J.26 Past Performance Questionnaire 5-31-24.docx

DOCX document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
CRITICAL POWER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
6973GH-24-R-00177
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Franchise Acquisition Services

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is being used to evaluate an offeror's past performance for a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Critical Power Systems (CPS) Installation and Design Contract.

The key details are:

  • The offeror is proposing on an FAA CPS Installation and Design Contract and is requesting past performance input from current or previous customers.
  • The questionnaire covers various aspects of the offeror's performance, including program management, design services, and installation services. Customers are asked to provide ratings and comments on the offeror's performance.
  • The completed questionnaires are to be returned to the FAA Contract Specialists by a specified due date.
  • The FAA will use the responses to this questionnaire as part of the overall evaluation of the offeror's past performance for this contract opportunity.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to CRITICAL POWER SYSTEMS INSTALLATION SERVICES, newest first.
File Type Posted
CPS SIR 6973GH-24-R-00177 Questions and Answers 10.16.24.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.001 Critical Power Systems Statement of Work (SOW) Rev 1. 10-16-2024.docx DOCX document
J.024 Price Proposal Critical Power Systems Cost Worksheet 10-11-24.xlsx.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
6973GH-24-R-00177 Amendment P00001.pdf PDF
6973GH-24-R-00177 REVISED SIR.pdf PDF
J.001 Critical Power Systems Statement of Work (SOW).docx DOCX document
J.002 Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).pdf PDF
J.003 Data Item Description (DID).pdf PDF
J.005 Contractor Acceptance Inspection (CAI) FAA Form 6010-5.pdf PDF
J.006 Travel Authorization Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.010 Pre-Construction Agenda and Checklist - DOT Form F4220.3.doc DOC document
J.011 FAA-C-1217H Construction Specification - ELECTRICAL WORK, PREMISES WIRING.pdf PDF
J.013 FAA-STD-002H Standard Engineering Drawing Preparation & Support.pdf PDF
J.015 FAA Order JO 3900.57A CHG 1 - EOSH Requirements in the Planning & Execution of Construction & Maintenance Activities at NAS Facilities.pdf PDF
J.017 FAA Order JO 6950.27B - Power System Studies.pdf PDF
J.020 Fuel Storage Tank Guidelines.pdf PDF
J.021 FST Program Specifications for Construction.pdf PDF
J.023 FAA Order 1370.121B - FAA Information Security and Privacy Policy.pdf PDF
J.028 Technical Approach Evaluation Worksheets rev2 06-04-24.docx DOCX document
J.029 FAA cleanup schedule - ACEPS support.pdf PDF
6973GH-24-R-00177 as of 9-17-2024.pdf PDF
J.004 Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).pdf PDF
J.009 Pre-Construction Installation EOSH Checklist - FAA Form 3900-18.pdf PDF
J.012 FAA-C-1391e INSTALLATION, TERMINATION, SPLICING, AND TRANSIENTSURGE PROTECTION OF UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM POWER CABLES.pdf PDF
J.016 FAA Order JO 3900.64A - Air Traffic Organization Electrical SafetyProgram.pdf PDF
J.024 Price Proposal Critical Power Systems Cost Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.025 Phase I, Volume II - Relevant Corporate Experience Form.docx DOCX document
J.027A-2 Technical Approach, Factor 3, Installation Proposal Form.pdf PDF
J.018 FAA Order JO 1050.17B - Environmental Compliance at Air Traffic Organization Facilities.pdf PDF
J.019 FAA Order JO 6950.2F Electrical Power Policy lmplementation at NationalAirspace System Facilities.pdf PDF
J.022 Contractor Release - DOT FORM 4220.4.pdf PDF
J.007 Performance Bond - FAA Form Number FAA 4400-63.pdf PDF
J.008 Payment Bond - FAA Form Number 4400-61.pdf PDF
J.014 FAA Order 1050.10D - Environmental Pollution Control and Abatement at FAA Facilities.pdf PDF
J.027A-1 Phase 2 Volume 2, Technical Approach - Factor 2 Category 2 CPS Design Proposal Form.pdf PDF
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name:

Point of Contact (POC):

POC Title:

POC Telephone No.:

POC E-Mail:

For each project included in the technical proposal, an associated past performance questionnaire must be provided.

In accordance with L.4.1.2, failure to copy both the CS and no questionnaires are returned by the customer, then the offeror may receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

If you are utilizing the FAA for this past performance questionnaire, please direct it to the FAA Project Execution Lead (PEL) or Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) for each respective project.

Equipment (check all that apply):
UPS☐ EG☐ FST☐

Project Name:

Contract Number:

Task Order Award Number (if applicable):

Contract Type (FFP, Cost Reimbursable, etc.):

Project/Task Order Period of Performance:

Approximate Project/Task Order Dollar Value:

Contract or Project/Task Order Description:

We are currently responding to the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Screening Information Request (SIR) No. [TBD], for Critical Power Systems (CPS). The FAA places emphasis in an Offeror’s past performance and experience as an evaluation factor in its procurements. Accordingly, the FAA is requiring that customers of Offerors responding to the SIR be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested.

We have identified Mr./Ms. [Insert name of Customer] of [Insert name of Customer’s company] as the point of contact based on his/her knowledge concerning our work. Your cooperation and completion of the following Past Performance Questionnaire is appreciated. If contacted by a representative of the FAA requesting additional information and/or clarification of your response to the questionnaire, you are hereby authorized to respond to such a request.

ATTACHMENT J.26

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS

The company who provided this questionnaire is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Critical Power Systems (CPS) Installation and Design Contract. Past performance is of considerable importance to this Source Selection. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the Contractor is very important.

We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and immediately return no later than (Insert date provided by CS] the following point of contact:

Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen, Contract Specialists (AAQ-720) E-mail: Stefanie.Wiles@faa.gov and Amanda.J.Garen@faa.gov Subject Line: SIR # Offeror Name – Past Performance

If you have any questions, please contact Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen via email, provided above.

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Please complete this questionnaire indicating the Contractor’s performance for the identified program based on the ratings listed under PART 2. Assessments should reflect only performance for which the Contractor is/was responsible.

2. Please select a “Number” or “Yes” / “No” corresponding to your rating or “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area. Selecting N/A is not detrimental to overall score of the Contractor.

3. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified project/program, we solicit your comments on other similar projects/programs for which your activity has contracts with this Contractor.

4. Please return completed questionnaire(s) to both Contract Specialists, by e-mail, no later than [(Insert date provided by CS] to the following:

Stefanie Wiles and Amanda Garen, Contract Specialists (AAQ-720) E-mail: Stefanie.Wiles@faa.gov and Amanda.J.Garen@faa.gov

ATTACHMENT J.26

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please indicate if performance involved one or more of the following products or services by marking all that apply:

Program Management: ☐ Design Services:

Engine Generator(s) ☐ Uninterruptible Power System(s) ☐ Fuel Storage Tank(s)☐

Installation Services:

Engine Generator(s) ☐ Uninterruptible Power System(s) ☐ Fuel Storage Tank(s) ☐

Other:

PART TWO: QUESTIONS

All questions must have a response. If the question does not apply please select N/A.

The numbers 0 to 4 correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire below:

RATING
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
3
EXCELLENT: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
2
VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
1
SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
0
UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and corrections are not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A
NOT APPLICABLE: Performance does not apply to a particular case in question or is not available. Selecting N/A is not detrimental to overall score of the Contractor.

PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

A. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

1.
How successful was the Contractor in providing fully

trained and skilled personnel, in a timely manner, to manage this program?

N/A

2.
How effective was the Contractor in managing all phases of

a task or project?

N/A

3.
How well did the Contractor demonstrate initiative and

ability to quickly identify technical, management or schedule problems and provide venues to resolve them?

N/A

4.
How effective was the Contractor’s quality control

program?

N/A

5.
How responsive was the Contractor in meeting equipment

delivery schedules?

N/A

6.
How timely was the Contractor in submitting required data

reports?

N/A

7.
How competent were key personnel, i.e., Program Manager

and Alternate Program Manager?

N/A

8.
How well did key personnel communicate with

Government/Customer personnel?

N/A

9.
How cooperative were key personnel with

Government/Customer personnel?

N/A

10.
How supportive was corporate management to the

Government/Customer personnel?

N/A

11.
How would you rate the Contractor’s overall management

of this contract?

N/A

12.
Have any major contract requirements been terminated or

rescheduled as a result of the Contractor’s inability to perform?

a.If so, please explain?
Yes ☐ orNo ☐
13.
Were any “cure” or “show cause” notices issued?

a. If so, for what?

b. What action did the Contractor take to correct the situation?

Yes☐ or No ☐

14.
Was an election made not to exercise an option due to the Contractor’s poor performance?

If so, why?

Yes ☐ or No ☐ or N/A☐

B. DESIGN SERVICES

15.
How effective was the Contractor in providing Engineering

Services?

N/A

16.
How efficiently did the Contractor integrate your project design work with their work schedule?
0

N/A

17.
How detailed was the contractor’s Site Survey and Report?
0

N/A

18.
If the contractor provided a Statement-of Work, did the Contractor uphold the duties as outlined?
0

N/A

19.
Was the Cost Estimate organized and structured in a way that pricing could be analyzed and all costs accounted for?
0

N/A

20.
If the Contractor provide an Arc Flash Risk Assessment Report, was the Contractor’s assessment thorough and

accurate?

N/A

21.
How detailed were the drawings in the Engineering Package for this project?
0

N/A

22.
How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance providing Engineering Services?
0

N/A

C. INSTALLATION SERVICES

23.
How effective was the Contractor in providing Installation

Services?

N/A

24.
How efficiently did the Contractor integrate your installation

project with their work schedule?

N/A

25.
How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in

tracking equipment shipments and arranging delivery?

N/A

26.
How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in

coordinating permits and approvals from Federal, State and local authorities having jurisdiction over the projects Scope- of-Work?

N/A

27.
How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in

obtaining qualified subcontractors, such as licensed electricians and fuel tank installers?

N/A

28.
How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in

completing as-built drawings?

N/A

29.
How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in

resolving the final inspection discrepancy list?

N/A

30.
How well did the Contractor manage the installation project

schedule overall?

N/A

31.
How would you rate the Contractor’s overall technical

performance for this installation contract?

N/A

D. Would you recommend award of a similar contract to this contractor? Yes ☐ or No ☐

PART THREE: CUSTOMER INFORMATION

The following information will assist in the analysis of the data provided. Information will be kept CONFIDENTIAL:

Name of Respondent:

Position Title:

Organization:

Telephone No.:

Length of Involvement in Program/Contract:

Date Questionnaire Completed:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .