B2_DRAFT_10.1_Section_L_Attachment_A_(Past_Performance).pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
SLAC Job Order Contract
Solicitation number
SLAC_RFP_368624
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for construction contracts at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, operated by Stanford University for the U.S. Department of Energy. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate contractor performance on federal construction projects and serves as a source selection tool marked as sensitive information under FAR 3.104.

The questionnaire is structured in five sections. Section 1 captures contract identification details including the general contractor, sub-tier being evaluated, contract number, contract type, competitive status, period of performance, initial and final costs, and description of services. Section 2 documents customer or agency identification and geographic scope of services. Section 3 identifies the evaluator and their experience with the contract. Section 4 contains the core evaluation criteria using a color-coded performance scale (Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Green/Satisfactory, Yellow/Marginal, Red/Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable). Evaluation categories include Technical Performance (seven questions covering operations quality, testing, data integrity, quality control, hardware/software practices, and environmental safety); Program Management (ten questions addressing contract management, customer cooperation, problem resolution, understanding of requirements, emergency response, subcontractor oversight, material management, acquisition management, process improvements, and responsiveness); Transition/Phase-in (two questions); Employee Retention/Attraction (three questions); Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation (two questions); and Cost Performance (four questions addressing forecasting accuracy, cost control, cost alerts, and reporting). Section 5 requires narrative summary, discussion of exceptional or unsatisfactory ratings, evaluation of future solicitation likelihood, and additional performance comments. The questionnaire includes questions regarding contract terminations for default or convenience and requires evaluator signature and submission to a designated contact.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
B2_DRAFT_03.2_Section_C_Construction_Task_Catalog_INCORPORATED_BY_REFERENCE.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.7_Section_C_Appendix F_SLAC_Landscape_Vegetation_Planting_Guidance.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.9_Section_C_Appendix H_SLAC_Drawing_Deliverables.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.3_Sec_J_SF1413_exp_05-2027.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.4_Subcontractor_Safety_Qualification_Form.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_10.2_Section_L_Attachment_B_(Bid_Form).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.1_Section_C_Statement_of_Work_JOC.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.3_Section_C_Appendix_B_SLAC_Electrical_Design_Standards.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.4_Section_C_AppendixC_SLAC_Design_Procedures_Sewer_Services.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.5_Section_C_Appendix_D_SLAC_Design_Procedures_Water_Services.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.6_Section_C_Appendix E_SLAC_Space_Standards.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.11_Section_C_Appendix J_DOE-STD-1066-2023.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.1_Sec_J_DBA_WD_CA20260018_09172026_Mod_08.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.2_Sec_J_Subcontractor_IIPP_Form.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.6_Final_Inspection_Report.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_00_RFP_Cover_Letter_JOC.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_02_RFP_Section_B_(Supplies or Services and Price_Costs).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.8_Section_C_Appendix G_SLAC_Seismic_Design_Specifications.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_05.1_Fixed_Price_Construction_March2024.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.7_Final_Release.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_11_RFP_Section_M_(Evaluation_Factors).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_01_RFP_Section_A_(Subcontract_Form).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.0_RFP_Section_C_SOW_Cover_JOC.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_03.10_Section_C_Appendix_I_INCORPORATED_BY_REFERENCE.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_04_RFP_Section_F_(Deliveries_Performance).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_05.0_RFP_Section_G_(General_TsCs).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_05.2_SLAC_General_Ts_Cs_Supplemental_Rider_Aug2026.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_07_RFP_Section_H_(Special_Terms_Conditions).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.0_RFP_Section_J_Cover.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_08.5_NTP_Submittal_Checklist.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_09.0_RFP_Section_K_(Rep_and_Certs_Cover).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_09.1_RFP_Section_K_Reps_and_Certs_Supplement_08.25.22.pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_10.0_RFP_Section_L_(Instructions_to_Offerors).pdf PDF
B2_DRAFT_10.3_Section_L_Attachment_C_(Q&A_Log).pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Operated by Stanford University for the U.S. Department of Energy

Attachment 5A Construction Past Performance

SLAC Source Selection Guidance Manual

Dated September 21, 2026

DRAFT

10 January 2013

SLAC Job Order Contract

RFP 368624

ATTACHMENT A

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. General Contractor (GC) on the Project:_______________________________________________________

B. GC or Sub-Tier Being Evaluated: ____________________________________________________________

C. Contractor Performing Evaluation: ___________________________________________________________

D. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

E. Contract number: _______________________________________

F. Contract type: ______________________________

G. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

H. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

I. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

J. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

K. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ____________________________

L. Description of service provided: ________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Sub-factors of the instant acquisition.

Technical Performance B P G Y R N

T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2 Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management B P G Y R N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

Program Management B P G Y R N

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in B P G Y R N

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction B P G Y R N

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation B P G Y R N

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance B P G Y R N

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via Email to:

Matt Mezzetta mezzetta@slac.stanford.edu

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .