S02 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
J065--SURGICAL INSTRUMENT PM&R Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C26224Q1864
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 22

About this file

This document is an addendum to the 52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services provision, which outlines the evaluation criteria for a federal contract opportunity.

The key details are:

  • The contract opportunity is for surgical instrument repair and sharpening services for the Department of Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System.
  • The contract has a base year from 09/30/2024 to 09/29/2025 with up to four 1-year option periods.
  • The evaluation factors are price and past performance. The award will be made to the quote most advantageous to the Government.
  • The solicitation is set aside for 100% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses under NAICS code 811210.
  • Quotes are due by 09/06/2024 at 1:00 PM Central Time and must indicate acceptance of the stated terms and conditions.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to J065--SURGICAL INSTRUMENT PM&R, newest first.
File Type Posted
P11 SOW Surgical Instruments Instrument Sharpening and Repair.docx DOCX document
S02 FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM TEMPLATE.docx DOCX document
P11 VA Owned Endoscope Power Inst Maintenance List 9 Sep 2024.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
S06 36C26224Q1864 Q and A.docx DOCX document
36C26224Q1864.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

ADDENDUM to 52.212-2 EVALUATION—COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

(a) Basis for Award. The Government will issue a purchase order to the responsible quoter whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

(b) The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:

(1) Price

(2) Past Performance

(c) Evaluation Approach. The Government will evaluate quotations using the comparative evaluation process outlined in FAR 13.106-2 (b) (3), where quotations will be compared to one another to determine which provides the best benefit to the Government. The Government reserves the right to consider a quotation other than the lowest price that provides additional benefit(s). Quotations may exceed minimum requirements of the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to select a quotation that provides benefit to the Government that exceeds the minimum requirements of the solicitation, but is not required to do so. Each response must meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. The Government is not requesting or accepting alternate quotations. The evaluation will consider the following:

(1) Past Performance: The past performance evaluation will assess the relative risks associated with a quoter’s likelihood of success in fulfilling the solicitation’s requirements as indicated by the quoter’s record of past performance. The past performance evaluation may be based on the contracting officer’s knowledge of and previous experience with the supply or service being acquired; Customer surveys, and past performance questionnaire replies; Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at http://www.cpars.gov/; or any other reasonable basis.

(2) Price: The Government will evaluate the price by adding the total of all line-item prices, including all options The Total Evaluated Price will be that sum.

(d) Options. The Government will evaluate quotations for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement (End of Provision)

Effective Date: 03/15/2023 Revision 01

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .