Attachment 4 - Application.pdf

Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Basic Ordering Agreement Application

60 CONS

Travis AFB

Table of Contents

1. Contractor Information Cover Letter

2. Past Performance Questionnaire

3. Bonding Letter

CONTRACTOR INFORMATION COVER PAGE

PART 1 General Information

Company Name:

Address:

POC Name:

Phone Number:

Email:

Intended Pool Pool 1: Minor Construction Pool 2: Major Construction

PART 2 Capability Statement

NAICS Applying Under:

Company Capabilities:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Reference Information:

Contract Number (Include task order number(s)) if applicable:

Contract Value:

Contractor performed as: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor

2. Description of Work Completed:

3. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Rating:

Below please provide a rating based on the following table to rate the contractor’s performance.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Note: Ratings other than a satisfactory rating should include accompanying rationale to justify the higher or lower rating.

3.1. Quality Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3.2. Schedule Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3.3. Cost Control Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3.4. Management Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3.5. Small Business Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

3.6. Regulatory Rating:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

Justification for Rating:

Additional Remarks:

Respondents Signature Name:

Email:

Phone Number:

Agency/Company:

Contractor’s Name:

Contractor's Point of Contact:

Contractor's Financial Institution:

Financial Institution's Phone:

(To Be Completed by Financial Institution)

1. How long has the contractor had an account with your financial institution?

2. What is the contractor's current status with the financial institution? (e.g., poor, good, excellent)

3. Does the contractor have the ability to obtain performance and payment bonds? What are the single and aggregate bonding amounts?

Single Award Bonding Capability:

Aggregate Bonding Capability:

Signature

Financial Institution Representative

Date

Attachment 3; Financial Information Questionnaire.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire