Appendix B12.docx
DOCX document 58 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services
- Solicitation number
- RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210
- Issued by
- Santa Clara County, San Diego City, California
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria appendix for a Request for Statement of Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by a county behavioral health services department for Adult and Older Adult Outpatient Continuum Services targeting justice-involved populations. The services are designed to serve justice-involved adults aged 18-59 and older adults aged 60 and over diagnosed with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use problems across multiple geographic service areas including South County, Central County, East County, and North County. Offerors must demonstrate organizational experience serving underserved communities including LGBTQ+ populations and those with exposure to trauma, violence, and neglect. The evaluation criteria focus on organizational structure and experience (55 points), proposed program description (15 points), historical performance analysis (5 points), electronic health record capacity (5 points), and financial solvency (20 points), totaling 100 points.
Offerors must demonstrate compliance with Medi-Cal and Medicare requirements including DHCS certification, CalAIM behavioral health requirements, and appropriate documentation and billing standards. Key qualifications include capacity to provide step-down services, submit timely reports to law enforcement and justice partners, maintain appropriate staff licensing and certifications, and provide seven-day-per-week services with 24-hour emergency coverage. Offerors must describe evidence-based practices such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, and justice-specific interventions including Thinking for a Change and Risk and Responsivity programs. Staffing requirements include paraprofessional, licensed clinical, license-waivered, and medical board-certified staff with demonstrated cultural competency, linguistic capacity across county threshold languages, and collaborative relationships with county departments, housing organizations, and forensic and reintegration partners. Offerors must provide emergency response plans for pandemics and disasters while maintaining safe protocols for staff and clients.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 76 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
APPENDIX B12
CATEGORY 2: OUTPATIENT SERVICES
ADULT AND OLDER ADULT OUTPATIENT CONTINUUM SERVICES - JUSTICE INVOLVED
Evaluation Criteria and Qualifications
Section 1: Organizational Structure and Experience[footnoteRef:1] Total Points: [1: For all criteria in Section 1, Offeror shall:
Select “Yes” or “No” for each criteria requiring a response; and Indicate evidence of the organization’s experience with each criteria/sub-topics in the submitted packet’s miscellaneous documents.]
| a. |
| Select Offeror’s experience with the Adult and Older Adult Outpatient Continuum Services - Justice Involved program needs as listed in Attachment A12, Scope of Work: |
Target Population:
☐ Justice-Involved Adult (ages 18 through 59) ☐ Justice-Involved Older Adult (ages 60 and over)
Indicate history and experience with the following populations served:
☐ Diagnosed with severe mental illness (SMI) ☐ Co-occurring substance use problems as a secondary concern ☐ Underserved communities, including justice-involved population, LGBTQ+, and low social economic status ☐ Individuals with extensive exposure to trauma, violence, and neglect
Indicate geographic locations (including clinic locations) where services would be provided:
☐ South County ☐ Central County ☐ East County ☐ North County
| b. |
| Offeror described steps their organization will take to decrease recidivism and reduce emergency psychiatric service episodes and acute hospitalizations. |
YES ☐ NO ☐
Offeror indicated the following:
☐ Reasons why their organization is capable of effectively delivering culturally proficient clinical services, supportive services, and the infrastructure development services required for this RFSQ;
☐ How their organization will provide co-occurring capable services;
☐ How organization proposes to accept and process clients based on level of care needs and individuals waiting to be released from in-custody;
☐ Describe the plan to engage clients with complex risk factors that include substance use, violence, neglect, justice involvement, and/or exposure to trauma;
☐ Include the background and experience in providing dual diagnoses crisis response and support services;
☐ Describe how Offeror will accomplish the objectives of the program as described in Attachment A12;
☐ How the proposed services are supportive of the wellness and recovery needs of the justice involved, dually diagnosed adult/older adult populations; and ☐ Describe the plan to ensure the target population and number of clients/caseloads are reached annually.
| c. |
| Offeror indicated evidence of the organization’s ability to meet all Medi-Cal and Medicare requirements, including: |
· Certification through DHCS;
· Documentation standards;
· Billing requirements; and
· CalAIM behavioral health requirements, including but not limited to:
· Medical necessity criteria;
· Documentation re-designs;
· Co-occurring treatment;
· Standardized screening and transition tools;
· Behavioral Health current procedural terminology (CPT) coding transitions; and
· Payment reform.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| d. |
| Offeror is capable of providing appropriate step-down services, including lower levels of care or transitioning beneficiaries from justice-focused treatment programs to traditional outpatient programs. |
YES ☐ NO ☐
Indicate history and experience with submitting reports and documentation to law enforcement agencies and justice partners:
☐ Client Status Reports ☐ Jail Assessment Coordinator List ☐ Other partners:
Indicate history and experience providing time-sensitive or frequent data requests as required by the BHSD for grant-funded services.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| e. |
| Select all the applicable boxes of the licenses and certifications Offeror currently possesses to provide the services: |
☐ Joint Commission Accreditation ☐ Community Care Licensing ☐ Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities International ☐ Other program accreditations:
| f. |
| Offeror addressed the following topics related to their organization’s capacity to administer and collect the required outcome evaluation data as described in Attachment A12, including: |
· Offeror’s capacity and process to administer and collect the required outcome evaluation data (e.g., assessment/outcome tools and performance measures currently utilized by staff);
· Process for staff to monitor and evaluate data (e.g., client/family satisfaction surveys, pre-/post-service tests, and culturally responsive services/practices); and
· Plan for ongoing evaluation and outcome improvement for the program (e.g., data collection and analysis); and
· How their organization’s data results inform clinical practices and service quality.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| g. |
| Select training and treatment practices used, including the following Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) and Promising Practices (PPs): |
☐ Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ☐ Dialectical Behavioral Therapy ☐ Motivational Interviewing ☐ Trauma-Focused CBT ☐ Solution-Focused Brief Therapy
Select the EBPs that Offeror will implement specifically for justice-involved clients:
☐ Thinking for a Change ☐ Criminal Thinking ☐ Moral Reconation Therapy ☐ Risk and Responsivity
| h. |
| Select the applicable boxes and list the various titles of the staff that make up Offeror’s treatment team to deliver the services as described in Attachment A12: |
☐ Paraprofessional staff:
(milieu staff, etc.)
☐ Licensed clinical staff:
(LMFT, Ph.D., etc.)
☐ License-waivered staff:
(Rehab Counselor, Associate Social Worker, etc.)
☐ Medical Board-certified staff:
(M.D., RN, RD, etc.)
☐ Other:
(Employment Specialist, Peer Support Worker, etc.)
Offeror included their organization’s staffing-related protocols in their submission’s miscellaneous section, addressing the following:
· Personnel Retention Plan
· Organizational strategies for ensuring that continuity of staffing and care is provided to the target population(s); and
· How the program will be staffed appropriately and in a timely manner, including plan for clinical supervision of professional and paraprofessional staff, and ability to provide services according to Medi-Cal standards.
· Staffing plan
· Staff who can obtain jail clearances;
· Organizational details (including staffing chart, leadership and management structure, reporting structure, and lists for staff providing supportive housing, clinical services);
· Resumés of existing staff that indicate position titles, linguistic and cultural skills, education, experience, and certifications;
· Staff training, recruitment, and retention process;
· Plan for recruiting experienced staff to deliver co-occurring mental health and substance abuse services to justice involved adults and older adults as described in Attachment A12;
· How staff will be involved in the planning, implementation, and evaluation phases of the program;
· Organizational practices related to recruiting, hiring, and promoting multi-lingual staff and/or a culturally or ethnically diverse workforce; and
· Organizational training requirements related to diversity, equity, and/or inclusion (e.g., LGBTQ+, cultural and linguistic capacity, racial equity).
· Additional required plans, including:
· Emergency/after-hours staffing plans; and
· Provision of quarterly staffing reports to the BHSD using County-provided or other tools.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| i. |
| Offeror ensures that the implementation of the program and the provision of services would occur in a timely manner as described in Attachment A12: |
☐ Offering services seven (7) days a week, including evening hours;
☐ Process for intake and admission [during business hours, after-hours, and weekends];
☐ Timeliness to psychiatric evaluations;
☐ Strategies used to engage and provide services to clients with required timelines;
☐ Hours of operation, clinic locations, and strategies that will be used to meet Network Adequacy standards;
☐ 24-hour coverage to clients in the programs; and ☐ The after-hours program contact plan for client emergencies.
| j. |
| Offeror described in detail: |
· How the program shall accept and manage urgent and emergent referrals received.
· How to engage the target population in services and prioritize referrals.
· How the referrals are made from outpatient treatment teams.
YES ☐ NO ☐
Given that transfers may include higher or lower level of care, or another behavioral health provider, Offeror described:
· How staff evaluates client throughout treatment for appropriate level of care.
· How staff will complete with Feedback Loop Process to ensure referral sources are notified of the status of the referral and informed outcomes.
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
| k. | |
| Offeror provided active plans for delivering services 1) during a pandemic AND 2) during any emergency disaster(s), while ensuring safe protocols are followed to protect staff and clients during service delivery. Offeror indicated policies and practices in place for cooperation with County-required COVID efforts (e.g., vaccination status tracking). | |
| YES ☐ | NO ☐ |
| 5 |
Section 2: Proposed Program Description[footnoteRef:2] Total Points: [2: Written response for each criteria in Section 2 is required. Please refer to the RFSQ Section IV, “Offeror’s Submission” for additional details.]
| a. |
| Offeror described their organization’s vision, mission, and/or values that is inclusive of promoting behaviors and practices towards a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive organizational mindset. Offeror described their organization’s leadership model inclusivity, and what tools and support is provided to improve their organization’s ability to identify and mitigate bias, respect differences, build empathetic relationships, and manage conflict. |
| 5 |
| b. |
| Offeror described and provided documentation to ensure the following cultural competency/outreach and engagement requirements can be met: |
· Capacity to provide culturally, ethnically, and linguistically appropriate services to the target population(s), including capacity for all County threshold languages as described in Appendix H;
· Organization provided methods to address barriers when staff are not available to meet the County threshold languages;
· Current and future actions and changes to ensure diversity and inclusion in service delivery;
· Capacity to provide outreach activities focused on reaching underserved, underrepresented, and/or multicultural populations; and
· Capacity to address and serve high-risk clients with co-occurring (mental health in addition to substance use challenges) treatment needs.
| c. |
| Offeror described types of collaborations (e.g., program designs and activities) with County departments, County-contracted Providers, and other agencies, including but not limited to: |
· County Health System (primary care physicians, County clinics) and Social Services Agency;
· Housing organizations [subsidy administrators, property managers];
· Forensic, Diversion, and Reintegration [judges and probation/parole officers/admin booking]; and
· Organizational experience working successfully with system partners.
Offeror described how partner collaborations will:
· Increase meaningful use of client time and abilities in work, school, and daily activities;
· Increase client ability to obtain/maintain a monthly income;
· Reduce utilization of inpatient hospital services;
· Decrease recidivism;
· Obtain health insurance for clients; and
· Maintain or obtain permanent supportive housing or permanent housing when clients exit the program.
| Section 3: Historical Performance Analysis Total Points: |
| 5 |
Historical data analysis will be reviewed by BHSD Program Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 4: Electronic Health Record Capacity Total Points: |
| 5 |
Offeror’s electronic health record (EHR) system capacity and responses as listed in Appendix I, Offeror’s Health Record Status, will be reviewed by BHSD EHR Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
| Section 5: Financial Solvency Total Points: |
| 20 |
Financial records will be reviewed by the Health System Finance Department and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.
RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210: Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services Page 1 of 2 APPENDIX B13: Adult and Older Adult Intensive Outpatient Continuum Services - Justice Involved Evaluation Criteria CATEGORY 2: Outpatient Services
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .