N4008526R0058 0008.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

See Section 00 70 00 - Conditions of the Contract

The purpose of this Amendment is as follows:

1. Provide Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPIs):

The Phase II proposal due date of 27 July 2026 NLT 2:00 P.M. EDT remains unchanged.

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE, NORFOLK, VA 23511-0395

UNITED STATES

Mary Pool, Email: mary.a.pool3.civ@us.navy.mil

J

See Continuation Sheet

N4008526R0058

WO# 1894554

1 31

16 Jul 2026

04 Mar 2026

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

1. PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY RESPONSES:

PPI #

Reference

Question Government Response Page Section Paragraph

French

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts - G2010

Roadways

Part Three "B" Secton G2010 states "A subsurface drainage system must be provided in all roadway areas." The Camp

Lejuene PWD Civil Design

Guidance states "No subsurface drainage system under roadways or parking areas". Please clarify which is applicable.

PENDING RESPONSE

French

Creek -

Part Three

"B" -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - 3.2.1.6

Dumpster

Pad and

Enclosure

Part Three "B" Section 3.2.1.6 states: "Conceal dumpsters with a decorative, gated structure in accordance with

Camp Lejeune BEAP provided in Part 6." The Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance states: "Ensure adequate dumpster accessibility for front loading trash trucks – no gates on enclosure." The RFP explicitly requires gates on the dumpster enclosure while the

PWD Guidance explicitly prohibits them, citing front-load trash truck accessibility

(Mack TerraPro w/40yd

Mammoth style bodies) as the operational basis for the prohibition. Please clarify whether dumpster enclosures on this project are required to include gates per Section

3.2.1.6, or whether gates are prohibited per the PWD Civil

Design Guidance. If gates are prohibited, please confirm the enclosure design should provide open access suitable for front-loading trash truck operations.

PENDING RESPONSE

French

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts -

G205005

Plantings

Part Three "B" Section

G205005 specifies: "Provide 3 inches of double shredded hardwood mulch over weed control fabric at planting beds." The Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance states: "Use 2-5" river rock for landscape beds in lieu of hardwood mulch." These are mutually exclusive materials for the same application. The two requirements cannot be reconciled without a clear determination of which governs. Please clarify which mulch material is required for landscape beds on this project:

(a) 3 inches of double shredded hardwood mulch per

ESR G205005, or (b) 2–5 inch river rock per the PWD Civil

Design Guidance. If river rock governs, please confirm the weed barrier fabric requirement from G205005 is still applicable.

PENDING RESPONSE

French

Creek -

Part Three

"B" -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - 3.2.1.10

Site

Drainage &

Storm

Water

Runoff

Part Three "B" Section

3.2.1.10 states: "Post-construction stormwater

(PCSM) plans will be reviewed and approved by

MCB Camp Lejeune Civil

Design Branch through their

MS4 Stormwater Program," and also states that "there are no existing stormwater permits on the project site." The PWD

Civil Design Guidance distinguishes between two submittal paths: (a) submit to

NCDEQ Wilmington Regional

Office if modifying an existing state-owned permit, or (b) submit to Camp Lejeune's

MS4 program if obtaining a new permit or modifying an

MS4-owned permit. With no existing permit on the project site, the base project permit

For basis of bid, the project site will require a new permit through MCBCL’s

MS4 program. If the project encroaches into SW8120302 or SW8211111 permit boundaries, then permit modifications will go through NCDEQ

Wilmington Regional

Office.

appears to fall under the MS4 path. However, if construction disturbance encroaches into adjacent permit boundaries

(SW8120302 or SW8211111), those modifications must go to

NCDEQ. The RFP does not clearly define the expected permit path or whether adjacent permit boundary encroachment is anticipated.

Please clarify: (a) Which permit submittal path applies for the project's primary stormwater permit – NCDEQ

Wilmington Regional Office or the Camp Lejeune MS4 program? (b) Is encroachment into the SW8120302 or

SW8211111 permit boundaries anticipated, and if so, which party is responsible for coordinating and submitting the permit modification to

NCDEQ?

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts - G2010

Roadways and

G202003

Paved

Surfaces

Part Three "B" Sections

G2010 and G202003 specify minimum bituminous pavement sections by layer thickness but do not designate a specific NCDOT asphalt mix type for the surface course.

The ESR defers mix type selection to the Designer of

Record. The Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance specifies: "Use S9.5C not

S9.5B for all asphalt surface courses to include light and heavy duty sections." The project includes both the parking area (east of H.M.

Smith Blvd.) and potentially new roadway tie-in work.

Clarity is needed on whether

S9.5C is required across all paved surfaces on this project.

Please confirm that NCDOT

S9.5C surface mix is required for all asphalt surface courses

Design pavement sections in accordance with ESR language for minimum specified sections. Use

MCBCL Civil Design

Guidance for additional information.

on this project, including both the parking lot east of H.M.

Smith Blvd. and any roadway paving, in accordance with the

PWD Civil Design Guidance.

Please also confirm this requirement supersedes the

Designer of Record's discretion implied in ESR

G2010.

French

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts -

G205005

Plantings

Part Three "B" Section

G205005 specifies:

"Encompass planting beds not used for bioretention filters with steel edging except where beds abut walls or sidewalks."

The Camp Lejeune PWD Civil

Design Guidance states:

"Landscape bed edge restraint shall either be concrete or aluminum (no painted steel)."

The ESR requires steel edging;

the PWD Guidance explicitly prohibits painted steel and limits materials to concrete or aluminum. These requirements are in direct conflict . Please clarify which material is required for landscape bed edging on this project: (a) steel edging per ESR G205005, or

(b) concrete or aluminum per the PWD Civil Design

Guidance. If concrete or aluminum is required, please confirm whether raw

(unpainted) steel edging is also acceptable or specifically excluded.

Follow MCBCL’s Civil

Design Guidance. Use of steel edging, regardless of surface finish, is prohibited on MCBCL

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts -

G205005

Plantings

The Camp Lejeune PWD Civil

Design Guidance states: "Add

18" minimum concrete mow strip around facilities to minimize maintenance and eliminate damage from rocks."

Neither Part Three "B"

Chapter 3 nor ESR G20 references a concrete mow strip around the building perimeter. The ESR G2050

Follow the Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance to provide 18" minimum concrete mow strip around facilities to minimize maintenance and eliminate damage from rocks.

and G205005 sections address landscaping and soil preparation adjacent to the building but do not mention this feature. It is unclear whether the concrete mow strip is required. Please confirm whether an 18-inch minimum concrete mow strip around the new BEQ building(s) is required.

French

Creek -

G20 Site

Improveme nts -

G204090

Other Site

Improveme nts

Part Three "B" Section

G204090 - Equipment Drying

Area explicitly states that 9-guage chain link fence fabric is reequired. However the

BEAP Section 3.4.9 chainlink fence is prohibited. Please confirm Chainlink fence is acceptable for use per section

G204090.

PENDING RESPONSE

French

Creek -

General

Please provide the most current available CAD files representing existing conditions for all areas associated with the project.

This request includes, at a minimum, existing topographic information, site features, pavement limits, grading, and all available underground utility information (including utility type, size, location, and depth where available)

PENDING RESPONSE

Hadnot

Point - Part

Three "B"

Chapter 3 -

Section

3.2.1.10

Part Three "B" Section

3.2.1.10 explicitly states, in the context of the System 1 legacy storm sewer replacement:

"Conflict boxes are an acceptable solution to resolve utility conflicts." The Camp

Lejeune PWD Civil Design

Guidance (24 March 2026) states under Utilities: "Reroute existing utilities to resolve conflicts vice other methods, e.g. conflict box" — establishing rerouting as the required approach and listing

Conflict boxes are permissible if the DOR can demonstrate that rerouting is not feasible.

conflict boxes as an example of a method that should not be used. These requirements are directly contradictory. Please clarify which requirement governs for the System 1 storm sewer replacement scope: (a) Are conflict boxes an acceptable solution for utility conflicts encountered along the System 1 replacement route per Section

3.2.1.10, or (b) must all utility conflicts be resolved by rerouting per the PWD Civil

Design Guidance?

Hadnot

Point - Part

Three "B"

Chapter 3 -

Section

3.2.1.6

Part Three "B" Section 3.2.1.6 requires: "Conceal dumpsters with a decorative, gated structure in accordance with

Camp Lejeune BEAP provided in Part 6." The Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance states: "Ensure adequate dumpster accessibility for front loading trash trucks – no gates on enclosure." The RFP explicitly requires gates on the dumpster enclosure while the

PWD Guidance explicitly prohibits them, citing front-load trash truck accessibility

(Mack TerraPro w/40yd

Mammoth style bodies) as the operational basis for the prohibition.Please clarify whether dumpster enclosures on this project are required to include gates per Section

3.2.1.6, or whether gates are prohibited per the PWD Civil

Design Guidance. If gates are prohibited, please confirm the enclosure design should provide open access suitable for front-loading trash truck operations.

Follow the Camp Lejeune

PWD Civil Design Guidance to provide accessibility for front loading trash trucks with no gates, as well as the

Camp Lejeune BEAP requirements

Hadnot

Point - Part

Three "B"

Chapter 3 -

Section

3.1.2.2.1

Section 3.1.2.2.1 states that the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer

"will be re-routed to create more buildable area on the project site" and that "a bypass must be constructed around or through the Water Plant Site."

It further states that once the bypass is connected, the existing piping and manholes shall be removed. Section

3.2.1.8.1 confirms the rerouting intent but defers the specific routing to the

Designer of Record. Two ambiguities arise from this language: First, "around or through the Water Plant Site" represents two materially different routing options with different requirements. Does the Government have a preferred or required routing for the sanitary sewer reroute

— "around" the Water Plant

Site or "through" it? If both are acceptable, what coordination or approvals are required for access through Building 20 if that route is chosen? (b) Is a separate temporary in-service bypass line required during construction of the permanent sewer reroute, or is the

Contractor expected to design and construct the permanent rerouted line such that continuous service is maintained without a separate bypass?

DOR is responsible to determine an acceptable reroute alignment. Bldg. 20 will soon be demolished. It is anticipated this area will be available to support potential reroute areas.

Contractor must design and install a permanent reroute while keeping the existing line active. Once tie-in is complete, existing line and appurtenances shall be removed.

Point - Part

Three "B"

Chapter 3 -

Section

3.1.2.2.2

Section 3.1.2.2.2 states:

"Public Works Department requires new tees to be cut into mains for the relocated section. Tap and saddle sleeves are not permitted."

The Camp Lejeune PWD Civil

Design Guidance (24 March

2026) states: "All water connections shall be cut in tee;

Tapping sleeves are prohibited. Contractor shall cut in new tees.

tapping sleeve must be approved by PWD" — indicating that tapping sleeves are not categorically prohibited but are subject to case-by-case PWD approval.

Please clarify which standard governs for water main connections on this project: (a)

Are tapping sleeves categorically prohibited as stated in Section 3.1.2.2.2, or

(b) may tapping sleeves be used with prior PWD approval per the Civil Design

Guidance? If tapping sleeves remain categorically prohibited, please confirm that this absolute prohibition applies to all connections on this project including tie-ins along G Street and Holcomb

Boulevard.

Hadnot

Point - Part

Three "B"

Chapter 3 -

Section

3.2.1.10

Section 3.2.1.10 establishes that the MS4 permitting path applies where: (1) the site pre-dates 1988 NCDEQ stormwater regulations, or (2)

MCB Camp Lejeune has ownership of a prior issued

NCDEQ stormwater permit. It further states "all other permit modifications must be reviewed and approved by

NCDEQ through the

Wilmington Regional Office."

The CLJ-Guidance states:

"Submit to NCDEQ

Wilmington Regional Office if modifying an existing permit still owned by the state" and

"Submit to MCB Camp

Lejeune's MS4 program if obtaining a new permit or if modifying an existing permit owned by MS4." The applicable permit —

SW8891107 — is an existing

State stormwater permit. The critical question is whether

NCDEQ has ownership of

SW8891107. Modification will go through the

Wilmington Regional

Office. Do not use Express

Program. Standard Program is faster due to Express

Program project backlog and staffing issues with NCDEQ.

Refer to NCDEQ’s website for latest fees effective

07/01/2025.

Camp Lejeune now holds ownership of SW8891107

(triggering the MS4 path) or whether NCDEQ still holds it as a state-issued permit

(triggering the NCDEQ

Wilmington Regional Office path). This distinction determines the submittal package requirements, the reviewing authority. Please confirm: (a) Which entity currently holds ownership of

State Stormwater Permit

SW8891107 — NCDEQ or

MCB Camp Lejeune? (b)

Based on that ownership, which submittal path applies for the required Major

Modification: the NCDEQ

Wilmington Regional Office or the Camp Lejeune MS4 program? (c) Please identify the specific permit reviewer or point of contact for the modification submittal. (d) If the NCDEQ path applies, does the express review timeline

(65% design target per the

PWD Guidance) apply to a

Major Modification, and what is the current express review fee under the 2025 fee schedule?

Survey Please provide a copy of the

CAD Files for the

Survey/Civil scopes.

Solicitation The solicitation includes references to two different periods of performance:

several for 1,461 Calendar

Days and another for 1,825 calendar days in the Project

Shcedule Narrative portion.

Please confirm the period of performance for the Project is

1,461 Calendar Days.

PoP is 1,461 days.

Part 2 -

General

Requireme nts, Div 01

91 00.15

22 and Part

6 Camp

Lejeune

Mechanical

Design

Guidenanc e

01 91 00.15 22, Page 29 -

3.2.14.2.2: Sample strategy for equipments is described w/ specific group requirements.

Camp Lejeune Mechanical

Design Guidance 1AUG2024

Note 33. states sample strategy requirements to be changed from 20% to 100% for all equipment. Should 3.2.14.2.2

Sample Strategy be revised to reflect 100%?

Yes. Sample Strategy to be revised to reflect 100%.

Part 6, D.10 Camp

Lejeune

Mechanical

Design

Guidance

1AUG2024

76.

Part 6, D.10 Camp Lejeune

Mechanical Design Guidance

1AUG2024, item 76 notes that

DALT is to be 100% Duct Air

Leakge Test on all projects.

D.14, 23 05 93-3.1.1 notes

25%. Please verify DALT is to be 100% of duct.

PENDING RESPONSE

Part Three

"A" -

Chapter 5 -

Standard

Requireme nts Page 8

5.0 Room Requirements:

Please verify Government

Furnished Refrigerators in 2+0 rooms do not require plumbing

DW connection.

PENDING RESPONSE

23 05

48.19

Please verify ATFP Bracing is only required for mechanical equipment over 31lbs hung from structure, not piping and duct distribution systems.

PENDING RESPONSE

23 81 00 2.3.1.10 23 81 00-2.3.1.10: PTAC Unit

Controls notes the function and temperature controls must be integral to unit. We undestand this to be a built in thermostat only. If a wall mounted thermostat is desired, please cllairfy.

PENDING RESPONSE

00 70 00 Please confirm FAR Clause

52.211-13 Time Extensions applies to this Project and will be incorporated into the

Contract Agreement.

Confirmed. FAR 52.211-13 to be incorporated via

Amendment.

00 70 00 Section 52.211-12 Liquidated

Damages within 00 70 00 notes "If Option Item 0004 for

Barracks at MCB Camp

Lejeune French Creek is exercised, if the contractor

Please see Amendment 0007 with updated liquidated damages.

fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the

Government in the amount of

$81,996.80 for each calendar day until the work is complete or accepted." Please confirm this $81,996.80 are exclusively for the Bid Option for the

French Creek Barracks

Building and are independent from the $90,250.86/CD noted for the Base Bid.

01 59 17 Please confirm MCB Camp

Lejeune is designated as a

Large Quantity Hazardous

Waste Generator and that all hazardous waste discovered within MCB Camp Lejeune and the confines of

Government facilities will identified as being generated by the Government and that

Government will sign hazardous waste manifests.

Part 3B, Ch. 6 /

ESR G20 /

Section

G2010

Roadways

This section in both RFPs

(French Creek and Hadnot

Point) states "Design of fire lanes must be in accordance with the requirements of ESR

Section D4090 and must take into consideration the static and dynamic support weight of the vehicles in accordance with the latest ASHTO H20 loading requirements and by existing soil conditions." We cannot locate ESR Section

D4090; is this an erroneous reference? With respect to pavement design, please provide the appropriate design vehicle(s) and anticipated traffic volume (number of passes over design life) to use in PCASE analysis for the fire lanes.

This section in both RFPs

(French Creek and Hadnot

Point) states that pavements are to be designed "based on the anticipated daily traffic over the life of the project

(25 years)". Please provide the anticipated traffic patterns, including the design vehicles (e.g.

passenger cars, pick-up trucks, fire trucks/emergency vehicles, etc.) and the anticipated daily traffic volume for each vehicle and for each pavement type

(light duty and heavy duty).

Part 3B, Ch. 6 /

ESR G20

/ Section

G201090

Other

Roadway s

1st paragraph

This section in both RFPs

(French Creek and Hadnot

Point) states "Design of fire lanes must be in accordance with the requirements of ESR

Section D4090 and must take into consideration the static and dynamic support weight of the vehicles in accordance with the latest ASHTO H20 loading requirements and by existing soil conditions." We cannot locate ESR Section

D4090; is this an erroneous reference? With respect to pavement design, please provide the appropriate design vehicle(s) and anticipated traffic volume (number of passes over design life) to use in PCASE analysis for the fire lanes.

PENDING RESPONSE

Part 3B, Ch. 6 /

ESR G20

/ Section

G2010

Roadway s and

G202003

Paved

Surfaces

2nd paragraph

In both RFPs (French Creek and Hadnot Point), Section

G2010 Roadways (2nd paragraph) states "The minimum PCC pavement must be 8-inch concrete surface course over 6-inch aggregate base course. The minimum bituminous concrete pavement section for regular/light-duty paving is 3” S9.5C surface course over 8” ABC base course. The minimum bituminous concrete pavement section for heavy-duty paving must be 2-inch bituminous surface course, 3-inch bituminous base course, and

12-inch aggregate subbase course". However, Section

G202003 Paved Surfaces (in both RFPs) provides slightly different minimum pavement sections - specifically, the minimum PCC pavement includes 6-inch concrete instead of 8-inch concrete and the minimum heavy duty bituminous pavement includes only 8-inch aggregate base course instead of 12-inch aggregate base course (RFP also incorrectly refers to ABC as "aggregate subbase course"). Are these differences due to the pavements being different use types (e.g. Roadway vs.

Parking Lot)? Please confirm the minimum pavement sections for both roadways and parking lots. Please also provide the anticipated traffic patterns, including the design vehicles (e.g. passenger cars, pick-up trucks, fire trucks/emergency vehicles, etc.) and the anticipated daily traffic volume for each vehicle and for each pavement type

(roadway, parking lot, light duty, and heavy duty).

Part 3B, Ch. 3 /

Section

3.2.1.2

Service

Access

1st paragraph

This section in both RFPs

(French Creek and Hadnot

Point) states "Design access streets and parking areas to accommodate service vehicles and fire protection equipment.

Provide vehicular access to aerial fire apparatus..." With respect to pavement design, please provide the appropriate design vehicle(s) and anticipated traffic volume

(number of passes over design life) for both the "service vehicles" and "aerial fire apparatus" to use in PCASE analysis.

PENDING RESPONSE

2 Part 3B, Ch. 6 /

ESR G10

Governm ent

Provided

Geotechn ical

3rd paragraph

This section in both RFPs

(French Creek and Hadnot

Point) states that a geotechnical report is to be prepared including recommendations for pavement design as specified and in accordance with UFC

3-201-01, Civil Engineering.

Informati on

In UFC 3-201-01, Chapter 4

Pavements, Section 4-1 (first paragraph), it states "Use pavement design criteria and procedures recognized by the

DOT in the state in which the project is located or UFC 3-

250-01. When state design criteria and procedures are used, the entire pavement section must conform in every detail to the applicable state criteria and materials must conform to the DOT material specifications." Please confirm the appropriate design criteria to use for pavement design on this project. Is it

UFC 3-250-01 or NCDOT

(since the project is in North

Carolina)?

00 21 00 5.i Please confirm the fifteen (15) conceptual drawings/sheets to be included in the proposal can be in 11" x 17" sized-pages.

Propose per RFP.

103 of

Vol 1 of 4

01 33

10.05 20

2.2.1

Design

Submittal

Packages

We suggest that the noted

Critical Path Design

Submittals to allowed to use only these submittals: CDW, Prefinal & Final. By eliminating the Design

Development submittal the critical path process will allow for the overall project schedule to be meet.

Propose per RFP.

23 09 00 Please confirm if RF wireless room thermostats would be acceptable? They offer the greatest control and efficiency and improve project pricing as this reduces conduit and wiring in the units. And can be American made.

Wireless thermostats are not acceptable

Attachment

H-Vol 2 of

2, item 84 of Camp

Lejeune

Mechanical

Attachment H - Vol 2 of 2, item 84 of the Camp Lejeune

Mechanical Design Guidance dated 1Aug2024 notes

Enthalpy Wheels are not permitted. Please consider the use of enthalpy wheels in

Follow Camp Lejeune

Mechanical Guidance.

Enthalpy wheels are not permitted. We have experienced numerous problems with maintenance

Design

Guidance lieu of the energy recovery cores for the DOAS for a more efficient and compact unit.

and replacement of enthalpy wheels at Camp Lejeune.

Please provide a Medium

Voltage One-Line Diagram of the affected areas at both sites to determine the demolition impacts to maintain supporting infrastructure for existing-to-remain facilities and to determine the means of integrating the new facilities into the campus MV distribution system. A supporting utility site plan with electrical manhole names and existing configuration to buildings would also be beneficial to determine the best modifications to the system to support existing and new buildings.

All available information has been provided. Please refer to Part 6 GIS information provided.

Part 3A D202001

D202001-Pipe and Fittings says to provide copper tubing and fitting for above ground and buried piping. Part 6, D.10 Camp Lejeune

Mechanical Design Guidance

1AUG2024, #148, says

"Domestic water piping shall by type L copper for above ground and type K copper for below ground". Are we to abide by the Mechanical

Design Guidance since Part

3A D202001 does not specify the type of copper to be used on the domestic water system?

Part 3A D202003

D202003-Domestic Water

Equipment states to provide a domestic hot water storage tank in addition to the high-efficiency domestic hot water heaters. Historically, the

Camp Lejeune barracks renovations have specified the use of large storage-type domestic hot water heaters with integral storage tanks

(such as those by PVI). Will this project require the use of large integral storage type domestic hot water heaters, or is it acceptable to provide water heaters and separate hot water storage tanks?

Part 3A D203001

PVC piping allowed for above ground installations when provided with effective noise reduction insulation. What is effective noise reduction insulation?

Part 3A D304003

D304003-Hot Water

Distribution Systems says to

"provide insulated type "K" copper hot water supply and return piping to serve the

HVAC equipment throughout the facility. Refer to site specific quidelines in Part 6 for additional specific material requirements." Part 6, D.10

Camp Lejeune Mechanical

Design Guidance 1AUG2024, #55, says "Heating hot water piping above ground 4" and small shall by Type L copper.

Heating hot water piping above ground larger than 4" shall be Type L copper or

Schedule 40 Black steel piping." Do we abide by

D304003 in Part 3A of the

RFP and only use Type "K" copper piping, or use Type "L" copper/Schedule 40 Steel piping depending on the size per Part 6, D.10 Camp Lejeune

Mechanical Design Guidance?

Part 3A D304006

D304006-Chilled Water

Distribution Systems says "For exterior buried chilled water distribution systems, coordinate with Section G30, Site Civil/Mechanical

Utilities." Part 3B, G3050

Cooling Distribution, says "not used". Part 6, D.10 Camp

Lejeune Mechanical Design

Guidance 1AUG2024 #54 says

"Chilled water piping below ground shall be pre-insulated

Type K copper sticks and kits or SDR11 HDPE piping with

PVC jacket." Since there is no guidance in part 3 of the RFP, are we to abide by the Camp

Lejeune Mechanical Design

Guidance?

Part 3A D304006

D304006-Chilled Water

Distribution Systems says to

"provide insulated type "K" copper hot water supply and return piping to serve the

HVAC equipment throughout the facility. Refer to site specific quidelines in Part 6 for additional specific material requirements." Part 6, D.10

Camp Lejeune Mechanical

Design Guidance 1AUG2024, #54, says "Chilled water piping above ground 4" and small shall by Type L copper.

Chilled water piping above ground larger than 4" shall be

Type L copper or Schedule 40

Black steel piping." Do we abide by D304006 in Part 3A of the RFP and only use Type

"K" copper piping, or use

Type "L" copper/Schedule 40

Steel piping depending on the size per Part 6, D.10 Camp

Lejeune Mechanical Design

Guidance?

Part 5

Section 23

81 00

Specification Section 2.3.1.7

Cabinet Construction states that the PTAC/PTHP enclosure shall be 18 gauge steel with removable face panels, access to controls, and adjustable louvers.

Historically, the barracks renovations which utilized

PTACs have specified the installation of a full ligature-proof cover with stationary louvers to protect the unit from damage and prevent access by room occupants. Will ligature-proof covers for the

PTAC/PTHP units be required on this project?

Part 3A D3030

D3030 Cooling Generating

Systems states to provide a single air-cooled chiller utilizing a primary/secondary pumping system. This pumping configuration is typically used with systems utilizing multiple chillers.

Since there will only be one chiller, would it be acceptable to use a primary-only pumping system with 3-way chilled water valves and constant flow through the chiller?

Part 3A

5.0 Room

Requireme nts

Section 5.0 Room

Requirements and the 4.2

Space Relationships diagram only show one main mechanical room (114 - Main

Mechanical Room) on the first floor. Will we be required to

"split" this main mechanical room into two separate rooms to provide one space for the

"hot" equipment (boilers/water heaters/HW pumps) and one space for the "cold" equipment

(air handlers/DOAS/CHW pumps) per Part 6 D.10

MCBCL Mech Design

Guidance Dated Aug 2024 #4?

D30

HVAC

D30 HVAC General System

Requirements state the summer design conditions for

Camp Lejeune to be

92Fdb/77Fwb (high ambient) and 88Fdb/79Fwb (high humidity). Part 6 D.10

MCBCL Mech Design

Guidance Dated Aug 2024 #15 calls for summer design conditions to be 91Fdb/77Fwb and 140 grains/lb with an 84F

MCDB. Which summer design condition should be used for sizing the cooling loads?

HVAC

D30 HVAC General System

Requirements state the winter design condition for Camp

Lejeune to be 27F. Part 6 D.10

MCBCL Mech Design

Guidance Dated Aug 2024 #15 calls for the winter design condition to be 26F 99% and

22F 99.6%. Which winter design condition should be used for sizing the heating load?

HVAC

D30 HVAC System

Description states to comply with the latest edition of

ASHRAE 62.1, Ventilation for

Acceptable Indoor Air Quality

- 2016 edition. The most current edition of ASHRAE

62.1 is 2025. Which version of ASHRAE 62.1 should be used on this project - 2016 or

2025?

HVAC

D30 HVAC makes multiple references to ASHRAE 90.1, but does not specify which version to utilize for this project. The NAVFAC High

Performance and Sustainable

Building Checklist makes reference to both ASHRAE

90.1-2013 and ASHRAE 90.1-

2016, while Section 01 91

00.15 22 Total Building

Commissioning makes reference to ASHRAE 90.1-

2019. Which version of

ASHRAE Standard 90.1 shall be used for this project?

PENDING RESPONSE

Page

Attachme nt H Vol section

3.2.8

Plaza and

Please confirm exterior finishes are intended to reflect

'informal spaces' and are not required to contain premium features representative of

'formal spaces', as defined

Exterior finishes are to reflect formal and informal spaces, as defined in BEAP.

Courtyar d within the BEAP on page 18 and elsewhere.

RFP -

Gener al

Confirm which FAR 52.229 clause is required and clarify contractor responsibility for state and local taxes.

FAR clauses 52.229-2, FAR

52.229-3 apply to this contract. FAR 52.229-12 does not apply and will be removed.

Existi ng

Condi tions/

Demo lition

Attachme nt I Price

Schedule

Confirm if the existing building(s) to be demolished will have all FF&E (furniture fixtures and equipment) removed by Others prior to mobilization of the contractor.

PENDING RESPONSE

598/6

French

Creek -

Attachme nt H Vol

1 Part 3

B Sect

G1040

1.1

The section states to anticipate contaminated soil and ground water per site characterization report avaialble in Part 6 attachment C4. The geotechnical report provides data for an adjacent parcel north of Connor St. which is not in the designated project boundary. Please confirm that this area north of Connor St. is not in the project boundary.

No prelimnary Geotechnical information is provided for the parcel across from Smith Blvd.

which is in the project boundary. Please provide geotechnical and soil information for this area of the project site if avaiable.

Geotech and soil information for that area of the project site is not available. Assume quantities in the base bid as indicated in Part 3B F20.

Attachme nt H-

MCB

LEJ FC

DBRFP

Vol 1 of

2 Part 3A

Section

B10

Section

B201001

Attachment H- MCB LEJ FC

DBRFP Vol 1 of 2 Part 3A

Section B10 Superstructure states “Precast concrete tilt-up construction is not allowed”.

American Concrete Institute

(ACI) defines tilt-up concrete as “a specialized technique for casting concrete elements in a horizontal position on-site and then tilting and lifting those panels into their final position in a structure”. Please confirm this definition is consistent with the intent of the exclusion

Conventional (certified plant cast) structural load-bearing concrete walls and floor slabs are consistent with the base’s vision of excluding tilt-up concrete as a building practice.

of tilt-up concrete, and that conventional (certified plant cast) structural load-bearing concrete walls and floor slabs are permissible. Furthermore, section B201001 Exterior

Closure states “Provide exterior closure consisting of a combination of brick masonry, concrete unit masonry, or architectural precast concrete…”, and section

B201002 Exterior Wall

Backup Construction states “

Provide Exterior Wall Back-up

Construction system (back-up systems for Exterior Closure) including cast-in-place concrete or concrete unit masonry as described below:

Exterior bearing walls consisting of metal studs as the primary floor or roof supporting structural element are not permitted”. Please confirm that the use of conventional certified plant cast structural load-bearing precast panels is an acceptable system for exterior walls, interior walls and floors.

Attachme nt H-

MCB

LEJ FC

DBRFP

Vol 1 of

2 Part 3A

Section

B10

Section

B201001

Section B201001 Exterior

Closure states “Provide exterior closure consisting of a combination of brick masonry, concrete unit masonry, or architectural precast concrete…”, and section

B201002 Exterior Wall

Backup Construction states “

Provide Exterior Wall Back-up

Construction system (back-up systems for Exterior Closure) including cast-in-place concrete or concrete unit masonry as described below:

Please confirm conventional

(certified plant) precast walls

(either load bearing or non-load bearing) with inset brick

Conventional (certified plant) precast walls (either load bearing or non-load bearing) with inset brick is an acceptable system for the exterior walls, as long as the connection between brick and the precast panels are be designed to transfer loads and resist water penetration while including proper flashing, drainage, and sealing to prevent moisture intrusion.

is an acceptable system for the exterior walls.

Attachme nt H; Vol

1 of 2, Chapter

6.

Engineeri ng

Systems

Require ments

A101002

Deep

Foundation s

Part Three A Chapter 6 section

A101002 Deep Foundations states “The building and first floor slab must be entirely supported by a pile foundation system consisting of either precast pre-stressed concrete piles or auger cast piles”, will the government allow alternative foundation systems?

PENDING RESPONSE

Attach ment I

Price

Sched ule

Attachment I price schedule indicates "The offeror shall enter prices and rates in the yellow highlighted cells…"

Are quantity and unit price to be entered on Option 0002, Option 0003, and Option 4?

Contractor to enter unit price.

Solicit ation Due Date

Please provide a 3 week bid extension to allow adequate time for design based on the level of bridging documents provided and for subsequent subcontractor pricing efforts.

The proposal due date remains unchanged.

Solicit ation Factor 5

Factor 5 Technical Solution requests a narrative inclusive of the Design Methodology, Construction Methodology, and Management Team sections. Factor 5 states that this narrative is limited to 8 pages. This is not nearly enough space to address all criteria requested in Factor 5 under each section. Please increase Factor 5 narrative page limit to 20 pages.

Propose per RFP.

Solicit ation Factor 5

Would NAVFAC consider revising Factor 5 to include a section for proposed betterments that are included in the proposed price? If betterments are desired, would

NAVFAC provide a higher technical rating for inclusion of betterments?

Creek

Part 3B

Section

G4030

G4030 -

OSP

Pathway and

Connection

Requireme nts

RFP states: Connection Point for the Camp Lejeune French

Creek site is MH FC400-5, located on the northwest corner of Connor Street and

H.M. Smith Blvd. Will the new OSP fiber and copper cable terminate into existing splice cases in this existing manhole or will the new OSP cable extend to another connection point?

Point

Part 3B

Section

G4031

G4030 -

OSP

Pathway and

Connection

Requireme nts

RFP states: Connection Point for Camp Lejeune Hadnot

Point (CLHP) is MH 1-4, located on the southern side of

G Street, between G Street and the existing parking lot on the northwest portion of the site.

Will the new OSP fiber and copper cable terminate into existing splice cases in this existing manhole or will the new OSP cable extend to another connection point?

Part 3 A -

Chapter 6

D4020 D4020 notes Camp Lejeune and MCAS New River do not have reliable power. If a fire pump is determined to be required in a facility with unreliable primary power, an emergency backup generator must be provided for the fire pump as a secondary power sources. D509002 then notes

Camp Lejeune and MCAS

Cherry Point site do not have reliable power. PPI for

Package 1 noted the MCAS

Cherry Point and MCAS New

River have reliable power and a Secondary power for the fire pump (i.e. a generator) is not required. Please confirm

Camp Lejeune has reliable power and generator for the fire pump is not required.

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.2.1.10

Please provide a sketch illustrating the existing storm sewer configuration, including

Storm Sewer System 1, Storm

Sewer System 2, and the recently constructed pipe connecting the two systems.

Clearly identify the portion of

Storm Sewer System 1 that has been plugged and abandoned in place. As well as the segments to be reconstructed as part of this project.

Additionally, please identify the location of the existing sanitary sewer crossing beneath/through the storm sewer system and show the nearest upstream and downstream sanitary sewer manholes. This information is requested to allow the Design-

Build Team to accurately define and quantify the work associated with this utility conflict.

All available information has been provided in Chapter 6.

Part 5 Section 23

81 00

Specification Paragraph

2.3.1.8 Louver states "for

locations located in hurricane prone areas provide field installed louvers that are hurricane rated per AMCA

540 and AMCA 550". The standard PTAC Louver does not meet AMCA 540 nor

AMCA 550. Typically at

Lejeune these louvers are not required to be hurricane rated.

Please note that the windows are not hurricane rated. if hurricane louvers are required, the PTAC/PTHP unit would not function properly as the unit would need to be moved inward of the exterior wall thus projecting more into the room. Please confirm AMCA

540 and AMCA 550 do not apply.

The Liquidated Damages for this project are $90,250.86 per calendar day for the base bid, Hadnot Point. There are then

Liquidated Damages for the

Option Barracks at French

Creek of $81,996.80. This seems excessive compared to industry standards and other

NAVFAC projects. Please consider reducing the

Liquidated Damages to increase subcontractor participation. See PPI #54 response

52.211-12 has separate

Liquidated Damages for the

Base Bid at Hadnot Point and then Option for French Creek.

However, there is only one period of performance. Please confirm these are not addative the Liquidated Damages are only associated with each site.

Meaning, if Hando Point achieves BOD by the end of the POP but the French Creek does not only the Liquidated

Damages for French Creek could be assessed. See PPI #54 response

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.2.1.10

Please provide the original design drawings, record drawings, and any available as-built drawings for the permitted regional stormwater pond associated with State

Stormwater Permit

SW8891107.

All available information has been provided.

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.2.1.10

Please provide the approved

State Stormwater Permit

(SW8891107), including any approved revisions, permit modifications, or supporting documentation associated with the permitted regional stormwater pond.

All available information has been provided.

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.2.1.10

Please provide any available inspection reports, maintenance records, Operations and Maintenance

(O&M) reports, or other

All available information has been provided.

documentation identifying deficiencies associated with the permitted regional stormwater pond.

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.2.1.10

The RFP states that the existing permitted regional stormwater pond associated with State Stormwater Permit

SW8891107 is to be brought into full Operations and

Maintenance (O&M) compliance as part of this project. To establish the original design intent and accurately evaluate the required rehabilitation, please provide the original design drawings for the permitted regional stormwater pond, including the inlet structure, outlet structure, embankment, emergency spillway, and any associated storm drainage infrastructure, if available.

All available information has been provided.

Civil Part 3B -

Chapter 3 -

Supplemen t - Section

3.1.2.2

The RFP states in Section

3.1.2.2 that the site utility information is based on a

Level B Subsurface Utility

Engineering (SUE) survey and a standard topographic survey performed in December 2025 and January 2026. However, the survey data included in the

RFP documents does not provide invert elevations for the existing storm sewer structures or associated piping on or adjacent to the project site. If available, please provide the invert elevations for the existing storm drainage system so the Design-Build

Team can verify the feasibility of the proposed drainage concepts developed for pricing and better assess potential design constraints.

There are several critical PPI's pending that require review and then offerors need to finalize their proposed design and pricing with the market.

To provide subcontractors and small business adequate time to participate and provide the best pricing, please extend the proposal due date at least 2 weeks or 2 weeks after all

PPI's are answered. At a minimum please extend the due date from a Monday as it is not an optimal day to get the best pricing from subcontractors, vendors, and small business.

See response to PPI #87.

Plumbing Part three

"A" -

Chapter

6/ESR D20

The RFP does not indicate if access panels are required to be lockable for plumbing shut off to bunk units bathrooms.

Please verify access panels are not required to be lockable for each bunk or bathroom..

Propose per RFP.

Commun ications

For both Hadnot Point and

French Creek, provide existing underground Comm oneline that shows existing buildings in the area served along with

MH numbers, conduit sizes, cable types and quantities and termination locations

General 00 21 00 Factor 5, Technical Solution instructs to include a narrative not to exceed 8 pages. Due to the amount of information requested in this narrative, in order to give an appropriate amount of detail, please consider increasing the page count to 12 pages.

Propose per RFP.

General 00 21 00 Factor 5, Technical Solution paragraph 2.c instructs to include a chart for the

Management Team. To show best detail and information, please confirm that this chart can be 11x17 and does not count against the page count

Propose per RFP; org chart is not required to be part of the narrative page limit.

for the Factor 5 Technical

Solution Narrative.

General 00 21 00 Factor 5, Technical Solution paragraph 2.c requests a narrative on authorities; roles;

responsibilities; and a brief synopsis of the names, education, training and experience of key individuals based on the proposed management structure. Please clarify if experience of the key individuals is to be years of experience, or experience of similar projects to that of this solicitation.

Experience of key individuals for Factor 5 refers to years of experience.

Electri cal

Servic e POC

- A3-

A4

Chang es -

AFTE

R

DEM

O

Electrical C.7 Confirm that splices of existing MV cable in manholes following demolition of building transformers is allowed as indicated in attachment C.7 PENDING RESPONSE

Electrical For both Hadnot Point and

French Creek, provide existing underground MV and LV onelines that shows existing buildings in the area served along with MH numbers, conduit sizes, cable types and quantities and termination locations.

Landscap e

Architect ure

BEAP Drinking Fountains are mentioned in the BEAP for

Camp Lejeune under 3.4.8 Site

Furnishings. Where are these required? Are they required at shelters?

Architect ural

A roofing warranty duration cannot be found in the RFP.

Please confirm if this should be a standard manufacturer’s

20 years is required by

Roofing UFC 3-110-03.

NDL 20-year warranty for the roof.

Architect ural

UFC 3-

110-03

UFC 3-110-03 paragraph D-

2.2 (General Contractor’s

Warranties [one to five years]) states the following: “Recently some government roof specifications call for a

General Contractor’s

Watertight Warranty to add another method of ensuring a quality roof installation.

Unless stated otherwise in the

Scope of Work in the RFP, all permanent new construction and replacement roofs require a Five-Year General

Contractor Bonded

Watertightness Warranty. The scope of work in the RFP may waive the Bonding requirement, but if not specified, the Bonded five-year watertightness warranty is required. The required wording of the warranty will be provided in the applicable

UFGS.” Please confirm if a five-year general contractor bonded watertightness warranty will or will not be required for this project.

Architect ural

D.13 - 01

91 19 -

1.6.6

Paragraph 1.6.6 in specification section 01 91 19

(Building Enclosure

Commissioning) mentions additional building enclosure tests. Please confirm if these tests will be completed by the

Owner’s Cx Agent/Team or if these will have to be subcontracted out to a third party testing agency by the

General Contractor.

Plumbing Part Three

"B" -

Chapter 3

Vapor Intrusion Mitigation system below slab is required to include a vapor barrier, stone sub base, sub-slab perforated colllection piping and plenum boxes and appropriated vertical riser vent piping per 3.2.1.21

Environmental Assessment of

Part Three "B" - Chapter 3-

Supplement Page 12. Per

3.1.1.8 the site does not have

Radon Contamination. Please confirm that a standard 20mil vapor barrier can be used w/ stone subbase without the need for perforated piping and vent stack systems noted.