Amendment_5.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is the make the follow ing changes:

1. Replace Attachment 23, MACC Project Chapel Survey w ith MACC Project Chapel Area Draw ing

2. Incorporate the revised SOW dated 29 August 2013 as Attachment 36

3. Add Electrical plans 1, 2, 3, and 4 PDFs as Attachments 27, 28, 29, and 30.

4. Add Floor Plan Title Block Template as Attachment 31

5. Add Shaw Draw ing Cover Sheet as Attachment 32

6. Add Chapel Area Survey PDF as Attachment 33

7. Add new Technical and Contracting Questions and Answ ers as Attachments 34 and 35.

8. Incorporate disclosure of magnitude (for the sample project only): Betw een $1,000,000 and $5,000,000

8. Add an additional site visit for 10 September 2013, at 1:30 P.M. EST at the Palmetto Chapel (Building 912)

9. Extend the proposal due date to 15 November 2013, by 2 P.M. EST.

10. Additional changes are incoporated and noted in Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Sep-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4803-13-R-0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Jul-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Sep-2013

CODE

20TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON/LGCA

321 CULLEN STREET

SHAW AFB SC 29152

FA4803 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA4803-13-R-0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 09-Sep-2013 02:00 PM to 15-Nov-2013 02:00 PM.

The required performance has changed from Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) is a competitive 8(a) multiple award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) construction contract based on established clauses, Terms and Conditions & General Provisions. Specific projects will be defined with each individual Task Order.Work is to be performed in the general construction category to include maintenance, repair, alteration, mechanical, electrical, heating/air conditioning, demolition, painting, paving, earthwork & waterfront work in industrial/office buildings. Work may involve design/build projects as well as new construction of buildings or facilities to include some or all of the above elements of work. Scope includes work at Shaw AFB, Pointsett Electronic Combat Range, & Wateree Recreation Facility,SC & various other sites throughout the southeastern US.A pre-proposal conference/site visit is scheduled for __20 Aug 13_____________. Only one pre-proposal conference/site visit will be held.IAW the SBA 8(a) bona fide office requirement,only offers in the geographic region who have an SBA pre-approved bona fide office within the five state area of South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama & Florida can bid. to Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) is a competitive 8(a) multiple award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) construction contract based on established clauses, Terms and Conditions & General Provisions. Specific projects will be defined with each individual Task Order.Work is to be performed in the general construction category to include maintenance, repair, alteration, mechanical, electrical, heating/air conditioning, demolition, painting, paving, earthwork & waterfront work in industrial/office buildings. Work may involve design/build projects as well as new construction of buildings or facilities to include some or all of the above elements of work. Scope includes work at Shaw AFB, Pointsett Electronic Combat Range, & Wateree Recreation Facility,SC & various other sites throughout the southeastern US.A second site visit is scheduled for 10 September 2013, at 1:30 PM EST. IAW the SBA 8(a) bona fide office requirement,only offers in the geographic region who have an SBA pre-approved bona fide office within the five state area of South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama & Florida can bid.Disclosure of Magnitude (for the seed project only):$1,000,000 to $5,000,000.

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

Global Changes

CLIN 0001 -- CLIN 0005

The NAICS code has changed from 236210 to 236220.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Executive Summary 2 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 10 Past Performance

Questionaire

5 17-MAY-2013

Attachment 11 Sample Project Statement of Work

46 15-APR-2013

Attachment 12 Security Requirements 6 16-MAY-2013 Attachment 13 MACC Technical

Questions and Answers

1 09-AUG-2013

Attachment 14 Blank Cost Estimate Sheet

1 14-AUG-2013

Attachment 15 Base Map to pre-bid site 1 14-AUG-2013 Attachment 16 MACC Questions and

Answers Set #2

5 16-AUG-2013

Attachment 17 Revised SOW 7 21-AUG-2013 Attachment 18 Contracting Q&A 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 19 Technical Q&A 6 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 2 MACC General

Provisions

17 26-FEB-2013

Attachment 20 Chapel Contours 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 21 Chapel Utility Area

Drawings

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 22 Chapel Utility with all area markings

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 23 MACC project chapel survey

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 24 Water Flow Test Map 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 25 MACC Meeting Minutes 4 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 26 ID2 Handbook 128 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 3 Shaw AFB Design

Standards

118 19-APR-2013

Attachment 4 Environmental Provisions 6 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 5 Special Provisions 6 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 6 WD SC 130011 01

DREDGING

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 7 WD SC130037 01 Building

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 8 WD SC130043 01 Highway

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 9 WD SC130054 01 Heavy 4 04-JAN-2013 to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 1 Executive Summary 2 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 10 Past Performance

Questionaire

5 17-MAY-2013

Attachment 11 Sample Project Statement of Work

46 15-APR-2013

Attachment 12 Security Requirements 6 16-MAY-2013 Attachment 13 MACC Technical

Questions and Answers

1 09-AUG-2013

Attachment 14 Blank Cost Estimate Sheet

1 14-AUG-2013

Attachment 15 Base Map to pre-bid site 1 14-AUG-2013 Attachment 16 MACC Questions and

Answers Set #2

5 16-AUG-2013

Attachment 17 Revised SOW 7 21-AUG-2013 Attachment 18 Contracting Q&A 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 19 Technical Q&A 6 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 2 MACC General 17 26-FEB-2013

Provisions Attachment 20 Chapel Contours 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 21 Chapel Utility Area

Drawings

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 22 Chapel Utility with all area markings

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 23 MACC project chapel survey

1 23-AUG-2013

Attachment 24 Water Flow Test Map 1 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 25 MACC Meeting Minutes 4 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 26 ID2 Handbook 128 23-AUG-2013 Attachment 27 electrical 1 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 28 electrical 2 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 29 electrical 3 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 3 Shaw AFB Design

Standards

118 19-APR-2013

Attachment 30 electrical 4 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 31 Floor plan title block template

1 04-SEP-2013

Attachment 32 shaw drawing cover sheet 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 33 chapel area survey pdf 1 04-SEP-2013 Attachment 34 Technical Questions and

Answers

4 04-SEP-2013

Attachment 35 Contracting Questions and Answers

8 04-SEP-2013

Attachment 36 Revise SOW 7 29-AUG-2013 Attachment 4 Environmental Provisions 6 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 5 Special Provisions 6 26-FEB-2013 Attachment 6 WD SC 130011 01

DREDGING

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 7 WD SC130037 01 Building

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 8 WD SC130043 01 Highway

5 04-JAN-2013

Attachment 9 WD SC130054 01 Heavy 4 04-JAN-2013

SECTION K - REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

The following have been modified:

52.219-1 SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (APR 2012) - ALTERNATE I (APR 2011)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236220

(2) The small business size standard is NAICS 236220-$33.5M.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Representations. (1) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small business concern.

(2) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents, for general statistical purposes, that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.

(3) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a women-owned small business concern.

(4) Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern in paragraph (b)(3) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It ( ) is, ( ) is not a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ] is, [ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this provision is accurate for each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ----------.] Each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the WOSB representation.

(5) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern eligible under the WOSB Program in (b)(4) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that--

(i) It ( ) is, ( ) is not an EDWOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [ ] is, [ ] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (b)(5)(i) of this provision is accurate for each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the EDWOSB concern and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: ----------.] Each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the EDWOSB representation.

(6) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.)

The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a veteran-owned small business concern.

(7) (Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (b)(6) of this provision.) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it ( ) is, ( ) is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

(8) [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (b)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents, as part of its offer, that--

(i) It ( ) is, ( ) is not a HUBZone small business concern listed, on the date of this representation, on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration, and no material change in ownership and control, principal office, or HUBZone employee percentage has occurred since it was certified by the Small Business Administration in accordance with 13 CFR part 126; and

(ii) It ( ) is, ( ) is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 126, and the representation in paragraph (b)(8)(i) of this provision is accurate for the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture. (The offeror shall enter the name or names of the HUBZone small business concern or concerns that are participating in the joint venture:____________.) Each HUBZone small business concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the HUBZone representation.

(9) (Complete if offeror represented itself as disadvantaged in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision.) The offeror shall check the category in which its ownership falls:

____ Black American.

____ Hispanic American.

____ Native American (American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians).

____ Asian-Pacific American (persons with origins from Burma, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, Japan, China, Taiwan, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Vietnam, Korea, The Philippines, U.S. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), Republic of the Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Samoa, Macao, Hong Kong, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Tuvalu, or Nauru).

____ Subcontinent Asian (Asian-Indian) American (persons with origins from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, or Nepal).

____ Individual/concern, other than one of the preceding.

(c) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern--

(1) Means a small business concern--

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

"Small business concern," means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (a) of this provision.

Veteran-owned small business concern means a small business concern--

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans (as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

"Women-owned small business concern," means a small business concern --

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; or

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

(d) Notice.

(1) If this solicitation is for supplies and has been set aside, in whole or in part, for small business concerns, then the clause in this solicitation providing notice of the set-aside contains restrictions on the source of the end items to be furnished.

(2) Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a small, HUBZone small, small disadvantaged, or women-owned small business concern in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8(a), 8(d), 9, or 15 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, shall--

(i) Be punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;

(ii) Be subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and

(iii) Be ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.

(End of provision)

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTI

52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (Addendum)

SECTION L- PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate Parts; Part I - Price Proposal, Part II - Technical Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance Information. Note the 3 separate Parts of the offeror’s Proposal will be evaluated in accordance with Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award. The separate Proposal Parts will be broken into factors for evaluation as follows:

Part I = Factor 1: Cost/Price Part II = Factor 2: Technical Acceptability Subfactor 1: Drawings Subfactor 2: Specifications

Subfactor 3: Design Calculations Subfactor 4: Construction Cost Estimate of the Sample Project

Subfactor 5: Submittals Part III = Factor 3: Past Performance

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit original and one (1) copy

(a) Complete blocks 14, 15, 17, 19, (if applicable) 20, 20A, 20B, 20C of Standard Form 1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract. Only official(s) having the authority to bind the company contractually must sign and date the SF 1442.

(b) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

(c) Provide a copy of the letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of Section 8(a) status.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Submit original plus three (3) copies.

Sample Project: Submit original plus three (3) copies.

Required Documents: Provide required documents as referenced in the sample project (Attachment 11 Sample Project SOW). In addition, an AF Form 3052 is required Technical data that will be review:

(a) Subfactor 1: Drawings

(b) Subfactor 2: Specifications

(c) Subfactor 3: Design Calculations

(d) Subfactor 4: Construction Cost Estimate of the Sample Project

(e) Subfactor 5: Submittals

Contact Information: Documents shall be sent to:

20 CONS/LGCAB

ATTN: JOSEPH NEMEDY/ DO NOT OPEN – RFP FA4803-13-R-0005

321 CULLEN STREET (Bldg 216)

SHAW AFB, SC 29152

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Limited to no more than 10 pages, excluding past performance questionnaires. Only references for relevant past efforts/contracts are desired. Submit original plus three (3) copies.

(a) Performance Surveys: The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and any other sources of information available to the Government to assess past performance.

Provide a list of no more than ten (10), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years as of proposal due date. Relevant contracts include includes efforts involving similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(b) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for up to ten (10) Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years:

Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.)

which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for relevant past efforts/contracts (similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires). In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(c) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past relevant contracts.

(d) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

D. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs, SOW & All Attachments) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the SOW.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP.

3. Any limitation on the number of proposal pages. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this

Section L will not be read or evaluated, and will be removed from the proposal.

4. Format for proposal Parts II and III shall be as follows:

(a) The proposals will be 8 1/2” x 11” paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, drawing, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

(b) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(c) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(d) Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required.

(c) Pre-proposal Conference: A pre-bid/pre-proposal conference will be conducted at 10:00a.m., on 10 Sep 2013 at 13:30 pm, at the Bldg 921, Shaw AFB, SC for the purpose of answering questions regarding this solicitation.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

M001- SOURCE SELECTION

a. Basis for Contract Award This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15, Contracting by Negotiation, as supplemented by the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS), DoD Source Selection Procedures, Appendix A, 04 March 2011 and Air Force Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 27 March 2013. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force (AF) FARSite, http://farsite.hill.af.mil. The Government will select the proposals with the lowest evaluated price from among those meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. Contract(s) may be awarded to the offeror(s) who is deemed responsible in accordance with the FAR Part 9.1, as supplemented, whose proposals conforms to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the lowest price technically acceptable past performance proposals.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded The Government intends to award no more than six (6) contract(s) for the Multiple Award Construction Contract.

c. Correction Potential of Proposals If an offeror’s proposal is eliminated or otherwise removed from the competitive range, no further revisions to that offeror’s proposal shall be accepted or considered. The Government may request or allow proposal revisions to clarify and document understandings reached during negotiations. At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror still in the competitive range may be given an opportunity to submit a final proposal revision. The Government will establish a cut-off date for receipt of final proposal revisions. Requests for final proposal revisions will advise offerors that the final revisions shall be in writing and that the Government intends to make award without obtaining further revisions.

d. Discussions If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the Final Proposal Revision are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

e. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable.

f. Approach

Step 1: Rank all proposals by price, from lowest to highest.

Step 2: Evaluate a minimum of 10 of the lowest priced proposals for technical acceptability and price reasonableness.

Step 3: Assess past performance for a minimum of 10 of the lowest priced technically acceptable offerors.

DoD Source Selection Procedures paragraphs 3.4 - 3.7 will be used if discussions may be conducted.

Step 4: Award to no more than six (6) Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) contractors for Best Value

M002 EVALUATION FACTORS

a. Evaluation Factors and Subfactors The following evaluation factors and subfactors will be used to evaluate each proposal. The Government will evaluate proposals for acceptability, but will not rank the proposals by the non-price factors or subfactors.

Factor 1: Cost/Price (Evaluations of PART 1- Price Proposal) Factor 2: Technical Acceptability Subfactor 1: Drawings Subfactor 2: Specifications

Subfactor 3: Design Calculations Subfactor 4: Construction Cost Estimate of the Sample Project (lowest dollar per square foot)

Subfactor 5: Submittals Factor 3: Past Performance

b. Cost/Price

1. The offeror's Price proposal for Sample Project, Attachment 11, will be evaluated for award purposes, based upon the total price proposed for the basic requirements. Price will be evaluated using techniques established in FAR 15.404-1 to ensure the Government receives a fair, reasonable, and balanced price. There are no Options to evaluate for this award.

2. In addition to the price analysis as described at FAR 15.404-1(b), price proposals will be analyzed to identify any potential unbalanced pricing (See FAR 15.404-1(g)). If the Government sees a wide variation in proposed contract line item prices, the technical evaluation board will be informed as soon as possible during the initial evaluation of proposals so the appropriate personnel may seek clarity through offeror exchanges. Absent any issues related to the stated requirement, unbalanced pricing may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror's proposal.

3. There is a great expectation of competition for this requirement; thus offerors are cautioned to present their best price proposal up-front. The offeror's price proposal shall represent the offeror's best effort to respond to the solicitation. As an LPTA source selection, the Government reserves the right to, but is not required to conduct analysis on offers that appear to be exceptionally low and not supported by the offeror's technical approach. In instances where an offeror receives acceptable technical and past performance ratings, yet proposed prices appear exceptionally low, offerors may be requested to address this disparity, providing evidence of their capability and/or experience providing similar service(s) at similar price(s). An exceptionally or unrealistically low offer may pose an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror's proposal.

4. If the Government cannot determine the proposed pricing to be fair and reasonable, other than cost and pricing data will be obtained from the offerors.

d. Remaining Technical Factors The Government’s technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

Subfactor 1. Drawings: Drawings must be legible. Drawings and 3D Rendering must conform to the requirements contained in the definitions for 35% , 65% and 100% design, conform to the requirements of MACC General Provisions (Attachment 2) and Sample Project SOW (Attachment 11), ensuring inclusion of professional certifications

Subfactor 2. Specifications: All sections must be legible, edited to match the project scope and conform to the MACC General Provisions (Attachment 2) and the Sample Project (Attachment 11) and conform to the Construction Standards Institute (CSI) 2012 MasterFormat divisions' standard as defined in the Shaw AFB Design Standards (Attachment 3)

Subfactor 3. Design Calculations: All required design calculations must be legible and conform to the requirements of the MACC General Provisions (Attachment 2) and the Sample Project (Attachment 11)

Subfactor 4. Construction Cost Estimate for the Sample Project: The construction cost estimate (AF Form 3052) must be legible (front and back), contain pricing for each line item category as well as a total cost and be signed and dated by the contractor.

Subfactor 5. Submittals*: All submittals required by the Sample Project (Attachment 11), including color boards, cut sheets, MSDS’s, and ETC, must be legible and correspond to the products being proposed for the project. Submittals must conform to the requirements contained in MACC General Provisions (Attachment 2)

*Design Submittals: The 35% , 65% and 100% design submittals must contain all of the elements required by definitions in the MACC General Provisions (Attachment 2). The elements must be indexed or otherwise easily identifiable, for example, the design calculations for primary structure components (foundations, structures, roofs, etc.) should be clearly identified as such.

e. Past Performance Factor The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror’s probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. Offerors must receive a past performance rating of “Acceptable” to be eligible for award.

(1) Ratings. The Past Performance factor will receive one of the ratings described below.

TABLE 1 - TECHNICAL RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

(2) Evaluation Process. The past performance evaluation considers each offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the solicitation requirements. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance proposal volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to: the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS); Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS); Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and interviews/questionnaires with Program Managers, Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials, the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

(i) Recency Assessment An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past 3 years as of proposal due date. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(ii) Relevancy Assessment The Government will conduct an evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine whether the products provided/services performed under those contracts relate to the Technical subfactors and Price factor.

For each recent past performance citation reviewed, the relevance of the work performed will generally be assessed for the Technical subfactors and Price Factor (however, all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered). Relevant performance includes efforts involving similar or greater in scope, magnitude and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. The Government may review more recent contracts or performance evaluations to ensure corrective actions have been implemented and to evaluate their effectiveness. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s). In determining the relevancy of effort performed under individual past performance contracts, the government will only consider the specific effort or portion consistent with that proposed by the prime, subcontractor or teaming partner.1 The past performance information forms (PIFs) and information obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevancy of past performance. The Government will use the following relevancy definitions when assessing recent, relevant contracts:

TABLE 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY RATINGS

Rating Definition

RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

TABLE 2- PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a) (2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

NOT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

1 Only the past performance effort which is related to the work the offeror is proposing to perform will contribute to the assessment. Take, for example, an RFP for a contact to manufacture, provide logistical support, and provide user training for “System X.” If an offeror submits recent past performance contracts involving manufacturing effort which is “essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires,” but the offeror is not proposing to manufacture System X (i.e., another team member or subcontractor is proposed to perform System X manufacture), the offeror’s past manufacturing performance would not contribute to the System X manufacturing performance assessment.

(iii) Performance Quality Assessment The Government will consider the performance quality of recent, relevant efforts (how well the contractor performed on the contracts). For each recent, relevant past performance citation reviewed, the performance quality of the work performed will be assessed for the Technical subfactors and Price Factor (however, all aspects of performance that relate to this acquisition may be considered). The quality assessment may result in positive or adverse findings. Adverse is defined as past performance information that supports an unsatisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comment received from sources without a formal rating system. For adverse information identified, the evaluation will consider the number and severity of the problem(s), mitigating circumstances, and the effectiveness of corrective actions that have resulted in sustained improvements. Process changes will only be considered when objectively measurable improvements in performance have been demonstrated. The Government will use the following quality levels when assessing recent, relevant efforts:

TABLE 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUALITY ASSESSMENT

Quality Assessment Description

SATISFACTORY (S) During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

UNSATISFACTORY(U) During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

NOT AVAILABLE(N) Quality and/or performance information is not available.

(3) Assigning Ratings. As a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments of the recent contracts evaluated, offerors will receive an integrated past performance rating at the factor level (see Table 2).

(End of Summary of Changes)