Amendment 0012.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to provide responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries, provide an updated Attachment H, provide an updated Price Proposal Form, change proposal receipt method, and provide updated small business goals.

The proposal due date remains unchanged.

See SF30 Block 14 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 21

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Mar-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9252

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Oct-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Mar-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9252

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0012

A. PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

1. 01 31 19.05 20 states a minimum of 3 CDW meetings

a. Yes, this is for the entire D/B RFP Package (8 MILCON projects), and each offeror can determine which projects are included in each CDW.

2. 01 33 10.05 20, 2.1 Changes to the RFP:

a. SEC or Word files of the RFP will be provided for updating upon contractor request.

B. PART 3 PROJECT PROGRAM

1. PART 3, General (ALL MILCONS)

a. CHAPTER 6 – ESR D30, Life-cycle-cost analysis - The HVAC system type is the result of an LCCA that was performed (by others) during the RFP writing process. Bidders are not expected or asked to perform an LCCA.

b. CHAPTER 6 – ESR G103004 1.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF SITE SOIL - FILL & BORROW: Obtain borrow materials required in excess of those furnished from required excavations from sources outside of Government property.

c. CHAPTER 6 – ESR G30, SITE CIVIL/MECHANICAL UTILITIES SYSTEM DESCRIPTION - Add the follow paragraph to this section: “Provide non-detectable warning tape and a continuous length of 10 gauge insulated tracer wire for the full length of each run of all nonmetallic piping below grade. Warning tape to be color coded with warning and identification of utility type imprinted in bold black letters continuously over the entire tape length. Warning and identification to read, "CAUTION, BURIED (utility type) LINE BELOW" or similar wording. Terminate tracer wire and make accessible above grade at valve boxes and at exterior of building.”

2. Part 3.2, Chapter 6 – ESR G40, P1300

a. System Description (page 1) - Replace last paragraph to read: “The site electrical utility system consists of all power and telecommunications and fiber optic cabling from the existing distribution system point of connection including all connections, accessories and devices as necessary and required for a complete and usable system. This section covers installations up to within 5 feet of new (or existing) from the new building location to the nearest cabling connection points to be coordinated by the TSD (Telecommunications Support Division). This section covers installations up to within 5 feet of new building location.

b. G403001 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS: Replace 3rd paragraph to read: The DEMARC connection point for the site telecommunications Fiber and Copper cable systems must be underground to an existing Manhole system for the P1300 project Headquarters (HQs) and Armory (Bid Option) facilities.

Extend to the new project facility underground in a system of existing manholes and duct bank located underground in direct buried in conduit to the new telecommunications equipment room.

c. G403003 CABLES AND WIRING: Replace this entire section with the following:

Cables and wiring for site telecommunications are required as stated in their respective categories.

Provide for the new HQs 550’ of 24-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable from new facility to Manhole 589-4-1; Leave 60’ Coil in Manhole 589-4-1, and Government shall perform splice.

Provide for the new HQs 2000’ of 200-Pair 24-AWG Copper Cable Outside Plant rated from new HQs to Manhole 590 via Manhole 589-4/Manhole 589-3/Manhole 589-2/ Manhole 589-1/ Manhole 589 to Manhole 590, Leave 30’ Coiled up in Manhole 590, and Government shall perform splice in Manhole 590.

Provide to the new Armory (Bid Option) 1300’ of 12-Strand Single Mode Fiber Optic Cable from new facility to Manhole 588; Leave 60’ Coil in Manhole 589-4-1, and Government shall perform splice.

Provide to the new Armory (Bid Option) 1500’ of 25-Pair 24-AWG Copper Cable Outside Plant rated from new facility via Manhole 588 to Manhole 590; Leave 30’ Coil in Manhole 590, and Government shall perform splice in Manhole 590.

Provide a Note: Contractor shall coordinate with the Base Telecommunications Group regarding Fiber and Copper cable identification and fiber strand and copper pair allocations.

d. G403004 DUCTBANKS, MANHOLES AND HANDHOLES: Replace this entire section with the following:

Provide a system of concrete encased duct-banks, manholes, and hand-holes for site telecommunications

Provide the new HQs 550’ of 3-way 4” conduit system concrete encased duct-bank from the new facility to existing Manhole 589-4-1.

Provide the new Armory (Bid Option) 1300’ of 2-way 4” conduit system and Hand-hole system from new Armory to Manhole 588.

Provide underground electrically detectable film warning tape with two-line messaging in permanent one inch bold letters continuously for the entire length for underground duct banks. Provide Innerduct in one of the three ducts. Provide the point of building entry hidden below ground. Seal all incoming communications ducts to resist liquid and gas infiltration at all maintenance holes and building entrance point locations.

e.

3. PART 3.3, Chapter 3 – P1509,

a. 3.1.2.2 Demolition Photos for Relocation of Buildings 123A, 219A, 419A, Gazebo, and S506: The intent is to clear the building site for the new buildings and relocate Shed 123A (Photo 4), Shed 219A (Photo 6), Shed 419A (Photo 11), Gazebo (Photo 18), S506 (Photo 19) on another portion of the site. It is the Governments Option based on final site design approval if Contractor is to demolish and remove any of these structures from site. These structures may require some minor renovation (i.e. new wood flooring, concrete floor slab, entry pavers, tie-downs, etc…) and this work to be reflected in the Contractor’s proposal.

b. Site drawing for P1509F: Part 6, Attachment B.2 notes: "Drawing is a Concept to be used for adjacency and circulation only". No conflict exist nor will phasing be required. Part 3.3 CHAPTER 6, G10 SITE PREPARATION requires site preparation activities to "consist of site clearing, demolition, salvage, relocation, earthwork, and hazardous waste remediation to ready the site for other work associated with the project". ESR F2010 1.1 requires to "Remove indicated existing structure to grade. Remove all on-site pavement and foundations to subgrade". Refer to updated Price Proposal Form: CLIN 0003A - Base Bid

(Item 0003D) to include the abatement and complete demolition of Buildings 119, 121, 123, 123A Shed, 223, 516, 520, 522, 522 Gazebo, and S506 Shed; CLIN 0045 (OPTION 13) for the abatement and demolition of Buildings 219, 219A, and 221; and CLIN 0047 (Options 15 & 16) for abatement and demolition of Buildings 419, 419A, 421 & 423. Note HazMat Abatement and Demo of B223 is included in CLIN 0003C. Buildings will be vacant and can be demolished once NTP is issued.

4. PART 3.4, Chapter 6 – P1520,

a. ESR G202007: Correction to section - Static tank displays will not be required for P-1520

5. PART 3.5, Chapter 3 – P1522,

a. 3.1.2.1 Buildings 511 and 511A to be demolished as reflected in Price Proposal Form, CLINS 0074 & 0075 for 2nd Engineering Support BN HQ; refer to Demolition Photos in Section 3.1.2.2.

6. Part 3.7 – P1525F, Chapter 1, Buildings 913 and 977

a. Confirmation: 913 was an addition to Building 977 (original building). Building 977 is now the number for both of these structures. Therefore the description currently provided in F20 reflects both structures; based on Property Records this facility consist of both the Operational Vehicle Garage of approx. 10,650SF and a Publics Works Shop of approx. 4,013SF. Refer to as-built drawings located in Part 6 “Attachments” Chapter C.1 for more information of these existing attached structures to be demolished including the concrete ramp located in the existing parking lot. Building to be vacant and can be demolished once NTP is issued.

7. PART 3 – CHAPTER 6 ESR D20, D203001 WASTE PIPE & FITTINGS (ALL MILCONS)

a. Text change to “Provide plastic PVC piping, fittings, and solvent cement for above and below ground installation.”

C. PART 4 PERFORMANCE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

1. PART 4, D203001 WASTE PIPE & FITTINGS ‐ All projects

a. D203001 1.1 PIPING AND FITTINGS: Text to change to “Plastic PVC or ABS piping, fittings, and solvent cement meeting requirements of ASTM D 2665 or ASTM D 2661 may be provided. Equip plastic piping with approved firestopping devices as required by code.”

2. PART 4, D203002, VENT PIPE & FITTINGS ‐ All projects

a. Text to change to “Plastic PVC or ABS piping, fittings, and solvent cement meeting requirements of

ASTM D 2665 or ASTM D 2661 may be provided. Equip plastic piping with approved firestopping devices as required by code. Single drainage/vent stack systems (such as Philadelphia system) and mechanical air admittance valves are not acceptable.”

D. PART 6 ATTACHMENTS, CHAPTER B

1. Part B.2 Site Bubble Plan – P1529

a. Building number is SHP416. This building is to be demolished by others (along with HP425, HP435, and

HP415) and will be removed prior to work under this MILCON.

E. ATTACHMENT H

1. F Price Proposal Form: See attached updated form

2. Phased Construction Schedule: See attached updated form

3. Wheeled Assets

---END OF AMENDMENT---

SECTION 00 21 16 - INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.4 FEDBIZOPS (FBO)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: Will be located on FBO under additional documents

6.1 ATTACHMENT A - PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

6.2 ATTACHMENT B - SECNAV 5512 – BASE ACCESS FORM (Naval Station Norfolk)

6.3 ATTACHMENT C - CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXP. PROJECT DATA SHEET

6.4 ATTACHMENT D – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING RECORD

6.5 ATTACHMENT E – SMALL BUSINESS PART. AND COMMITMENT STRATEGY

6.6 ATTACHMENT F – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

6.7 ATTACHMENT G – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

6.8 ATTACHMENT H – PROPOSED PROJECT DURATIONS

1. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This solicitation is being issued as an Unrestricted Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction and the size standard is $39,500,000

1.1.3 This acquisition will be advertised utilizing FAR Part 36.3, Two Phase Design Build Selection Procedures and 15 – Contracting by Negotiations resulting in a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for construction services.

1.1.4 magnitude of construction per Project is as follows, in accordance with DFARS 236.204.

P1199F – CLB HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES REPLACEMENT – $10,000,000 - $25,000,000

P1300F – 2D TANK BN/CO HQ AND ARMORY REPLACEMENT – $25,000,000 - $100,000,000

P1509F – REPLACE REGIMENTAL HEADQUARTERS 2DMARDIV – $25,000,000 - $100,000,000

P1520F – 1/8 BN HQ REPLACEMENT – $10,000,000 - $25,000,000

P1522F 24TH AND 26TH MEU HEADQUARTERS REPLACEMENT – $25,000,000 - $100,000,000

P1524F 2D TSB HQ REPLACEMENT – $10,000,000 - $25,000,000

P1525F – ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION REPLACEMENT – $10,000,000 - $25,000,000

P1529F – MCAB HQ REPLACEMENT – $25,000,000 - $100,000,000

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

The general intent of this solicitation is to award a Fixed Price construction contract for design-build (DB) projects in Package 2, Hurricane Florence Recovery HQ Facilities at MCB Camp Lejeune. Package 2 consists eight (8) projects: P1199F – CLB Headquarters Facilities Replacement, P1300F – 2D Tank BN/CO HQ and Armory Replacement, P1509F – Replace Regimental Headquarters 2DMARDIV, P1520F – 1/8 BN HQ Replacement, P1622F – 24th and 26th MEU Headquarters Replacement, P1524F – 2D TSB HQ Replacement, P1525F – Environmental Management Division Replacement, and P1529F – MCAB Headquarters Replacement, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

P1199F – Combat Logistics Battalion (CLB) Headquarters Facilities Replacement: Constructs three-7,500 square foot headquarters facilities for CLB 2, CLB 6 and CLB 8. Each facility will be a steel frame with reinforced concrete masonry unit with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. Site Improvements includes demolition, utilities, and a parking lot.

P1300F – 2D Tank Battalion/Company Headquarters and Armory: Constructs a 25,000 square foot steel frame battalion/company headquarters facilities with reinforced concrete masonry unit with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. The facility includes administrative and support space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations of 2D Tank Battalion. Also constructs a 8,400 square foot low-rise reinforced concrete masonry unit Armory building with structural walls supported on pile foundation, structural steel framing, reinforced CMU walls with brick veneer, and reinforced concrete roof with standing seam metal roof. The facility includes administrative space and secure storage for crew serve weapons. Construction also includes a 4,700 square foot covered cleaning area for the armory. Site improvements includes demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1509F – Replace Regimental Headquarters 2D Marine Division: Constructs four low-rise regimental headquarters totaling 49,000 square feet for 2D, 6TH, 8TH, and 10TH Marines with reinforced concrete masonry unit with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. These facilities includes administrative and support space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations of regimental headquarters. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1520F – 1/8 Battalion Headquarters Replacement: Constructs a 23,200 square foot low-rise steel frame battalion headquarters facilities for the 1/8 Marines with reinforced concrete masonry units with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. This facility includes administrative and support space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations of 1/8 Marines battalion headquarters. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1522F – 24th and 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit Headquarters: Constructs a 43,000 square foot Multi-Story steel frame Headquarters and Academic Instruction Building for the 24th and 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) with reinforced concrete masonry unit with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. Facilities will include the support space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations in support of the MEUs Headquarters and Training mission. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1524F – 2D Transportation Support Battalion Headquarters Replacement: Constructs a 17,400 square foot low-rise steel frame headquarters facility for the 2D Transportation Support Battalion (TSB) with reinforced concrete masonry units with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. This facility includes administrative and support space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations of a battalion headquarters. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1525F – Environmental Management Division Replacement: Constructs a 10,200 square foot administrative, operational vehicle garage, classroom and supply warehouse for the Resource Conservation Recovery Section of the Environmental Management Division (RCRS-EMD). Building to be single-story reinforced concrete masonry unit on concrete pile foundations with structural steel framing, reinforced masonry walls with brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roofs. The facility includes support space necessary to conduct day-to-day operations of RCRS. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P1529 – Marine Corps Advisor Battalion HQ Replacement: Constructs a 37,000 square foot low-rise steel frame facility for the 2D Marine Corps Advisor Battalion (2D MCAB) with reinforced concrete masonry units with reinforced masonry walls, brick veneer, reinforced concrete floors, and standing seam metal roof. These facilities includes administrative, support, and operational space necessary to conduct the day-to-day operations of the 2D MCAB. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2.2 The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3 The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

2.4 Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 4-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II unless corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are equal to each other and, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). All technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

2.5 Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified Significant Weakness(s) and/or Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance . This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

3. EVALUATIONS FOR AWARD

3.1 The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

PHASE I

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience

Factor 3 – Past Performance

PHASE II

Factor 4 – Technical Solution Factor 5 – Project Management Approach Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization

The distinction between Experience and Past Performance is that Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 4-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II unless corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are equal to each other and, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). All technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

After evaluating Phase I proposals, the source selection authority shall select the most highly qualified offerors and request that only those offerors submit Phase II proposals. In accordance with FAR 36.303-1(a)(4), the solicitation shall state that a maximum of three offerors will be selected to submit Phase II proposals unless the Government determines that a number greater than three is in the Government’s best interest.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3.2 Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

a. Price & Factor 6: PHASE II

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Price binder: Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit one (1) original electronically, marked “Original” in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments. Additionally, the offeror shall submit one (1) hard copy Original, marked “Original”; one (1) CD-ROM; and one (1) hard copy, marked “Copy”, in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments. All hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders. All submissions shall including the following:

• Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, DUNS, CAGE code, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address;

• Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;

• Price Proposal Form;

• Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award Management

(SAM);

• Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-4212 for the 2018 filing cycle;

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million; and

• Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

• Small Business Subcontracting Plan (see below).

• Factor 6 and all corresponding Factor 6 Attachments.

In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies, the original version of the proposal will govern. Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically FAR 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003).

NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition.

Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

WOSB 9%

SDVOSB 3%

Small businesses identified by name shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).

See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Attachment G) for format.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price, including all options and planned modifications. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

b. Non-price Factors: Phase I and Phase II

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Non-price binder: The offeror shall submit one (1) original electronically, marked “Original” in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments. Additionally, the offeror shall submit one (1) hard copy Original, marked “Original”; one (1) CD-ROM; and two (2) copies, marked “Copy”, in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments. All hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders. All submissions shall including the following:

• Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, CAGE Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;

• 8 ½ x 11 paper, 10-point font;

• Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated; and

• Additionally, include an electronic version of the price and non-price proposal on one CD-ROM.

As with the price proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies (or CD-ROM), the electronic version marked “original” of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered. Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the roles, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. The narrative shall identify the location of the specific offices that will be involved in completing the work included in this solicitation. If the experience of a significant design subcontractor(s) is being claimed in Factor 2 - Experience, the firm must be included in the above narrative and organizational chart.

Note: If the Offeror is proposing to utilize multiple Designers of Records (DOR) (i.e. one DOR for each Project), clearly state which DOR will be designing each Project.

The technical approach narrative and organizational chart shall be limited to two (2) double-sided page or four (4) single-sided pages. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). If providing a letter of commitment, the letter shall be from the proposed DOR on the DOR’s letterhead and addressed to the Offeror.

(3) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed statement from the Surety on the Surety’s letterhead demonstrating a minimum bonding capacity for a single award of $250,000,000.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Failure to provide any of the above required information may result in the offeror being rated Unacceptable.

Offerors that are rated Unacceptable in this factor will be found ineligible to proceed to Phase II unless corrected through discussions (if held).

Factor 2 – Experience

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: New Construction of a 15,000 square feet or greater Headquarters Facility, Administrative Facility, Operational Facility, Warehouse or Academic Facility.

- Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

- At least one relevant facility meeting the above Size/Scope/Complexity requirements must be a Headquarters Facility or Administrative Facility.

- At least one project meeting the Size/Scope/Complexity requirements shall have a final construction cost of $125,000,000 or greater. This project may include a single facility or multiple facilities, as long as one of the facilities in the project meets the above Size/Scope/Complexity requirements.

Note: For the purpose of this evaluation, a “facility” is considered to be a single building; a facility is not a compound, complex, installation, or campus. Square Footage must be specifically provided per relevant facility. A total square footage of a compound, complex, campus, installation or a building containing multiple facility types is not sufficient and will be considered Not Relevant.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Furthermore, the offeror must have been the prime contractor on the project. Projects completed outside of this window will be considered “Not Relevant.” Furthermore, the offeror must have been the prime contractor (Block 4, Attachment C) on the project. As such, the offeror’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered.

Further, subcontractor experience will not be considered.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. The Government reserves the right not to consider a project submitted for both construction and design experience on a single Project Data Sheet. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages). The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy as defined above to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of three (3) up to a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the Designer of Record(s) that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: Design of a 15,000 square feet or greater Headquarters Facility, Administrative Facility, Operational Facility, Warehouse or Academic Facility.

- Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

- At least one relevant facility meeting the above Size/Scope/Complexity requirements must be a Headquarters

Facility or Administrative Facility.

Note: For the purpose of this evaluation, a “facility” is considered to be a single building; a facility is not a compound, complex, installation, or campus. Square Footage must be specifically provided per relevant facility. A total square footage of a compound, complex, campus, installation or a building containing multiple facility types is not sufficient and will be considered Not Relevant.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Projects completed outside of this window will be considered “Not Relevant.” The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data sheet under Block 4 next to “Design Completion Date.”

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. The Government reserves the right not to consider a project submitted for both construction and design experience on a single Project Data Sheet. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages). The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy as defined above to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. The project should clearly state which design office location performed the work.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the first five (5) for Construction Experience and first five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with three or more of the facility types included under Size/Scope/Complexity (Headquarters Facility, Administrative Facility, Operational Facility, Warehouse or Academic Facility) may be considered more favorably than those that do not.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with constructing multiple buildings concurrently or sequentially at a campus, compound, installation, or complex may be considered more favorably than those that do not.

Relevant design projects that were performed by the specific design office identified in Factor 1 may be considered more favorably.

Factor 3 – Past Performance

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Construction Experience. If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Design Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment F) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors are permitted to submit copies of previously completed PPQs.

However, Offerors shall not incorporate previously submitted PPQs submitted for other RFPs by reference into their proposal; but this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, John Bishop, john.p.bishop1@navy.mil.

Offerors are highly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Additionally, Offerors are highly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total. Information provided beyond this page limit will not be considered.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Factor 4 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. A technical narrative is required for each of the Projects included in this MILCON Package: P1522F 24th, and 26th MEU Headquarters Replacement, P1529F MCAB HQ Replacement, P1300F 2D Tank BN/CO HQ and Armory Replacement, P1509F Replace Regimental Headquarters 2DMARDIV, P1509 1/8 BN HQ Replacement, P1199F CLB Headquarters Facilities Replacement, P1524F 2D TSB HQ Replacement, and P1525F Environmental Management Division Replacement. The description for each project shall include the following systems:

o Architectural o Building structure o Building envelope o Mechanical Systems and DDC Controls to include accessibility to Mechanical room and circulation within the mechanical system.

o Electrical and Communication Systems infrastructure.

o Resiliency to include cyber secure EMCS integration, utility metering and controls o Anti-terrorism/force protection features o General concept proposed to meet sustainability and low impact development (LID).

o Site layout to include improvements and/or efficient use of sites.

o Special Systems to include, but not limited to security measures for P1522F, P1529F, P1300F and P1509F;

cybersecurity measures for all but P1525F; and weapons storage for P1300F.

Provide concept drawings for: P1522F, 24th, and 26th MEU Headquarters Replacement

Concept drawings shall include:

o Site Plan including primary facilities, roadways, parking, emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances.

o Floor Plan including interior circulation, adjacencies, square footage and mechanical spaces.

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) for each MILCON project included in the Package. Include up to a total of six (6) conceptual drawings for P1522F to supplement the narrative. The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit, but the conceptual drawings are not included in the limit.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to or enhancing of the technical requirements of the RFP.

The narrative does not require the identification of specific subcontractors. However, if the Offeror identifies a specific subcontractor to perform major or…