AMD 03 21R1334.pdf

972483

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

N62742-21-R-1334, Amendment 0003

See Next Page

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Feb-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6274221R1334

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Dec-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-Feb-2021

CODE

HAND DELIVER

NAVFAC PACIFIC

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BR (ACQ33)

4256 RADFORD DR, BLDG 62

HONOLULU HI 96818-3296

N62742 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

J-023 BACHELOR OFFICER QUARTERS-A WON 972483

US NAVSUPPACT MCB, GUAM

Amendment 0003

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

This amendment is issued to revise the following:

1. Document 00100, paragraph 1.5 Preaward Survey/Responsibility Determination is revised to add the following subparagraph g. after subparagraph f.:

g. As a part of the pre-award survey, the Contracting Officer will verify that summary level scores of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) are posted in the Supplier Performance Risk Assessment (SPRS) (https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) (see DFARS 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements (Nov 2020)) prior to award

2. Document 00202 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Document 00202, Rev 1. Areas revised are annotated with a line in the right margin.

3. Document 00600 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Document 00600, Rev 1. This amendment adds FAR 52.204-26 to Document 00600.

4. Document 00700, Clause 1.154, DFARS 252.222-7999, COMBATING RACE AND SEX STEREOTYPING (NOV 2020)(DEVIATION 2021-O0001) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with “Not Used”

5 Amendment 0002, Item 4.a deleted Section 01 14 00 in its entirety and replaced it with a revised Section 01 14 00, however, the revised Section 01 14 00 was inadvertently omitted from Amendment 0002. Revised Section 01 14 00 is provided under this Amendment 0003.

6. Specification Project Table of Contents is deleted and replaced with the attached Project Table of Contents.

7. Section 01 30 02.00 20, paragraph 1.2, SD-07 Certificates, is deleted in its entirety.

8. Section 01 33 00 Submittal Register is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 01 33 00 Submittal Register.

9. Section 01 57 19.03 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 01 57 19.03 20, Supplemental Temporary Environmental Controls, Munitions Response Explosives Safety Submission (MRESS) Guam Construction

10. Section 05 50 13, paragraph 1.2, removed SD-04 Sample – Expansion Joint Cover

11. Section 06 41 16.00 10 paragraph 1.4, is revised to delete SD-11 Closeout Submittals – LEED Documentation.

12. Section 08 71 00 is revised as follows:

a. Paragraph 2.3.6, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Provide Dormakaba RFID Locking System and associated accessories. Proximity card will be provided by the government, which includes the RFID reader and locking mechanisms. Provide two of the Dormakaba FDU G4 model. Notwithstanding any other provision of this contract, no other product will be acceptable.

b. Paragraph 2.3.7.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Provide Dormakaba Ilco 790 Mortise Lockset at each living unit.

13. Section 23 05 48.19 paragraph 1.3, is revised to add the following sentence before the last sentence, “Submit the following….PROCEDURES.”

When shown in this specification, detailed shop drawings for all required equipment, piping and ductwork, with calculations certified by a registered structural engineer, shall be submitted.

14. Section 23 65 00 is deleted in its entirety.

15. Section 26 05 48.00 10 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 26 05 48.00 10.

16. Section 26 12 19.10, is revised to delete paragraph 2.2.1.1 g.

17. Section 26 20 00 Paragraph 2.25, 1st sentence is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Provide parallel type surge protective devices (SPD) which comply with UL 1449 at the service entrance and panelboards as indicated.

18. Section 27 10 00 Part 1.5 Submittals is revised to require Government approval of all submittals identified under SD-02, SD03, SD-06, SD-07, SD-09, SD-10, and SD-11.

19. Section 27 54 00.00 20 Part 1.4 Submittals is revised to require Government approval of all submittals identified under SD-02, SD-03, SD-05, SD-06, SD-08.

20. Section 31 21 13 paragraph 1.11.1. 1st sentence is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

There is one Bachelor Officer Quarters Building, five stories high, concrete, slab-on grade construction.

21. Section 31 23 00.00 20 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 31.23 00.00 20.

22. Section 31 32 23 is revised as follows:

a. Paragraph 3.2.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

3.2.1 Grout Hole Drilling

a. Drill grout holes with standard rotary or percussion drilling equipment. No core recovery will be required and the type bit used shall be optional with the Contractor. The minimum diameter of hole shall be 50 mm at the popint of maximum penetration.

b. Perform drilling in accordance with the applicable grouting method hereinafter described.

c. All probe holes shall be grouted. Provide one probe hole for each 21 square meters (sm) of footing area and at least one probe hole for each footing smaller than 12 sm. Drill each probe hole to 3 meters deep below bottom of footing. For continuous footings, drill probe holes at least 3 meters on cener and 3 meters below the bottom of the footings.

b. Paragraph 3.2.3.2 Backfilling of Holes, last sentence is deleted in its entirety.

23. Section 32 11 20 is added.

24. Section 32 11 23 is revised as follows:

a. Paragraph 3.10, 1st sentence is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Finish the surface of the top layer of base course after final compaction by cutting any overbuild to grade and rolling with a steel-wheeled roller.

b. Paragraph 3.10, 3rd sentence is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

If the elevation of the top layer of base course is 13 mm or more below grade, scarify the top layer to a depth of at least 75 mm, blend new material in and compact to bring to grade.

c. Paragraph 3.15, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Dispose of any unsuitable materials that have been removed outside the limits of Government-controlled land.

No additional payments will be made for materials that have to be replaced.

25. Section 32 14 13.13 is added.

26. Section 32 16 15, is deleted in its entirety.

27. Section 33 11 00 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 33 11 00.

28. Section 33 40 00 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the attached Section 33 40 00.

29. Section 33 82 00 is revised as follows:

a. Paragraph 1.5 Submittals is revised to require Government approval of all submittals identified under SD-02, SD03, SD-06, SD-07, SD-08, SD-09, SD-10, and SD-11.

b. Paragraph 2.8.2 is deleted in its entirety.

30. DWGS I-100 through I-113, are revised to delete Note 1 and to replace it with the following note:

The Contractor shall be responsible for the FF&E as noted under CLIN 0002.

31. Revised Drawings: The following previously issued drawings dated 12/04/2020 are revised and reissued.

These revised drawings supersede the previously issued drawings:

NO.

SHEET

NO.

NAVFAC

NO.

DESCRIPTION

1 GI101 17255213 EGRESS CAPACITY REVISED FOR NEW EGRESS DOOR

2 GI102 17255214 EGRESS CAPACITY REVISED FOR NEW EGRESS DOOR

3 GI103 17255215 EGRESS CAPACITY REVISED FOR NEW EGRESS DOOR

4 CG501 17255252 UPDATED NOTES

5 CG502 17255253 UPDATED NOTES

6 CG503 17255254 UPDATED NOTES

7 CS101 17255256 ADDED DOOR PAD PAVER BLOCKS

8 CS401 17255259 ADDED DOOR PAD PAVER BLOCKS

9 CU501 17255277 DETAIL 4 REMOVED FROM DRAWING

10 CU503 17255279 ADDED DIMENSION

11 LP101 17255288 ADDED PAVERS TO NEW EGRESS DOOR

12 LP502 17255294 REVISED DETIAL A1 AND A3

13 LP503 17255295 REVISED DETIAL C2

14 S-114 17255307 ADDED WALL SECTION & DTL

15 S-410 17255347 ADDED WALL SECTION & DTL

16 A-101 17255351 DIRECTIONAL SIGN ADDED

17 A-114 17255356 DOOR ADDED, WINDOWWALL REDUCED

18 A-201 17255376 DOOR ADDED, WINDOWWALL REDUCED

19 A-221 17255380 DOOR ADDED, WINDOWWALL REDUCED

20 A-534 17255414 CLOSET DETAIL ADDED

21 A-601 17255418 GATES ADDED / REMARKS EDIT

22 A-611 17255421 WINDOWWALL REDUCED

23 IG601 17255446 SIGN TYPE L ADDED

24 IG622 17255450 SIGN TYPE L ADDED

25 FA001 17255460 NOTE REVISED PER REVIEW COMMENT

26 FA102 17255462 NOTES ADDED FOR NEW EGRESS DOOR

27 M-601 17255503 REVISED MECHANICAL SCHEDULE

28 E-102 17255560 ADDED AND RELOCATED LIGHT FIXTURES

32. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

End of Amendment

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

Table of Contents

DOCUMENT 00202 EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD-REV 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

1.2 COMPETITIVE RANGE

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS / RATING SCHEME

2.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 PRICE EVALUATION

2.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

2.4 RATING SCHEME

ATTACHMENTS

(A) Construction Experience Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306 (a)). Therefore, the initial proposal shall conform to the solicitation requirements and should contain the best offer from a technical and price standpoint.

Only the three (3) lowest-priced proposals will be evaluated for fair and reasonable pricing and technical acceptability. If none of the three (3) lowest-priced proposals are found to be technically acceptable, then the next three (3) lowest-priced proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability. If none of the six (6) lowest priced proposals are found to be technically acceptable, then all remaining proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability.

The Government intends to select the lowest reasonably priced technically acceptable offer and award a contract (within the funds available) without conducting discussions.

1.2 COMPETITIVE RANGE

The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the Contracting Officer determines discussions are necessary, the Contracting Officer may conduct discussions with offerors determined to be in the competitive range. The Government may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the most highly rated. If the Contracting Officer determines the number of proposals in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

1.3 ENFORCEABILITY OF PROPOSAL

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of a contract. The awardee’s proposal will be incorporated into the contract and all items proposed will become binding requirements of the contract. By submission of the offer, the offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., subcontractors with teaming agreements, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions must be equal or better and will require prior approval by the Contracting Officer.

PART II. EVALUATION FACTORS / RATING SCHEME

2.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD

The contract resulting from this solicitation will be awarded to that responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the lowest evaluated price of proposals (within the funds available) meeting the acceptability standards for the technical evaluation factors. An overall technical factor rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be considered for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor will result in the overall technical proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall technical rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” will make a proposal ineligible for award.

2.2 PRICE EVALUATION

a. One or more of the following techniques may be used to evaluate the total evaluated price to ensure that it is fair and reasonable:

Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Estimate

2.3 TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

The following evaluation factors shall be used to evaluate the technical proposals.

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE

FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 3: SAFETY

Factor 1 –EXPERIENCE:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall complete the attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) for each project submitted and complete all individual blocks. Attachment A and all information therein is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to evaluate experience. The Government will evaluate only the information provided in Attachment A and all other information provided on other than Attachment A will not be considered.

The Offeror may expand individual blocks on the Attachment A; however, Attachment A for each project submitted shall not exceed a total of four (4) single-sided pages [or, two (2) double-sided pages], 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger. Information exceeding the four (4) single-sided pages [or two (2) double-sided pages] will not be evaluated. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP.

Submit a maximum of two (2) construction projects that best demonstrates the offeror’s experience that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the types of projects described below. If the offeror submits more than two (2) projects for evaluation, the Government will evaluate the first two (2) projects submitted and disregard any other project information after the first two (2). For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant construction project is further defined as:

New construction of multi-story (4 stories or greater) bachelor enlisted quarters, bachelor officer quarters, dormitory, hotel, apartment, or condominium project, consisting of concrete building superstructure approximately $40 million or more in dollar value, completed or substantially completed within ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Substantially complete means at least 90% physically complete.

NOTES:

1. Building repair, renovation, conversion, and addition work will not be considered as a relevant project.

2. A relevant construction project is further defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

3. There is a clear distinction between “experience” and “past performance”. Experience is related to the types and amounts of projects previously accomplished. Past performance relates to how well a contractor has performed.

4. The “Offeror” is defined as the exact name in Block 14 of the Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF1442). If the Offeror is utilizing experience and past performance information of any entity other than (1) the Offeror; (2) if the Offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract; or (3) a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is now part of the Offeror, the Offeror shall provide in its proposal a fully-executed teaming agreement or other contractual agreement. The teaming agreement or other contractual agreement shall, at a minimum, (1) be signed by the Offeror and the other entity, (2) specifically reference this solicitation/contract, and (3) specify the work to be performed by the other entity such that it is clear that the other entity will be meaningfully involved in this contract. For item (3), clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the other entity in terms of the work it will specifically perform or manage in the performance of the contract at the worksite. Note that generalized statements concerning commitment of resources are not sufficient to demonstrate that an entity will be meaningfully involved in the performance of the contract.

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

Examples of “generalized statements” include a commitment of resources merely based on an entity’s “access” to resources and other generalized statements such as an entity will “provide support and expertise on the project.”

The government will only consider information provided in the teaming agreement for the purpose of determining whether the Offeror has clearly demonstrated that any entity (other than the Offeror and, if the offeror is a joint venture, its joint venture partners jointly and severally liable for the contract) will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. For experience and past performance information of a firm that has been acquired by the Offeror and is no longer a separate legal entity, the Offeror shall provide an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate that the predecessor firm is now part of the Offeror in Block 1 of Attachment A.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation and acceptability include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements and Part II, paragraph 2.4 below.

Factor 2 –Past Performance

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1. If a completed CPARS or CCASS evaluation is not available, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) shall be completed and signed by the contracting agent and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration. A PPQ shall not be from a prime contractor to a subcontractor. The Offeror shall provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offerors may submit PPQs previously submitted for other solicitations.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

NOTES:

1. The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor. In addition, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

2. Performance awards, letter of appreciation, certificates, or additional information submitted will not be considered.

3. See Notes for Factor 1.

(b) Basis of Evaluation

The Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and past performance on other relevant construction projects currently documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government may consider information in the Offeror’s proposal as well as information gathered from other sources including former customers, Government agencies, Federal databases and other references. The information provided by the Offeror may provide the

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

major portion of the information used in the Government’s evaluation for past performance. The Government however, is not restricted to the information provided by the Offeror and may use other sources (such as those listed in the submittal requirements) to assess past performance information.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, and the context of the data in the Offeror’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance. The Offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown past performance shall be considered “acceptable”.

The basis of evaluation and acceptability are as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements and Part II, paragraph 2.4 below.

Factor 3 – SAFETY

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: For a partnership, joint venture, or LLC etc., separate OSHA300 logs, OHSHA Form 300A, TRC and DART rate submittal requirements are required for each partner/member;

however, only one safety narrative is required. If any Offeror/partner/LLC member has TRC and/or DART rates, then, TRC and DART Rates shall not be submitted for any subcontractors or affiliates of that Offeror/partner/LLC member. If any Offeror/partner/LLC member does not have TRC and/or DART rates, provide an explanation as to why it is unable to provide them and submit TRC and DART information specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) below for the firm(s) that will be providing the on-site construction labor resources for that Offeror/partner/LLC member.

(1) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate and Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate: Submit the OSHA DART and TRC rates and supporting OSHA 300 log and OSHA Form 300A summary for the three previous complete calendar years (2020, 2019, 2018). If an offeror does not have the OSHA DART or TRC rates, affirmatively state so, explain why and submit equivalent DART and TRC rates based upon the OSHA formula shown below. The following provides the OSHA formula for DART and TRC:

The OSHA DART rate is calculated by adding up the number of incidents involving work related deaths, one or more Lost Days, one or more Restricted Days, or the transfer of an employee to a different job within the same company, multiplying that number by 200,000, and then dividing that number by the number of employee labor hours worked.

Total Number of DART incidents x 200,000 DART Rate = Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

The OSHA TRC rate is calculated by multiplying the number of recordable cases by 200,000, and then dividing that number by the number of labor hours.

Total Number of Recordable Cases x 200,000 TRC Rate =Number of employee labor hours worked

“Recordable cases” include each work related death and each work related injury or occupational illness involving days away from work, restricted work, transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

(2) Technical Approach for Safety: Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202-REV 1

compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work. The offeror will describe methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels. Additionally, the contractor will describe their methodology to execute an effective program that utilizes sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

There is no page limitation to address paragraph (1) above. The narrative to address paragraph (2) above shall not exceed two (2) pages (single-sided, 8.5” x 11”, 1” margin left/right/top/bottom, and 10-point font or larger).

Narrative pages shall contain the page number.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation and acceptability are DART rates of 2.99 or less for each of the three previous years (2020, 2019, 2018), TRC rates of 4.49 or less for each of the three previous years (2020, 2019, 2018) and an acceptable technical approach for safety as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements for Factor 3 and Part II, paragraph 2.4 below.

2.4 RATING SCHEME

The following information is pertinent to the rating of the technical proposals:

(a) Deficiency: A material failure of the proposal to meet a Government requirement.

(b) If the proposal contains an “UNACCEPTABLE” rating for any of the Factors, the overall rating of the technical proposal will be “UNACCEPTABLE”. An overall technical rating of “UNACCEPTABLE makes a proposal ineligible for award.

FACTOR 1 – EXPERIENCE and FACTOR 3 – SAFETY

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

ACCEPTABLE Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

UNACCEPTABLE Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

J-023 BACHELOR OFFICER QUARTERS A WON 972483

MARINE CORPS BASE GUAM

RFP N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00202 – ATTACHMENT A

ATTACHMENT A

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2

1. Name of Entity that Performed Project*: _________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________ Phone Number: __________________________________ Entity Identifier (DUNS #): __________________________ Point of Contact: _________________________________ Contact Phone Number: _____________________________

a. If the firm that performed the project has been acquired by the Offeror and is no longer a separate legal entity, the Offeror shall provide an explanation of the acquisition sufficient to demonstrate that the predecessor firm is now part of the Offeror.

b. Name of Entity that Performed Work that Experience is Claimed for* (i.e.; if the project was performed by a J/V and Offeror is claiming experience of one of the J/V members that performed work on the project, state the exact legal name of the JV member the Offeror claims experience for): __________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________ Phone Number: ___________________________________ Entity Identifier (DUNS #): __________________________ Point of Contact: __________________________________ Contact Phone Number: _____________________________

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

5. Type of work:

New Construction Renovation Repair Alteration Other (explain):

6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):

DOCUMENT 00202 – ATTACHMENT A

Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects.

7. Construction Project:

Total Construction Award Amount: $___________________ Final Construction Price: $______________________

Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

Design-Build Design-Bid-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain):

8. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.:

unique features, square footage, construction methods, any problems encountered and how it was resolved), including any sustainable features or USGBC LEED certifications. If design-build, include a description of the design-effort.

DOCUMENT 00202 – ATTACHMENT B

ATTACHMENT B

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC PACIFIC (ACQ33) REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC PACIFIC (ACQ33) WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC PACIFIC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC PACIFIC (ACQ33). PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC PACIFIC (ACQ33) POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH

BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

MARINE CORPS BASE GUAM, AGANA, GUAM

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00600-REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOCUMENT 00600-REV 1

REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

9/20

1.1 SUMMARY

1.2 FAR 52.204-8, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020)/DFARS 252.204-

7007, ALTERNATE A (APR 2020)

1.3 FAR 52.204-24, REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2020)

1.4 FAR 52.204-26, COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES-

REPRESENTATION (OCT 2020)

1.5 FAR 52.209-7, INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2018)

1.6 FAR 52.209-13, VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROL TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS-CERTIFICATION

(JUL 2020)

1.7 FAR 52.219-4, NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS

CONCERNS (MAR 2020) (DEVIATION 2020-O0008 REV. 1)

1.8 DFARS 252.203-7005 REPRESENTATION RELATING TO COMPENSATION OF FORMER DOD

OFFICIALS (NOV 2011)

1.9 DFARS 252.204-7017, PROHIBITION ON THE ACQUISITON OF COVERED DEFENSE

TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES—REPRESENTATION (DEC 2019)

1.10 DFARS 252.204-7019, NOTICE OF NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2020)

1.11 DFARS 252.219-7000, ADVANCING SMALL BUSINESS GROWTH (SEP 2016)

1.12 DFARS 252.225-7974, REPRESENTATION REGARDING BUSINESS OPERATIONS WITH THE

MADURO REGIME (CD 2020-O0005) (FEB 2020)

1.13 DFARS 252.236-7010, OVERSEAS MILITARY CONSTRUCTION – PREFERENCE FOR UNITED

STATES FIRMS (JAN 1997)

1.14 DFARS 252.247-7022, REPRESENTATION OF EXTENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY SEA (JUN 2019)

-- End Document Table of Contents--

N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00600-REV 1

REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

9/20

Request for Proposal No: RFP N62742-21-R-1334________________

Name and Address of Offeror: _______________________________________

Business Phone:(___)____________________ Facsimile Phone:(__)______________

CEC/DUNS Number: _______________________ TIN NUMBER:_______________________

CAGE Number:____________________________ Email Address:____________________

1.1 SUMMARY

The following clauses are from the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). Complete the paragraphs below, and return with the proposal.

1.2 FAR 52.204-8, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020) /

DFARS 252.204-7007, ALTERNATE A (APR 2020)

(a)(1) The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 236116.

(2) The small business size standard is $39.5 million.

(3) The small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, other than on a construction or service contract, but which proposes to furnish a product which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b)(1) If the provision at FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is included in this solicitation, paragraph (e) of this provision applies.

(2) If the provision at FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management, is not included in this solicitation, and the Offeror has an active registration in the System for Award Management (SAM), the Offeror may choose to use paragraph (e) of this provision instead of completing the corresponding individual representations and certifications in the solicitation. The Offeror shall indicate which option applies by checking one of the following boxes:

(i) Paragraph (e) applies.

(ii) Paragraph (e) does not apply and the Offeror has completed the individual representations and certifications in the solicitation.

(c)(1) The following representations or certifications in SAM are applicable to this solicitation as indicated:

(i) 52.203-2, Certificate of Independent Price Determination. This provision applies to solicitations when a firm-fixed-price contract or fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment is contemplated, unless–

(A) The acquisition is to be made under the simplified acquisition procedures in part 13;

N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00600-REV 1

(B) The solicitation is a request for technical proposals under two-step sealed bidding procedures; or

(C) The solicitation is for utility services for which rates are set by law or regulation.

(ii) 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions. This provision applies to solicitations expected to exceed $150,000.

(iii) 52.203-18, Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements-Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(iv) 52.204-3, Taxpayer Identification. This provision applies to solicitations that do not include the provision at 52.204-7, System for Award Management.

(v) 52.204-5, Women-Owned Business (Other Than Small Business). This provision applies to solicitations that-

(A) Are not set aside for small business concerns;

(B) Exceed the simplified acquisition threshold; and

(C) Are for contracts that will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(vi) 52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(vii) 52.209-2, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations-Representation.

(viii) 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. This provision applies to solicitations where the contract value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(ix) 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law. This provision applies to all solicitations.

(x) 52.214-14, Place of Performance-Sealed Bidding. This provision applies to invitations for bids except those in which the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(xi) 52.215-6, Place of Performance. This provision applies to solicitations unless the place of performance is specified by the Government.

(xii) 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations (Basic, Alternates I, and II). This provision applies to solicitations when the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(A) The basic provision applies when the solicitations are issued by other than DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard.

(B) The provision with its Alternate I applies to solicitations issued by DoD, NASA, or the Coast Guard.

N62742-21-R-1334

DOCUMENT 00600-REV 1

(C)The provision with its Alternate II applies to solicitations that will result in a multiple-award contract with more than one NAICS code assigned.

(xiii) 52.219-2, Equal Low Bids. This provision applies to solicitations when contracting by sealed bidding and the contract will be performed in the United States or its outlying areas.

(xiv) 52.222-22, Previous Contracts and Compliance Reports. This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xv) 52.222-25, Affirmative Action Compliance. This provision applies to solicitations, other than those for construction, when the solicitation includes the clause at 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity.

(xvi) 52.222-38, Compliance with Veterans’ Employment Reporting Requirements. This provision applies to solicitations when it is anticipated the contract award will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold and the contract is not for acquisition of commercial items.

(xvii) 52.223-1, Biobased Product Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that require the delivery or specify the use of USDA–designated items; or include the clause at 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts.

(xviii) 52.223-4, Recovered Material Certification. This provision applies to solicitations that are for, or specify the use of, EPA–designated items.

(xix) 52.223-22, Public Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Reduction Goals-Representation.

This provision applies to solicitations that include the clause at 52.204-7.)

(xx) 52.225-2, Buy American Certificate. This provision applies to solicitations containing the clause at 52.225-1.

(xxi) 52.225-4, Buy American-Free Trade Agreements-Israeli Trade…