ATTACHMENT_14_BIDDER_QUALIFICATIONS_MATRIX.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 0000040415
- Issued by
- California
About this file
This is a Bidder Qualifications Matrix for a California state agency solicitation, specifically for the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). The document establishes mandatory and desirable qualification requirements that bidders must meet to be considered for contract award. The solicitation requires bidders to demonstrate experience with large-scale technology migration and integration projects, including Salesforce platform migrations involving at least 1 million transactions per day, MuleSoft integration platform implementations processing at least 1 million real-time and batch transactions daily, and data cleansing and migration projects involving at least 200 million data records. All of these projects must have contract values of at least $10 million. Additionally, bidders must provide evidence of experience using iterative waterfall development methodologies with parallel project efforts and demonstrate previous work for California state agencies or US government entities with minimum contract values of $5 million. The matrix requires bidders to provide detailed project reference information across six project columns, including start dates, end dates, total duration, contract values, client names, and comprehensive descriptions of project scope and responsibilities.
The document contains mandatory qualification requirements (Pass/Fail basis) covering corporate project experience, subcontractor compliance certifications, and insurance requirements including $1 million per occurrence commercial liability coverage with $2 million annual aggregate limits, workers' compensation coverage with $1 million employer's liability limits, and additional insured status for the State of California. Desirable qualifications worth 100 and 107 points respectively include three years of experience with motor vehicles organizations and experience with US government or California state agencies on projects valued at $10 million or more. Bidders must also certify compliance with responsibility certifications regarding debarment status and provide appropriate waivers of subrogation for workers' compensation policies when performing work on state-owned property. The matrix includes a threaded comment noting that addenda should not be issued if the RFP has not yet been released.
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Bidder Qualifications Attachment 15: Bidder Qualifications Matrix tc={400723BF-7A3F-4930-A06C-0DD1E50E139D}: [Threaded comment]
Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924
Comment:
If the RFP have not been released, there should not be any addendum
| Bidder Name: | Bidder Qualifications Details | Project #1 | Project #2 | Project #3 | Project #4 | Project #5 | Project #6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Req. # | Requirement | Priority | Bidder Agrees? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Yes/No) | Pass / Fail or | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum Points | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | Start Date | End Date | Total Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Calculated) | Contract Value | Client Name | Project Name | Description | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EXAMPLE→ | EXAMPLE: The Bidder must possess X, Y, Z experience. | Mandatory | YES | Pass / Fail | 1/1/20 | 12/1/20 | 11 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] | 1/1/20 | 2/1/20 | 1 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] | 1/1/20 | 2/1/20 | 1 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] | 1/1/20 | 12/1/20 | 11 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] | 1/1/20 | 2/1/20 | 1 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] | 1/1/20 | 2/17/21 | 14 | $10,000,000 | Department of ABC | ABC Automation Project | [100 words or less] |
| BQ.1 | Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has performed at least two (2) projects of similar size and scope (as defined below) in the last eight (8) years to DMV’s future project: A project involving large-scale legacy IBM mainframe service migration to Salesforce Platform involving at least 1M transactions per day, with a contract value of at least ten million dollars ($10M), including the following direct responsibilities: | ||||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | Mandatory | NO | Pass / Fail | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: |
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecture and Design | ||||||
| o | Salesforce development | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Complex logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Testing and release management | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation |
o # of transactions processed per day
| (LIST 2 OR MORE PROJECTS IN THE COLUMNS PROVIDED for BQ.1) | |||||||
| BQ.2 | Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has performed at least two (2) projects of similar size and scope (as defined below) in the last eight (8) years to DMV’s future project: A project involving large-scale legacy integration service migration to MuleSoft Integration Platform involving at least 1M real-time and batch transactions per day, with a contract value of at least ten million dollars ($10M), including the following direct responsibilities: | ||||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | |
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Integration requirements gathering | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing heterogeneous system integrations | ||||||
| o | MuleSoft development | ||||||
| o | Validation testing | ||||||
| o | Release management | ||||||
| o | Integration between other internal and external systems | ||||||
| o | Logging and auditing | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation |
o # of transactions processed per day
| (LIST 2 OR MORE PROJECTS IN THE COLUMNS PROVIDED for BQ.2) | |||||||
| BQ.3 | Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has performed at least two (2) projects of similar size and scope (as defined below) in the last eight (8) years to DMV’s future project: A project involving large-scale legacy data cleansing, conversion, and migration involving at least 200M data records, with a contract value of at least ten million dollars ($10M), including the following direct responsibilities: | ||||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| Mandatory | Pass / Fail | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | |||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation | ||||||
| o # of transactions processed per day | 0 | $0.00 | Describe project's scope regarding: | ||||
| o | Data assessment to evaluate data sources and data quality | ||||||
| o | Data cleansing, conversion, and migration planning | ||||||
| o | Pre-migration validation testing | ||||||
| o | ETL: actual data transfer and transformation | ||||||
| o | Post-migration validation to ensure data accuracy and completeness | ||||||
| o | Data security measures for the entirety of the migration process | ||||||
| o | Architecting and designing reporting architecture | ||||||
| o | Knowledge transfer: training delivery and training materials development, system documentation |
o # of transactions processed per day
| (LIST 2 OR MORE PROJECTS IN THE COLUMNS PROVIDED for BQ.3) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| BQ.4 | Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has performed at least two (2) projects in the last eight (8) years using an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | 0 | Describe how the project used an iterative waterfall development methodology where multiple project efforts ran in parallel. | ||||||
| (LIST 2 OR MOREPROJECTS IN THE COLUMNS PROVIDED for BQ.4) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| BQ.5 | Project reference forms combine to show at least two (2) Bidder-managed projects in the last eight (8) years was for a California state agency with a contract value of at least five million dollars ($5M). | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency | 0 | $0.00 | Describe the project for the CA state agency |
| (LIST 2 OR MORE PROJECTS IN THE COLUMNS PROVIDED for BQ.5) |
BQ.6 Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has three (3) years of experience in the last eight (8) years performing one or more Bidder-managed projects for a motor vehicles organization with a contract value of at least five million dollars ($5M). Desirable 100 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a motor vehicles organization
BQ.7 Project reference forms combine to show the Bidder has three (3) years of experience in the last eight (8) years performing two or more Bidder-managed projects for a US government or California state agency with a contract value of at least ten million dollars ($10M). Desirable 107 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency 0 $0.00 Describe the project for a US government or CA state agency
| BQ.8 | The Bidder certifies that any subcontractor that the Bidder chooses to use in fulfilling the requirements of this solicitation, and which is expected to receive more than ten percent (10%) of the value of the Contract, also meets all administrative and bid requirements of the solicitation, including corporate project and Key Staff reference requirements as applicable to the services provided by the subcontractor. | Mandatory | NO | Pass / Fail | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BQ.9 | The Bidder certifies it complies with the Responsibility Certification, attesting that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that the Bidder, the Bidder's subcontractor(s), or any personnel related to the Contract to be awarded, are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of Contracts by any state or federal agency. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | |||||||
| BQ.10 | The Contractor's Commercial Liability Insurance coverage shall be written on an occurrence basis in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1M) per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage liability combined. Annual aggregate limit shall not be less than two million dollars ($2M). The policy shall include coverage for liabilities arising out of premises, operations, independent contractors, products, completed operations, personal and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. This insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made, or suit is brought subject to the Contractor's limit of liability. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | |||||||
| BQ.11 | The Contractor's Commercial Liability policy must include the State of California, its officers, agents, employees, and servants as an additional insured, but only insofar as the operations under the Contract are concerned. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | |||||||
| BQ.12 | The Contractor must maintain statutory workers' compensation and employer's liability coverage for all its employees who will be engaged in the performance of the Contract, including special coverage extensions where applicable. Employer's liability limits of one million dollars ($1M) shall be required. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | |||||||
| BQ.13 | When performing work on state-owned or controlled property, Contractor agrees to provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the State for its workers' compensation policy. | Mandatory | Pass / Fail | |||||||
| 207 |
If the RFP have not been released, there should not be any addendum
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .