ATTACHMENT 15- BIDDER REFERENCE FORM.pdf

ATTACHMENT 15: BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

Purpose: Based on the satisfaction ratings received from the Bidder's references, the State will use the ratings to score the Bidders.

Instructions to Bidder: Complete Part A, items 1-8 of this form, attach the corresponding ATTACHMENT 14: BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS MATRIX and send to references to complete Part B, items 10-22. Once this form is completed, the Bidder must submit it with its proposal.

The Bidder must complete and submit a Reference Form for each corresponding project cited on

ATTACHMENT 14: BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS MATRIX.

Instructions to the Bidder’s Reference: Complete Part B, items 10-22 of this form using the rating scale in “Reference Satisfaction Rating” field (item 9). Rate your satisfaction with the Bidder who performed the services described in item 8, Project Description & Bidder's role on the project, and confirm that the information in Part A is consistent and corresponds with ATTACHMENT 14: BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS MATRIX attached. Complete the bottom of this form and return the form to the Bidder.

PART A: TO BE COMPLETED BY BIDDER

1 Bidder:

2 Project Name:

3 Name of Company for whom the Project was completed:

4 Contact Name and Information of the Bidder's Reference:

5 The Bidder was the Prime Contractor for this Project: ☐ Yes ☐ No

6 Bidder's Start and End Dates on the Project:

7 Contract Amount: $

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

TBD

PART A: TO BE COMPLETED BY BIDDER

8 Project Description & Bidder's role on the project:

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

PART B: TO BE COMPLETED BY BIDDER'S REFERENCE

Reference Satisfaction Rating:

Using the following scale to rate the Bidder's overall performance on the services provided:

0 = Unsatisfactory, 3 = Marginal, 5 = Satisfactory, 8 = Exceeds Expectations

Circle only one number for each question (10-22) below.

Reference Ratings

(Total possible rating score=104)

The Bidder performed a project involving large-scale legacy IBM mainframe service migration to the Salesforce Platform involving at least one million (1M) transactions per day, with a contract value of at least ten million dollars ($10M), including the following direct responsibilities:

• Requirements gathering

• Architecture and Design

• Salesforce development

• Integration between other internal and external systems

• Complex logging and auditing

• Testing and release management

• Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation

0 3 5 8

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

The Bidder performed a project involving large-scale legacy integration service migration to MuleSoft Integration Platform involving at least 1M real-time and batch transactions per day, with a contract value of at least $10M, including the following direct responsibilities:

• Integration requirements gathering

• Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations

• MuleSoft development

• Validation testing

• Release management

• Integration between other internal and external system

• Logging and auditing

• Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentatio

0 3 5 8

The Bidder performed a project involving large-scale legacy data cleansing, conversion, and migration involving at least two hundred million (200M) data records, with a contract value of at least $10M, including the following direct responsibilities:

• Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality

• Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning

• Pre-migration validation testing

• ETL: actual data transfer and transformation

• Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness

• Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process

• Architecting and designing reporting architecture

• Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation

0 3 5 8

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

The Bidder performed the project using an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel.

0 3 5 8

The Bidder project was for a California state agency with a contract value of at least five million dollars ($5M).

0 3 5 8

The Bidder project was for a motor vehicles organization with a contract value of at least $5M.

0 3 5 8

The Bidder project was for a US government or California state agency with a contract value of at least $10M.

0 3 5 8

Technical Delivery: How would you rate the quality of the system implemented by the Bidder?

0 3 5 8

Technical Delivery: How would you rate the quality of deliverables completed by the Bidder?

0 3 5 8

Technical Delivery: How would you rate the Bidder's ability to adhere to technical standards?

0 3 5 8

Project Management: How would you rate the Bidder's effectiveness at managing project schedule and scope?

0 3 5 8

Project Management: How would you rate the Bidder’s ability to manage risk and change control?

0 3 5 8

Staff Quality: How would you rate the Bidder's effectiveness at providing skilled personnel timely throughout the term of the Contract?

0 3 5 8

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

By completing this reference form, I declare the following:

1. I have reviewed the information contained in Part A, items 1-8 above, and ATTACHMENT 14:

BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS MATRIX and the information is true and correct;

2. I am/was employed by the company for whom the project was completed; and

3. I performed a management or supervisory role on the cited project.

TO BE COMPLETED BY BIDDER'S REFERENCE

Signature:

Printed Name:

Date:

Title or role on the project:

Email:

Phone:

State of California Department of Motor Vehicles

RFP ISD26-3629

BIDDER REFERENCE FORM

ATTACHMENT 15: BIDDER REFERENCE FORM