SOO Attachment 4 Full Operating Capability.pdf

PDF 78 KB Posted

Attached to
Survivability Test Stand
Solicitation number
FA910126RB005
Issued by

About this file

This is a Full Operating Capability (FOC) Checklist document that defines acceptance criteria for an Infrared (IR), Radar Cross-Section (RCS), and acoustic testing facility. FOC is achieved when the contractor demonstrates the ability to operationally test all specified use cases, including a fully functional test stand with full threshold rotation capabilities, complete radar systems (3-D Deep Cavity Scanner, IR, Acoustics, and SAR/LSAR), supporting infrastructure (Mission Control, Facility Storage and control, Fuel Storage/Delivery, Target Preparation, Fire Suppression, and Earthwork), data control and post-processing capabilities, and execution of all four use cases. All necessary components must complete testing with delivered reports and full functionality.

The checklist organizes FOC acceptance criteria across seven product categories: Baseline Documentation (8 criteria covering traceability, configuration, design changes, engineering change proposals, software documentation, KPP/KSA threshold demonstration, acceptance test reports, supplier/subcontractor audits, and technical document updates); Technical Plans (4 criteria including SEMP alignment, logistics and maintenance task analysis incorporation into LCSP, training plan approval, and TEMP execution); Process Control (4 criteria addressing program processes, critical program information management, configuration control board operations, and reliability growth configuration changes); Risk Assessment (3 criteria requiring technical risk identification, mitigation plan documentation, and Risk Management Plan approval); Life-Cycle Cost Estimate (3 criteria involving production cost model updates, CARD consistency, and LCSP approval); and Verification (6 criteria requiring completion of specification qualification tests, requirements verification traceability, subsystem and system test documentation, performance verification against baselines, and system-level performance validation). Each criterion is evaluated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
STS Solicitation QA Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - Section L Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Atch 8 - Delivery Order 1 SOO Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
STS JA Final_Redacted Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA910126RB0050002 SF 30.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT A - STS CDRLs Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
AEDC Industry Day STS Slides Rev. 3.pdf PDF
Survivability Test Stand Industry Day Itinerary.pdf PDF
STS Solicitation QA.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA910126RB0050001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - Section L Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - Section M Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Atch 4.7 - STS Initial Order Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 4.7 - STS Initial Order Pricing Sheet Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 4 - Section L.pdf PDF
Atch 4.7 - STS Initial Order Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 4 - Section L.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - Section M.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA910126RB0050001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - Section L Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
STS Solicitation QA.pdf PDF
Atch 4.7 - STS Initial Order Pricing Sheet Amendment 0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 5 - Section M Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
STS Solicitation Questions V2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STS Solicitation Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
STS Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Atch 2 - DRAFT STS DD254.pdf PDF
Atch 4.2 Past Present Performance Quest.pdf PDF
Atch 4.7 - STS Initial Order Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 4.8 - SB Participation Commitment Document.pdf PDF
Atch 7 - Form 5000.pdf PDF
Atch 8 - Delivery Order 1 SOO .pdf PDF
Atch 1 - Survivability Test Stand SOO.pdf PDF
SOO Attachment 1 - Survivability Test Stand Use Cases.pdf PDF
SOO Attachment 2 - Survivability Test Stand KPPs KSAs.pdf PDF
SOO Attachment 3 Initial Operating Capability.pdf PDF
Atch 3 - STS GFP List.pdf PDF
Atch 4 - Section L.pdf PDF
Atch 4.4 - STS Client Authorization Letter.pdf PDF
Atch 4.6 - STS Relevancy Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 6 - Holloman Specific Language STS.pdf PDF
Solicitation-FA910126RB005-.pdf PDF
Atch 4.1 PPI Tool - Attachment for Section L.pdf PDF
Atch 4.5 - STS Subcontractor Consent Letter.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT A - STS CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch 4.3 - PPQ Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Atch 5 - Section M.pdf PDF
Show all 47

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Full Operating Capability (FOC)

Checklist

Definition: FOC is defined as the ability to operationally test all Infrared (IR), Radar Cross- Section (RCS) and acoustic Use Case that includes completing:

1) Fully functional Test Stand with full threshold rotation (stand, turntable, engine specific fixtures)

2) Radars (3-D Deep Cavity Scanner, IR, Acoustics and SAR/LSAR)

3) Infrastructure (Mission Control, Facility Storage and control, Fuel Storage/Delivery, Target Preparation, Fire Suppression and Earthwork)

4) Ability to control, collect and post-process test data

5) Ability to execute all four (4) Use Cases

All the necessary components will have completed testing, with reports delivered and be fully functional.

Product Criteria Acceptable Unacceptable Baseline Documentation

Bi-directional traceability has been documented

Baseline Documentation

Configuration of the system or system element(s) is clearly documented

Any design changes made to the system element(s) since CDR are documented in the technical documentation (TDP)

All approved engineering change proposals (ECP), requests for deviation, and requests for waiver have been incorporated into the system product baseline

For software, a technical understanding is reached on the validity and the degree of completeness of the software test reports and as appropriate, computer system operator’s manual, software user’s manual, and the system diagnostic manual

Demonstrated the capability to satisfy KPP and KSA thresholds based on available test data, analysis or inspection

Acceptance test reports are complete, have been reviewed, and deficiencies have been addressed

Audit of supplier/subcontractor test procedures and results shows compliance with specification requirements as mapped down to the lowest level end item in the requirements verification traceability documentation, and that formal test data is complete and accurate as judged against the test procedures

All technical documents have been updated and reflected in the final TDP

TDP is complete, reviewed and accepted

Technical Plans SEMP is complete, adequate, and aligned with the program SEP

Technical Plans Logistics support analysis and maintenance task analysis are complete, and the results incorporated into the LCSP

Technical Plans Training plan that adequately supports the system operations and maintenance has been reviewed and approved

Technical Plans TEMP is up to date, signed, and being properly executed

Process Control Adequate processes are in place for the program to succeed

Process Control Critical program information (CPI) is being adequately managed and protected

Process Control CCB is processing configuration changes in accordance with industry standards, supplier instructions, processes and procedures, and maintaining the proper configuration baselines

Process Control Configuration changes have been identified as required for reliability growth to ensure threshold compliance at FOC

Risk Assessment Technical risks are identified, and mitigation plans are in place and documented in the final Risk Report

Risk Assessment Risk management process is in place demonstrated by documented execution results of existing mitigation plans associated with the purpose of the review

Risk Assessment Risk Management Plan is updated, delivered, reviewed and approved

Life-Cycle Cost Estimate

System production cost model has been updated

Updated CARD is consistent with the approved initial product baseline

Updated LCSP is delivered, reviewed and approved

Verification All system specification qualification test requirements have been successfully completed

Verification Each requirement listed in the requirements verification traceability documentation has been successfully verified in accordance with the identified methodology based on all available test data, analysis, or inspection

Verification

All subsystem and system tests are completed and documented (Test Reports)

Subsystem/element performance has been verified against the allocated baseline, and integrated functional performance has been verified against the functional baseline

Adequately detailed requirements verification traceability documentation exists outlining the method for verification for each requirement

System-level performance has been verified as satisfactory against the functional baseline

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .