J.028 Technical Approach Evaluation Worksheets rev2 06-04-24.docx

J.28 Technical Approach Evaluation Worksheets Table of Contents

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 1 - Key Personal Evaluation Questions

1. Did the Offeror submit a Letter of Intent that confirms Key Personnel will be dedicated to the contract for one (1) year after contract award?

2. Did the Offeror submit a resume that showed a Program Manager possessing the minimum requirement of five (5) years of program management experience with contracts that are same or similar in scope and complexity as shown in Sections C.1.1 of the SOW?

3. Did the Offeror submit a resume that showed a Program Manager exceeding the minimum requirement of five (5) years to ten (10) years of program management experience with contracts that are same or similar in scope and complexity as shown in Sections C.1.1, C.3.2.6, C.3.2.7 and C.3.2.8 of the SOW?

4. Did the Offeror submit a resume that shows a Program Manager that far exceeds the requirement by having more than ten (10) years of Program Management experience with contracts that are same or similar in scope and complexity as shown in Sections C.1.1, C.3.2.6, C.3.2.7 and C.3.2.8 of the SOW of the SOW?

5. Did the Offeror submit a resume that shows the Program Manager possesses Program Management experience with a contract of same or similar scope and complexity on a Critical Power Systems, Category 2 as shown in section C.1.1 of the SOW?

6. Did the Offeror submit a resume that shows the Program Manager possesses Program Management experience with two or more Critical Power Systems Installation Projects, Category 2 as shown in section C.1.1 of the SOW that meets or exceeds the scope and/or complexity of this requirement?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 10 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 6 (Yes + No) = _____ * 10 = _____ Key Personnel Overall Score

NOTES/COMMENTS:

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 2 – Category 2 Critical Power Systems Design Proposal Questions Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 2 – CPS Design

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Factor 2, CPS as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 * Did the submitted Project include Engine Generators (EGs), each 1000 kW or larger, configured in parallel AND Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), each 200 kVA or larger, configured in parallel AND/OR Fuel Storage Tanks (FST), each 5,000 gallons or larger, configured in parallel with environmental remote monitoring?

1.2 Did the Design Package clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

1.3 Did the Design Package provide sequenced drawings that show how the equipment and associated components will be installed or removed for each stage/phase in construction?

1.4 Did the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation?

1.5 Did the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?

1.6 Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the Critical Power System SOW section C.2.2-C.2.4 AND/OR Industry Standards listed in section C.2.5?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility?

2.2 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System layout that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?

3. Demolition

3.1 Did the Design Package provide a Demolition Plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?

4. Engine Generator

4.1 Did the Design Package describe how the EG was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)

4.2 Did the Design Package include a detailed Parallel/Redundant EG System Design that could be used to build a fully functional system?

4.3 Did the Design Package for the new power system have a remote or inline radiator?

5. UPS

5.1 Did the Design Package describe how the UPS was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)

5.2 Did the Design Package include a detailed Parallel/Redundant UPS System Design that could be used to build a fully functional system?

6. Electrical

6.1 Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)?

6.2 Did the Design Package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA Standards, Specifications, and Orders?

6.3 Did the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?

6.4 Did the Design Package Provide a detailed Cable and Conduit schedule?

6.5 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Equipment Layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?

6.6 Did the Design Package address points of egress per the NEC? (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)

6.7 Did the Design Package provide detailed information for built in redundancy for system operability and sequence of operations?

7. Monitor and Control

7.1 Did the Offeror’s Design package describe experience integrating SCADA, HMI, RSP, RMP, or Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

7.2 Did the Design Package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate?

7.3 Did the Design Package describe designing new Power Control and Monitoring Systems and/or designing modifications to existing Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

7.4 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include power quality monitoring, circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment control and monitoring?

7.5 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include Engine Generator, control and/or monitoring?

7.6 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include UPS, control and/or monitoring?

7.7 Did the Design Package include Automated Controls and Environmental Monitoring system for FST system.

7.8 Did the Design Package provide Control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration?

8. Mechanical

8.1 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show a fuel system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

8.2 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show an HVAC system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

8.3 Did the mechanical drawings show detailed exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

9. Power Analysis

9.1 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations?

9.2 Did the submitted Power Analysis Report provide organized Time Current Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays, and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?

9.3 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 30 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 35 (Yes + No) = _____ * 30 = _____ CPS Design Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 2 – EG Design

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Factor 2, EG as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 * Did the submitted Project include Engine Generators (EGs), each 1000 kW or larger?

1.2 Did the Design Package clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

1.3 Did the Design Package provide sequenced drawings that show how the equipment and associated components will be installed or removed for each stage/phase in construction?

1.4 Did the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation?

1.5 Did the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?

1.6 Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the Critical Power System SOW section C.2.2-C.2.4 AND/OR Industry Standards listed in section C.2.5?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility?

2.2 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System layout that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?

3. Demolition

3.1 Did the Design Package provide a Demolition Plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?

4. Engine Generator

4.1 Did the Design Package describe how the EG was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)

4.2 Did the Design Package include a detailed Parallel/Redundant EG System Design that could be used to build a fully functional system?

4.3 Did the Design Package for the new power system have a remote or inline radiator?

5. Electrical

5.1 Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)?

5.2 Did the Design Package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA Standards, Specifications, and Orders?

5.3 Did the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?

5.4 Did the Design Package Provide a detailed Cable and Conduit schedule?

5.5 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Equipment Layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?

5.6 Did the Design Package address points of egress per the NEC? (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)

5.7 Did the Design Package provide detailed information for built in redundancy for system operability and sequence of operations?

6. Monitor and Control

6.1 Did the Offeror’s Design package describe experience integrating SCADA, HMI, RSP, RMP, or Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

6.2 Did the Design Package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate?

6.3 Did the Design Package describe designing new Power Control and Monitoring Systems and/or designing modifications to existing Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

6.4 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include power quality monitoring, circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment control and monitoring?

6.5 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include Engine Generator, control and/or monitoring?

6.6 Did the Design Package provide Control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration?

7. Mechanical

7.1 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show a fuel system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

7.2 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show an HVAC system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

7.3 Did the mechanical drawings show detailed exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

8. Power Analysis

8.1 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations?

8.2 Did the submitted Power Analysis Report provide organized Time Current Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays, and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?

8.3 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 13 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 31 (Yes + No) = _____ * 13 = _____ EG Design Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 2 – UPS Design

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Factor 2, UPS as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 *Did the submitted Project include Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), each 200 kVA or larger?

1.2 Did the Design Package clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

1.3 Did the Design Package provide sequenced drawings that show how the equipment and associated components will be installed or removed for each stage/phase in construction?

1.4 Did the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation?

1.5 Did the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?

1.6 Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the Critical Power System SOW section C.2.2-C.2.4 AND/OR Industry Standards listed in section C.2.5?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility?

2.2 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System layout that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?

3. Demolition

3.1 Did the Design Package provide a Demolition Plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?

4. UPS

4.1 Did the Design Package describe how the UPS was sized for the project? (Specification from the facility owner, load study, manufacturer provided sizing software, or other means.)

4.2 Did the Design Package include a detailed Parallel/Redundant UPS System Design that could be used to build a fully functional system?

5. Electrical

5.1 Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)?

5.2 Did the Design Package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA Standards, Specifications, and Orders?

5.3 Did the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?

5.4 Did the Design Package Provide a detailed Cable and Conduit schedule?

5.5 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Equipment Layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with proper equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?

5.6 Did the Design Package address points of egress per the NEC? (e.g., for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)

5.7 Did the Design Package provide detailed information for built in redundancy for system operability and sequence of operations?

6. Monitor and Control

6.1 Did the Offeror’s Design package describe experience integrating SCADA, HMI, RSP, RMP, or Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

6.2 Did the Design Package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate?

6.3 Did the Design Package describe designing new Power Control and Monitoring Systems and/or designing modifications to existing Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

6.4 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include power quality monitoring, circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment control and monitoring?

6.5 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include UPS, control and/or monitoring?

6.6 Did the Design Package provide Control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration?

7. Mechanical

7.1 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show an HVAC system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

7.2 Did the mechanical drawings show detailed exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

8. Power Analysis

8.1 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Protective Device Coordination Analysis (PDCA) demonstrate a properly coordinated system in multiple operating scenarios and system configurations?

8.2 Did the submitted Power Analysis Report provide organized Time Current Curves (TCC) for settable protective devices including circuit breakers, relays, and other components for better understanding of coordination within the protective devices?

8.3 Did the submitted Power Analysis Studies Report or Arc Flash Risk Assessment (AFRA) identify the flash-protection boundary and the incident energy at assigned working distances throughout any position or level in the overall electrical system, and specify the appropriate labels for each piece of equipment within the design?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 13 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 29 (Yes + No) = _____ * 13 = _____ UPS Design Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 2 – FST Design

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Factor 2, FST as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 *Did the submitted Project include Fuel Storage Tanks (FST), each 5,000 gallons or larger, configured in parallel with environmental remote monitoring?

1.2 Did the Design Package provide sequenced drawings that show how the equipment and associated components will be installed or removed for each stage/phase in construction?

1.3 Did the Design Package include Electrical Installation Details that provide detailed electrical information necessary for installation?

1.4 Did the Design Package show a control wiring diagram that outlines all of the required control circuits for the system to operate?

1.5 Did the design package convey an understanding of the FAA specifications, standards, and orders listed in the Critical Power System SOW section C.2.2-C.2.4 AND/OR Industry Standards listed in section C.2.5?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System One-Line diagram incorporating the temporary system into the existing facility?

2.2 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Temporary System layout that allows the installation contractor the capability to install the temporary system?

3. Demolition

3.1 Did the Design Package provide a Demolition Plan that includes demolition drawings that clearly shows what equipment will be removed and what equipment will be retained as part of the project?

4. Electrical

4.1 Did the Design Package show a new or existing panel schedule(s)?

4.2 Did the Design Package include and show compliance with the applicable NEC, OSHA, and FAA Standards, Specifications, and Orders?

4.3 Did the Design Package show an existing and/or new One-Line diagram that appropriately represents the overall system?

4.4 Did the Design Package Provide a detailed Cable and Conduit schedule?

4.5 Did the Design Package provide a detailed Equipment Layout that shows where the new equipment will be installed with equipment clearances compliant with NEC, OSHA and FAA Orders, Standards and Specifications as applicable?

4.6 Did the Design Package address points of egress per the NEC? (e.g. for equipment rated 1,200 amperes or above)

4.7 Did the Design Package provide detailed information for built in redundancy for system operability and sequence of operations?

5. Monitor and Control

5.1 Did the Design Package show point-to-point control wiring diagram that outlines all the required control circuits for the system to operate?

5.2 Did the Design Package describe designing new Power Control and Monitoring Systems and/or designing modifications to existing Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

5.3 Did the Design Package Power Control and Monitoring system include power quality monitoring, circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment control and monitoring?

5.4 Did the Design Package include Automated Controls and Environmental Monitoring system for FST system.

5.5 Did the Design Package provide Control drawings that include network diagrams and block diagrams showing overall system integration?

6. Mechanical

6.1 Did the Design Package provide detailed mechanical drawings that show a fuel system design that could be used to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

6.2 Did the mechanical drawings show detailed exhaust system connections, mounting points, and vibration isolation as required to build a fully functioning code compliant system?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 4 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 22 (Yes + No) = _____ * 4 = _____ FST Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3 – Category 2 Critical Power Systems Installation Proposal Questions Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.1 – Capabilities Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.1 – CPS Installation

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Sub-Factor 3.1,CPS as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1. * Did the submitted Project include Engine Generators (EGs), each 1000 kW or larger, configured in parallel AND Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), each 200 kVA or larger, configured in parallel AND/OR Fuel Storage Tanks (FST), each 5,000 gallons or larger, configured in parallel with environmental remote monitoring?

1.2. Did the Offeror's narrative clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system (EG, ATS, fuel tank, conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) to allow for removal and replacement of the existing EG and provide enough fuel (based on EG burn rate of GAL/HR) in order to keep facility operational during construction?

3. Cutover Plan

3.1 Did the Offeror provide a Cutover Plan that includes a description of each Shutdown/Cutover for the submitted project, along with a detailed sequence of events for each Shutdown/Cutover to ensure effective execution of the work and communication with all stakeholders?

4. Equipment Installation

4.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe EG Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?

4.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe UPS Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?

4.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe FST Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model Number(s), of the unit(s) installed?

4.4 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing an Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) and/or switchboard(s)/switchgear with an integral Automatic Transfer controller?

4.5 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Flooded/Wet cell batteries and/or installing Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) batteries?

4.6 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Parallel/Redundant EG Systems and/or Parallel/Redundant UPS Systems with Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

5. Startup and Commissioning of Equipment

5.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of an engine generator or UPS (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?

5.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation, insulation resistance tests, load tests and load sharing?

5.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of EDE equipment?

6. Project Cost and Schedule

6.1 Is the submitted project cost organized and structured to show a detailed cost breakdown by discipline (electrical, mechanical, structural, etc.) , labor, material, and other costs?

6.2 Did the Offeror submit a construction schedule which shows milestone dates and sequence of tasks and durations?

6.3 Did the installation have a test plan to check all the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?

7. Fuel System

7.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe installing a Temporary Fuel System while replacing the existing fuel system to keep the facility operational?

7.2 Did the offeror’s narrative describe the installation or removal of UST, AST, fuel monitoring, fuel line installation, labeling and control system IAW the FST design and specifications in the SOW section C.2.1 and the documentation in the SOW for the Fuel System Program?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 48 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 18 (Yes + No) = _____ * 48 = _____ CPS Installation Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.1– EG Installation

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Sub-Factor 3.1,EG as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1. * Did the submitted Project include Engine Generators (EGs), each 1000 kW or larger, configured in parallel?

1.2. Did the Offeror's narrative clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

2. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system (EG, ATS, fuel tank, conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) to allow for removal and replacement of the existing EG and provide enough fuel (based on EG burn rate of GAL/HR) in order to keep facility operational during construction?

3. Cutover Plan

3.1 Did the Offeror provide a Cutover Plan that includes a description of each Shutdown/Cutover for the submitted project, along with a detailed sequence of events for each Shutdown/Cutover to ensure effective execution of the work and communication with all stakeholders?

4. Equipment Installation

4.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe EG Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?

4.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing an Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS) and/or switchboard(s)/switchgear with an integral Automatic Transfer controller?

4.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Parallel/Redundant EG Systems with Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

5. Startup and Commissioning of Equipment

5.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of an engine generator or UPS (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?

5.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation, insulation resistance tests, load tests and load sharing?

5.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of EDE equipment?

6.Project Cost and Schedule

6.1 Is the submitted project cost organized and structured to show a detailed cost breakdown by discipline (electrical, mechanical, structural, etc.) , labor, material, and other costs?

6.2 Did the Offeror submit a construction schedule which shows milestone dates and sequence of tasks and durations?

6.3 Did the installation have a test plan to check all the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?

7. Fuel System

7.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe installing a Temporary Fuel System while replacing the existing fuel system to keep the facility operational?

7.2 Did the offeror’s narrative describe the installation or removal of UST, AST, fuel monitoring, fuel line installation, labeling and control system IAW the FST design and specifications in the SOW section C.2.1?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 22 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 15 (Yes + No) = _____ * 22 = _____ EG Installation Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.1–UPS Installation

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Sub-Factor 3.1,UPS as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 * Did the submitted Project include Uninterruptible Power Systems (UPS), each 200 kVA or larger, configured in parallel?

1.2 Did the Offeror's narrative clearly indicate installation of Switchboard(s) and/or Switchgear with Power Monitoring?

1. Temporary System

2.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience installing a temporary power system (conductors and other ancillary equipment as required) in order to keep facility operational during construction?

2. Cutover Plan

3.1. Did the Offeror provide a Cutover Plan that includes a description of each Shutdown/Cutover for the submitted project, along with a detailed sequence of events for each Shutdown/Cutover to ensure effective execution of the work and communication with all stakeholders?

3. Equipment Installation

4.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe UPS Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?

4.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Flooded/Wet cell batteries and/or installing Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) batteries?

4.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with installing Parallel/Redundant UPS Systems and/or Parallel/Redundant UPS Systems with Power Control and Monitoring Systems?

4. Startup and Commissioning of Equipment

5.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of an engine generator or UPS (voltage, frequency, phase rotation and load testing)?

5.2 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with verifying voltage, phase rotation, insulation resistance tests, load tests and load sharing?

5.3 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of EDE equipment?

6.Project Cost and Schedule

6.1 Is the submitted project cost organized and structured to show a detailed cost breakdown by discipline (electrical, mechanical, structural, etc.) , labor, material, and other costs?

6.2 Did the Offeror submit a construction schedule which shows milestone dates and sequence of tasks and durations?

6.3 Did the installation have a test plan to check all the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 22 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 13 (Yes + No) = _____ * 22 = _____ UPS Installation Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.1 – FST Installation

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Sub-Factor 3.1,FST as a zero.

1. Scope

1.1 *Did the submitted Project include Fuel Storage Tanks (FST), each 5,000 gallons or larger, configured in parallel with environmental remote monitoring?

2. Cutover Plan

2.1 Did the Offeror provide a Cutover Plan that includes a description of each Shutdown/Cutover for the submitted project, along with a detailed sequence of events for each Shutdown/Cutover to ensure effective execution of the work and communication with all stakeholders?

3. Equipment Installation

3.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe FST Size(s), Manufacturer, and Model number(s) of the unit(s) installed?

4. Startup and Commissioning of Equipment

4.1 Did the Offeror’s narrative describe experience with startup and commissioning of EDE equipment?

5. Project Cost and Schedule

5.1 Is the submitted project cost organized and structured to show a detailed cost breakdown by discipline (electrical, mechanical, structural, etc.) , labor, material, and other costs?

5.2 Did the offeror submit a construction schedule which shows milestone dates and sequence of tasks and durations?

5.3 Did the installation have a test plan to check all the building controls functions as part of the equipment startup?

6. Fuel System

6.1 Did the offeror’s narrative describe the installation or removal of UST, AST, fuel monitoring, fuel line installation, labeling and control system IAW the FST design and specifications in the SOW section C.2.1?

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 4 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 8 (Yes + No) = _____ * 4 = _____ FST Installation Overall Score

Phase 2, Volume 2, Factor 3, Sub-Factor 3.2 – Complexity

*If the answer is “NO” for this question, stop evaluation and score Sub-Factor 3.2 as a zero.

1. *Did the offeror's submission include three (3) projects (with at least one Category 2 project) that meet the Category type(s) in SOW Section 1.1, with an overlap of 90 calendar days of *active construction and meet the minimum physical distance of 5 miles away from the address listed for each project submitted? (1 point)

2. Did the offeror's submission include three (3) projects (with at least two Category 2 projects) that meet the Category type(s) in SOW Section 1.1, with an overlap of 90 calendar days of *active construction and meet the minimum physical distance of 5 miles away from the address listed for each project submitted? (1 point)

3. Did the offeror's submission include three (3) Category 2 projects that meet Category 2 in SOW Section 1.1, with an overlap of 90 calendar days of *active construction and meet the minimum physical distance of 5 miles away from the address listed for each project submitted? (1 point)

4. Did at least one of the submitted projects have a power system installation that meets the qualifications for an NPFA 110 Level 1 System? (1 point)

5. Do at least two of the submitted projects have a power system installation that meets the qualifications for an NPFA 110 Level 1 System? (1 point)

6. Do three of the submitted projects have a power system installation that meets the qualifications for an NPFA 110 Level 1 System? (1 point)

Subtotal

This evaluation is worth a total of 12 points. The overall score for this section is calculated by dividing the number of “Yes” responses by the total number of questions and then multiplying the result by the total potential score. (Rounding up to three significant figures: X.XX)

_____ (Yes) / 6 (Yes + No) = _____ * 12 = _____ Complexity Overall Score

* Active Construction is defined as the period of time following completion of mobilization and commissioning equipment.