Amendment_0002.pdf

W16ROE30148256

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

a. Incorporate Revised Specifications and Draw ings.

b. To incorporate Responses to Questions (For Informational Purpose Only).

Proposal due date is changed From: 04 June 2013 at 2:00 PM EST. To: 18 June 2013 at 2:00 PM EST.

NOTE: Offeror must acknow ledge receipt of this amendment by the date specified in the proposal (or as amended) by one of the follow ing methods: in the space provided on the SF 1442, by separates letters, or by telegram by signing block 15 below . FAILURE TO ACKNOWLDEGE AMENDMENTS BY THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMISSION, MODIFICATION, REVISION, AND WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS (FAR 15.208).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 12

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-May-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DS-13-R-0017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

02-May-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-May-2013

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK

26 FEDERAL PLAZA, RM 1843

NEW YORK NY 10278-0090

W912DS 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DS-13-R-0017

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

AMENDMENT 0002 TO THE BID SCHEDULE, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CERDEC

Flight Activity Facility, Lakehurst, NEW JERSEY; W912DS-13-R-0017

TO OFFERORS

The following changes shall be made to the drawings and specifications.

DRAWINGS

1. The following drawings have been ADDED;

NUMBER TITLE DATE

NONE

2. The following drawings are REVISED and REISSUED:

NUMBER TITLE DATE

A-513 WINDOW DETAILS May 13

CU 101 UTLITY PLAN - PARTIAL May 13 CU 105 APRON SUBDRAINAGE PLAN May 13 C-507 CEVIL DETAILS May 13

EP 401 ENLARGED PLAN VIEW May 13 EP 407 ENLARGED PLAN VIEW May 13 EP 602 POWER RISER DIAGRAM May 13 EP 602 POWER RISER DIAGRAM May 13 EP 701 PANEL SCHEDULES May 13 EP 706 PANEL SCHEDULES May 13

SPECIFICATIONS

1. The following specifications are ADDED to the specification and issued with this amendment:

SECTION TITLE DATE

NONE

2. The following specifications are REVISED and REISSUED:

SECTION TITLE DATE

08 60 45 TRANSLUCENT PANELS 20 May 13

3. The following specifications are REVISED but NOT REISSUED:

SECTION 00 22 11, PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, AND

BASIS OF AWARD – BEST VALUE LPTA:

Attachment #2 - Past Performance Questionnaire is deleted in its entirety and replaced with that which accompanies (revisions are in red text).

Paragraph 3.1.2 Factor 2-Contractor Performance In the first paragraph, last line, delete the following sentence in its entirety without substitution: "If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact: inclusive of the Corps of Engineers address and phone/fax information".

Delete paragraph 2.7 in its entirety and replace it with the following:

“2.7 Format Requirements

Submit one (1) original plus five (5) copies. All proposals shall contain the volume number and the name, address and telephone number of the Prime or Joint Venture team, or other entity identified on the cover.

The original proposal must be clearly marked as “ORIGINAL” and the original signatures must be in blue ink. Copies of the proposals must also be clearly marked as “COPY x of y” (e.g.; COPY 1 of 5). Proposal clarity and material organization in each volume are mandatory. No material shall be incorporated by reference. Each volume will be submitted separately bound. The proposal shall address and contain the information listed below.

The information will be used by the Source Selection Board to evaluate each proposal. Offerors are advised that conciseness and relevance of the proposal is important and unrelated information will not be evaluated. Proposals that provide only superficial coverage of the information required below, may not receive additional consideration and may be excluded from the competitive range. Additionally, should the proposal include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the proposal may be determined to be "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award.”

Delete paragraph 3.2.2 in its entirety and replace it with the following:

“3.2.1. GENERAL

The price proposal shall be submitted in a separate binder labeled "Volume II – Price Proposal". The sections shall parallel the submission requirements identified in the bid schedule. Provide one (1) original plus five (5) copies of bound written material (folded and bound in Volume II). Submit the Pro Forma information in a separate envelope labeled: “Volume II - Pro Forma Requirements.”

BIDDER’S QUESTIONS AND GOVERNMENT REPLY

(Questions that may be of general interest of all bidders/Government and that are not readily answered by the proceeding changes will appear below. These questions may have been paraphrased or altered to represent several questions regarding the same subject and/or clarify and simplify the question(s).

Questions and answers are issued to the Offerors/Bidders for information only.)

Q020: Specification Section 23 81 47, Water Loop and Ground Loop Heat Pump Systems, Page 24, Part 3.4.1, Paragraph i, stipulates that the ground heat exchanger is subject to a permit by rule process through the NJDEP Division of Water Quality, Bureau of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in reference to

“injection wells.” Please be advised that all well permitting and submission of well records are processed through the NJDEP Bureau of Water Systems and Well Permitting and subject to New Jersey Administrative Code (NJAC) Chapter 7:9D. As a closed loop system, the ground loop heat exchanger is not subject to the reporting stipulated in the specifications with the Bureau of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. Please confirm that this is correct.

A020: The subject specification is under revised and is reissued with a forthcoming amendment

Q021: On Drawing EP601 Key Note 17 is the circuitry “associated with BID ITEM 26”. A review of the Bid Schedule shows the last bid item to be Option 25. Please include a BID Item LINE for option 26, ”Generator.”

A021: Offerors are advised that electrical drawings containing item 26 have been revised to eliminate references to Bid Option 26. These revised drawing are issued with this amendment.

Offerors are also advised that the generator is included in base bid. The bid schedule remains correct as issued.

Q023: Is there a specification for the Paint booth for bid option 25?

A023: Yes; Offerors are directed to section 23 35 19.00 20, INDUSTRIAL VENTILATION AND

EXHAUST.

Q024: A number of our vendors and subcontractors are requesting that the bid submission date be extended. Please consider June 18, 2013.

A024: The submission date has been extended as of this amendment to 18 June, 2013.

ATTACHMENT #2

PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE

The Offeror/Contractor listed is being considered in a Source Selection by the US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District. This is a request for past performance information on a project the Offeror has identified as being relevant to this solicitation. This information will be used in the evaluation of the Offeror's performance of that project. The following information, once submitted, will be treated as confidential and will not be released. This information will only be used to evaluate this Offeror for this solicitation. Please complete and return the forms to the US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District at the following mailing address or via fax to

US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District Attn: Contracting Division, Room 1843 (Renee George) Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090 renee.george@usace.army.mil Phone: 917-790-8177 Fax: 212-264-3013

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS.

CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY DISCOURAGED FROM SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT. THE OFFEROR SHALL INSTRUCT HIS CLIENT THAT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE MUST BE RETURNED TO THE

OFFEROR FOR INCLUSION IN THE OFFEROR'S PROPOSAL. PACKAGE TO USACE. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE

RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECTYOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(A) Acceptable Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were acceptable.

An Acceptable rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Acceptable solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(U) Unacceptable Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unacceptable rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unacceptable rating.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF

THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively E VG S M U N lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary).

(End of Summary of Changes)