J.3_PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx

DOCX document 38 KB Posted

Attached to
Nationwide Tower/Antenna Multiple Award Construction IDIQ Contract (TMACC)
Solicitation number
70Z08822RESDV0001
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
70118 Final Report FY19 PMV080.pdf PDF
Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
15261 Final Report FY19 PMV080.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
44217 Final Report FY19 PMV080.pdf PDF
A001 12 847597 TOWER- 65 SST MULTIPLE RAISED PLATFORMS.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
65 SS TOWER - MT. DIABLO - STAMPED STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.pdf PDF
70118_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
15261_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
21206_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
17283_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
15290_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
17908_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
813509 R21 Tower San Onofre Peak Maintenance Report.pdf PDF
44217_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
15301_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
813531_R21 Tower Cambria_FY16.pdf PDF
15297_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
15255_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001- R1.pdf PDF
15259_Final Report_FY19_PMV080.pdf PDF
TOWER 65 SST MULTIPLE RAISED PLATFORMS.pdf PDF
813559_R21 Tower Mt Jenner_FY16.pdf PDF
Appendix A_Seed Project_USCG District 11 Towers.pdf PDF
Request for Proposal_70Z08822RESDV0001.pdf PDF
J.8_U.S. Tower Manual_COMDTINST M11000.4.pdf PDF
J.2_EXPERIENCE INFORMATION FORM.docx DOCX document
J.5_USCG District Map.pdf PDF
CONTRACTOR REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION.pdf PDF
J.7_U.S. Coast Guard Safety and Environmental Health Manual_COMDTINST M5100.47.pdf PDF
Appendix A_Seed Project_USCG District 13 Towers.pdf PDF
Finalized_Source Selection Plan_TMACC.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3- Appendix D_20130812_EIS Standard Protection Measures_final.pdf PDF
1.1.3_Final Specification SEED Project for National Tower Maintenance and Inspection IDIQ Contract_FY22.pdf PDF
1.10.1_DBA_Wage Determination_Seed Project.zip ZIP file
J.6_U.S. Coast Guard Asbestos Exposure Control Manual_COMDTINST M6260-16.pdf PDF
J.1_EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW SHEET.docx DOCX document
Enclosure 3- Appendix C_GTPermittingGuidelines.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3- Appendix F_Sea Turtle and Small Tooth Sawfish Construction Conditions.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3- Appendix E_Standard Manatee Conditions for In-Water Work.pdf PDF
Show all 41

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Contractor Information (Firm Name):

Client Information (Name):

RFP#70Z08822RESDV0001

ATTACHMENT J.3 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

NAVFAC/USACE/USCG PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4 )

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work HighMedRoutine How is this project relevant to project of submission?

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: THE USCG REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMIT DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USCG WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USCG SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

1) RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Neutral
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
EVGSMUN
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
EVGSMUN
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
EVGSMUN

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
EVGSMUN

3. COST CONTROL:

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
EVGSMUN
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
EVGSMUN

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No

Continued…

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No

1. BUSINESS RELATIONS

MANAGEMENT

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
EVGSMUN
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
EVGSMUN
c) Government Property Control
EVGSMUN
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
EVGSMUN
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
EVGSMUN
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
EVGSMUN
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
EVGSMUN

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
EVGSMUN

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
EVGSMUN
d) Overall customer satisfaction
EVGSMUN

SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E

VG

S

M

U

N

GENERAL

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .