Appendix B17.docx
DOCX document 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services
- Solicitation number
- RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210
- Issued by
- Santa Clara County, San Diego City, California
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document for the Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services Department's Request for Statements of Qualifications (RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210) for Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services, specifically for Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Full Service Partnership Services. The procurement seeks qualified organizations to provide comprehensive behavioral health services to justice-involved adults aged 26 through 59 and justice-involved older adults aged 60 and over across four Santa Clara County geographic regions: South, Central, Eastern, and Northern. The services must address complex needs including severe mental illness, co-occurring substance use and mental health conditions, homelessness, and exposure to trauma. The document outlines evaluation criteria organized into five sections totaling 100 points: organizational structure and experience (70 points), proposed program description (15 points), historical performance analysis (5 points), electronic health record capacity (5 points), and financial solvency (5 points).
Offerors must demonstrate capability in multiple clinical and operational areas including evidence-based practices, staff qualifications and retention, 24/7 crisis intervention capacity, Medi-Cal compliance, cultural competency, and collaboration with county departments and justice system partners. Organizations must provide detailed documentation on their ability to reduce recidivism and emergency psychiatric services, manage dual diagnoses, deliver timely intake and psychiatric evaluations, maintain adequate staffing with appropriate clearances, accept urgent referrals, and provide continuity of services during pandemics or disasters. The evaluation will assess organizations' vision and values related to diversity and inclusion, their linguistic capacity to serve county threshold languages, experience with step-down services, and data collection capabilities for outcome evaluation and quality improvement. Financial and electronic health record systems will be reviewed separately by specialized departmental subject matter experts using criteria established in the RFSQ.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 76 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX B17
CATEGORY 3: FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP SERVICES
FORENSIC ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT
Evaluation Criteria and Qualifications
Section 1: Organizational Structure and Experience[footnoteRef:2] Total Points: [2: For all criteria in Section 1, Offeror shall:
Select “Yes” or “No” for each criteria requiring a response; and Indicate evidence of the organization’s experience with each topic in the submitted packet’s miscellaneous documents.]
| a. |
| Select Offeror’s experience with the following Adult and Older Forensic Assertive Community Treatment program needs as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work: |
Target Populations ☐ Justice-Involved Adults (ages 26 through 59) ☐ Justice-Involved Older Adults (ages 60 and over)
Santa Clara County Geographic Locations (including clinic locations for services) ☐ South ☐ Central ☐ Eastern ☐ Northern
Additional Specialties ☐ Severe Mental Illness (SMI) ☐ Co-occurring Conditions ☐ Justice-Involved Populations
Complex Risk Factors, including:
☐ Abuse/Violence ☐ Substance Use ☐ Psychological Trauma ☐ Intergenerational Impacts of Incarceration ☐ Substance Use ☐ Homeless/At-risk of Homelessness ☐ LGBTQ+ Community ☐ Low social economic status ☐ Underserved, Underrepresented, and Unserved Ethnic and Cultural Populations
| b. |
| Offeror described steps their organization will take to decrease recidivism and reduce emergency psychiatric services and acute hospitalizations, including but not limited to: |
· Reasons why the organization is capable of effectively delivering culturally proficient clinical services, supportive services, and the infrastructure development services required for this RFSQ;
· How the organization will motivate and provide services to individuals who have previously failed multiple intensive outpatient programs;
· How organization proposes to accept and process clients based on level of care needs and individuals waiting to be released from in-custody;
· The plan to engage clients with complex risk factors that include substance abuse, violence, neglect, justice involvement, and/or exposure to trauma;
· Included the background and experience in providing dual diagnoses crisis response and support services;
· How organization will accomplish the objectives of the program as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work;
· How the proposed services are supportive of the wellness and recovery needs of the justice involved, dually diagnosed adult/older adult populations; and
· The plan to ensure the target population and number of clients/caseloads are reached annually.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 10 |
| c. |
| Confirm if Offeror has the ability to meet the following Medi-Cal requirements below and if they indicated history and experience providing time-sensitive or frequent data requests as required by the BHSD for grant-funded services. |
· Certification,
· Documentation,
· Billing requirements, and
· CalAIM behavioral health requirements, including but not limited to:
· Medical necessity criteria;
· Documentation re-designs;
· Co-occurring treatment;
· Standardized screening and transition tools;
· Behavioral Health current procedural terminology (CPT) coding transitions; and
· Payment reform.
YES ☐ NO ☐
Select all applicable report and document submission experience with law enforcement agencies and justice partners:
☐ Client Status Reports ☐ Jail Assessment Coordinator List
| d. | |
| Offeror indicated organization can provide appropriate step-down services, including lower levels of care or transitioning beneficiaries from justice-focused treatment programs to traditional outpatient programs. | |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| e. |
| Select all applicable licenses and certifications Offeror currently possesses to provide services as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work: |
☐ Joint Commission Accreditation ☐ Community Care Licensing ☐ Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities International ☐ Other Program Accreditations:
| f. |
| Offeror addressed the following topics related to their organization’s outcome evaluation data as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work, including: |
· Capacity and process to administer and collect the required outcome evaluation data (e.g., assessment/outcome tools and performance measures currently utilized by staff);
· Process for staff to monitor and evaluate data (e.g., client/family satisfaction surveys, pre-/post-service tests, and culturally responsive services/practices);
· Plan for ongoing evaluation and outcome improvement for the program (e.g., data collection and analysis); and
· How their organization’s data results inform clinical practices and service quality.
| g. |
| Select all applicable training and treatment practices used, including but not limited to the following Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs), Promising Practices (PPs), and Trauma-Informed Practices: |
| 5 |
☐ Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) ☐ Trauma-Focused CBT ☐ Dialectical Behavioral Therapy ☐ Solution-Focused Brief Therapy ☐ Motivational Interviewing ☐ Other:
EBPs specific to the justice-involved population:
☐ Thinking for a Change ☐ Moral Reconation Therapy ☐ Criminal Thinking ☐ Risk and Responsivity
| h. | |
| Select all applicable staff and include titles for a list of employees that make up Offeror’s treatment team to deliver the services as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work: | |
| ☐ | Paraprofessional staff: |
(milieu staff, etc.)
☐ Licensed/License-Registered clinical staff:
(LMFT, Ph.D., etc.)
☐ Medical Board-certified staff:
(M.D., RN, RD, etc.)
☐ Other:
(Employment Specialist, Peer Support Worker, etc.)
| i. |
| Offeror included organization’s staffing-related protocols in the proposal’s miscellaneous section, addressing the following: |
1. Personnel Retention Plan
· Organizational strategies for ensuring continuity of staffing and care provided to the target population(s); and
· How the program will be staffed appropriately and in a timely manner, including plan for clinical supervision of professional and paraprofessional staff, and ability to provide services according to Medi-Cal standards.
2. Staffing Plan
· Staff can obtain jail clearances;
· Organizational details (including staffing chart, leadership and management structure, reporting structure, and lists for staff providing supportive housing, clinical services);
· Resumés of existing staff that indicate position titles, linguistic and cultural skills, education, experience, and certifications;
· Staff training, recruitment, and retention process;
· Process for providing intensive case management services at project-based sites (e.g., administrative, supervisory, and direct service staff information);
· Organizational practices related to recruiting, hiring, and promoting multi-lingual staff and/or a culturally or ethnically diverse workforce; and
· Organizational training requirements related to diversity, equity, and/or inclusion (e.g., LGBTQ+, cultural and linguistic capacity, racial equity).
3. Additional Required Plans
· Emergency/after-hours staffing; and
· Provision of quarterly staffing reports to BHSD using County-provided or other tools.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| j. |
| Offeror submitted a plan to ensure the program implementation and provision of services would occur in a timely manner as described in Attachment A17, Scope of Work. Steps include, but are not limited to, the following: |
· Staff compliance with County jail clearances required to provide outreach and engagement in custodial settings;
· Twenty-four (24)-hour crisis intervention services and immediate support;
· Offering services seven (7) days a week, including evening hours;
· Process for intake and admission (during business hours, after-hours, and weekends);
· Timeliness to psychiatric evaluations;
· Strategies used to engage and provide services to clients with required timelines;
· Hours of operation, clinic locations, and strategies that will be used to meet the Network Adequacy standards;
· Providing services 24/7 with structured monitoring of withdrawal symptoms and medical referral if necessary;
· Providing orientation to substance use treatment continuum;
· Maintaining data collection related to client requests for placements and completed client placements;
· Ability to provide appropriate related Step-Down services; and
· Discharge planning process and documentation in clinical record.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| k. |
| Offeror submitted documentation related to the following requirements: |
· How the program shall accept and manage urgent and emergent referrals received.
· How to engage the target population in services and prioritize referrals.
· How the referrals are made from outpatient treatment teams.
· Client transfers to a different level of care or another behavioral health provider.
· Staff evaluation process for each client for appropriate level of care throughout treatment.
· How staff will communicate to ensure referral sources are notified of the status of the referral and informed outcomes.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| l. | |
| Offeror provided active plans for delivering services 1) during a pandemic AND 2) during any emergency disaster(s), while ensuring safe protocols are followed to protect staff and clients during service delivery. Offeror indicated policies and practices in place for cooperation with County-required COVID efforts (e.g., vaccination status tracking). | |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
Section 2: Proposed Program Description[footnoteRef:3] Total Points: [3: Written response for each criteria in Section 2 is required. Please refer to the RFSQ Section IV, “Offeror’s Submission” for additional details.]
| a. |
| Offeror described their organization’s vision, mission, and/or values that is inclusive of promoting behaviors and practices towards a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive organizational mindset. Offeror described their organization’s leadership model inclusivity, and what tools and support is provided to improve their organization’s ability to identify and mitigate bias, respect differences, build empathetic relationships, and manage conflict. |
| 5 |
| b. |
| Offeror provided documentation to ensure the following cultural competency/outreach and engagement requirements can be met: |
· Capacity to provide culturally, ethnically, and linguistically appropriate services to the target population(s), including capacity for all County threshold languages as described in Appendix H, Cultural Competence Form;
· Organization methods to address barriers when staff are not available to meet the County threshold languages;
· Current and future actions and changes to ensure diversity and inclusion in service delivery;
· Capacity to provide outreach activities focused on reaching underserved, underrepresented, and/or multicultural populations, which include outreach and engagement efforts to clients in carceral settings; and
· Capacity to address and serve high-risk clients with co-occurring (mental health and substance use) treatment needs.
| c. |
| Offeror described types of collaborations (e.g., program designs and activities) with County departments, County-contracted providers, and other agencies, including but not limited to: |
· County Health System (primary care physicians, County clinics), Adult Custody Health, Pharmacy, Forensic, Diversion, and Reintegration, and Social Services Agency;
· Justice System (judges, public defender, district attorney, and probation/parole officers/admin booking);
· Housing organizations (subsidy administrators, property managers); and
· Organizational experience working successfully with system partners.
Offeror described how partner collaborations will:
· Increase meaningful use of client time and abilities in work, school, and daily activities;
· Increase client ability to obtain/maintain a monthly income;
· Reduce utilization of inpatient hospital services;
· Decrease recidivism;
· Obtain health insurance for clients; and
· Maintain or obtain permanent supportive housing or permanent housing when clients exit the program.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| Section 3: Historical Performance Analysis Total Points: |
| 5 |
Historical data analysis will be reviewed by BHSD Program Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 4: Electronic Health Record Capacity Total Points: |
| 5 |
Offeror’s electronic health record (EHR) system capacity and responses as listed in Appendix I, Offeror’s EHR Status, will be reviewed by BHSD EHR Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 5: Financial Solvency Total Points: |
| 5 |
Financial records will be reviewed by the Health System Finance Department and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210: Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services Page 1 of 2 APPENDIX B17: Forensic Assertive Community Treatment Evaluation Criteria CATEGORY 3: Full Service Partnership Services
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .