Appendix B20.docx
DOCX document 67 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services
- Solicitation number
- RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210
- Issued by
- Santa Clara County, San Diego City, California
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria appendix for a Request for Service Quotation (RFSQ) issued by a county behavioral health services department for post-release community supervision services within the adult and older adult system of care. The document outlines comprehensive evaluation criteria across five sections totaling 100 points, addressing organizational structure and experience (70 points), proposed program description (15 points), historical performance analysis (5 points), electronic health record capacity (5 points), and financial solvency (5 points). Offerors must demonstrate the ability to serve justice-involved adults aged 18 through 59 and older adults aged 60 and over across multiple geographic regions (Central, East, North, and South County), with specialization in serving populations with severe mental illness, co-occurring conditions, trauma exposure, and underserved communities including LGBTQ+ individuals and those with low socioeconomic status.
The evaluation criteria require offerors to address critical operational competencies including recidivism reduction strategies, Medi-Cal and Medicare compliance, CalAIM behavioral health requirements, appropriate step-down service capabilities, relevant licensures and accreditations, outcome evaluation data processes, and evidence-based practices such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Trauma-Focused CBT, and justice-specific interventions like Thinking for a Change and Moral Reconation Therapy. Offerors must submit detailed staffing plans addressing personnel retention, clinical supervision, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and emergency response protocols, along with implementation plans demonstrating seven-day-per-week service availability, after-hours coverage, and emergency pandemic and disaster response procedures. The evaluation process will include review by subject matter experts in program performance, electronic health records systems, and financial solvency, with specific focus on organizational vision and values promoting equity, cultural competency, and meaningful collaborations with county departments, contracted providers, and community agencies.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 76 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX B20
CATEGORY 4: COMMUNITY REINTEGRATION SERVICES
POST-RELEASE COMMUNITY SUPERVISION SERVICES
Evaluation Criteria and Qualifications
Section 1: Organizational Structure and Experience[footnoteRef:1] Total Points: [1: For all criteria in Section 1, Offeror shall:
Select “Yes” or “No” for each criteria requiring a response; and Indicate evidence of the organization’s experience with each criteria/sub-topics in the submitted packet’s miscellaneous documents.]
| a. |
| Select all applicable boxes with the following program requirements as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work: |
Target Populations ☐ Justice-Involved Adults (age 18 through 59) ☐ Justice-Involved Older Adults (ages 60 and over)
Indicate geographic locations (including clinic locations) where services would be provided:
☐ Central County ☐ East County ☐ North County ☐ South County
Additional Specialties ☐ Severe Mental Illness (SMI) ☐ Co-occurring conditions ☐ Underserved communities, including:
· LGBTQ+ community;
· Justice-involved populations; and
· Low social economic status.
☐ Individuals with extensive exposure to:
· Trauma;
· Violence; and
· Neglect.
| b. |
| Offeror described steps their organization will take to decrease recidivism and reduce emergency psychiatric service episodes and acute hospitalizations. |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| c. |
| Offeror described their ability to meet timely reporting and Medi-Cal/Medicare requirements, including: |
· Certification;
· Documentation;
· Billing requirements; and
· CalAIM behavioral health requirements, including but not limited to:
· Medical necessity criteria;
· Documentation re-designs;
· Co-occurring treatment;
· Standardized screening and transition tools;
· Behavioral Health current procedural terminology (CPT) coding transitions; and
· Payment reform.
Indicate history and experience with submitting reports and documentation to law enforcement agencies and justice partners:
☐ Client Status Reports ☐ Jail Assessment Coordinator List
| d. |
| Offeror has the ability to meet Medicare requirements, including certification. |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| e. |
| Offeror demonstrated capablility of providing appropriate step-down services, including lower levels of care or transitioning clients from justice-focused treatment programs to traditional outpatient programs. Transfers may include higher or lower level of care, or another behavioral health provider, including but not limited to: |
· Evaluate clients throughout treatment for appropriate level of care; and
· Staff to engage in Feedback Loop Process to ensure referral sources are informed of referral outcomes.
Select all applicable specialty practices inclusive in Offeror’s services, as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work.
☐ Discharge planning ☐ Intake ☐ Flexible intake ☐ Therapy and education in approaches, etc.
| f. |
| Select all applicable licenses and certifications Offeror’s organization currently possess to provide the services as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work. |
☐ Joint Commission Accreditation ☐ Community Care Licensing ☐ Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities International ☐ Other program accreditations:
| g. |
| Offeror addressed the following topics related to their organization’s outcome evaluation data as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work, including: |
· Process to administer and collect the required outcome evaluation data (e.g., assessment/outcome tools and performance measures currently utilized by staff);
· Process for staff to monitor and evaluate data (e.g., client/family satisfaction surveys, pre-/post-service tests, and culturally responsive services/practices);
· Plan for ongoing evaluation and outcome improvement for the program (e.g., data collection and analysis); and
· How their organization’s data results inform clinical practices and service quality.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| h. |
| Select all applicable training and treatment practices used, including the following Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) and Promising Practices (PPs): |
☐ Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ☐ Trauma-Focused CBT ☐ Dialectical Behavioral Therapy ☐ Solution-Focused Brief Therapy ☐ Motivational Interviewing
With at least one (1) of the following EBPs specific to treatment for the justice-involved population:
☐ Thinking for a Change ☐ Moral Reconation Therapy ☐ Criminal Thinking ☐ Risk and Responsivity
| i. |
| Select all applicable and include titles of staff that make up your treatment team to deliver the services as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work: |
☐ Paraprofessional Staff:
(Milieu staff, etc.)
☐ Licensed Clinical Staff:
(LMFT, Ph.D., etc.)
☐ Medical Board-Certified Staff:
(M.D., RN, RD, etc.)
Offeror included organization’s staffing-related protocols in the proposal’s miscellaneous section, addressing the following:
1. Personnel Retention Plan
· Organizational strategies for ensuring that continuity of staffing and care is provided to the target population(s); and
· How the program will be staffed appropriately and in a timely manner, including plan for clinical supervision of professional and paraprofessional staff, and ability to provide services according to Medi-Cal standards.
2. Staffing Plan
· Organizational details (including staffing chart, leadership and management structure, reporting structure, and lists for staff providing supportive housing, clinical services);
· Resumés of existing staff that indicate position titles, linguistic and cultural skills, education, experience, and certifications;
· Staff training, recruitment, and retention process;
· Organizational practices related to recruiting, hiring, and promoting multi-lingual staff and/or a culturally or ethnically diverse workforce; and
· Organizational training requirements related to diversity, equity, and/or inclusion (e.g., LGBTQ+, cultural and linguistic capacity, racial equity).
3. Additional Required Plans
· Emergency/after-hours staffing; and
· Provision of quarterly staffing reports to the BHSD using County-provided or other tools.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| j. |
| Offeror submitted a plan to ensure the program implementation and provision of services would occur in a timely manner as described in Attachment A20, Scope of Work. Steps include, but are not limited to, the following: |
☐ Offering services seven (7) days a week, including evening hours;
☐ Process for intake and admission (during business hours, after-hours, and weekends);
☐ Timeliness to psychiatric evaluations;
☐ Strategies used to engage and provide services to clients with required timelines;
☐ Hours of operation, clinic locations, and strategies that will be used to meet the Network Adequacy standards;
☐ 24-hour coverage to clients in programs;
☐ After-hours program contact plan for client emergencies; and ☐ Ability to hire staff who can receive jail clearances.
| k. |
| Offeror described experience with the following services in the proposal’s miscellaneous section: |
· How the program shall accept and manage urgent and emergent referrals;
· How to engage the target population in services and prioritize referrals; and
· How the referrals are made from outpatient treatment teams.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| l. | |
| Offeror provided active plans for delivering services 1) during a pandemic AND 2) during any emergency disaster(s), while ensuring safe protocols are followed to protect staff and clients during service delivery. Offeror indicated policies and practices in place for cooperation with County-required COVID efforts (e.g., vaccination status tracking). | |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
Section 2: Proposed Program Description[footnoteRef:2] Total Points: [2: Written response for each criteria in Section 2 is required. Please refer to the RFSQ Section IV, “Offeror’s Submission” for additional details.
| a. |
| Offeror described their organization’s vision, mission, and/or values that is inclusive of promoting behaviors and practices towards a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive organizational mindset. Offeror described their organization’s leadership model inclusivity, and what tools and support is provided to improve their organization’s ability to identify and mitigate bias, respect differences, build empathetic relationships, and manage conflict. |
| 5 |
| b. |
| Offeror described and provided documentation to ensure the following cultural competency/outreach and engagement requirements can be met: |
· Capacity to provide culturally, ethnically, and linguistically appropriate services to the target population(s), including capacity for all County threshold languages as described in Appendix H, Cultural Competence Form;
· How Offeror addresses barriers when they do not have staff available to meet the County threshold languages;
· Current and future actions and changes to ensure diversity and inclusion in service delivery;
· Capacity to provide outreach activities focused on reaching underserved, underrepresented, and/or multicultural populations; and
· Capacity to address and serve high-risk clients with co-occurring (mental health in addition to substance use challenges) treatment needs.
| c. |
| Offeror described types of collaborations (e.g., program designs and activities) with County departments, County-Contracted Providers (CCPs), and other agencies, including but not limited to: |
· County Health System (primary care physicians, County clinics), Forensic, Diversion, and Reintegration [judges and probation/parole officers/admin booking], and Social Services Agency;
· Housing organizations [subsidy administrators, property managers]; and
· Organizational experience working successfully with system partners.
Offeror described how partner collaborations shall:
· Increase meaningful use of client time and abilities to participate in vocational services/sustain employment, participate in educational programs/school, and daily activities;
· Increase client ability to obtain/maintain a monthly income;
· Obtain health insurance for clients;
· Reduce utilization of inpatient hospital services;
· Reduce client recidivism rates;
· Maintain or obtain permanent supportive housing or permanent housing when clients exit the program; and
· Increase successful program discharges and graduation rates from the justice system.
| Section 3: Historical Performance Analysis Total Points: |
| 5 |
Historical data analysis will be reviewed by BHSD Program Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 4: Electronic Health Record Capacity Total Points: |
| 5 |
Offeror’s electronic health record (EHR) system capacity and responses as listed in Appendix I, Offeror’s Health Record Status, will be reviewed by BHSD EHR Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 5: Financial Solvency Total Points: |
| 5 |
Financial records will be reviewed by the Health System Finance Department and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210: Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services Page 1 of 2 APPENDIX B20: Post-Release Community Supervision Services Evaluation Criteria CATEGORY 4: Community Reintegration Services
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .