Attachment_01_-_MASTER_SOW_-_150421.pdf

ACV-SOW-03001

UNCLASSIFIED

Statement of Work (SOW)

For the Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV)

M67854-15-R-0001

Section J, Attachment 01

ACV-SOW-03001

Version 1.2 21 April 2015

DISTRIBUTION A: Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.

Revision Date Summary of Changes

1.0 19 Mar 2015 Initial release of the RFP

1.1 15 April 2015

Section 3.6.4.1.2 – “up to the beginning of Government organic supply support” was removed from the end of the

2nd sentence

1.2 21 April 2015

Section 3.9 – SOW Crosswalk updated for TDP changes for final TDP submissions – CLIN 6005 added where appropriate

Section 3.5.1.7 – Second paragraph referral to “figures (1) and (2)” replaced with “Table 5”

Revision Date Summary of Changes

This page blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACV-SOW-03001 Unclassified

1 SCOPE

1.1 BACKGROUND

1.2 INTRODUCTION OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

2.1.1 SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND HANDBOOKS

2.2 OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, AND PUBLICATIONS

2.2.1 REGULATIONS, FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS, DEFENSE FEDERAL

ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENTS, MANUALS, DIRECTIVES, INSTRUCTIONS, AND

FORMS 4

2.3 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

2.3.1 STANDARDS AND GUIDEBOOKS

2.4 AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOCUMENTS

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OVERVIEW

3.1.1 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

3.1.2 SECURITY

3.1.3 OPERATIONS SECURITY PLAN

3.1.4 PROGRAM PROTECTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

3.2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

3.2.1 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY

3.2.2 CONFERENCES, REVIEWS, AGENDAS, AND REPORTS

3.2.3 MONTHLY PROGRESS STATUS REPORTS

3.2.4 INTEGRATED MASTER PLANNING/INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULING/SCHEDULE

RISK ASSESSMENT

3.2.5 CONTRACTOR WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

3.2.6 RESERVED

3.2.7 RESERVED

3.2.8 COST ESTIMATING AND ANALYSIS

3.2.9 RESERVED

3.2.10 CONTRACTOR CONTROLLED LIFE CYCLE COST ESTIMATE

3.2.11 MATERIAL PRICING REPORT

3.2.12 TIME SERIES LOT SIZE PRICING DATA

3.2.13 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

3.3 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

3.3.1 TECHNICAL REVIEWS

3.3.2 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT

3.3.3 QUALITY

3.3.4 REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT

3.3.5 INTERFACE CONTROL DIAGRAMS

3.3.6 DRAWINGS/MODELS

3.3.7 OPEN SYSTEMS

3.3.8 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

3.3.9 VEHICLE CONFIGURATION DATA

3.3.10 CONFIGURATION AUDITS

3.3.11 CONFIGURATION CONTROL

3.3.12 CONTRACTOR VERIFICATION REPORT

3.3.13 TECHNOLOGY

3.3.14 ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

3.3.15 SOFTWARE

3.3.16 CALIBRATION UPDATES

3.3.17 DATA

3.3.18 DIMINISHING MANUFACTURING SOURCES AND MATERIAL SHORTAGES

3.3.19 TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

3.3.20 BALLISTIC PROTECTION/SEAT TEST AND ANALYSIS

3.3.21 FORCE PROTECTION AND VULNERABILITY REDUCTION

3.3.22 GOVERNMENT MOBILITY MODELING AND SIMULATION

3.3.23 SEAWORTHINESS ANALYSIS

3.3.24 CORROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL PLAN

3.3.25 THERMAL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS

3.3.26 LAUNCHING FROM AND EMBARKING TO AMPHIBIOUS SHIPS ANALYSIS

3.3.27 WATERTIGHT INTEGRITY ANALYSIS

3.3.28 HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION

3.3.29 WEIGHT CONTROL AND REPORTING

3.3.30 LOAD PLAN

3.3.31 RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

3.3.32 FAILURE REPORTING, ANALYSIS, AND CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEM

3.3.33 FAILURE PREVENTION REVIEW BOARD

3.3.34 TECHICAL DATA PACKAGE

3.4 MANUFACTURING OF THE EMD/LRIP/FRP VEHICLES

3.4.1 MANUFACTURING PLAN

3.4.2 MANUFACTURING READINESS ASSESSMENT FOR EMD/LRIP/FRP

3.4.3 CRITICAL PROCESS

3.4.4 PROCESS FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS

3.4.5 VEHICLE ASSEMBLY AND GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY INTEGRATION 56

3.4.6 BREAK-IN OPERATIONS

3.4.7 CONTRACTOR ACCEPTANCE TEST

3.4.8 RESET LRIP INITIAL OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION VEHICLES

3.4.9 FIRST ARTICLE TESTING

3.4.10 PASS THROUGH OF COMMERCIAL WARRANTIES

3.5 TEST AND EVALUATION

3.5.1 MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT

3.5.2 GOVERNMENT TEST AND EVALUATION ON EMD VEHICLES

3.5.3 GOVERNMENT TEST AND EVALUATION ON LRIP VEHICLES

3.5.4 TRANSPORTATION

3.6 LOGISTICS

3.6.1 LOGISTICS PROGRAM MANAGEMENT MEETINGS

3.6.2 LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION

3.6.3 SUPPORTABILITY ANALYSIS

3.6.4 SUPPLY SUPPORT

3.6.5 PACKAGING, HANDLING, STORAGE, AND TRANSPORTATION

3.6.6 TRAINING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

3.6.7 TECHNICAL MANUALS

3.6.8 DEPOT LEVEL OVERHAUL/REBUILD PRODUCTS

3.6.9 PRODUCTION LINE SHUTDOWN

3.6.10 FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVES

3.7 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED INFORMATION/PROPERTY

3.7.1 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED INFORMATION

3.7.2 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY

3.7.3 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

3.7.4 SCHEDULE OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY

3.7.5 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY BASELINE INVENTORY REPORT

3.7.6 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY STATUS REPORT

3.7.7 REPAIR AND FAILURE REPORT

3.7.8 CONTRACTOR ACQUIRED PROPERTY

3.7.9 MAINTENANCE OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY

3.7.10 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY WITH WARRANTY

3.7.11 FINAL DISPOSITION OF GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED PROPERTY

3.8 DISPOSITION OF VEHICLES

3.8.1 DISPOSITION OF EMD LIVE FIRE VEHICLES

3.8.2 DISPOSITION OF NON-LRIP OPTION SELECTED CONTRACTOR EMD VEHICLES ... 93

3.8.3 DISPOSITION OF FUSL VEHICLES

3.9 CROSSWALK MATRIX

Section J, Attachment (1)

Statement of Work

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 1

1 SCOPE

This Statement of Work (SOW) describes the work scope associated with the Amphibious Combat

Vehicle (ACV) Phase 1, Increment 1, Program hereafter referred to as the ACV Program. It includes all efforts associated with the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) vehicle production and testing, Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) (Option, if exercised) Build, and Full Rate Production (FRP)

(Option, if exercised) Build. It includes the associated Program Management, Systems Engineering (SE), Test and Evaluation (T&E), and Integrated Product Support planning requirements.

1.1 BACKGROUND

The ACV Program will continue to build upon the preparatory work of the Marine Personnel Carrier

(MPC) Program efforts conducted from 2006 to 2013. In 2006, the Office of the Secretary of Defense

(OSD) provided strategic planning guidance to the United States Marine Corps (USMC) to maintain a two (2) Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MEB) forcible entry capability and propose a mix of vehicles suitable for Irregular Warfare (IW) to provide a mobility portfolio that better balanced our maneuver/mobility capability for Major Contingency Operations and IW. In response, the USMC proposed a combination of a light vehicle and a medium vehicle designed for the threats seen in IW. Both maintain a capability to maneuver with formations while conducting Major Contingency Operations. A medium personnel carrier was assessed as necessary to provide the full protection required in a high

Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) environment, and the multi-axle wheeled configuration was assessed as the most suitable platform for high cross country speed, combined with the ability to transit urban infrastructure in a non-threatening and non-destructive manner. The Marine Requirements

Oversight Council (MROC) convened on 4 February 2008 for a decision brief on the MPC material solution and operational fielding placement, based on the MPC Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) dated

December 2007. The Ground Combat Tactical Vehicle Strategy was finalized in August 2008, setting the fundamental MPC capacities (Acquisition Objectives), strategic lift envelope, protection, payload, and performance required of the MPC as a system.

After the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) Program cancellation in January 2011, a Systems

Engineering Operational Planning Team (SE-OPT) convened to conduct engineering and cost analysis of

EFV requirements to identify those parameters driving complexity in design, identify trade-space, and develop requirement generation options for an EFV replacement, called the ACV. The SE-OPT analyzed

11 system concepts against capabilities delivered, cost, and schedule of delivery. The SE-OPT fully developed four (4) of the system concepts with various capabilities and costs that represented a range of capability from Assault Amphibious Vehicle (AAV)-based system concepts to new developmental ACV-based system concepts. All four (4) system concepts were low water speed capable. The SE-OPT determined and recommended that the most affordable solution was to develop a modern low water speed capable AAV replacement.

Concurrently with the efforts of the SE-OPT, the Government awarded four (4) MPC Demonstrations and

& Studies (D&S) Contracts on 6 August 2012 to better understand the capabilities of Non-Developmental

Items (NDIs) to meet water performance, survivability, and human factors/stowage capacity requirements. The promising results of testing these demonstrator vehicles led to a re-invigorated ACV

Program in late 2013 using the type of NDI vehicles tested during the D&S Contracts as a baseline. In

January 2014, the MPC initiative was reprioritized and repurposed to be the material approach for the

Phase 1 Program of the ACV. The MPC Program was then re-designated as the ACV Phase 1 Increment

1 (i.e., ACV 1.1) and an acquisition strategy was selected with a NDI Armored Personnel Carrier (APC).

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 2

In April 2014, the MROC approved the ACV Capability Development Document (CDD) which will be followed by a Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) approval once the AoA is finalized, setting the stage for development of programmatic and contractual documentation. The Materiel Development

Decision (MDD) was received on 4 June 2014 to formally initiate the ACV Program. The current requirement for the USMC is 12 infantry battalion lift equivalents via APCs. The ACV capability along with the AAV Survivability Upgrade will provide the USMC ten (10) infantry battalion lift equivalents through 2035. After which time, the future phase(s) of the ACV Program will provide for the entirety of the USMC armored lift capacity requirement.

1.2 INTRODUCTION OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK

The purpose of this contract is to procure NDI ACV Personnel (P) Vehicles from EMD to FRP (Option, if exercised). This EMD contract will include scope associated with the following: Design/Development;

Program Management Support; Tooling Development; Manufacturing ACVs; Logistics Management

Information (LMI) Data development; Training Materials development; Technical Manual (TM) development; Pre-Milestone (MS) C Test Support; Corrective Action Mods.

This SOW will also include Options (if exercised) to manufacture LRIP and FRP Vehicles, after the down-select decision is completed by the Government. Tasking for these contracts will include: Post MS

C Test Support; Design/Development; Program Management Support; Training Materials development;

TM development; Support Equipment development; Manufacturing ACVs; LMI Data; Test Support; Test and Initial Spares; Refurbishment of Test Vehicles, Field Service Representative (FSR) and Training

Support for fielding.

2 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The following documents form a part of this SOW to the extent specified herein. Unless otherwise noted, in the event of a conflict between the SOW and the references cited herein (except for related specification sheets) the text of this SOW takes precedence. All second tier and below references cited shall be considered as guidance only. Nothing in this document, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

2.1 GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

2.1.1 SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND HANDBOOKS

SPECIFICATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Military Performance

Specification (MIL-PRF)-

32216A

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-

Shelf (COTS) Manuals and

Preparation of Supplemental Data1

12 Aug

Military Handbook (MIL-

HDBK)-29612A

Instructional Systems

Development/Systems Approach to

Training and Education

31 Aug

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 3

DEPARTMENT OF NAVY

ACV-SPE-02003 Amphibious Combat Vehicle Phase I, Increment 1 System Performance

Specification

Draft

MIL-PREF-29612B Training Data Products Aug 2001

STANDARDS

Military Standard (MIL-

STD)-129R

Military Marking for Shipment and

Storage

18 Feb 2014

MIL-STD-130-N,

Change 1

Identification Marking of United

States (U.S.) Military Property

16 Nov 2012

MIL-STD-464C Electromagnetic Environmental

Effects Requirements for Systems

1 Dec 2010

MIL-STD-882E System Safety 11 May 2012

MIL-STD-2073-1E,

Change 1

Standard Practice for Military

Packaging

7 Jan 2011

MIL-STD-3018, Change 1 Parts Management 27 Oct 2011

MIL-STD-31000A Technical Data Packages 26 Feb 2013

MIL-STD-881C Work Breakdown Structures for

Defense Materiel Items

03 Oct 2011

Federal Standard (FED-

STD)-313E

Material Safety Data, Transportation

Data, and Disposal Data for

Hazardous Materials Furnished to

Government Activities

1 Jul 2014

GUIDEBOOKS

Department of Defense

(DoD) Guide

Corrosion Prevention and Control

Planning Guidebook (CPCPG), Spiral

No. 4

4 Feb 2014

DoD Guide DoD Integrated Master Plan and

Integrated Master Schedule

Preparation and Use Guide

21 Oct 2005

DoD Guide Interim Risk Management Guide for

DoD Acquisition, Seventh Edition

Dec 2014

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 4

(Interim Release)

DoD Guidance Technology Readiness Assessment

(TRA) Guidance

April 2011

DoD MRL Deskbook Manufacturing Readiness Level

(MRL) Deskbook, Version 2.2.1

Oct 2012

DEPARTMENT OF ARMY

U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers Waterways

Experiment Station

North Atlantic Treaty Organization

(NATO) Reference Mobility Model, Edition II, (NRMMII) Version 2.8.2b

Dec 1992

Department of the Army

Pamphlet (DA PAM) 73-1

Test and Evaluation in Support of

Systems Acquisition

30 May

Navy Marine Corps

(NAVMC) 1553.1

Systems Approach To Training User's

Guide, Short Title: SAT User Guide

27 Oct 2010

MIL-DTL-53072E Chemical Agent Resistant Coating

(CARC) System Application

Procedures and Quality Control

Inspection

9 May 2013

HANDBOOKS

MIL-HDBK-61A Configuration Management Guidance 7 Feb 2001

2.2 OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS, DRAWINGS, AND PUBLICATIONS

2.2.1 REGULATIONS, FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS, DEFENSE FEDERAL

ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENTS, MANUALS, DIRECTIVES,

INSTRUCTIONS, AND FORMS

REGULATIONS

DEPARTMENT OF ARMY

AR 73-1 Army Regulation Test and Evaluation

Policy

1 Aug 2006

FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 5

Federal Acquisition

Regulations (FAR)

2.101(b)

Definitions 13 Nov

FAR 52.245-1 Government Property June 2007

DEFENSE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SUPPLEMENTS

Defense Federal

Acquisition Regulation

Supplements (DFARS)

252.211-7003

Item Unique Identification Dec 2013

DFARS 252.227-7013 Rights in Technical Data—

Noncommercial Items

Feb 2014

DFARS 252.227-7014 Rights in Noncommercial Computer

Software and Noncommercial

Computer Software Documentation

Feb 2014

DFARS 252.227-7017 Identification and Assertion of Use, Release, or Disclosure Restrictions

Jan 2011

DFARS 252.234-7003 Notice of Cost and Software Data

Reporting System

Nov 2010

MANUALS

DoD 4000.25-2-M Military Standard Transaction

Reporting and Accounting Procedures

13 June

DoD 5000.04-M-1

Cost and Software Data Reporting

Manual

4 Nov 2011

DoD 5220.22-M National Industrial Security Program

Operating Manual

28 Mar

Naval Sea Systems

Command (NAVSEA)

S9310-AQ-SAF-010

U.S. Navy Lithium Battery Safety

Program TM: Responsibilities and

Procedures

15 Jul 2010

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DIRECTIVES

Defense Logistics

Management (DLM)

4000.25-2-M

Military Standard Requisitioning and

Issue Procedures

13 Jun 2012

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 6

Directive (DoDD) 8570.01

Information Assurance Training, Certification, and Workforce

Management

15 Aug

INSTRUCTIONS

Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02

(Final)

Operation of the Defense Acquisition

System

7 Jan 2015

DoDI 5200.39, Change 1 Critical Program Information

Protection within DoD

28 Dec

DoDI 8320.04 Item Unique Identification (IUID)

Standards for Tangible Personal

Property

June 2008

DoDI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework for

DoD Information Technology

12 Mar

DoDI 8520.2 Public Key Infrastructure and Public

Key Enabling

24 May

DoDI 8582.01 Security of Unclassified DoD

Information on Non-DoD Information

Systems

6 Jun 2012

COMNAVSURFLANT/

COMNAVSURFPAC

INSTRUCTION 3340.3D

Marine Corps Order

(MCO) 1553.2B

Wet Well Operations Manual

Management Of Marine Corps

Formal Schools and Training

Detachments

9 Oct 2012

1 Apr 2011

MCO 3070.2A

The Marine Corps Operational

Security (OPSEC) Program

2 Jul 2013

MCO 4790.25

Ground Equipment Management

Program 12 Jan 2014

Office of the Chief of

Naval Operations

Instruction (OPNAVINST)

3000.12A

Operational Availability of

Equipment’s and Weapon Systems

2 Sep 2003

OPNAVINST 3432.1A Operations Security 4 Aug 2011

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 7

FORMS

DD Form 250 Material Inspection and Receiving

Report Aug 2000

DD Form 254 Contract Security Classification

Specification, Department of Defense Dec 1999

DD Form 1423 Contract Data Requirements List

(CDRL)

Aug 1996

DD Form 1586 Contract Funds Status Report Aug 1996

DD Form 2734/1 Contract Performance Report, Format

1, Work Breakdown Structure Apr 2005

DD Form 2734/2 Contract Performance Report, Format

2, Organizational Categories Apr 2005

DD Form 2734/3 Contract Performance Report, Format

3, Baseline

Apr 2005

DD Form 2734/4 Contract Performance Report, Format

4, Staffing

Apr 2005

DD Form 2734/5 Contract Performance Report, Format

5, Explanations and Problem

Analyses

Apr 2005

DD Form 2794 Cost and Software Data Reporting

Plan

May 2011

GSA Optional Form

Optional Form (OF) 346 U.S. Government Motor Vehicle

Operators Identification Card

Nov 1985

2.3 NON-GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS

2.3.1 STANDARDS AND GUIDEBOOKS

STANDARDS

SAE Government Electronics and Information Technology

Association Standard (GEIA-

STD)-0007, Rev B

Logistics Product Data 01 May 2013

American Society of Mechanical

Engineers (ASME) Y14.24

Types and Application of Engineering

Drawings

1 Jan 2012

ASME Y14.34 Associated Lists 1 Jan 2013

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 8

ASME Y14.35M Revision of Engineering Drawings and Associated Documents

8 Dec 1997

ASME Y14.41 Digital Product Definition Data

Practices

14 May 2012

ASME Y14.5-2009 Geometric Dimensioning and

Tolerancing

9 Feb 2009

ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices 30 Jul 2013

American Society Testing

Materials (ASTM)-D-3951

Standard Practice For Commercial

Packaging

Institute of Electrical and

Electronic Engineers (IEEE)

12207.2

Software Life Cycle Processes 1997

International Organization for

Standardization (ISO) 9001:2008

Quality Management Systems-

Requirements

National Aerospace Standard

(NAS) 411-1:2013

National Aerospace Standard:

Hazardous Materials Target List

30 Sep 2013

NAS 411, Rev 3 National Aerospace Standard:

Hazardous Materials Management

Program

30 Sep 2013

National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency

Report (NISTIR) 7622

National Institute of Standards and

Technology Interagency Report

7622, “Notional Supply Chain Risk

Management Practices for Federal

Information Systems: Piloting Supply

Chain Risk Management for Federal

Information Systems”

Oct 2012

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special

Publication 800-53A

Guide for Assessing the Security

Controls in Federal Information

Systems and Organizations

June 2010

SAE JA1011 Evaluation Criteria for Reliability-

Centered Maintenance Processes

Aug 2009

GUIDEBOOKS

International Society of

Weight Engineers, Inc.

Recommended Practice

Number 5

Mass Properties Control System for

Wheeled and Tracked Vehicles, Revision A

26 May

National Defense Industrial

Association Guidebook

Engineering for System Assurance, Version 1.0

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 9

REPORTS

NISTIR 7622

Piloting Supply Chain Risk

Management (SCRM) for Federal

Information Systems, 16 Oct 2012

MANUALS

Automotive Industry

Action Group (AIAG)

Failure Mode and Effects

Analyses (FMEA) Manual th Edition of Industry Standards 2008

2.4 AVAILABILITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOCUMENTS

DoD Directives, Manuals, Instructions, and Publications are available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ or from the National Technical Information Services (NTIS), 5301

Shawnee Rd, Alexandria, VA 22312.

DoD FAR and DFARS are available online at http://farsite.hill.af.mil/.

DoD Forms are available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/.

Department of Navy (DON) Issuances (e.g., Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV)

Instructions) are available online at http://doni.daps.dla.mil/allinstructions.aspx.

General Services Administration (GSA) OF are available by ordering from http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116942

Military Specifications, Military Standards, Military Handbooks, and Data Item Descriptions (DIDs) are available online at http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700

Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.

If a DoD document cannot be acquired, they may be provided by the Government upon the Contractor’s request.

3 REQUIREMENTS

This SOW encompasses the EMD and the Production and Deployment (PD) Phases of the ACV

Acquisition Program. The ACV performance requirements are fully described in Section J, Attachment

02, ACV System Performance Specification ACV-SPE-02003. Vehicle quantities are detailed in Section

B - Supplies or Services and Prices of the Request for Proposal (RFP).

Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) 0001 – For EMD Design and Development, the Contractor shall provide the following efforts:

Vehicle Design/Development

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

Program Management

Armor and Seat Coupons

Development of Software http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/infomgt/forms/ http://doni.daps.dla.mil/allinstructions.aspx http://www.gsa.gov/portal/forms/download/116942 http://quicksearch.dla.mil/

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 10

Management of Government Furnished Property (GFP)

CLIN 0002 – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 13 ACV-P EMD Vehicles.

CLIN 0003 –Delivery incentive for EMD vehicles, see Section H; H.5 Delivery Incentive.

CLIN 0004 – The Contractor shall prepare and deliver EMD, LRIP and FRP Contract Data Requirements

List (CDRLs) in accordance with Exhibit A, DD-1423s.

CLIN 0005 (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 3 ACV-P EMD Vehicles.

CLIN 1001 (Option) – The Contractor shall continue to Design and Develop EMD vehicles, and provide the following efforts:

Program Management

Producibility

Engineering Planning

Management of GFP

CLIN 1002 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide EMD Test Support that shall include the following efforts:

Pre-MS C Test Support

Test Spares

Vehicle Transportation

Conduct of training for testing

FSRs

CLIN 1003 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide corrective action modifications to the EMD vehicles in support of system Reliability Growth Testing (RGT). These corrective action modifications are in response to safety and reliability failures discovered during system developmental testing. The corrective action modifications will be implemented during the planned Corrective Action Periods.

CLIN 1004 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following efforts for Logistics Management:

Develop and deliver LMI data

Develop and deliver Technical Manuals

Develop and deliver Training Material

Preservation, Packaging, and Storage Plan for Unique Production Tooling

CLIN 1005 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide Studies for Advanced Capability Improvements in accordance with Attachment 26. This will include design and installation of key objective-level performance improvements to EMD vehicles. A contract modification will be awarded prior to any efforts being executed by the Contractor.

CLIN 1006 (Option) – The non-selectee Contractor shall follow the instructions identified in SOW paragraph 3.8.2 for disposition of the Contractor EMD vehicles.

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 11

CLIN 1007 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide Post down-select efforts for EMD Design and

Development to include the following:

Program Management

Management of GFP

CLIN 1008 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide post down-select efforts for EMD Test Support to include the following efforts:

Conduct and Support Post-MS C Test

Support IOT&E Testing

Vehicle Transportation

Test Spares

For the PD phase the following CLINs shall apply:

CLIN 2001 (Option) will include two (2) sub-CLINs for the LRIP (Lot 1) Vehicles. They are:

CLIN 2001AA (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver four (4) ACV-P Full-Up

System-Level (FUSL) vehicles.

CLIN 2001AB (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 26 ACV-P Production vehicles.

CLIN 2002 (Option) will include two (2) sub-CLINs for other production related Costs for LRIP (Lot 1).

They are:

CLIN 2002AA (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following development funded efforts:

Test Support

Test Spares

Vehicle Transportation

Logistics Demonstration

First Article Testing

Corrective Action Modifications

Conduct of Training for Testing

CLIN 2002AB (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following procurement funded efforts:

Program Management

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

Acceptance Testing

CLIN 2003 (Option) will include two (2) sub-CLINs for Fielding and Support Costs for LRIP (Lot 1).

They are:

CLIN 2003AA (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following development funded efforts:

Develop logistics products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 12

CLIN 2003AB (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following procurement funded efforts:

Procure data products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

Procure support equipment

Procure initial spares

Fielding support

Unique Production Tooling Preservation, Packaging, and Storage

CLIN 2004 (Option) – The Contractor shall reset LRIP operational test and evaluation vehicles identified in SOW paragraph 3.4.8.

CLIN 3001 (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 30 ACV-P vehicles for LRIP (Lot

2).

CLIN 3002 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following production related efforts for LRIP

(Lot 2):

Program Management

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

Vehicle Transportation

CLIN 3003 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following fielding and support efforts for LRIP

Procure data products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

Procure support equipment

Procure initial spares

Fielding support

CLIN 4001 (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 30 ACV-P vehicles for FRP (Lot

1).

CLIN 4002 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following production related efforts for FRP

(Lot 1):

Program Management

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

CLIN 4003 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following fielding and support efforts for FRP

(Lot 1):

Procure data products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

Procure support equipment

Procure initial spares

Fielding support

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 13

CLIN 4004 (Option) – The Contractor shall develop and deliver depot data and support products necessary for depot stand-up.

CLIN 5001 (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 80 ACV-P vehicles for FRP (Lot

2).

CLIN 5002 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following production related efforts for FRP

Program Management

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

CLIN 5003 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following fielding and support efforts for FRP

Procure data products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

Procure support equipment

Procure initial spares

Fielding support

CLIN 6001 (Option) – The Contractor shall manufacture and deliver 38 ACV-P vehicles for FRP (Lot

3).

CLIN 6002 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following production related efforts for FRP

(Lot 3):

Program Management

Procurement of Vehicle Tooling

CLIN 6003 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide the following fielding and support efforts for FRP

(Lot 3):

Procure data products (LMI data, training materials, TMs)

Procure support equipment

Procure initial spares

Fielding support

CLIN 6004 (Option) – The Contractor shall provide production line shut-down efforts:

Production Line Shut-Down

CLIN 6005 (Option) – Technical Data Package

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 14

3.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OVERVIEW

3.1.1 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall provide all necessary personnel, resources and facilities to execute the requirements, and provide deliverables within the identified schedules. The Contractor shall ensure that video teleconference and telephone bridges are available at the Contractor’s facility for the entire contract period of performance. All personnel attending demonstration events at the test sites shall speak fluent

English, and submit visit requests to applicable test agencies.

3.1.2 SECURITY

The Contractor shall safeguard controlled unclassified information and administrative data and classified program information and material at all levels of classification through all stages of the contract associated with the ACV from unauthorized access or disclosure in accordance with DoDI 8582.01, "Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems."

The Contractor shall comply with the security requirements imparted by the Contract Security

Classification (DD Form 254), per Section J, Attachment 23, and the National Industrial Security

Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), DoD 5220.22-M (current version). Additional information can be found in the National Industrial Security Program Library on the Defense Security Service web site:

http://www.dss.mil/isp/fac_clear/download_nispom.html.

3.1.3 OPERATIONS SECURITY PLAN

The Contractor shall develop an OPSEC plan. The OPSEC plan shall:

1) Describe the OPSEC environment to include identification of critical information, the

OPSEC threat, and vulnerabilities an adversary might exploit to acquire critical information,

2) Document the OPSEC risk analysis,

3) Identify proposed and actual OPSEC measures,

4) Define and assign specific OPSEC responsibilities and tie the OPSEC Plan to the contractor's corporate OPSEC Program, and

5) Serve as a repository of the OPSEC history of the contract. Additional guidance can be found in the OPNAVINST 3432.1A, "Operations Security" and MCO 3070.2A

"The Marine Corps OPSEC Program".

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver the Contractor's OPSEC Plan in accordance with CDRL A001.

3.1.4 PROGRAM PROTECTION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

The Contractor shall provide a Program Protection Implementation Plan (PPIP) that includes a criticality analysis, vulnerability assessment, risk assessment, and countermeasure selection and implementation, with assumptions, rationale, and results. For each Level I and Level II component with the following

Protection Failure Criticality Levels, Table (1), the Contractor shall identify the associated logic-bearing hardware, software, and firmware that implements critical functions or introduces vulnerability to the associated components (designated as critical components).

http://www.dss.mil/isp/fac_clear/download_nispom.html

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 15

Level Description

Level I: Total Mission Failure Function/component failure is a failure that results in total compromise of mission capability

Level II:

Significant/Unacceptable Degradation

Function/component failure is a failure that results in unacceptable compromise of mission capability or significant mission degradation

Level III: Partial/Acceptable Function/component failure is a failure that results in partial compromise of mission capability or partial mission degradation

Level IV: Negligible Function/component failure is a failure that results in little or no compromise of mission capability

Table (1) Protection Failure Criticality Levels

The Contractor shall demonstrate visibility into its supply chain for critical components, understanding of the risks to that supply chain, and shall implement or provide plans for implementation of risk mitigation efforts to counter those risks.

The Contractor shall plan for and implement countermeasures which mitigate foreign intelligence, technology exploitation, supply chain and battlefield threats, and system vulnerabilities that result in the catastrophic (Level I) and critical (Level II) protection failures, including:

1) Application of supply chain risk management key practices, applied as appropriate to the development of the system. Supply chain risk management key practices are found in the

National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report 7622, Piloting SCRM for Federal Information Systems, and the National Defense Industrial Association

Guidebook, Engineering for System Assurance, both publicly available.

2) Identification and recording of the relevant cost, schedule, and performance information used to choose between alternates as a part of the selection of critical components. The

Contractor shall define associated program protection risks with the selected critical component(s) and work with the Government to develop mutually-agreeable risk management plans.

3) Implementation of processes to control access by foreign nationals to program information, including system design information, DoD-unique technology, and software or hardware used to integrate commercial technology.

4) Establishment and maintenance of a Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance

System. The processes and practices employed to ensure that genuine hardware, software and logic elements will be employed in the solution. The Contractor shall ensure flow down requirements necessary for the Contractor’s Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance System are levied upon subcontractors.

5) Implementation of processes for safeguarding unclassified controlled technical information in the development environment.

The Contractor shall develop a set of secure design and coding practices to be followed for implementation of Level I and II critical components. Top 10 Secure Coding Practices

(https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/seccode/Top+10+Secure+Coding+Practices) and the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE)/SysAdmin, Audit, Network, Security (SANS) top 25 most dangerous software errors (http://cwe.mitre.org/top25/index.html) may be used as guidance.

The Contractor’s PPIP shall address the following areas:

Section 2: Identifying what to protect https://www.securecoding.cert.org/confluence/display/seccode/Top+10+Secure+Coding+Practices http://cwe.mitre.org/top25/index.html

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 16

Section 4: Vulnerabilities

Section 5: Countermeasures

Section 7: Program Protection Risks

Section 8: Managing and Implementing Program Protection Plan (PPP)

Section 9: Process for Management and Implementation of PPP

Section 10: Process for Monitoring and Reporting Compromises

Appendix C: Criticality Analysis

The Contractor shall prepare and deliver the Contractor’s PPIP in accordance with CDRL A002. The

Government will provide a Contracting Office letter to the Contractor validating that the Critical Program

Information/Critical Technology (CPI/CT) is properly identified for the program.

3.1.4.1 PROGRAM PROTECTION REVIEW MEETINGS

The Contractor shall host three (3) Program Protection Review Meetings in accordance with the Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. Each of the three (3) meetings shall include:

The Contractor’s CPI Assessment identifying CPI or CT (defined by DoDI 5200.39, July 16, 2008 Incl Change 1 Dec 28, 2010, CPI Protection within the DoD)

A classified session for the Contractor’s Anti-Tamper Plan and status of the Anti-Tamper

Solution’s implementation

For planning purposes, each meeting will be a one (1) day event.

3.1.4.2 CYBERSECURITY

The Contractor shall designate an Information Systems Security Manager (ISSM) who shall meet the training and certification requirements as defined in DoDD 8570.01, “Information Assurance Training, Certification, and Workforce Management,” dated 15 Aug 2004.

The Contractor shall ensure that Contractor Information Assurance Workforce (IAW) personnel comply with Contractor IAW certification standards and security background investigation requirements, as defined in the DoDD 8570.01.

The Contractor shall ensure that Contractor IAW personnel comply with the identification, tracking and assignment reporting requirements, as defined in the DoDD 8570.01. Contractor IAW personnel shall meet the same standards for IAW certification, system access, management, training and reporting requirements as Government IAW personnel, as defined in DoDD 8570.01.

The Contractor shall comply with and provide Cybersecurity/Information Assurance (IA) supporting activities and functions for the requirements, processes, reporting activities, reviews, certification and accreditation, security design, and assessment activities as defined in the DoDI 8510.01, “Risk

Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information Technology (IT),” dated 12 Mar 2014.

The Contractor shall ensure that ACV IA designated contract deliverables and activities are in compliance with DoDI 8510.01.

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 17

The Contractor shall ensure that deliverables comply with applicable U.S. Government and DoD

Cybersecurity/IA, Directives, Regulations, and Standards that are applicable to the ACV Program’s

Security Classification Level (SCL).

The Contractor shall provide a Cybersecurity/IA status at each of the identified Program Management

Reviews (PMRs) per Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. The Government may require the

Contractor to provide quarterly Cybersecurity/IA program status reports at the PMR to ensure

Cybersecurity/IA is fully integrated and compliant with:

1) Federal Information Security Management Act of 2002, Title III-Information

Security

2) NIST Special Publication 800-53A Guide for Assessing the Security Controls in

Federal Information Systems and Organizations

3) DoDI 8510.01- Risk Management Framework for DOD IT, dated 12 Mar 2014

4) Interim DoDI 5000.02 – Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, dated 25

November 2013

5) The ACV Program’s designated SCL implementation requirements as defined by

DoDI 8510.01

6) The Government’s Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The Contractor ISSM shall ensure the ACV design is reviewed for Cybersecurity/IA and Anti-Tamper

Compliance at the Preliminary Design Review (PDR)/Critical Design Review (CDR), Vehicle

Acceptance Review (VAR), and the Production Readiness Review/System Verification Review

(PRR/SVR).

The Contractor shall provide support to the Government to successfully achieve an Authority to Operate

(ATO) as defined in DoDI 8510.01.

The Contractor shall deliver the Cybersecurity/IA Assessment in accordance with CDRL A003.

3.1.4.3 ANTI-TAMPER PLAN

The Contractor’s Anti-Tamper Plan shall provide countermeasures to protect CPI and Critical

Technologies in accordance with DoDI-5200.39, “Critical Program Information with DoD, Change 1,” dated 28 Dec 2010 to address the following:

1) Deter countermeasure development that would decrease U.S. warfighting capabilities

2) Prevent the unauthorized or out of baseline augmentation or change of capabilities in

Direct Commercial Sales (DCS), Foreign Military Sales (FMS), and International

Cooperative Development Programs

3) Prevent unauthorized technology changes on CPI or any released capability

4) Protect U.S. critical design knowledge and manufacturing processes from unauthorized transfer

5) Protect U.S. investment in weapon system capabilities, and avoid additional unplanned investment to regain the U.S. advantage

The Contractor’s Anti-Tamper countermeasures shall be verified by Contractor testing to include any prototypes. The Contractor shall deliver the detailed Anti-Tamper solution as an Anti-Tamper Plan submission in accordance with CDRL A004 and the ACV Security Classification Guide, Section J, Attachment 25, and shall incorporate the solutions into the ACV design.

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 18

3.2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

The Contractor shall provide a qualified Program Manager (PM) that shall be responsible for the accomplishment of all tasks in this SOW. The Contractor’s PM shall plan, organize, manage, schedule, implement, control, analyze, and report on all elements of the SOW. The Contractor’s PM shall have resources and authority to efficiently and effectively execute tasks necessary to complete the requirements. The Contractor’s PM shall be prepared to present and discuss the status of contract activities, requirements, and issues with the Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault (PM AAA)

ACV Product Manager (PdM), the Contracting Officer, and the Contracting Officer Representative

(COR).

The Contractor shall execute the program with established, defined, and repeatable organizational processes, procedures, and policies unless otherwise directed within this SOW or other Government regulations, policies, and/or direction.

The Contractor shall deliver all Unclassified/Classified CDRLs in accordance with each DD Form 1423 and the CDRL Submission Instructions, per Section J, Attachment 04.

3.2.1 ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY

The Contractor shall identify clear lines of authority, within their organization, of the personnel who shall be responsible for conducting all activities delineated in this SOW. Those individuals shall be responsible for determining and controlling the resources necessary to satisfy each element of this SOW.

3.2.2 CONFERENCES, REVIEWS, AGENDAS, AND REPORTS

The Contractor shall plan, host, attend, coordinate, provide administrative support and conduct meetings, formal reviews and events, conferences, and audits (hereinafter called "reviews") in conjunction with the

Government. The reviews shall be conducted at the Contractor’s or Government’s facilities, as indicated in Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. The reviews shall be included in the IMS, and multiple reviews may be held concurrently with the Government’s approval. In addition, the Contractor shall be available to participate in Government – Contractor internet conferencing (Web Meetings) using

Government approved systems such as Defense Connect Online (DCO) conferencing tool.

Prior to each review, the Contractor shall prepare agendas for Government approval, unless waived by the

Government, in accordance with CDRL A006. The Contractor shall deliver Conference Reports following each review, in accordance with CDRL A008. Action item documentation, assignment of responsibility for completion and due dates will be determined by the Government Chairperson prior to adjournment of all reviews. A summary of all action items, responsible parties, and completion dates shall be included with the meeting minutes.

3.2.2.1 POST-AWARD AND CONTRACT OPTION POST-AWARD CONFERENCES

3.2.2.1.1 POST-AWARD CONFERENCE

The Post-Award Conference (PAC) is the first meeting of key Contractor and Government personnel.

This PAC is to achieve a clear and mutual understanding of all contract requirements between the

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 19

Government and the Contractor, and identify and resolve potential problems to ensure successful contract performance. The PAC shall be conducted within 20 calendar days after contract award, per Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. The PAC shall include Contractor representatives, the cognizant Contract

Administration Office and the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer, or designated representative, initiating the conference, will designate or act as the chairperson. The Contractor shall participate with the Government to draft an agenda for the PAC, prior to the meeting.

3.2.2.1.2 CONTRACT OPTION POST-AWARD CONFERENCE

A contract Option PAC shall be held within 20 calendar days after exercise of the LRIP and FRP CLINs

(Options, if exercised) per Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. The attendees shall include the

Contractor, contracting representative, Government Contracting Officer, management, and technical personnel from both the Government and the Contractor. The Contractor shall participate with the

Government to arrange a schedule and agenda for the PAC prior to the meeting.

3.2.2.2 RESERVED

3.2.2.3 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT REVIEWS

The Contractor shall participate in PMRs during EMD, LRIP (Option, if exercised) and FRP (Option, if exercised) to assess program cost, schedule, performance, process implementation, risk, and status related to the execution of the ACV Program per Section J, Attachment 03, Meeting List. The PMRs may be held in conjunction with other reviews and conferences for efficiency. The Contractor shall summarize the following items and any others that the Government identifies within 30 days of each of the PMRs:

1) Work completed (inclusive of meeting action items)

2) Work planned for upcoming quarter

3) Contract tasks not completed

4) Significant accomplishments

5) Problems or delays

6) Corrective actions

7) Schedule updates and Critical Path Analysis

8) Other program or personnel changes

9) Risk Management Status (Cybersecurity and Safety included)

10) Configuration Management

11) IMS review with critical path and supporting metrics

12) Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) review with supporting metrics

13) Contractor Cost Data Reporting (CCDR) with most recent cost estimates

14) Status Report for each Integrated Product Team (IPT) or Team

15) Project Metric Status (including Average Unit Manufacturing Cost (AUMC))

16) Technical Performance Measures (TPMs)

3.2.3 MONTHLY PROGRESS STATUS REPORTS

The Contractor shall deliver a Monthly Progress Status Report for the EMD CLINs, and the LRIP

(Option, if exercised) and FRP (Option, if exercised) CLINs in accordance with CDRL A009.

3.2.4 INTEGRATED MASTER PLANNING/INTEGRATED MASTER

SCHEDULING/SCHEDULE RISK ASSESSMENT

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 20

3.2.4.1 CONTRACT INTEGRATED MASTER PLAN

The Contractor shall develop and deliver a Contract Integrated Master Plan (IMP) in accordance with the

Integrated Program Management Report (IPMR), CDRL A010. The Contract IMP shall be traceable to the Government Program IMP, provided in Section J, Attachment 05, Program IMP, and shall include all accomplishments and criteria necessary to achieve each identified Program IMP event. The Contractor shall maintain the IMP throughout the period of performance and if changes occur, obtain written

Government approval. The Contract IMP shall be statused by the Contractor to the third level of the

Government Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). The IMP shall comply with the “DoD Integrated

Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and Use Guide.” If the Contract IMP requires additional IMP accomplishment criteria to be added to the Program IMP, the Contractor can request a change to the Program IMP. The Government will use an established internal process to evaluate the proposed change prior to approval. The Contractor shall liaison with the COR to facilitate the integration of all Contract IMP events, accomplishments, and criteria into the ACV Program IMP.

3.2.4.2 CONTRACT INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

The Contractor shall decompose the Contract IMP into a time-based IMS showing the detailed tasks required to accomplish the work effort contained in the Contract IMP. The Contractor shall develop and deliver the Contract IMS in accordance with IPMR, CDRL A010. The Contractor shall liaison with the

COR to facilitate the integration of key Contract IMS milestones and tasks into the Program IMS. The

Contractor shall develop task definitions that include task durations and dependencies with other Contract

IMS Tasks. The Contractor shall maintain the Contract IMS and the Government will ensure key

Contract IMS milestones and tasks are fully integrated into the Program IMS. The Contractor shall deliver an IMS Narrative Report and Analysis to reflect changes in the Contract IMS, in accordance with

IPMR, CDRL A010. In addition, the Contractor shall perform system critical path and near-critical path analyses to the closest major acquisition MS (e.g., MS C) and to each key system-level technical review

(e.g., PDR/CDR, VAR). The Contractor shall deliver the results of the analyses and Corrective Action

Plans in the IMS Narrative Report and Analysis to resolve those efforts negatively impacting the critical path, in accordance with the IMPR, CDRL A010.

The Contract IMS shall meet the below listed requirements:

1) Define all tasks required to execute the Government-approved Contract IMP. Define all internal and external schedule dependencies necessary to execute the Contract

IMS.

2) Incorporate material order, material delivery, fabrication, assembly, and test for vehicle production and delivery into the IMS (e.g., EMD CLINs, LRIP (Option, if exercised) CLINs, and FRP (Option, if exercised) CLINs).

3) Include Contractor tasks required to accomplish each IMP event and relevant subcontractor scheduled milestones necessary for the achievement of each Contract

IMS event.

4) Include all CDRL deliveries and events as defined by the IMP.

5) Be vertically traceable to the Contract IMP, the Contract Work Breakdown Structure

(CWBS), and the Contract SOW and horizontally traceable to all dependent project tasks, identifying the relationships and constraints between project tasks.

ACV SOW 03001 Unclassified Page 21

3.2.4.3 SCHEDULE RISK ASSESSMENT

A probabilistic SRA shall be developed and delivered in accordance with IPMR CDRL A010. The SRA will provide the Government with an understanding of the potential schedule impacts associated with existing or emerging program risks. These analyses shall compute the probability of completing key milestones, events, and tasks/activities by specific dates. The Contractor shall report optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely remaining durations and rationale for the values in accordance with the

Contract IMS for each task/activity on the following paths: critical path to contract completion, critical path to the next Major MS (e.g. MS C), and the next three (3) near-critical paths to the next Major MS.

Global weighting values and rationale shall also be provided by the Contractor. In addition, the

Contractor technical team members shall be asked to provide pessimistic, most likely, and optimistic durations for moderate to high risk activities identified in the Program Risk Database (generally identified through a risk cube) that are associated with IMS tasks.

3.2.5 CONTRACTOR WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

The Contractor shall refine the WBS Index and Dictionary developed by the Government at an appropriate level to make the resulting structure program specific, and to facilitate effective Program

Management; in accordance with MIL-STD-881C, Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel

Items. The Contractor shall establish the CWBS definition at a level necessary to identify work progress and enable effective management, regardless of the CWBS level reported per Section J, Attachment 06, Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Plan, for program oversight.