ExhibitC-PastPerformanceQuestionaire.rtf

Each Offeror with relevant performance information must send this Performance Questionnaire to at least two of the following points of contact for each contract submitted.

Preferred points of contact are, in order of descending preference:

Program Manager, PCO, Technical or Engineering Lead, ACO.

The points of contact shall return completed questionnaires to the PCO, identified below.

Janice Olson Contracting Officer 5222 Martin Road Redstone Arsenal, 35806 Exhibit C Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the potential award of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge of, or experience with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. If you need more space, attach additional page(s). Please return within 3 days. If any response herein is negative, please indicate whether the contractor was previously informed as such and provide a copy of his response, if applicable. .Thank-you.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PART I – CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

Contract Number:

Type of Contract:

Prime Contractor

Prime Contractor Address

Contracting Organization & Address

Telephone No:

E-mail:

Contracting Officer:

Contract Administrator:

Customer Name and Address

Telephone No:

E-mail:

Customer POC:

Telephone No:

E-mail:

Briefly describe the nature of the contractual effort:

What was the period of performance of this contract? Please include the $ value for each period.

Period of Performance

Dollar Value Acquisition Method: Competitive Yes No Contract Type: FFP ; T&M or LH ; Cost Type , Other FP type

PART II – PERFORMANCE

Provide responses to the questions below using the following ratings:

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problems for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the elements contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective

1. Quality:

4. Schedule:

To what extent did the contractor perform your effort in accordance with the originally proposed schedule?

How well did the contractor make advanced coordination with your staff on slippages that were beyond the contractor’s control?

3. Cost Control: (For T&M, LH, & cost type contracts) To what extent did the contractor practice sound cost control techniques?

To what extent were the following performed:

4. Business Relations: How well did the contractor satisfy the customers’ expectations?

5. Management:

Did the Contractor provide adequate qualified personnel?

Did the contractor comply with the terms and conditions of the contract?

Did the contractor rely upon the Government for guidance in resolving problems?

Did the Contractor provide timely, correct invoices?

Please note any contracts that were partially or completely terminated for default or convenience and any show cause or cure notice correspondence.

Explain whether the contractor was totally, partially, or not “at fault” in each instance and whether the contractor took appropriate action to solve the problems brought to his/her attention.

6. Other: Please provide relevant information that was not covered under the previous areas.

7. Would you have any reservations about recommending a future contract award to this company? Please elaborate.

PART III – SUBCONTRACTOR CONTROL

8. Did the contractor use subcontractor(s) in the performance of any portion of this contract?

No Yes (Please complete the remaining portion of Part III) 8(a). What did the subcontractor(s) do?

9. How well did the prime manage the subcontractor(s)?

10. Did the contractor meet or exceed the goals contained in an approved subcontracting plan during the course of the contract performance?

11. Was the contractor timely in awarding subcontracts?

Indicate timeliness of subcontract awards and management of subcontracts?

12. Did any problem occur with the subcontractor(s)?