Amendment 2 Updated RFO 52.212-2 EVALUATION.pdf

1305M226Q0101 0002

RFO 52.212-2 EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND SERVICES (OCT 2014) ADDENDUM

This provision has been tailored to this procurement:

(a) The Government intends to award a Firm-Fixed Price contract as a result of this solicitation in accordance with RFO Part 16.504, to the responsible vendor whose quote, conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government intends to issue a single-award IDIQ that allows for the issuance of FFP task orders.

The Government will utilize a Best Value Tradeoff process in accordance with FAR Part 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services. The contracting officer may perform a comparative evaluation of quotations. The Technical Proposal is the most important factor, then Past Performance.

All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price. The degree of its importance will increase commensurately with the degree of equality among the business solution factors.

Confidence Ratings shall be utilized in order to determine a vendor’s capabilities. Confidence ratings are as follows:

High Confidence - The Government has high confidence that the offeror understands the requirements, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with little to no Government intervention.

Some Confidence - The Government has some confidence that the offeror understands the requirements, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract with some Government intervention.

Low Confidence - The Government has low confidence that the offeror understands the requirements, proposes a sound approach, and will be successful in performing the contract even with Government intervention.

The quotes will be evaluated on the criteria listed below:

Volume I – Price Quote Price evaluation of reasonableness will be determined through comparison with the Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE), historical pricing, and competition. A price/cost realism analysis will not be performed.

The Government will evaluate price proposals to determine whether they are complete and in accordance with RFO Provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors- Commercial Products and Commercial Services. This includes submitting a price schedule and lump sum prices for each of the 3 scenarios attachment.

Volume II - Technical Proposal

Technical Proposal confidence rating will be determined based on the vendor’s ability to detail successful strategies for deliverables listed in the PWS for CLIN 0001, 0002, 0003, and their approach to

1305M226Q0101 0002 responding to each of the 3 listed scenarios from Attachment Number 4.

Proposals that demonstrate a capability to meet the requirements with a high level of efficiency with strategies for ensuring timely delivery will be rated more favorably while proposals assessed to have some risk for service degradation and delay will be assessed less favorably.

Volume III – Past Performance

Past performance confidence rating shall be determined based on the no more than three (3) examples of similar tower maintenance contracts the vendor has previously demonstrated.

The Government will evaluate the relevance, recency, and quality of the vendor's past performance..

Relevance will be weighted based on project magnitude, including multi-site execution, geographical complexity, and performance within a Federal agency framework.

(End of Provision)