RM Travel Support_Attach 3_52.212-2 Evaluations__10.16.25.docx

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

ATTACHMENT THREE (3)

FAR 52.212-2, ADDENDUM to EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (NOV 2021)

1.1 The Basis of award

The Government intends to award a firm fixed price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal is determined to be the most advantageous, based on the evaluation criteria below. Award will be made using best value trade-off procedures, considering price and other factors. The Government reserves the right to award without discussion; therefore, Offerors are encouraged to submit their best initial proposal.

Factor 1, Technical Capability is slightly more important than Factor 2, Past Performance. Factors 1 and 2 combined are significantly more important than Factor 3, Price. A contract will not be awarded to an Offeror with deficiencies as defined in FAR 15.001.

EVALUATION FACTORS

Proposals will be evaluated based on the following three (3) factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Capability- Travel Support Services (PWS 2.1.1 through PWS 2.1.15 Tasks and subtasks) The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s narrative response to determine the degree to which the proposal demonstrates a clear understanding and capability to perform the tasks to include all subtasks outlined in Sections 2.1.1 through 2.1.5 of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

The ratings used for Factor 1 are defined as follows:

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings

Factor 2 – Past Performance Past performance will be evaluated as a measure of the Government's confidence in the Offeror's ability to successfully perform based on prior and current contracts. Because this is a small business/8(a) set-aside, the requirements of 13 C.F.R. §§ 125.2(g) and 125.8(e) apply.

The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's recent and relevant record in providing services that meet the contract's requirements.

1. The government will assess past performance both in aggregate and on an individual contract basis when assigning a confidence rating. Information will be obtained from the Offeror’s submission and may also include sources such as Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS).

2. Greater consideration may be given to contracts deemed most relevant to the work described in this solicitation. Offerors with no relevant past performance or insufficient information will receive a “Neutral Confidence” rating.

3. Adverse past performance includes any record supporting a less than satisfactory rating or unfavorable comments from any source, including those without a formal rating system.

Evaluation Criteria Recency. An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be on-going or must have been completed within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information outside this period will not be evaluated.

Relevancy. The Government will determine how closely the Offeror’s prior work matches the scope and magnitude of this solicitation. The Government is not bound by the Offeror’s assessment of relevancy. Relevancy will be rated for individual contracts, task/delivery orders, or BPA calls submitted for evaluation.

The ratings used for Factor 2 are defined as follows:

Relevancy Assessment

Performance Confidence ratings

government has a high expectation the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 3 – Price The price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b). The Government will establish a total evaluated price based on the sum of all prices quoted. The Government may use one or more price analysis techniques. Incomplete pricing submissions may result in rejection.

Offeror shall complete the pricing information on all CLINs identified under this solicitation in Section B. Each set of CLIN will be evaluated separately.

The price for the FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services will be evaluated using the final year’s proposed pricing.

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION (CUI)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104