Appendix B14.docx

DOCX document 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services
Solicitation number
RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210
Issued by
Santa Clara County, San Diego City, California

About this file

This document is an evaluation criteria appendix for a Request for Sealed Qualifications (RFSQ) issued by a county behavioral health services department for Adult and Older Adult Cross Systems Initiative Full Service Partnership services. The solicitation seeks qualified organizations to deliver comprehensive behavioral health treatment and support services to adults ages 26-59 and older adults ages 60 and over, with specialized capacity to serve LGBTQ+ communities, justice-involved populations, individuals with severe mental illness, co-occurring conditions, and those with special needs and disabilities. The scope of work is detailed in Attachment A14, though specific response deadlines, award dates, and contract terms are not provided in this evaluation criteria document.

The evaluation framework allocates 100 total points across five sections: Organizational Structure and Experience (70 points), Proposed Program Description (15 points), Historical Performance Analysis (5 points), Electronic Health Record Capacity (5 points), and Financial Solvency (5 points). Offerors must demonstrate Medi-Cal and CalAIM behavioral health compliance, including DHCS certification, staff credentialing, and medical necessity documentation. Required staffing includes licensed clinical staff, medical board-certified personnel, paraprofessional staff, and peer support workers, with mandatory submission of personnel retention and staffing plans addressing diversity, equity, inclusion, and emergency protocols. Organizations must evidence competency in evidence-based practices such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, and trauma-informed approaches, and demonstrate capacity for 24/7 crisis support, culturally and linguistically appropriate service delivery across county threshold languages, inter-agency collaboration with housing organizations and justice system partners, and data collection and outcome evaluation using State Data Collections Reporting systems.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Appendix H_1.docx DOCX document
Appendix B18.docx DOCX document
Appendix A rev11182025.docx DOCX document
Attachment A18.docx DOCX document
Appendix B19.docx DOCX document
Attachment A8.docx DOCX document
Attachment B.pdf PDF
Appendix B10.docx DOCX document
Attachment A3.docx DOCX document
Appendix B16.docx DOCX document
Appendix F.docx DOCX document
Appendix H.docx DOCX document
Attachment A20.docx DOCX document
Addendum 6.pdf PDF
Attachment A15.docx DOCX document
Addendum 7.pdf PDF
Appendix D.docx DOCX document
Attachment A9 rev 11142025.pdf PDF
Attachment A13.docx DOCX document
Attachment A4.docx DOCX document
RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210.pdf PDF
Appendix B2.docx DOCX document
Attachment A22.docx DOCX document
Attachment A22 rev 11142025.pdf PDF
Attachment A2.docx DOCX document
Addendum 2.pdf PDF
Addendum 1.pdf PDF
Appendix B20.docx DOCX document
Appendix B9 rev 11142025.docx DOCX document
Addendum 4.pdf PDF
Attachment A14.docx DOCX document
Appendix G rev11182025_1.docx DOCX document
Appendix B12.docx DOCX document
Appendix B17.docx DOCX document
Attachment A16.docx DOCX document
Attachment E.pdf PDF
Appendix B13.docx DOCX document
Attachment A19.docx DOCX document
Attachment A12.docx DOCX document
Attachment A1.docx DOCX document
Appendix B8.docx DOCX document
Appendix E.docx DOCX document
Appendix B7.docx DOCX document
Attachment A7.docx DOCX document
Appendix G rev11182025.docx DOCX document
Attachment A17.docx DOCX document
Attachment A9.docx DOCX document
Appendix B5 rev11182025.docx DOCX document
Attachment A5.docx DOCX document
Attachment A9 rev11182025.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 76 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

APPENDIX B14

CATEGORY 3: FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP SERVICES

CROSS SYSTEMS INTIATIVE FULL SERVICE PARTNERSHIP

Evaluation Criteria and Qualifications Section 1: Organizational Structure and Experience[footnoteRef:2] Total Points: [2: For all criteria in Section 1, Offeror shall:

Select “Yes” or “No” for each criteria requiring a response; and Indicate evidence of the organization’s experience with each topic in the submitted packet’s miscellaneous documents.]

a.
Select Offeror’s experience with the following Adult and Older Adult Cross Systems Initiative Full Service Partnership program needs as described in Attachment A14, Scope of Work:

Target Population ☐ Adult (ages 26 through 59) ☐ Older Adult (ages 60 and over)

Additional Specialties ☐ LGBTQ+ Community ☐ Co-occurring Conditions ☐ Full Service Partnership Program ☐ Special Needs and Disabilities ☐ Justice-Involved Populations ☐ Severe Mental Illness (SMI) ☐ Other:

b.
Offeror indicated evidence of the organization’s ability to meet the following Medi-Cal requirements, including:

· Certification through DHCS;

· Documentation;

· Staff credentialling;

· Billing requirements; and

· CalAIM behavioral health requirements, including but not limited to:

· Medical necessity criteria;

· Documentation re-designs;

· Co-occurring treatment;

· Standardized screening and transition tools;

· Behavioral health current procedural terminology (CPT) coding transitions; and

· Payment reform.

YES ☐NO ☐
10
c.
Select all applicable staff and include titles for a list of employees that make up Offeror’s treatment team to deliver the services as described in Attachment A14, Scope of Work:
☐Paraprofessional staff:

(milieu staff, etc.)

☐ Licensed/License-Registered clinical staff:

(LMFT, Ph.D., etc.)

☐ Medical Board-certified staff:

(M.D., RN, RD, etc.)

☐ Other:

(Employment Specialist, Peer Support Worker, etc.)

d.
Offeror addressed the following topics related to their organization’s outcome evaluation data as described in Attachment A14, Scope of Work, including:

· Usage of State Data Collections Reporting (DCR) systems in a timely manner;

· Capacity and process to administer, collect, store, and analyze the required outcome evaluation data (e.g., assessment/outcome tools and performance measures currently utilized by staff, referrals, participation record, medical and treatment records, demographic information, and client satisfaction surveys);

· Process for staff to monitor and evaluate data (e.g., client/family satisfaction surveys, pre-/post-service tests, and culturally responsive services/practices);

· Plan for ongoing evaluation and outcome improvement for the program (e.g., data collection and analysis); and

· How their organization’s data results inform clinical practices and service quality.

YES ☐ NO ☐

Offeror described their ability to:

· Comply with the reporting requirements reflected in Division 5 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code, Division 1, and Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations; and

· Develop a process to systematically monitor, analyze, and improve the performance of the program in order to ensure client treatment outcomes are achieved.

YES ☐NO ☐
10
e.
Select all applicable training and treatment practices used, including but not limited to the following Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs), Promising Practices (PPs), and Trauma-Informed Practices:
5

☐ Brief Psychodynamic Therapy ☐ Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy

(CBT)

☐ Dialectical Behavioral Therapy ☐ Family Therapy ☐ Integrated Co-Occurring Disorder Practices ☐ Motivational Interviewing ☐ Seeking Safety ☐ Trauma-Informed Approaches ☐ Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) ☐ Stages of Change ☐ Other:

f.
Offeror included organization’s staffing-related protocols in the proposal’s miscellaneous section, addressing the following:

1. Personnel Retention Plan

· Organizational strategies for ensuring continuity of staffing and care are provided to the target population(s); and

· How the program will be staffed appropriately and in a timely manner, including plan for clinical supervision of professional and paraprofessional staff, and ability to provide services according to Medi-Cal standards.

2. Staffing Plan

· Organizational details (including staffing chart, leadership and management structure, reporting structure, and lists for staff providing supportive housing, clinical services);

· Resumés of existing staff that indicate position titles, linguistic and cultural skills, education, experience, and certifications;

· Staff training, recruitment, and retention process;

· Data showing agency’s vacancy and retention rates and trends;

· Process for providing intensive case management services at project-based sites (e.g., administrative, supervisory, and direct service staff information);

· Organizational practices related to recruiting, hiring, and promoting multi-lingual staff and/or a culturally or ethnically diverse workforce; and

· Organizational training requirements related to diversity, equity, and/or inclusion (e.g., LGBTQ+, cultural and linguistic capacity, racial equity).

3. Additional Required Plans

· Emergency/after-hours staffing; and

· Provision of quarterly staffing reports to the BHSD using County-provided or other tools.

YES ☐NO ☐
10
g.
Offeror submitted a plan to ensure the program implementation and provision of services would occur in a timely manner as described in Attachment A14, Scope of Work. Steps include, but are not limited to, the following:

· Strategies used to engage and provide services to clients within required timelines;

· Hours of operation, clinic locations, and planning strategies to meet the Network Adequacy standards;

· Providing 24/7 coverage and crisis support to clients in the program; and

· Discharge planning process and documentation in clinical record, including strategies to assess for discharge and facilitate transitions to lower or higher levels of care.

YES ☐NO ☐
10
h.
Offeror provided active plans for delivering services 1) during a pandemic AND 2) during any emergency disaster(s), while ensuring safe protocols are followed to protect staff and clients during service delivery. Offeror indicated policies and practices in place for cooperation with County-required COVID efforts (e.g., vaccination status tracking).
YES ☐NO ☐
5

Section 2: Proposed Program Description[footnoteRef:3] Total Points: [3: Written response for each criteria in Section 2 is required. Please refer to the RFSQ Section IV, “Offeror’s Submission” for additional details.]

a.
Offeror described their organization’s vision, mission, and/or values that is inclusive of promoting behaviors and practices towards a more equitable, diverse, and inclusive organizational mindset. Offeror described their organization’s leadership model inclusivity, and what tools and support is provided to improve their organization’s ability to identify and mitigate bias, respect differences, build empathetic relationships, and manage conflict.
5
b.
Offeror described how their program will be reflective of the ethnic, cultural, and linguistically diverse populations of the County, and how the program will provide services in a manner that are sensitive and aware of language and cultural influences on clients, including but not limited to:

· Capacity to provide culturally, ethnically, and linguistically appropriate services to the target population(s), including capacity for all County threshold languages as described in Appendix H, Cultural Competence Form;

· Organization methods to address barriers when staff are not available to meet the County threshold languages;

· Current and future actions and changes to ensure diversity and inclusion in service delivery; and

· Capacity to provide outreach activities focused on reaching underserved, underrepresented, and/or multicultural populations.

c.
Offeror described types of collaborations (e.g., program designs and activities) with County departments, County-contracted providers, and other agencies, including but not limited to:

· County Health System (primary care physicians, County clinics), Forensic, Diversion, and Reintegration, and Social Services Agency;

· Housing organizations (subsidy administrators, property managers);

· Justice System (judges and probation/parole officers); and

· Other County-contracted providers responsible for clients’ behavioral health treatment (mental health, substance use, or co-occurring services); and

· Organizational experience working successfully with system partners.

Offeror described how partner collaborations will:

· Increase meaningful use of client time and abilities in vocational services/sustain employment, educational programs/school and daily activities;

· Incorporate clients natural support networks (families, landlords, friends, employers, religious communities, etc.) into planning of care and services;

· Increase client ability to obtain/maintain a monthly income;

· Obtain health insurance for clients;

· Reduce client recidivism rates; and

· Maintain or obtain permanent supportive housing or permanent housing when clients exit the program.

Section 3: Historical Performance Analysis Total Points:
5

Historical data analysis will be reviewed by BHSD Program Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.

Section 4: Electronic Health Record Capacity Total Points:
5

Offeror’s electronic health record (EHR) system capacity and responses as listed in Appendix I, Offeror’s Electronic Health Record Status will be reviewed by BHSD EHR Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.

Section 5: Financial Solvency Total Points:
5

Financial records will be reviewed by the Health System Finance Department and rated according to the criteria laid out in this RFSQ.

RFSQ-BHS-FY23-0210: Adult and Older Adult System of Care Services Page 1 of 19 ATTACHMENT B14: Cross Systems Initiative Full Service Partnership Services Evaluation Criteria CATEGORY 3: Full Service Partnership Services

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .