Consolidated RFI Responses.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Travis AFB MACC BOA
- Solicitation number
- FA442725R0016
About this file
This Consolidated RFI Responses spreadsheet contains detailed questions and answers for the Travis Air Force Base Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Blanket Purchase Agreement (BOA). The solicitation is a small business set-aside for two construction pools: Pool 1 for minor non-complex construction and Pool 2 for design-build or major construction projects. Key details include a revised submission deadline of 16 May 2025 at 1430, with Pool 2 applications to be evaluated at a later date. Contractors can apply for either or both pools, with no restrictions on participation.
The document clarifies several administrative aspects, including past performance submission requirements, bonding information, and application documentation. Specific notes indicate that contractors can submit CPARS or additional performance reports to supplement the required Past Performance Questionnaire, and that task orders will require bonds for projects over $150,000. The solicitation is being conducted by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command, with the primary goal of establishing a pool of qualified small business contractors to perform construction work at Travis Air Force Base in California.
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1 Project Title: MACC BOA Travis Air Force Base, CA INSTRUCTIONS: Please complete this form if your firm has questions concerning any aspect of the application process. All questions must be submitted to the Contracting Officer by RFI due date. Specify the page, section, and paragraph number(s) pertaining to your question.
Late inquiries/questions may not be entertained.
| Document | Page | Section | Paragraph | Questions | Responses |
| Various | There is a discrepancy in the application due date and time across the attachments: |
• Attachment 2 (SF1442) states the application is due May 7, 2025, no later than 1400 PDT.
• Attachment 6, section 1.2, states the application is due May 9, 2025, no later than 14:30 PST.
• Attachment 7, section 2.4, simply states applications must be submitted by May 9, 2025.
| Could you please confirm the correct submission date and time? | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. The extended date is 16 May 25 at 1430. | |||||
| Attachment 4 | Can previously completed PPQs and/or CPARS be submitted in lieu of the provided form in Attachment 4? | No, The application and compliance with the application is required to be considered. | ||||
| Attachment 4 | 6 | Attachment 4, page 6, includes a form to be completed by the Financial Institution. However, item number 3 requests bonding information—specifically single and aggregate limits—which are typically provided by a Surety, not a Financial Institution. Can we instead submit a letter from our Financial Institution addressing the applicable items on the form, and a separate letter from our Surety providing the required bonding information, in lieu of completing the form as-is? | The contractor can complete the form based on input from the two institutions. The signature block was changed to remove the financial institutions signature. The letters can be attached as supporting documents. | |||
| N/A | Is there a Contract Dollar Amount for each of the Pools 1 and 2, independently? | Pool 1 is and pool 2 proposed amounts are annotated on the SF1442. | ||||
| N/A | Is this a Full and Open application request or just open to 8(a) firms? | This requirement is a complete small business set aside with no further set-asides | ||||
| Attachment 6 | 1 | General | 1.1 | Could you please clarify the due date for Pool 1? The SF 1442 (Attachment 2) indicates May 7, 2025, while Attachment 6, Page 1 of the RFP states May 9, 2025. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. The extended date is 16 May 25 at 1430. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | General | 1.1 | Can you please clarify the intent for the May 9th application submission is for Pool 1 only? | The 16th of May 2025 is the due date for the initial stand-up of pool 1 only. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | Application | 2.2 | Can you please confirm that Pool 2 application submissions will be identified after establishment of Pool 1 awardees? | Pool 2 will be opened after the initial stand-up of pool 1. Pool 1 will be reopened at that time as well. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | Application | 2.2 | May Offerors submit for Pool 1 (again) after Pool 1 and 2 are reopened via amendment? | The agreements are going to be established for 5 years. If a vendor is already in pool 1 their agreement will be valid. | |
| Attachment 4 | 5 | PPQ | NA | May Offerors complete the first page (Attachment 4, page 4) of the Past Performance Questionnaire, but in lieu of submitting the respondent page (Attachment 4, page 5) provide a CPARS and/or previously completed past performance questionnaire? Given the many changes for government personnel, identifying points of contact that have current project knowledge can be prohibitive as many federal employees can no longer be reached. | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | |
| Attachment 2 | 1 | SF 1442, 13.a | NA | Please confirm Standard Form 1442 does not need to be submitted with the application as there is no pricing component associated with this submission. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. | |
| Attachment 6 | 2 | Pool 2 | 2.4.4 | Are Offerors able to provide more than one SF 330 (Attachment 7) for each discipline (i.e., architects and engineers)? | SF330s are only required for pool 2. This initial application is only for pool 1 | |
| Attachment 7 | 4 | Pool 2 | 4.2.2 | Are Offerors eligible to in both Pool 1 and Pool 2 assignments? Does entry to Pool 1 prohibit Offerors from application of Pool 2? | There are no restrictions for Pool 1 or Pool 2. Contractors have the ability to participate in both pools. | |
| Attachment 7 | 4 | Pool | 4 | If an Offeror intends to pursue a single pool, for instance, Pool 2, should that Offeror forgo submission of the Pool 1 application due May 9th and await a forthcoming amendment to submit a single application for Pool 2? - OR - Should that entity submit all the information (Steps 1-4) for that application on the May 9th due date with the assumption that it will be evaluated for both Pools 1 and 2? | Pool 2 applications will not be evaluated at this time. It is best to submit the application for pool 2 when it is open. | |
| Attachment 7 | 2 | General | 2, Step 2 | Can consideration be given to extend the relevant period of projects evaluated for past performance from three (3) years to five (5) years? | The government prefers relevant project with in the past three years. Unless it is deemed in the best interest of the government to not do so. | |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | Would the government kindly consider extending the application due date, at least one week, following responses to all RFIs? | The will extend the solicitation until 16 May at 1430 | |
| Attach 6 | 1 | 2.3.3 | Attachment 6-Instructions for BOA Application, 2.3.3. Bonding Capability ends with a partial | |||
| sentence, "Applicants bonding shall". Please clarify | Corrected | |||||
| Attach 6 & | ||||||
| Attach 7 | A6: p1 ; | |||||
| A7: pp 1 & 2 | A6: 2.3.2 & A7: Step 2 & 3.4.1 | Attachment 6 Instructions, 2.3.2. Past Performance, ask for projects completed in the past three |
years, but Attachment 7 Application Evaluation Procedure, Step 2, and Para. 3.4.1 say two years.
| Please confirm that three years is correct. | Corrected | ||||
| Attach 7 | p1 | Step 4 and Section 3.1 | Please confirm that Attachment 7 Application Evaluation Procedure, Step 4 regarding SF330 and | ||
| 3.1 Evaluation Factor Architect/Engineer Qualifications apply only if we are applying for Pool 2 Major Construction. | Step 4 is only for Pool 2 applications. | ||||
| Attach 6 & | |||||
| Attach 7 | A6: p1; A7: p4 | A6:1.1 & A7:4.2 | Attachment 7 Application Evaluation Procedure, 4.2. Pools, lists a date of 05/07/2025 for Pool 1 |
Minor Construction, but Attachment 6 Instructions say 05/09/2025. Please confirm that the actual
| deadline is 05/09/2025, and 05/07/2025 is just aspirational. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. The extended date is 16 May 25 at 1430. | |||||
| Attach 2 | Attachment 2 Model Agreement contains a Standard Form 1442 with a due date of 05/07/2025, 2 pm PDT, along with Sections A–M. Is this Model Agreement merely illustrative, or are we supposed to sign and submit the SF 1442 alone or the entire document? If we are to submit the SF1442, is the due date 05/07/2025, 2 pm Pacific Daylight Time, or | |||||
| 05/09/2025, 230 pm Pacific Daylight Time? | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. The extended date is 16 May 25 at 1430. | |||||
| Is there a listing of Primes Subs can access for networking purposes? | There are no prime contractors at this moment. | |||||
| For QA/QC materials testing and 3rd party special inspections, will that be covered by the General Contractor or the CM? | Quality Control responsibilities always fall with the contractor. QA is the responsibility of the government | |||||
| Attachment 4 - Application | 3 | Part 2 | 1 | Should we list all NAICS we cover or just the NAICS for this application (236210 - Industrial Building Construction)? | You can list as many NAICS that apply to your company. | |
| Attachment 4 - Application | 6 | Bonding | 1 | Page 6 of the application is requesting information that will come from two different institutions. Our bank (questions 1 and 2) and our bonding surety (question 3). How should that section be completed? | The contractor can complete the form based on input from the two institutions. The signature block was changed to remove the financial institutions signature. The letters can be attached as supporting documents. | |
| Instructions for BOA Application | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | It appears that all pool 1 and pool 2 applications must be received by 09 MAY25 please confirm this interpretation. | No, Pool 2 is not open at this time. | |
| Instructions for BOA Application | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | Please confirm an application period for the Pool 2 contractors will be established after the Pool 1 contractors have been selected as indicated. | Pool 2 will be opened along with the reopening of pool 1 at a later date. | |
| Instructions for BOA Application | 1 | 2 | 2.2 | If we do not submit an application by 09MAY25 for pool 1, will we be able to submit our application for pool 2 via the amendment mentioned. | Yes, participation in pool 1 does not determine pool 2 eligibility. | |
| Instructions for BOA Application | 1 | 1 | 1.2 | Please confirm all RFI responses issued under this solicitation will be will be posted to SAM.gov. | Yes. | |
| Instructions for BOA Application | 1 | 1 | 1.2 | Will Pool 2 Contractors be allowed to ask questions (RFI's) once the Pool 2 "Amendment" is opened after the initial application period of 09MAY25. | Yes, when pool 2 opens contractors will have the ability to submit RFIs. | |
| Attachment 6 Instructions | 1 | 2 | 2.3.2 | The instructions require the use of PPQ's to be completed by the applicable agency. Please clarify if the Contractor can utilize government issued CPARS in lieu of the PPQs for relevant projects. | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | |
| Attachment 2 Model Agreement SF1442 | 1 | The Contract Data listed in SAM.gov states the SF1442 is for information only. Please confirm the SF1442 provided is not required to be completed and/or submitted as part of this solicitation. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the proposed terms and conditions. It does not need to be completed. | |||
| Attachment 2 Model Agreement SF1443 | 1 | 13 | a | Please confirm the bid date noted in the SF1442 is erroneous/fictitious and has no bearing on the SAM.gov proposal period "Bid Date" of 09MAY25 prior to 2:30 PM or as stated in "Attachment 6 Instructions for BOA Application" | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the clauses that are being proposed in the future agreements. 16 May 25 at 1430 is the new date. | |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | Does this BOA have a set aside on it? Ex: 8(a), SB, HUB ? | It is a small business set aside with no further set-aside restrictions. All small-businesses are welcome to apply. | |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | Will Bid bonds, Performance Bonds and Payment Bonds be required for each task order? | Yes, bonds will be required for any TO over the 150,000 threshold. | |
| NA | NA | NA | NA | Will prime contractors be required to have a place of business within the San Francisco / Sacramento | ||
| SBA districts? | Preferable, will also consider other SBA districts in California | |||||
| SF 1442 | SF 1442 states that the bid due date is May 7th 2025 however, page 1 of Instruction to bidders states | |||||
| May 9th 2025 and sam.gov says May 9th 2025. Please advise which date is correct. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the clauses that are being proposed in the future agreements. 16 May 25 at 1430 is the new date. | |||||
| NA | NA | NA | NA | Will each participant be required to provide a bid for each task order? If a participant can not provide a bid for a particular task order, will they be required to submit a "No Bid" letter? | No, agreements are non-binding. If a contractor does not intend to participate the contractor is within their right. The government doe reserve the right to end agreements early if considered to be in the governments best interest as well. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | Att 6 - Instruction to bidders mentions that Pool 1 is due on May 9th, however, it mentions that Pool 2 will be reopened/opened at a later date through amendments. Can we submit for Pool 2 with the due date for Pool 1? | Pool 2 applications will not be evaluated at this time. It is best to submit the application for pool 2 when it is open. | |
| Instructions of BOA | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | Please confirm the Due date for pool 1 proposals? The 1442 states May 7th the documents states May 9th. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the clauses that are being proposed in the future agreements. 16 May 25 at 1430 is the new date. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | 2.3.2 | Can we submit a CPARS to satisfy this requirement? | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | ||
| Attachment 6 | 1 | 2.3.2 | Will a Past Performance Questionnaire be provided? | A PPQ form is in attachment 4 - Application. | ||
| Attachment 6 | 1 | Past performance | PPQ | Can we submit CPARS instead of the PPQ forms? | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | |
| Attachment 6 & Attachment 2 | 1 | General | 1 | Please clarify bid due date. Attachment 6 calls for May 9 and SF1442 on Attachment 2 calls for May 7. | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the clauses that are being proposed in the future agreements. 16 May 25 at 1430 is the new date. | |
| Attachment 2 | 1 & 2 | SF1442 | Does form SF1442 need to be submitted with offer on bid date? | The SF 1442 used in the attachments is for informational use only. It is there to demonstrate the clauses that are being proposed in the future agreements. | ||
| Attachment 6 | 2 & 2 | Pool 1 and 2 | Does the GC have to perform contracts on pool 1 to be considered for pool 2 | No, pool 1 and pool 2 are for different types of construction. | ||
| Att4. | 1 | Confirm there are no page limitations of contractors application package. | There is no page limit requirement in the instructions | |||
| Att. 6 | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | Please clarify if Contractors who are only interested in Pool 2:Major Construction are to submit proposals by the 9 May 2025 deadline and that these applications will be evaluated at a later date. | Pool 2 applications will not be evaluated at this time. It is best to submit the application for pool 2 when it is open. | |
| Att. 7 | 2 | Step 2 | 2 | Will submission of CPARS Evaluations be accepted in lieu of the Past Performance Questionnaire? | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | |
| Attachment+5+-+SF330.pdf | 9 | ALL | ALL | I am not sure it this is for a complete project or the architect that we think e will use when we get awarded the MACC contract? We want to show the correct people but it is hard to say who that would be from our roster until we know more about the details of the job... Please advise the best practices for filling this page out. Thank you. | This is for the establishment of an agreement. Pricing will happen at the task order level. | |
| Attachment+5+-+SF330.pdf | 9 | C. Proposed Team | ALL | How do we represent subcontractors when we do not yet know the scope of work? We have sub-contractors and capabilities to accomplish any range of tasks required. Please advise how we correctly represent our capabilities on this form. | The SF330 does not need to be completed for pool 1 applications. Currently the government is only interested in prime capabilities and past performance at this time. | |
| Attachment+5+-+SF330.pdf | 25 | ALL | ALL | How do we know what the scope is here for us to pair the correct team members with the project? Is this intended to be in relation to the sample projects we provided in our capability statement? | There is no project, this is for the establishment of an agreement with prime contractors for pool 1 that have capability and experience to perform potential projects. | |
| Attachment+2+-+Model+Agreement.pdf | 2 | 18 | ALL | ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS |
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)
| Is there anything for us to note here? | No, when the application closes, this would require the offeror to acknowledge any amendments (if any). | |||||
| Attachment+2+-+Model+Agreement.pdf | 4 | ALL | ALL | How do we do unit pricing without any scop of work or plans? How do we list it on the form for submission? | This is for the establishment of an agreement. Pricing will happen at the task order level. | |
| Attachment 6 | 1 | Past performance | PPQ | Can we submit CPARS instead of the PPQ forms? | The application is preferred but additional performance reports can be attached as supporting documentation. | |
| Attachment 6 & Attachment 2 | 1 | General | 1 | Please clarify bid due date. Attachment 6 calls for May 9 and SF1442 on Attachment 2 calls for May 7. | The 1442 is for informational use only. The purpose is to show the proposed terms and conditions of the agreements. 16 May 25 at 1430 is the new date. | |
| Attachment 2 | 1 & 2 | SF1442 | Does form SF1442 need to be submitted with offer on bid date? | No, the 1442 is for informational use only | ||
| Attachment 6 | 2 & 2 | Pool 1 and 2 | Does the GC have to perform contracts on pool 1 to be considered for pool 2 | No, Pool 1 and pool 2 are independent of each other. | ||
| Attachment 7 | PPQ | PPQ | We already have in our possession PPQ's that we want to use for this project. Is it ok if our company sends them directly to you instead of coming straight from the owner? | The PPQ in the application is required |
&"Times New Roman,Bold"&14&UREQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) FORM
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .