Atch 4.2 Past Present Performance Quest.pdf
PDF 540 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Survivability Test Stand
- Solicitation number
- FA910126RB005
About this file
This document is a Past-Present Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template used to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts, specifically for the Survivability Test Stand contract FA9101-26-R-B005.
The questionnaire collects contract identification information including contractor name, points of contact, CAGE code, contract number, dollar amount, contract type, period of performance, program title, and the contractor's role as prime contractor, joint venture partner, or subcontractor. Respondents provide their identification details and general comments. The evaluation framework uses a five-tier performance rating scale: Blue/Exceptional, Purple/Very Good, Green/Satisfactory, Yellow/Marginal, and Red/Unsatisfactory, with detailed definitions for each rating. Technical performance is assessed across six categories: Technical Approach, Quality, Timeliness, Responsiveness, Management and Subcontracts, and Integration. Cost/Price performance evaluates nine criteria including change response, cost control, cost forecasting, and accounting system adequacy. Respondents must provide specific cost data including original contract cost, negotiated changes, actual/projected completion cost, baseline estimate at completion, and cost underrun/overrun figures. The questionnaire requires narrative summaries discussing exceptional or unsatisfactory ratings, contractor strengths and weaknesses, design deficiencies encountered, and whether cure notices or terminations were issued. A final section asks evaluators to assess their likelihood of awarding to the contractor again given current knowledge of their execution capabilities. Completed questionnaires should be submitted via email to charles.king.42@us.af.mil and brett.moore.6@us.af.mil.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Survivability Test Stand
FA9101-26-R-B005
Attachment 4.2
ATTACHMENT 4.2
Past - Present Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION : Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
A. Contractor (Company / Division):
B. Point of Contact (Program Manager and Contracting Officer):
C. Telephone Number:
D. CAGE Code: ________________
E. Contract Number:
F. Dollar Amount:
G. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, CPAF):
H. Contract Period of Performance:
I. Program Title:
J. Brief Program Description:
K. Program Phase: (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development [EMD])
L. Contractor Performed as the:
__ Prime Contractor
__ Joint Venture Partner (specify below)
a. Managing and other partners:
b. State the specific role(s) this JV partner performed in executing the work:
__ Subcontractor (specify a. the Prime Contractor, and b. the role in executing the work
a. Identify the Prime Contractor:
b. State the specific role(s) this subcontractor performed in executing the work:
Attachment 4.2
II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Name(s):
B. Address:
C. Phone Number(s):
D. Fax Number:
E. Email Address:
F. Position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO / ACO):
G. Other suggested points of contact:
III. GENERAL COMMENTS
IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please indicate your performance rating for the contractor by circling or place an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
B BLUE / EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
P PURPLE / VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.
G GREEN / SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.
Y YELLOW / MARGINAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.
R RED / UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Blue, Purple, Yellow, or Red, and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reports [CPARs]). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify question number.
Attachment 4.2 A. TECHNICAL FACTOR - Rate the contractor’s performance for the following:
1. TECHNICAL APPROACH B P G Y R N/A
A) Quality/integrity of engineered design and technical data/report preparation efforts
B) Contractor maintained a consistent pace in completing design work
C) Design team assigned to the project was well qualified
D) Design work met the established standards of quality
E) Design work met operational requirements of the project
F) Contractor adequately identified risks and proposed risk mitigations
2. QUALITY B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements
B) Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that met the contract requirements
C) Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications
3. TIMELINESS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time
B) Contractor provided timely cost proposals
C) Contractor met critical milestones and accelerated work as necessary to minimize impact to operations
4. RESPONSIVENESS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems
B) Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations
C) Contractor identified problems as they occurred, suggested approaches to the problems, and displayed initiative to solve problems
D) Contractor attended meetings as needed and maintained communication with the Government
E) Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frame specified in the contract
5. MANAGEMENT AND SUBCONTRACTS B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor effectively managed and coordinated its work
B) Contractor cooperated with other members of the project team
C) Contractor hired, maintained and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers
D) Contractor ensured on-site manager or site superintendent was consistently present on site when work was performed on site
E) Contractor ensure the on-site manager or site superintendent had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule
AMACHER, LINDSEY G CIV USAF AFMC AFTC/PZ
@CRAIG, DESIREE L CTR USAF AFMC 704 TG/PMD-OL @GIPSON, MEGAN D CIV USAF AFMC 704 TSS/AEDC/PMD
Attachment 4.2 F) Contractor was compliant with small business subcontracting requirements
6. INTEGRATION B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor effectively integrated major components and subcomponents
B) Contractor executed an effective business model integrating multiple technical disciplines
C) Contractor provided an integration plan detailing processes, timeliness, dependencies, and management strategies for integrating and assembling a complete system
B. COST / PRICE FACTOR - Rate the contractor’s performance for the following:
CHANGE/COST CONTROL B P G Y R N/A
A) Contractor responded to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable, and supportable cost proposals.
B) Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or modifications
C) Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government
D) Contractor provided accurate and timely forecast costs
E) Contractor developed and met realistic project cost estimates
F) Contractor alerted Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred
G) Contractor submitted accurate and timely vouchers
H) Contractor ensured subcontractors/suppliers were paid in a timely manner
I) Contracor’s accounting system is adequate for management and tracking of costs
Please provide the following information regarding cost / price:
(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $_____________________
(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $_____________________
(3) Actual / Projected Cost to Complete $_____________________
(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion (EAC) $_____________________
(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $_____________________
(6) Cost Underrun / Overrun (-) $_____________________
Attachment 4.2
C. NARRATIVE SUMMARY
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Blue / Exceptional, Purple / Very Good, Yellow / Marginal, or Red / Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
3. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
4. During execution of this project, did you encounter any design deficiencies or oversights? If so, were you satisfied with the contractor’s resolution?
D. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY
1. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
Yes_____ No_____
2. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_______ Pending Termination______
No_____
Attachment 4.2 If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules):
E. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what was promised in the proposal, I definitely would_____ probably would _____ might or might not _____ probably would not _____ definitely would not _____ award to that contractor today given that I had a choice.
REMARKS:
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please email this completed questionnaire to:
charles.king.42@us.af.mil and brett.moore.6@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .