J.26 Past Performance Questionnaire 5-31-24.docx
DOCX document 66 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CRITICAL POWER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-24-R-00177
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is being used to evaluate an offeror's past performance for a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Critical Power Systems (CPS) Installation and Design Contract.
The key details are:
- The offeror is proposing on an FAA CPS Installation and Design Contract and is requesting past performance input from current or previous customers.
- The questionnaire covers various aspects of the offeror's performance, including program management, design services, and installation services. Customers are asked to provide ratings and comments on the offeror's performance.
- The completed questionnaires are to be returned to the FAA Contract Specialists by a specified due date.
- The FAA will use the responses to this questionnaire as part of the overall evaluation of the offeror's past performance for this contract opportunity.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OFFEROR INFORMATION
Company Name:
Point of Contact (POC):
POC Title:
POC Telephone No.:
POC E-Mail:
For each project included in the technical proposal, an associated past performance questionnaire must be provided.
In accordance with L.4.1.2, failure to copy both the CS and no questionnaires are returned by the customer, then the offeror may receive an Unknown Confidence rating.
If you are utilizing the FAA for this past performance questionnaire, please direct it to the FAA Project Execution Lead (PEL) or Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for each respective project.
| Equipment (check all that apply): |
| UPS☐ EG☐ FST☐ |
Project Name:
Contract Number:
Task Order Award Number (if applicable):
Contract Type (FFP, Cost Reimbursable, etc.):
Project/Task Order Period of Performance:
Approximate Project/Task Order Dollar Value:
Contract or Project/Task Order Description:
We are currently responding to the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Screening Information Request (SIR) No. [TBD], for Critical Power Systems (CPS). The FAA places emphasis in an Offeror’s past performance and experience as an evaluation factor in its procurements. Accordingly, the FAA is requiring that customers of Offerors responding to the SIR be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested.
We have identified Mr./Ms. [Insert name of Customer] of [Insert name of Customer’s company] as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge concerning our work. Your cooperation and completion of the following Past Performance Questionnaire is appreciated. If contacted by a representative of the FAA requesting additional information and/or clarification of your response to the questionnaire, you are hereby authorized to respond to such a request.
ATTACHMENT J.26
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The company who provided this questionnaire is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Critical Power Systems (CPS) Installation and Design Contract. Past performance is of considerable importance to this Source Selection. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the Contractor is very important.
We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and immediately return no later than (Insert date provided by CS] the following point of contact:
Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen, Contract Specialists (AAQ-720) E-mail: Stefanie.Wiles@faa.gov and Amanda.J.Garen@faa.gov Subject Line: SIR # Offeror Name – Past Performance
If you have any questions, please contact Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen via email, provided above.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Please complete this questionnaire indicating the Contractor’s performance for the identified program based on the ratings listed under PART 2. Assessments should reflect only performance for which the Contractor is/was responsible.
2. Please select a “Number” or “Yes” / “No” corresponding to your rating or “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area. Selecting N/A is not detrimental to overall score of the Contractor.
3. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified project/program, we solicit your comments on other similar projects/programs for which your activity has contracts with this Contractor.
4. Please return completed questionnaire(s) to both Contract Specialists, by e-mail, no later than [(Insert date provided by CS] to the following:
Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen, Contract Specialists (AAQ-720) E-mail: Stefanie.Wiles@faa.gov and Amanda.J.Garen@faa.gov
ATTACHMENT J.26
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please indicate if performance involved one or more of the following products or services by marking all that apply:
Program Management: ☐ Design Services:
Engine Generator(s) ☐ Uninterruptible Power System(s) ☐ Fuel Storage Tank(s)☐
Installation Services:
Engine Generator(s) ☐ Uninterruptible Power System(s) ☐ Fuel Storage Tank(s) ☐
Other:
PART TWO: QUESTIONS
All questions must have a response. If the question does not apply please select N/A.
The numbers 0 to 4 correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire below:
| RATING |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| 3 |
| EXCELLENT: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective. |
| 2 |
| VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| 1 |
| SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| 0 |
| UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and corrections are not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A |
| NOT APPLICABLE: Performance does not apply to a particular case in question or is not available. Selecting N/A is not detrimental to overall score of the Contractor. |
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
| 1. |
| How successful was the Contractor in providing fully |
trained and skilled personnel, in a timely manner, to manage this program?
N/A
| 2. |
| How effective was the Contractor in managing all phases of |
a task or project?
N/A
| 3. |
| How well did the Contractor demonstrate initiative and |
ability to quickly identify technical, management or schedule problems and provide venues to resolve them?
N/A
| 4. |
| How effective was the Contractor’s quality control |
program?
N/A
| 5. |
| How responsive was the Contractor in meeting equipment |
delivery schedules?
N/A
| 6. |
| How timely was the Contractor in submitting required data |
reports?
N/A
| 7. |
| How competent were key personnel, i.e., Program Manager |
and Alternate Program Manager?
N/A
| 8. |
| How well did key personnel communicate with |
Government/Customer personnel?
N/A
| 9. |
| How cooperative were key personnel with |
Government/Customer personnel?
N/A
| 10. |
| How supportive was corporate management to the |
Government/Customer personnel?
N/A
| 11. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall management |
of this contract?
N/A
| 12. |
| Have any major contract requirements been terminated or |
rescheduled as a result of the Contractor’s inability to perform?
| a. | If so, please explain? | |
| Yes ☐ or | No ☐ |
| 13. |
| Were any “cure” or “show cause” notices issued? |
a. If so, for what?
b. What action did the Contractor take to correct the situation?
Yes☐ or No ☐
| 14. |
| Was an election made not to exercise an option due to the Contractor’s poor performance? |
If so, why?
Yes ☐ or No ☐ or N/A☐
B. DESIGN SERVICES
| 15. |
| How effective was the Contractor in providing Engineering |
Services?
N/A
| 16. |
| How efficiently did the Contractor integrate your project design work with their work schedule? |
| 0 |
N/A
| 17. |
| How detailed was the contractor’s Site Survey and Report? |
| 0 |
N/A
| 18. |
| If the contractor provided a Statement-of Work, did the Contractor uphold the duties as outlined? |
| 0 |
N/A
| 19. |
| Was the Cost Estimate organized and structured in a way that pricing could be analyzed and all costs accounted for? |
| 0 |
N/A
| 20. |
| If the Contractor provide an Arc Flash Risk Assessment Report, was the Contractor’s assessment thorough and |
accurate?
N/A
| 21. |
| How detailed were the drawings in the Engineering Package for this project? |
| 0 |
N/A
| 22. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance providing Engineering Services? |
| 0 |
N/A
C. INSTALLATION SERVICES
| 23. |
| How effective was the Contractor in providing Installation |
Services?
N/A
| 24. |
| How efficiently did the Contractor integrate your installation |
project with their work schedule?
N/A
| 25. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in |
tracking equipment shipments and arranging delivery?
N/A
| 26. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in |
coordinating permits and approvals from Federal, State and local authorities having jurisdiction over the projects Scope- of-Work?
N/A
| 27. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in |
obtaining qualified subcontractors, such as licensed electricians and fuel tank installers?
N/A
| 28. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in |
completing as-built drawings?
N/A
| 29. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in |
resolving the final inspection discrepancy list?
N/A
| 30. |
| How well did the Contractor manage the installation project |
schedule overall?
N/A
| 31. |
| How would you rate the Contractor’s overall technical |
performance for this installation contract?
N/A
D. Would you recommend award of a similar contract to this contractor? Yes ☐ or No ☐
PART THREE: CUSTOMER INFORMATION
The following information will assist in the analysis of the data provided. Information will be kept CONFIDENTIAL:
Name of Respondent:
Position Title:
Organization:
Telephone No.:
Length of Involvement in Program/Contract:
Date Questionnaire Completed:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .