STS Solicitation Questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Survivability Test Stand
- Solicitation number
- FA910126RB005
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document from a Survivability Test Stand (STS) solicitation (FA910126RB005) issued by the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center. The document contains seven substantive contractor questions with government responses, primarily addressing proposal requirements, scheduling, and site visit logistics.
Regarding proposal submission, Corvid Technologies sought clarification on pricing format preferences for Basis of Estimates (BOEs), the treatment of fee/profit in Attachment 4.7, and the level of detail required from subcontractors in cost proposals, with responses noted as pending from the Financial Management office. For project scheduling, the government provided key milestone dates: Kick-off Meeting approximately 10 days after RFP release, System Requirements Review (SRR) at approximately 30 days after RFP release, Preliminary Design Review (PDR) at 6 months after SRR, and Critical Design Review (CDR) at 9 months after PDR. Regarding the site visit to White Sands Missile Range (WSMR) and Holloman Air Force Base, the government clarified that attendance is limited to 3 persons per company due to bus space constraints for both the WSMR portion and Holloman portion of the trip. The government indicated that the February 26 agenda will be finalized closer to the industry day and confirmed the site visit will focus on physical location orientation, current building conditions, and distance assessment between main base and test site, with technical details to be discussed on the first day.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Table 1
| Survivability Test Stand (STS) - Solicitaiton Questions | |||||||
| Q# | Contractor / Agency | Solicitation/ | |||||
| Attachment Subject | Page #, Paragraph Reference | Question / Comment | OPR | Response/Document Edits | Comments from STS Team | ||
| 1 | Corvid Technologies | Pricing | Does the Government have a preferred format for BOEs within the Price Narrative? | FM | FM response pending | ||
| 2 | Corvid Technologies | Pricing | Atch 4.7 | Attachment 4.7 does not appear to have a dedicated place for fee/profit. Does the Government have a preference of how this is broken out or built into the inputs? | FM | FM response pending | |
| 3 | Corvid Technologies | Pricing | What level of detail is required from subcontractors for the cost proposal? In lieu of certified pricing data being required, does the Government want them to submit unsanitized cost proposals at the same time as the prime contractors? | FM | FM response pending | ||
| 4 | Corvid Technologies | Are there expected end dates for the System Requirements Review as well as the various PDRs and PDR Reporting that we should use for proposal purposes? | Desi Craig | Kick-off Meeting ~10 Days ARO |
SRR ~30 Days ARO PDR ~6 Months after SRR CDR ~9 months after PDR
| 5 | Corvid Technologies | Site Visit | Cover Letter | I'm assuming that you intend that to be three persons per team. We may have representatives from four of five companies on our team interested in attending. But I think your intent is that only three persons from our Corvid Team can go on the site visit. Is that interpretation correct? | Desi Craig | We are utilizing buses from Base Transportation to take everyone through WSMR and to the site. Space is limited, therefore we are limiting companies to 3 persons per company, if there are Subs they would be their own company and limited to 3. |
| 6 | Corvid Technologies | Site Visit | Cover Letter | I read paragraph 7 as there is not a limit on the number of attendees for the Holloman portion of the trip. Is this correct? If it is correct, do you have any info on what will be discussed during the Holloman portion? The reason that I'm asking is that if we have 4 or 5 team members who would like to attend, but only 3 can go to WSMR, it would be good to know if it's worth their time, or if we should just limit ourselves to 3 for the entire trip. | Desi Craig | Yes, there is a limit due to space restrictions with the buses and the unknown with how many vendors are attending. The point of the trip to the test site is to show vendors where the system will be located in reference to other buildings, show them the current condition of the buildings we intend to reutilize and get a good understanding of the distance between main base and the test site. The technical details will be discussed on the first day. |
| 7 | Corvid Technologies | Site Visit | Is the agenda for Feb 26 set well enough to know when you expect to finish? We are working on arranging travel. If it's a full day, we'll arrange accommodations for that night and fly home on Friday, but if the plan is for only a half day, we may be able to fly home that evening. Either way is great, just wanted to ask before we lock anything in. | Desi Craig | Yes, in the event that we don't get all the one-on-ones accomplished on Wednesday (the 25th) we have the 26th reserved for the rest of the one-on-ones. We will provide an agenda as we get closer to the industry day. | |
| 8 | ||||||
| 9 | ||||||
| 10 | ||||||
| 11 | ||||||
| 12 | ||||||
| 13 | ||||||
| 14 | ||||||
| 15 | ||||||
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | ||||||
| 18 | ||||||
| 19 | ||||||
| 20 | ||||||
| 21 | ||||||
| 22 | ||||||
| 23 | ||||||
| 24 | ||||||
| 25 | ||||||
| 26 | ||||||
| 27 | ||||||
| 28 | ||||||
| 29 | ||||||
| 30 | ||||||
| 31 | ||||||
| 32 | ||||||
| 33 | ||||||
| 34 | ||||||
| 35 | ||||||
| 36 | ||||||
| 37 | ||||||
| 38 | ||||||
| 39 | ||||||
| 40 | ||||||
| 41 | ||||||
| 42 | ||||||
| 43 | ||||||
| 44 | ||||||
| 45 | ||||||
| 46 | ||||||
| 47 | ||||||
| 48 | ||||||
| 49 | ||||||
| 50 | ||||||
| 51 | ||||||
| 52 | ||||||
| 53 | ||||||
| 54 | ||||||
| 55 | ||||||
| 56 | ||||||
| 57 | ||||||
| 58 | ||||||
| 59 | ||||||
| 60 | ||||||
| 61 | ||||||
| 62 | ||||||
| 63 | ||||||
| 64 | ||||||
| 65 | ||||||
| 66 | ||||||
| 67 | ||||||
| 68 | ||||||
| 69 | ||||||
| 70 | ||||||
| 71 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .