contractor. References are asked to provide an overall performance rating and indicate if they would hire the contractor in the future. Responses are requested by July 30, 2021 to be considered in proposal evaluation.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to USNS ARCTIC REGULAR OVERHAUL DRY DOCKING 2022, newest first.
File Type Posted
S9555-AR-MMO-010_10_0.pdf PDF
USNS Arctic Master Calibration List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AOE-8 List of Waster Sleeves.xls XLS spreadsheet
Q and A 2.docx DOCX document
S6161-PQ-FSE-010_3_0.pdf PDF
Machinery Control SystemSSDGLM2500 Sensors.docx DOCX document
Copy of J - 3 Category B Items ARCTIC REV 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Q and A 1.docx DOCX document
0957_A_PROPELLER CLEAN AND POLISH_ON DOCK (2.5YR)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
J - 3 Category B Items ARCTIC REV 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Arctic 2022 ROH Index REV 1.docx DOCX document
0963_A_SEA CHEST AND MARINE GROWTH PROTECTION (5YR)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
0961_FREEBOARD PRESERVATION (5 YR)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
WI 0405 REFERENCE TV-DTS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION TEST SHEET.docx DOCX document
0953_A_ANCHORS CHAINS AND LOCKERS 5YR_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
0966_A_SHAFT ALIGNMENT AND BEARING REACTION CHECKS_TAOE_CSI.docx DOCX document
0967_A_SHAFT ALIGNMENT AND BEARING REACTION CHECKS 3 AND 4_TAOE_CSI.docx DOCX document
0962_A_CATHODIC PROTECTION (5YR)_TAOE_CCSI_REV 1.docx DOCX document
0968_A_SHAFT ALIGNMENT AND BEARING REACTION CHECKS (POST SEA TRIAL)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
0155_A_TANK VENT INSPECTION (5YR).docx DOCX document
0959_A_UNDERWATER HULL CLEANING AND PAINTING-NWB(10YR)_TAOE_CCSI_REV 1.docx DOCX document
J - 2 Category A Items ARCTIC REV 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
0656_A_LIFE RAFT CERTIFICATION_REV-A-ARCTIC TAOE CCSI.docx DOCX document
0956_A_OVERHAULING SEA VALVES (5YR)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
0955_A_STERN TUBE SEAL ASSEMBLY (5YR)(SCSI)_TAOE_CCSI.docx DOCX document
J - 14 Technical Data Non-Disclosure.docx DOCX document
J - 10 Interport Differential - Arctic Nov MTA 2018.docx DOCX document
J - 4 GFM LIST USNS ARCTIC FY 22 ROHDD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J - 2 Category A Items ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
J - 3 Category B Items ARCTIC.xls XLS spreadsheet
J - 11 Dry Dock Evaluation Form.docx DOCX document
J - 9 Disclosure of Lobbying Activities SF-LLL.doc DOC document
J - 7 MSC Ship Repair Facility Survey.doc DOC document
J - 8 Request for Spec Clarification.doc DOC document
J - 12 Past Performance Data.doc DOC document
N3220521R4207 ARCTIC Solicitation.docx DOCX document
SYNOPSIS N3220521R4207 USNS ARCTIC ROH 2022.docx DOCX document
SOURCES SOUGHT FOR USNS ARCTIC ROHDD 2022.docx DOCX document
Show all 38

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachment J-13

TO: EMAIL:

PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Service/Deliveries c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors)

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, by BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION 1:00 PM 30 July 2021 to Ed Ruhling. Information can also be sent via e-mail attention of Ed Ruhling at edward.v.ruhling.civ@us.navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Ed Ruhling
Contract Specialist

For your convenience, a cover sheet for use in mailing/faxing is provided below.

Military Sealift Command
Attn: Ed Ruhling

Bldg SP-64 471 C Street Naval Station Norfolk, VA 23511-2419

From: (Name and Address of Organization) __________________________________________________

__________________________________________________
(Point of Contact Name)__________________________________________________
(Facsimile/Phone Number)__________________________________________________
(E-mail Address)__________________________________________________
To(Point of Contact Name)Ed Ruhling
(Facsimile Number)(757) 443-0733
(E-mail Address)edward.v.ruhling.civ@us.navy.mil

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organiation.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.) Timeliness or Scheduling of Supplies/Deliveries: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Key Personnel and Staffing (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Cost Control (COST CONTRACTS ONLY): Actual cost / rates reflect closely to negotiated cost / rates, adequate budgetary internal controls, current, accurate and complete billings

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .