Attachment K - B2 Hazardous Materials Report Bldgs HP51HP53HP55HP57_1340.pdf

Hazardous Material Report for Buildings HP51, HP53, HP55, HP57, and 1340

MCB Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Mid-Atlantic

Contract: N40085-24-D-2500 Delivery Order: N40085-25-F-0992

Project Number: 209986

Date: March 2026 Airside Office Park 100 Airside Drive

Moon Township, PA 15108

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

ES-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. ES -1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

1.2 Relevant Regulations

2.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES

2.1 General

2.2 Survey

2.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

2.4 Inspection of Caulking for Potential PCB Content

2.5 Inspection for Other Hazards

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

3.1 Asbestos

3.2 Paint

3.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

3.4 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)

3.5 Other Hazards

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 Asbestos

4.2 Paint

4.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

4.4 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)

4.5 Other Hazards

5.0 L IMITATIONS OF THE INSPECTION

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Summary of Asbestos -Containing Materials

Table 2 Summary of Paint

Table 3 Summary of TCLP

Table 4 Summary of PCBs

Table 5 Summary of Other Potentially Hazardous Materials

ES-2

LIST OF APPENDICES

Attachment A Asbestos Survey Material Su mmaries

Attachment B Laboratory Analytical Report for Asbestos

Attachment C Laboratory Analytical Report for TCLPs

Attachment D Laboratory Analytical Report for PCBs

Attachment E Photographs

Attachment F Training Certificates and Certificates of Accreditation

Attachment F Previous Asbestos Reports

ES-3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

The Clark Nexsen -Michael Baker Joint Venture (Team) was retained to provide Architect-Engineering

Services for the development of a Lean Design -Build Request For Proposal (RFP) to support the new construction of military barracks utilizing the Marine Corps BEQ Model RFP following FC 1 -300 -09, Draft UFC 4 -721-01 Permanent Party Unaccompanied Housing, and FC 4-721-10N Navy and Maine Corps

Unaccompanied Housing. The new barracks are to constructed at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp

Lejeune, in Jacksonville, North Carolina. The project could potentially demolish a total of five (5) structures at the facility to accommodate the proposed new construction of military dormitories. The

Team performed hazardous material survey for five (5) buildings associated with this project. The buildings included Building s HP51, HP53, HP55, HP57, and 1340. This summary report documents the survey of the buildings by a certified inspector(s) for asbestos -containing material (ACM), suspected lead-containing paint (LCP), suspected polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), fluorescent light tube investigation, mercury -containing equipment , and other universal wastes (UW) . The facilities are scheduled for demolition, and these surveys serve to identify the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project.

Mr. Gary Case conducted this field investigation and inspection. Mr. Case is a United States

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) -certified Building Inspector, Management Planner, and

Project Designer for asbestos and a certified Inspector and Risk Assessor for lead paint. The inspection involved the identification of suspect homogeneous building materials and paint, sampling and laboratory analysis, and an assessment of the conditions and location of the suspected building materials and paint, as well as other hazards. Laboratory analysis of the bulk material (for asbestos , paint, and PCBs ) and potential building waste samples was conducted by EMSL Analytical, Inc. of

Westmont, New Jersey.

ES-4

Regulatory Background

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Federal Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA), and the State of North Carolina define ACM as any material that contains greater than one percent asbestos.

Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 (40 CFR 61), Subpart M (USEPA National Emission

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants), OSHA (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the State of North Carolina require that an asbestos inspection be conducted prior to renovation/demolition activities.

The O ccupational S afety and Health Administration (OSHA) Lead Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) is applicable where paints that contain any amount of lead will be disturbed . OSHA considers all paint

(since all paint has some level of lead within it) as LCP. Thus, all of the paint would be considered LCP.

USEPA and the State of North Carolina define elevated waste debris as 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead.

Summary of Findings and Recommendations

The purpose of this environmental study was to identify hazardous materials (asbestos, LCP , etc.) prior to the demolition of these buildings , so that proper procedures can be utilized to prevent creation of any potential hazards . This survey was conducted in support of the initial demolition design for these buildings; thus, it is assumed that all of the materials identified in this survey will have to be removed to accomplish the project.

ES-5

The following chart provides details on the identified concerns within the building s.

Building Number

ACM

Concern

LCP

TCLP

PCBs

Other Hazards

HP51 Yes Yes

No No Yes

HP53 Yes Yes

HP55 Yes Yes

HP57 Yes Yes

1340 Yes Yes

Base Area Yes

Asbestos

Our Asbestos Inspector assessed the existing building materials suspected to contain asbestos and to be impacted during demolition activities . The asbestos survey was conducted during January 5 -9, 2026. Based upon the review of the results of this investigation, all of the buildings contain building components that can be classified as ACM . . It should also be noted that all of the underground utility steam lines at the base are considered to be covered with asbestos-containing material.

Table 1 reports this summary. The ACM within the surveyed areas can currently be managed in-place with little potential hazard. However, due to the proposed project, all of the ACM should be properly handled when removed, and if removed, disposed of accordingly. The development of hazardous material abatement drawings and specifications would be warranted for the safe removal of the positively identified and presumed ACM.

ES-6

Paint

Based upon the age of the paint in these buildings, all of the painted materials should be identified as

LCP . General observations of the condition of the paint were documented to assist with the potential project . Table 2 presents the specific information for the lead paint . Numerous painted building components were observed to be damaged and deteriorated . While there is no abatement of paint planned, the proposed contractor should be aware of the LCP during the demolition activities, so that proper safety worker procedures can be performed. The requirements of the Occupational Safety and

Health Administration (OSHA) Construction Standards need to be invoked if any metal content is present in the paint that may be affected by demolition activities. OSHA does not provide a minimum concentration criteria level for these metals; however, it requires precautions and protection for workers and the working environment be taken at any workplace where an exposure to airborne metals may occur. The proposed contractor shall be responsible to perform work according to all applicable federal, state, and local laws. The development of specifications would be warranted for the safe removal of the presumed LCP .

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

Based upon the result of the TCLP samples, the painted building components of the buildings should not produce construction debris that would need to be reported and handled as a hazardous waste (see

Table 3). It is assumed that all of the metal from the buildings will be salvaged and recycled during the project.

Inspection of Caulkings for Potential PCB Content

Based upon the results of the PCB sample s, the caulking used in these buildings are not regulated PCB -containing waste (see Table 4). Thus, the caulkings can be considered non-hazardous waste.

ES-7

Other Hazards

Based upon the results of this investigation, several of the buildings contain other hazard s and universal wastes, namely suspected mercury -containing thermostats, and potentially hazardous materials (see Table 5). These hazards should be corrected to prevent any future problems. The survey revealed the following:

- Approximately 3,870 light bulbs were estimated to be located in the buildings . The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273.

- Approximately 2,175 light fixtures were estimated to be located in the buildings . There is a possibility that PCB -containing light ballasts exist in the buildings. Should fluorescent light ballasts that are not specifically marked “non -PCB containing” ballasts be encountered during demolition/renovation, they should be managed and disposed of in accordance with Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA) Storage and Disposal Requirements for Fluorescent Light

Ballasts.

- Approximately 765 thermostats were estimated to be located in the buildings . The thermostats are likely to contain mercury and should be disposed of in accordance with the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273.

- Approximately 30 EXIT signs were estimated to be located in the buildings . Self -luminous

EXIT signs containing the radioactive gas, tritium, were widely used in a variety of facilities across the United States. While the current United States Department of Defense’s Unified

Facilities Criteria specifically prohibits tritium exit signs in military facilities, given the age of these buildings, signs containing this gas may be present . Intact tritium EXIT signs pose little

ES-8

or no threat to public health and safety and do not constitute a security risk . However, the

NRC requires proper accounting and disposal of all radioactive materials. Proper handling and accounting are important, because a damaged or broken sign could cause minor radioactive contamination of the immediate vicinity, requiring a potentially expensive clean up . It is recommended that these be collected intact and disposed of at a licensed recycling facility.

- Significant mold issues were noted in the buildings, especially in the bathroom areas. Large amounts of fuzzy, slimy, or powdery black mold were noted on the ceilings, walls, and fixtures in a majority of the bathrooms. One of the causes may be due to the lack of exhaust fans, broken exhaust fans, or lack of use of the exhaust fans. The high moisture content within the rooms was noted during the inspection. Molds have the potential to cause health problems.

The Contractor will be required to take precautions and provide protection for workers and the working environment in any workplace where an exposure to mold or mold contaminated items may occur.

The proposed contractor shall be responsible to perform work according to all applicable federal, state, and local laws . Specifications are warranted for the safe removal of the identified hazardous materials.

Disclaimer

The information that is presented in this report reflects the conditions that were observed in the buildings during the time frame this inspection was conducted. However, conditions could change due to vandalism, deterioration, or maintenance activities . Although every effort was made to identify all potential suspect building materials and components, there is no guarantee that additional materials are not present . Conditions may exist in the buildings; such that inaccessible materials may only become apparent during demolition/renovation activities.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

The Clark Nexsen -Michael Baker Joint Venture (Team) was retained to provide Architect-Engineering

Services for the development of a Lean Design -Build Request For Proposal (RFP) to support the new construction of military barracks utilizing the Marine Corps BEQ Model RFP following FC 1 -300 -09, Draft UFC 4 -721-01 Permanent Party Unaccompanied Housing, and FC 4-721-10N Navy and Maine Corps

Unaccompanied Housing. The new barracks are to constructed at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Camp

Lejeune, in Jacksonville, North Carolina. The project could potentially demolish a total of five (5) structures at the facility to accommodate the proposed new construction of military dormitories. The

Team performed hazardous material survey for five (5) buildings associated with this project. The buildings included Building s HP51, HP53, HP55, HP57, and 1340. This summary report documents the survey of the buildings by a certified inspector(s) for asbestos -containing material (ACM), suspected lead-containing paint (LCP), suspected polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), fluorescent light tube investigation, mercury -containing equipment , and other universal wastes (UW). The facilities are scheduled for demolition, and these surveys serve to identify the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project.

Mr. Gary Case of Michael Baker conducted this field investigation and inspection during January 5 - 9, 2026. Mr. Case is a United States Environmental Protection Agency - (USEPA ) certified Building

Inspector, Management Planner, and Project Designer for asbestos and a certified Inspector and Risk

Assessor for lead paint.

This report summarizes the activities and procedures used during the project and presents the survey findings and recommendations . The text of this report is supplemented by information found within the Figures, Tables, and Attachments A through G. The Figures contain the floor plans for each of the buildings (not drawn to scale) and sample location drawings . The Tables represent the findings for

ACM, LCP, TCLP, PCBs, and Other Hazardous Components within the buildings. Attachment A contains field data forms that were used to document the asbestos inspection s of the buildings. Attachment B contains the laboratory analytical report for bulk material s for asbestos . Attachment C contains the laboratory analytical report for bulk materials for TCLPs. Attachment D contains the laboratory analytical report for bulk materials for PCBs. Attachment E contains photographs of the buildings.

Attachment F contains copies of training certificates for the staff who conducted the investigation and the certificates of accreditation for the laboratories that conducted sample analysis. Attachment G contains copies of previous asbestos survey reports used during the inspection.

1.2 Relevant Regulations

Relevant regulations and policies are summarized below .

• The USEPA, Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the State of

North Carolina define ACM as any mater ial that contains greater than one percent asbestos.

• Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61 (40 CFR 61), Subpart M (USEPA National

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants), OSHA (29 CFR 1926.1101), and the State of

North Carolina require that an asbestos inspection be conducted prior to demolition/renovation activities.

• The OSHA Lead Standard (29 CFR 1926.62) is applicable where paints that contain any amount of lead will be disturbed. OSHA considers all paint (since all paint has some level of lead within

it) as LCP . Thus, all paint will be considered LCP.

• USEPA and the State of North Carolina define elevated waste debris as 5 milligrams per liter

(mg/L) for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead.

2.0 INSPECTION PROCEDURES

2.1 General

Mr. Gary Case conducted this field investigation and inspection of the buildings. Mr. Case is an USEPA -certified Building Inspector, Management Planner, and Project Designer for asbestos and a certified

Inspector and Risk Assessor for lead paint . Copies of his training certifi cates are included in

Attachment E.

Michael Baker utilized EMSL Analytical, Inc. of Westmont, New Jersey for laboratory analysis of collected samples . EMSL Analytical is accredited in accordance with standards set by the U.S. National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation

Program (NVLAP), and by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) for both asbestos and paint analysis . Copies of their certifica tions are included in Attachment E.

2.2 Survey

The inspector conducted a thorough search within these buildings to identify potential asbestos -containing building materials, LCP, PCBs, and other hazards. When a suspected material was located, the bulk material sampling plan was implemented . Under this plan, suspect building materials were grouped into homogeneous sampling areas, which contained materials that were uniform in texture, appearance, color, physical characteristics, and function . For asbestos and paint, each homogeneous material or paint was given a unique identification number. Once the homogeneous material boundaries were established, core samples of the material or paint were collected . Insulation materials that were composed of fiberglass were not considered potential (i.e., suspect) ACM . Material condition of each asbestos material was assessed as described in the chart below.

MATERIAL CONDITION DESCRIPTIONS

Condition Description

No Damage Material is intact and is not damaged

Damaged Less than 10% distributed damage, or less than 25% localized damage

Significant

Damage

10% or more distributed damage, or 25% or more localized damage

For each suspect asbestos homogeneous material, the material description, location(s), approximate quantity of asbestos, friability, condition, sample identification, sample location, and sample result information were recorded on the field data forms found in Attachment A. The definition of a friable material is one that can be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to powder under hand pressure when dry.

The definition of a nonfriable material is one that cannot be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to powder under hand pressure when dry. Sample locations are noted in the field data. The building layout figures of the buildings are included in Figures .

Samples were collected by using chisels, utility knives, etc. to remove small pieces of building materials. Each sample was placed into a re sealable plastic bag and given a unique sample identification number . During sampling activities, the inspector exercised care to prevent any suspected material from becoming airborne. Wet wiping was used during the sampling to immediately clean up any debris generated by the sampling process .

2.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

Michael Baker collected composite samples of all of the painted building components from each of these buildings. These samples were obtained for the purpose of characterizing the waste debris that will be generated during the demolition/renovation activities with respect to paint disposal requirements (i.e., hazardous or non -hazardous) . The components selected for inclusion in the composite sample were based on those items that may be designated for removal during the future demolition/renovation project. The percentage of the building components within the total sample was roughly based on the estimated percentage of weight that the components will represent in the total weight of the building debris. However, in order to be conservative, slightly higher percentages of the lead-based paint containing components were included in the sample than what may likely be in the actual debris . The composite samples also were sent to EMSL Analytical, Inc. for analysis of Resource

Conservation and Recovery Act ( RCRA ) metals using the TCLP methods . The RCRA 8 metals are arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver.

2.4 Inspection for Other Hazards

Michael Baker visually inspected these buildings for other potentially hazardous materials, evidence of mold, and/or water intrusion concurrently with the asbestos survey. Michael Baker also documented any safety and/or physical concerns observed at the buildings.

2.5 Inspection of Caulkings for Potential PCB Content

Michael Baker inspected these buildings for evidence of caulking suspected to contain PCBs concurrently with the asbestos survey.

3.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

3.1 Asbestos

Samples contai ning greater than one percent asbestos are considered to be asbestos containing as defined by the US EPA . In addition to the US EPA, the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air

Pollutants (NESHAP), 40 CFR, Part 61, requires that any asbestos sample containing less than 10 percent asbestos when analyzed by P olarized L ight Microscopy (PLM) be reanalyzed using the PLM point counting procedure. Otherwise, the material must be considered ACM. For this investigation, the

Scope of Work did not require confirmation of asbestos content through additional analysis; thus, the building materials containing less than or equal to 10 percent asbestos would be assumed to be ACM .

As part of the investigation, Michael Baker identified and collected bulk material samples for fourteen

(14) suspected homogeneous materials that were present and suspected to be asbestos containing for these buildings. Also, the inspector had to assume four (4) building materials due to the material being inaccessible to sample. A summary of the ACM for the buildings is presented in Table 1. The field data for the buildings, including a listing of the suspected homogeneous materials and the corresponding sample results, can be found in Attachment A. The laboratory analytical reports for these buildings are contained in Attachment B.

It should also be noted that all of the underground utility steam lines at the base are considered to be covered with asbestos -containing material.

3.2 Paint

The field personnel reviewed and identified the lead-containing paint on the building components with and on the exterior of the buildings . Table 2 presents the specific information for the paint.

3.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

Based upon the results of the TCLP samples, the painted building components of the buildings should not produce construction debris that would need to be reported and handled as a hazardous waste (see

Table 3). It is assumed that all of the metal from the buildings will be salvaged and recycled during the project.

3.4 Inspection of Caulkings for Potential PCB Content

Michael Baker inspected these buildings for evidence of caulking suspected to contain PCBs concurrently with the hazardous material survey. Based upon the results of the PCB samples, the caulkings used in these buildings are not regulated PCB -containing waste (see Table 4). They can be considered a non-hazardous waste.

3.5 Other Hazards

An investigation for evidence of mold, water intrusion , other hazardous materials, safety issues, and other hazards was conducted in th ese buildings. Several i tems , such as thermostats and fluorescent lights that may contain mercury, exit signs that may contain radioactive materials, and ballasts that may contain PCBs were searched for throughout the building. The results of the investigation for other hazards and the field data to support the following environmental and safety hazard co ncerns are documented within Table 5, and as summarized below:

- Approximately 3,870 light bulbs were estimated to be located in the buildings . The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing fluorescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273.

- Approximately 2,175 light fixtures were estimated to be located in the buildings . There is a possibility that PCB -containing light ballasts exist in the buildings. Should fluorescent light ballasts that are not specifically marked “non -PCB containing” ballasts be encountered during demolition/renovation, they should be managed and disposed of in accordance with Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA) Storage and Disposal Requirements for Fluorescent Light

Ballasts.

- Approximately 765 thermostats were estimated to be located in the buildings . The thermostats are likely to contain mercury and should be disposed of in accordance with the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273.

- Approximately 30 EXIT signs were estimated to be located in the buildings . Self -luminous

EXIT signs containing the radioactive gas, tritium, were widely used in a variety of facilities across the United States. While the current United States Department of Defense’s Unified

Facilities Criteria specifically prohibits tritium exit signs in military facilities, given the age of these buildings, signs containing this gas may be present. Intact tritium EXIT signs pose little or no threat to public health and safety and do not constitute a security risk. However, the

NRC requires proper accounting and disposal of all radioactive materials. Proper handling and accounting are important, because a damaged or broken sign could cause minor radioactive contamination of the immediate vicinity, requiring a potentially expensive clean up. It is recommended that these be collected intact and disposed of at a licensed recycling facility.

- Significant mold issues were noted in the buildings, especially in the bathroom areas. Large amounts of fuzzy, slimy, or powdery black mold were noted on the ceilings, walls, and fixtures in a majority of the bathrooms. One of the causes may be due to the lack of exhaust fans, broken exhaust fans, or lack of use of the exhaust fans. The high moisture content within the rooms was noted during the inspection. Molds have the potential to cause health problems.

The Contractor will be required to take precautions and provide protection for workers and the working environment in any workplace where an exposure to mold or mold contaminated items may occur.

NOTE : All quantities of the hazardous materials must be field verified and/or quantified by a licensed contractor prior to the demolition activities.

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

The purpose of th ese hazardous material assessment/ survey was to identify hazardous materials

(ACM , LCP , etc.) prior to the demolition/renovation of these buildings, so that proper procedures can be utilized to prevent creation of any potential hazards . This survey was conducted in support of the initial concept demolition/renovation design for th ese buildings; thus, it is assumed that all of the materials identified in this survey may have to be removed to accomplish the project . Specific recommendations have been provided based upon discussion of the potential demolition/renovation of these buildings (plans are subject to change).

4.1 Asbestos

Based upon the review of the results of this investigation, the buildings contain building components that can be classified as ACM (see Table 1). Most of the ACM is currently in good condition and can be managed in -place with little potential hazard. However, in the event of the proposed demolition project, all of the ACM that will be impacted or disturbed should be properly handled or removed, and if removed, disposed of accordingly. Abatement plans should be designed in accordance with USEPA and other federal, state, and local regulations and/or using appropriate guidelines by a certified Asbestos

Designer and reviewed by a Certified Industrial Hygienist. All of the abatement activities should be overseen and managed by an experienced Asbestos Abatement Supervisor, and removal should be performed by certified, trained asbestos workers. Removal notifications, activities, and disposal must be completed in accordance with USEPA and other applicable federal, state, and local regulations.

4.2 Paint

Based upon the age of the selected building s, the buildings contain building components that are coated with LCP (see Table 2). The exterior of the selected buildings had areas of damaged or deteriorated paint . The interior of several buildings also had areas of damaged and/or deteriorate paint, especially above the ceiling tile s in the buildings . If the building s are to be demolished , the selected contractor should be responsible for the safe and proper handling of the painted items according to all federal, state, and local regulations . All of the activities should be overseen and managed by an experienced supervisor and trained workers . The contractor should comply with the

OSHA lead standard, which regulates occupational exposure to lead , as well as other metals, including cadmium and chromium.

4.3 Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)

Based upon the results of the TCLP sampling, the demolition debris of the buildings should be non-hazardous (see Table 3) and treated as normal construction waste .

4.4 Inspection of Caulkings for Potential PCB Content

Based upon the results of the investigation, no evidence of regulated PCB -containing caulking was found during the survey (see Table 4).

4.5 Other Hazards

Based upon the results of this investigation, there are numerous hazard s associated with the components used in the buildings (see Table 5). All of the items should be corrected and/or handled prior to the proposed demolition project to ensure that the current building conditions do not represent any safety concerns during the project .

5.0 LIMITATIONS OF THE INSPECTION

The information that is presented in this report reflects the conditions that were observed in the buildings during the time frame that this inspection was conducted. Although every effort was made to identify all of the potential suspect building materials and/or paint , there is no guarantee that additional materials are not present . Conditions may exist such that inaccessible materials may only become apparent during demolition/renovation activities . If suspect building materials or paints are identified during demolition/renovation activities, they should be sampled and analyzed prior to disturbance . If warranted, the material should be removed and handled according to all applicable

USEPA , OSHA, state, and local regulations.

FIGURES

Gcase Typewritten Text Building HP51

Building HP53

Building HP55

Building HP57

Building 1340

Building HP51

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

BLUE TEXT ARE SAMPLE NUMBERS

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-31B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-31A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-32A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-32B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-33B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-33A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-34A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP51-34B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International

ROOF

Building HP53

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

BLUE TEXT ARE SAMPLE NUMBERS

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP53-14B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP53-14A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

ROOF

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Building HP55

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

BLUE TEXT ARE SAMPLE NUMBERS

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-13A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-13B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

ATTIC

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

ROOF

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-14A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-14B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-12A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP55-12B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Arrow

Building HP57

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

BLUE TEXT ARE SAMPLE NUMBERS

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP57-32B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

HP57-32A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

ROOF

Rectangle

Building 1340

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

BLUE TEXT ARE SAMPLE NUMBERS

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text

ROOF

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text 1340-28A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text 1340-28B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Rectangle

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text 1340-27A

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Typewritten Text 1340-27B

Gary Case - Michael Baker International Arrow

Arrow

TABLES

TABLE 1

SURVEY OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material Description Category of ACM Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of

Material

28 Roofing Material Black Membrane Underlay on

Concrete Category II, Non-Friable ACM 2,016 Square Feet No Damage

35 Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm

Rooms Category I, Non-Friable ACM 144 Mirrors No Damage

Building HP53 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material Description Category of ACM Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of

Material

15 Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm

Rooms Category I, Non-Friable ACM 144 Mirrors No Damage

Building HP55 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material Description Category of ACM Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of

Material

12 Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm

Rooms Category I, Non-Friable ACM 144 Mirrors No Damage

Building HP57 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material Description Category of ACM Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of

Material

24 Vapor Barrier Black, on Dorm Shower Pans Category I, Non-Friable ACM 160 Square Feet Damaged

27 Roofing Sealant Black Category II, Non-Friable ACM 2,672 Square Feet No Damage

33 Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm

Rooms Category I, Non-Friable ACM 144 Mirrors No Damage

Building 1340 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material Description Category of ACM Approximate Quantity of Asbestos

Condition of

Material

16 Miscellaneous Sealant Gray, Throughout Building on Shower Heads Category I, Non-Friable ACM 1 Square Feet Damaged

29 Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm

Rooms Category I, Non-Friable ACM 144 Mirrors No Damage

TABLE 2

SURVEY OF LEAD PAINT

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Buildings Component Locations Color Substrate Condition Findings Recommendations

Building HP51

Building HP53

Building HP55

Building HP57

Building 1340

* The requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Construction Standards need to be invoked if any metal content is present in the paint that may be affected by renovation activities. OSHA does not provide a minimum concentration criteria level for lead; however, it requires precautions and protection for workers and the working environment be taken at any work place where an exposure to airborne metals may occur.

All painted components

Interior and

Exterior

All Paint

Colors All Substrates All Conditions

All paint contains at least a trace of lead and must be addressed according to OSHA requirements.

If impacted by renovation and/or demolition activities, proper handling and/or removal of the lead-containing paint is needed.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF TCLP RESULTS

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building Material Content Test Type Material Description Sample Number Sample Result Hazardous or Non-

Hazardous

HP51 Anticipated Waste Debris from Facility TCLP for Lead Building components CL - TCLP1 <0.32 mg/L Non-Hazardous

HP53 Anticipated Waste Debris from Facility TCLP for Lead Building components CL - TCLP2 <0.32 mg/L Non-Hazardous

HP55 Anticipated Waste Debris from Facility TCLP for Lead Building components CL - TCLP3 <0.32 mg/L Non-Hazardous

HP57 Anticipated Waste Debris from Facility TCLP for Lead Building components CL - TCLP4 <0.32 mg/L Non-Hazardous

1340 Anticipated Waste Debris from Facility TCLP for Lead Building components CL - TCLP5 <0.32 mg/L Non-Hazardous

According to the EPA, TCLP criteria limit for leachable lead is defined as 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) using laboratory analysis.

TABLE 4

SUMMARY OF OTHER POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

LOS ALAMITOS ARMY RESERVE CENTER

LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA

Buildings Light Bulbs Ballasts Thermostats Exit Signs Smoke

Detectors A/C Units Recommendations

59 256 - Various bulbs 64 6 6 12 0

192 0 0 0 0 0 0

274 392 - Various bulbs 194 8 5 8 0

NOTE: These are approximate quantities tallied at the time of the survey. Actual quantities should be field verified upon removal and/or demolition of the buildings.

If impacted by demolition activities, proper handling and/or removal of these components is needed.

TABLE 5

SUMMARY OF OTHER POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Buildings Light Bulbs Ballasts Thermostats Exit Signs Recommendations

HP51 774 - Various bulbs 435 153 6

HP53 774 - Various bulbs 435 153 6

HP55 774 - Various bulbs 435 153 6

HP57 774 - Various bulbs 435 153 6

1340 774 - Various bulbs 435 153 6

NOTE: These are approximate quantities tallied at the time of the survey. Actual quantities should be field verified upon removal and/or demolition of the buildings.

If impacted by renovation and/or demolition activities, proper handling and/or removal of these components is needed.

ATTACHMENT A

ASBESTOS SURVEY MATERIAL SUMMARY

MCB CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material

Type

Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Locations

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

01 No - - - - - - - - - -

02 No - - - - - - - - - -

03 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

04 No - - - - - - - - - -

05 No - - - - - - - - - -

06 No - - - - - - - - - -

07 No - - - - - - - - - -

08 No - - - - - - - - - - Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

White

Caulking White, around

Doors and Windows

Interior of

Building

Not Applicable

Cove Base

Adhesive

NoCaulking Gray, around Doors and Windows

Exterior of

Building

Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

No Not Applicable

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Pipe

Insulation

Sealant

Wall and

Ceiling Board

White, with White

Joint Compound

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Cove Base

Adhesive

Yellow, under 4"

Brown Vinyl Cove

Base

Throughout the

Dorm Rooms

Not ApplicableNo

No Not Applicable

No

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Ceiling Tile 2' x 2' White Throughout the

Building

Not Applicable

Vinyl Floor

Tile and

Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12" Beige with

Brown Vinyl Floor

Tile with Black Floor

Adhesive

Throughout the

Building

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Yellow, under 4"

Black Vinyl Cove

Base

Janitor's Rooms No Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains less than 10% asbestos is considered positive, unless re-analyzed by PLM point count.

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material

Type

Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Location

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

09 No - - - - - - - - - -

10 No - - - - - - - - - -

11 No - - - - - - - - - -

12 No - - - - - - - - - -

13 No - - - - - - - - - -

14 No - - - - - - - - - -

15 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

Not ApplicableCaulking White, around

Interior Ductwork

Interior of

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Material Listed

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Gray, around Wall

Brick Joints

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Exterior of

Building

Throughout the

Building

Wall and

Ceiling Board

Throughout the

Mechanical

Rooms

No

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

No

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Duct Sealant Red

Caulking

NoThroughout the

Building

White, with White

Joint Compound

Not Applicable

Throughout the

Mechanical

Rooms

No Not Applicable

No Not Applicable

No

Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

White

Not Applicable

Pipe

Insulation

Sealant

Wall Board White, with White

Joint Compound

Textured

Ceiling

White, on Ceiling

Board

Throughout the

Dorm Rooms and Offices

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material

Type

Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Location

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

20 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

21 No - - - - - - - - - -

22 No - - - - - - - - - -

23 No - - - - - - - - - -

24 No - - - - - - - - - -

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Vinyl Floor

Sheeting and

Floor

Adhesive

Wallboard /

Sheathing

White Throughout the

Dorm Rooms

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Residual

Mastic

Black First Floor

Center Corridor

No

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

No Material Listed

Not Applicable

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

No Material Listed

No Material Listed

Not Applicable

Not ApplicableFoil Backed

Tape

Silver

Fibrous

Debris

White First Floor West

Offices

Overhead

No Not ApplicableNegative by

Previous

Sampling Results

Not Applicable

Throughout the

Building

Beige with Tan Vinyl

Floor Sheeting and

Tan Floor Adhesive

Throughout the

Dorm Rooms

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material

Type

Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Locations

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

25 No - - - - - - - - - -

26 No - - - - - - - - - -

27 No - - - - - - - - - -

28 No - - - - - - - - - -

29 No - - - - - - - - - -

30 No - - - - - - - - - -

31 No HP51 - 31A (VFS) None Detected Room 101

HP51 - 31A (FA) None Detected Room 101

HP51 - 31B (VFS) None Detected Room 205

HP51 - 31B (FA) None Detected Room 205

Not Applicable

Vinyl Floor

Sheeting and

Floor

Adhesive

Tan Stone Vinyl

Floor Sheeting and

Tan Floor Adhesive

Throughout the

Building

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Roof Sealant Silver Attic Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

No Damage

Roofing

Material

Black Tar Paper Attic Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Roofing

Material

Black Membrane

Underlay on

Concrete

Attic Positive by

Previous

Sampling Results

Yes 2,016 Square

Feet

Not Applicable

Roof Sealant Black Attic Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Caulking White, on Perimeter

Flashing Edge

Floor

Leveling

Compound

Gray Third Floor

Lounge

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

No Not ApplicableAttic Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP51 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material

Type

Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Locations

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

32 No HP51 - 32A None Detected Room 105

HP51 - 32B (VFS) None Detected Room 104

HP51 - 32B (FA) None Detected Room 104

33 No HP51 - 33A (VFT) None Detected Room 217

HP51 - 33A (FA) None Detected Room 217

HP51 - 33B (VFT) None Detected Room 305

HP51 - 33B (FA) None Detected Room 305

34 No HP51 - 34A (S) None Detected Roof

HP51 - 34A (Tar) None Detected Roof

HP51 - 34B None Detected Roof

35 No Not Sampled Not Sampled

Vinyl Floor

Sheeting and

Floor

Adhesive

Tan Swirl Vinyl Floor

Sheeting and Tan

Floor Adhesive

Not ApplicableThroughout the

Building

No Not Applicable

Exterior Roof No Not Applicable

Vinyl Floor

Tile and

Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12"White Vinyl

Floor Tile with Black

Floor Adhesive

Not Applicable Not ApplicableThroughout the

Building

No Damage

Asphaltic

Roofing

Material

Brown Shingles

Glue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm Rooms

Throughout the

Building

Assumed Yes 144 Mirrors

(3' x 3' Mirror)

Not Applicable

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP53 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Locations

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

01 No - - - - - - - - - -

02 No - - - - - - - - - -

03 Throughout the

Building

No - - - - - - - - - -

04 No - - - - - - - - - -

05 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

06 Throughout the

Building

No - - - - - - - - - -

07 No - - - - - - - - - -

08 No - - - - - - - - - -

Not Applicable

Textured

Ceiling Material

White, on Ceiling

Board

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Wall and

Ceiling Board

White, with White

Joint Compound

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Cove Base

Adhesive

Yellow, under

Various Colored 4"

Vinyl Cove Base

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Vinyl Floor Tile and Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12" Tan Vinyl

Floor Tile with Black

Floor Adhesive

Not Applicable

Ceiling Tile 2' x 2' White Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Attic Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Vinyl Floor Tile and Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12" White

Vinyl Floor Tile with

Black Floor

Adhesive

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Miscellaneous

Sealant

Gray, around

Interior Ductwork

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Roofing

Material

Black Membrane

Underlay on

Concrete

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP53 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Location

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

09 No - - - - - - - - - -

10 No - - - - - - - - - -

11 No - - - - - - - - - -

12 No - - - - - - - - - -

13 No - - - - - - - - - -

14 No HP53 - 14A None Detected Roof

HP53 - 14B None Detected Roof

15 No Not Sampled Not Sampled

Not Applicable Not Applicable

Plaster Ceiling Gray Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Caulking Gray, around

Windows and Doors

Exterior of

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No

Not Applicable

Miscellaneous

Sealant

White, around

Interior Ductwork

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Duct Sealant Red

Not ApplicableExterior Stucco White Exterior of

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Asphaltic

Roofing

Material

Brown Shingles Exterior Roof No Not Applicable Not Applicable

No DamageGlue Tan, under Mirrors in Dorm Rooms

Throughout the

Building

Assumed Yes 144 Mirrors

(3' x 3' Mirror)

According to EPA, asbestos-containing material (ACM) is defined as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos using laboratory analysis or, by NESHAP, contains

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA

Building HP55 Homogeneous

Material

Number

Material Type Material

Description

Material

Locations Friable Sample Numbers Sample Results

Sample

Locations

Asbestos-

Containing

Material

Approximate

Quantity of

Asbestos

Condition of

Material

01 No - - - - - - - - - -

02 Throughout the

Building

No - - - - - - - - - -

03 No - - - - - - - - - -

04 No - - - - - - - - - -

05 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

06 Throughout the

Building

No - - - - - - - - - -

07 Yes - - - - - - - - - -

08 No - - - - - - - - - -

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not ApplicableThroughout the

Building

Vinyl Floor Tile and Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12" White with

Brown Vinyl Floor

Tile with Black Floor

Adhesive

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Textured

Ceiling Material

White, on Ceiling

Board

Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable

Cove Base

Adhesive

Yellow, under 4"

Brown Vinyl Cove

Base

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No

Not Applicable

Pipe Insulation White Throughout the

Building

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Wall and

Ceiling Board

White, with White

Joint Compound

Vinyl Floor Tile and Floor

Adhesive

12" x 12" Tan with

White Vinyl Floor

Tile with Black Floor

Adhesive

Negative by

Previous

Sampling Results

No Not Applicable Not Applicable

Not Applicable Not Applicable

Ceiling Tile 2' x 2' White Throughout the

Building

Negati…