CAMMO_Industry_Day_Master_Brief_FBO.pdf

Space and Missile Systems Center Space and Missile Systems Center

Consolidated Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN) Modifications, Maintenance, & Operations (CAMMO) Industry Day

18 February 2014

Safety & Facilities

SMC Industry Day

1Lt. Dan Beckett

SMC/RN

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Evacuations

• In the event of an emergency, evacuate out the nearest exit

& assemble at the appropriate rally point

– Fire Alarm: southwest parking lot

– Bomb Threat or Gas Leak: Across Stewart Ave, behind the dental clinic

Evacuations

Restrooms

• The closest restrooms to the conference:

Overview

Industry Day, Site Visits, & One-on-Ones

• 18 Feb 2014

– Industry Day Briefings

– ATB & Warehouse Tours

• 19 Feb 2014

– Shriever AFB Site Visit

• 20 & 21 Feb 2014

– One-on-Ones with Industry

• 26 Feb 2014

– Vandenberg AFB Site Visit

Briefing Overview

• Industry Day Rules of Engagement

• Opening Comments

• AFSCN Operations

• AFSCN Sustainment

• CAMMO Programmatic Topics

• CAMMO Contractual Topics

• Closing Comments

Industry Day Rules of Engagement

• The briefings presented today contain preliminary, pre-decisional information only

• All information provided is subject to change

• The government is not currently soliciting proposals

Signing In

• Please ensure that you have signed in with Ms. Vollbracht in the conference room foyer

• In an effort to open up the lines of communication between different businesses, it is the government’s intention to compile the list of attendees (to include contact info) and post it to FedBizOpps

• If you do not wish to have your business information posted, please ensure you have indicated this on the sign in sheet

Questions

• To ensure that important information is available to all parties, including those who weren’t able to attend, many questions will NOT be accepted during the course of the briefings today

• If you have a question, please take detailed notes and submit them to the government POC utilizing the question submission form (posted to FedBizOpps) no later than Friday, 7 March, 2014

– Any questions submitted in this way will be answered and publically released via FedBiZOpps but the question source (the business) will not be revealed

• Government POC:

– Lt Dan Beckett; daniel.beckett@us.af.mil; 719-556-2204 mailto:daniel.beckett@us.af.mil

• Examples of questions to ask via submission form:

– “Can you describe how <technical process> works?”

– “Can you clarify <specific> maintenance process?”

• Examples of questions to ask during briefing:

– “Can you repeat what you just said?”

– “What does <acronym> stand for?”

• Examples of questions to ask via submission form:

– “Can you describe how <technical process> works?”

– “Can you clarify <specific> maintenance process?”

• Examples of questions to ask during briefing:

– “Can you repeat what you just said?”

– “What does <acronym> stand for?”

Opening Comments

Mr. Bruno Mediate

First in Space!

Col William Liquori, Jr.

Commander, 50th Space Wing

50th Space Wing

Mission Command satellites to deliver decisive global effects

Vision

The unrivaled leader in satellite operations prevailing across all environments

Col Sutherland Network Operations Group

Col Rittershaus Vice Commander

50 SW

Leadership Team

Col Barthel Mission Support Group

Col Roberts Operations Group

CMSgt Coles Command Chief

Col Liquori Commander

The unrivaled leader in satellite operations, prevailing across all environments

Col Tommy Roberts Commander, 50th Operations Group

Col Roberts

Det 1

7 SOPS AFRC 19 SOPS AFRC

50th Operations Group

CMSgt Perry Superintendent

2 SOPS

Lt Col Ste. Marie

3 SOPS

Lt Col Igl

Lt Col Claxton Deputy Commander

1 SOPS

Lt Col Doran

4 SOPS

Lt Col Munoz

3 SES

Lt Col Fulmer

Mr. Edwards Technical Director

50 OSS

Lt Col Cantore

148 SOPS CA-ANG

Lt Col Daniels 50 OGV Lt Col Bertsch

6 SOPS

AFRC

Multispectral Imagery and Space Situational Awareness ISR Support to Deployed Forces

Telemetry, tracking and commanding for AF’s only Space Based Surveillance asset

Enhanced Knowledge of On-Orbit Space Object

SBSS

1st Space Operations Squadron Always in Control

ATRR

ORS-1

GPS IIA GPS IIR GPS IIF

Precision Navigation and Timing Key Enabler of Precision Engagement

Location and Timing support to 3B+ Civil Users Worldwide

2nd Space Operations Squadron Pathways for Peace

WGS DSCS

Secure, Wideband Military Communications

Primary military means for long-haul communications

Provides space-borne communications to National Authorities and U.S. and Allied Forces

Secure high-rate data provided to POTUS, SECDEF, Theater Commanders, and strategic and tactical forces worldwide

3rd Space Operations Squadron 1st in Space Communications

Milstar AEHF

Global, secure, survivable, strategic and tactical communication

Provides Communications for POTUS, SECDEF, Combatant Commanders and Deployed Forces

4th Space Operations Squadron Linking the Forces

Execute assigned advanced programs on behalf of USAF

Create/strengthen USAF relations with partner DoD agencies

Develop/sustain a core cadre of space professionals to serve as Subject Matter Experts for future AFSPC space-based endeavors

3rd Space Experimentation Squadron

Premier professionals…Superior Mission Assurance…Global Effects!

Col Jonathan A. Sutherland Commander, 50th Network Operations Group

Provide assured access to space and cyberspace through command and control, operations and maintenance critical to global combat effects

50th Network Operations Group

Worldwide Team of Professionals

Superior Mission Assurance

Global Effects in Space and Cyberspace

50 NOG Leadership Team

Group Superintendent

Col Sutherland Commander

Mr. Diaz Technical Director Lt Col Scott

21 SOPS

Lt Col Jackson

23 SOPS

Lt Col Gibson

22 SOPS

Committed to Mission … Compliance … Innovation

CMSgt Sale

Lt Col Plunkett

50 SCS

Lt Col McGibney Deputy Commander

AFSCN & GPS Locations - 50 NOG

Operational Control Nodes Schriever AFB - HAWK Vandenberg AFB –DICE

PIKE

Schriever

(CTS)

HULA

Kaena Point

(HTS)

COOK

Vandenberg

(VTS)

BOSS

New Boston

(NHS)

LION

Oakhanger

(TCS)

POGO

Thule

(TTS)

BEACH/CAPE

KWAJ

Kwajalein

GUAM

Guam

(GTS)

REEF

Diego Garcia

(DGX)

ASCN

Ascension

ARTS/Legacy Antenna

RBC Antenna/Upgrade In-Progress

MUE Antenna

GPS Antenna

Inactive Antenna

One team, embracing innovation for continues mission success

Lt Col Aaron Gibson Commander, 22 SOPS

22nd Space Operations Squadron

Mission and Vision

Providing assured access to space in all environments

One team, embracing innovation for continued mission success

Comm Relay Satellite

SAFB

Remote Tracking Station

…through the Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN)

Mission Satellite

One team, embracing innovation for continued mission success

Providing assured access to space in all environments

Air Force Satellite Control Network

New Boston, NH (1959)

22 SOPS

23 SOPS

Schriever, CO (1988)

Cape Canaveral, FL (1972)

Kaena Pt, HI (1959)

Diego Garcia, UK (1991)

Guam (1965)

Oakhanger, UK (1970)

Thule, GL (1961)

Operational Control Nodes:

Schriever AFB

Vandenberg AFB

21 SOPS

Vandenberg, CA (1959)

- 16 Ground Antennas

- 2 Transportable Antennas

- 150+ Satellites

- 29 Operations Centers

- 166K Supports in FY13

‘The sun never sets on the AFSCN’

Thule New Boston

Kaena Point

Colorado Tracking Station

Vandenberg

Guam

Diego Garcia

Oakhanger

AFSCN Mission Assurance

R&D 12%

C3 34%

Weather 13% Warning 16%

Intel 22%

GPS 3%

DISA ATM

Network

Schriever

Control Node

Vandenberg

Control Node

Meeting Operational Demand

LONG

TERM

PLANNING

LAUNCH

INTEGRATION

MISSION

PRIORITY

ALLOCATION

FINAL

DECONFLICTION

PUBLICATION

NTO

EXECUTION

(REAL

TIME)

ASSESSMENT

Network Tasking Order

DCC

Cisco Works

Electronic Scheduling Dissemination

Mission Prioritization

Launch Integration

Planning

A Day in the Life…

Cohesive global team focused on mission assurance… cost-effective, innovative, and reliable solutions

Lt Col Sarah Jackson Commander, 23 SOPS

23d Space Operations Squadron and New Boston Air Force Station

23d Space Operations Squadron

Provide assured access to space through operations and maintenance of satellite command and control systems

Cohesive global team focused on mission assurance through cost-effective, innovative, and reliable solutions

Lt Col Sarah Jackson

23 SOPS Leadership

Tim Brecheen Mission Support

Lt Col Cary Belmear Operations Officer

Maj Joel Neuber Det 1 Commander

Maj Nate Case OL-A Ops Officer

23 SOPS AFSCN Locations

The Sun Never Sets on the Air Force Satellite Control Network

BOSS

New Boston

(NHS)

LION

Oakhanger

(TCS)

POGO

Thule

(TTS)

BEACH

CCAFS

(EVCF)

Satellite Operations

Relay Data and Upload Commands

Download Data

Real-time Data

Actionable Information!

Satellite Contact = contacting a satellite from a ground tracking station and receiving and sending data

Telemetry Receive data from a satellite

Payload State of health

Tracking Knowing a satellite’s location

100-450,000 miles above the earth Range accurate to <6.1 meters Range rate accurate to 0.03 m/sec

Commanding Data sent to a satellite

Payload Bus

Det 1 – Thule AB, Greenland Thule Tracking Station (POGO) Tenant Unit of 821 ABG Northernmost AFSCN site

2 Antennas specialize in Polar orbits Personnel:

2 Military personnel provide oversight US contractors providing O&M 2 Greenlandic contractors

OL-A – Oakhanger, UK Telemetry & Commanding Station (LION) Installation owned by MOD

Busiest AFSCN site Personnel:

1 US Military (Operations Officer/Liaison) UK contractors providing O&M 13 Ministry of Defense Police

OL-B – Cape Canaveral AFS, FL Eastern Vehicle Checkout Facility (BEACH)

Housed in the Satellite Assembly Building 6-foot antenna on building roof Supports pre-launch and launch activities for all satellites prior to AFSCN use

Personnel:

Contractor providing O&M

23 SOPS – NBAFS, NH

New Hampshire Tracking Station (BOSS) 2,826-acre installation Infrastructure valued over $100M

Total force mix

9 AD Military 31 DoD Civilians Contractors providing O&M Contractors provide Security

Forces (not CAMMO)

DSCS Terminal (60’) 1976

BOSS-A

(13m) 2007

BOSS-C

(46’) 1972

DMSP

(11m) 1991

Source B (7m) 2007 BOSS-B (RBC)

(13m) 2013

23 SOPS – NBAFS, NH

New Hampshire Tracking Station (BOSS)

Station Support 31-person CE section: infrastructure and facilities support Modernization and energy conservation projects 24/7 security forces Outdoor Recreation and Services activities

Environmental Stewardship

UXO clearance program – 2004-present Managing wildlife and natural resources Provide safe drinking water to station personnel

UXO LIDAR Data

23 SOPS

Operate & maintain

8 AFSCN antennas DSCS SATCOM Terminal

Maintain (not CAMMO) 2 GPS Ground Antennas 2 GPS Monitor Stations

24/7/365 assured access to space 67,000 satellite contacts/year

6 locations - 4 time zones - 3 countries

Flawless Network Operations today… …A path forward into tomorrow

Lt Col Hondo Scott Commander, 21 SOPS

Welcome to the 21st Satellite Operations Squadron

21 SOPS Mission/Vision

Mission Assure access to space by enabling launch, on-orbit operations and specialized communications

Flawless Network Operations today…

…A path forward into tomorrow

21 SOPS AFSCN Locations

The Sun Never Sets on the Air Force Satellite Control Network

COOK

Vandenberg

(VTS)

HULA

Kaena Point

(HTS)

REEF

Diego Garcia

(DGX)

GUAM

Guam

(GTS)

ARTS/Legacy Antenna

RBC Antenna/Upgrade In-Progress

MUE Antenna

GPS Antenna

Inactive Antenna

ARTS/Legacy Antenna

RBC Antenna/Upgrade In-Progress

Detachment 1 (REEF) 21 SOPS, Diego Garcia

Linking the Heavens and Earth

Provides unique AFSCN & GPS S. Equatorial & E.

Hemisphere capability Newest site in the AFSCN (1991) Support nearly all Eastern Range launches GPS Ground Antenna and Monitor Station (Not CAMMO)

24K+ satellite contacts (site record) 99.8% mission success rate

Major Allison Goodspeed

REEF Facilities

8 buildings, 8 acres Operates two AFSCN antennas RBC and ARTS

Operates two GPS antennas Ground Antenna (GA) and

Monitor Station (MS) Host mission equipment for other missions

AFSPC MUE

DGS-A (ARTS)

DGS-B (RBC)

GPS Ground Antenna

Maj Jerome Frederick Jr.

Where America’s Space Ops Day Begins

Activated in 1965 High-power AFSCN uplink Responsible for GPS antennas at Kwajalein

23K+ satellite contacts (site record)

99.7% mission success rate

Detachment 2 (GUAM) 21 SOPS, Guam

GUAM Facilities

12 buildings, 20 acres antennas ARTS and RBC GTS-C (Estimated activation April 14) Hosts mission equipment for several non-AFSCN missions

DRMUE

DRMUE-S

SOURCE-G

AFSPC MUE

DRMUE-S

GTS-B(13m)

Major George Sanderlin

Guardians of Kaena Point and the Heavens

Operational since 1959 Oldest in AFSCN RBC System testing in progress

HULA-A & B support telemetry collection for MDA GPS Monitor Station (CAMMO)

20K+ satellite contacts 99.7% mission success

Detachment 3 (HULA) 21 SOPS, Hawaii

HULA Facilities

37 buildings, 153 acres antennas ARTS and RBC HTS-C – Hybridization (2014)

Operates one GPS Monitor Station

Host mission equipment for several non-AFSCN missions USCG Lighthouse AFWA Solar Observatory

MDA

Pentagon Project AFSPC MUE (in testing)

Bldg 41

HTS-B, CE & Power Plant

Entry Control Point

HTS-A, HTS-C, HQ

& Support bldgs

Capt Josh Failing Flight Commander

Big Sky Ranch

Activated in 1959 First operational RBC Supports all Western Range space launches High-power uplink enhancement Low-power uplink enhancement

21K+ satellite contacts

99.8% mission success rate

Vandenberg Tracking Station (COOK)

21 SOPS

Capabilities:

Provide facilities, redundant/backup power, reliable communications, and security, to support tenant missions.

Tenants supported:

- Alternate Master Control Station (AMCS) for 2 SOPS

- Back-up Space Operation Center-Vandenberg (BSOC-V) for 3 & 4 SOPS

- Back-up Network Operations Center (BNOC) for 22 SOPS

- 148 SOPS, California Air National Guard, MILSTAR Ops Center (MOC-V)

- Source-V

COOK Facilities

EOSOF Operations Centers (DICE)

AFSCN Communications Control Center Monitor communications for ~460 satellite contacts/day Lead for comm link/equipment Fault

Detection/Fault Isolation/Fault Resolution Contractor responsible for C4 & Test

Equipment Maintenance Patch and Test

Operations/Level 1 maintenance for AFSCN Node equipment

DISN Facility of the Year 2011/2012!

COMSEC

DMSP & NAVSOC Comm Equipment

DISA SATCOM

Two Medium Earth Terminals AF SATCOM Runner Up Facility of the Year

Vandenberg East/West

Two 38’ DISA SATCOM Antennas Commissioned Jul 10 AFSCN data Pacific Presidential comm UK comm & data

Providing Assured Access to Space and Cyberspace Assets by Exploiting, Implementing and Sustaining Superior Communication Technologies for Global Customers

Mr. Paul Van Stee Deputy Director

50th Space Communications Squadron Schriever Air Force Base

Get the Right Information to the Right People at the Right

Time…Every time!

Providing Assured Access to Space and Cyberspace Assets by

Exploiting, Implementing and Sustaining Superior Communication Technologies for Global Customers

50th Space Communications Squadron

SCOO– Network Operations

AF Satellite Control Network Administration System Administration Functions Supporting Air Force Satellite

Control Network at 21 Worldwide User Locations Installs, Configures, Maintains, and Administers the Distributed

Communications Controllers and Wide Area Network Interface Units for AFSCN at

Schriever and Remote User Locations AFSCN Database- Maintains, Add/Move/Change and Distribution to Sites

CAMMO

CAMMO Requirements Routing subsystem WANIU maintenance (preventive, corrective, hardware, software maintenance) Distributed Communications Controller (preventive, corrective, hardware, software maintenance) Electronic Scheduling Dissemination (preventive, corrective, hardware, software maintenance) Cryptographic (preventative, corrective, hardware maintenance) Archival Recorder System (preventative, corrective and hardware maintenance) Timing subsystem (only modems, routing, cabling, fault isolation)

SCOT– Transmission Systems

Long-Haul Communications: Tech Control-Circuit Actions-COMSEC Considered one of the Largest Tech Control Facilities in the Air Force

Manages and Maintains 1,650 Circuits, Supporting 150 Satellites \ Supports $6.2B AFSCN System and 8 Remote Tracking Stations World-Wide 7 DoD Space Programs; GPS, DSCS, MILSTAR, NOAA, NAVSOC, MDA, DMSP, and All Tenant Units Impact: Tech Control Facility is Conduit for AFSPC Satellite SA

DISA Node Site Coordinators for Schriever with 70 Nodes--Largest in AFSPC Oversees Circuit/Network Monitoring, Equipment and System Fault Isolation, Troubleshooting, and Path Restoration--Tech Control is 24/7 Circuit Actions Maintains 1650+ Records History, Provides Quality Control and

Tier 2 Maintenance Support, and the Focal Point for all DISA Installations COMSEC Controlling Authority for all AFSCN Circuits and 79 Remote Sites—

289 Items Total

SCXC– Configuration Management

Administers Installation/Modification Process Across the 50th

Space Wing Includes Tenant Units and Geographically-Separated Units (GSU) Provides Facilities and Communications Conveyance Modifications

Planning/Documentation Management Minimizes Operational Impact of Changes and Modifications to Comm

Systems Maintains Baseline Integrity by Ensuring Compliance to Standards and

Codes

SCXS– Base Support

Information Assurance (IA)

Provides Wing and Mission Partners IA Support Conducts Annual IA Assessments for 45 Host, Tenant, and Wing GSU Activities Provides IA and Certification and Accreditation Guidance to ~90 IA Offices Tracks DoD Certification Requirements and Reports Status to AFSPC

Communications Security (COMSEC) Management Office Manages 8K Accountable COMSEC Items Responsible for Six 50SCS Local Elements (LE) Subordinate to Main Account 23 Overall LE Accounts (22- Air Force, 1- Navy) Two Numbered COMSEC Accounts and Two Key Processors

SCXS– Base Support…Continued

Emissions Security (EMSEC) Management

Oversees Wing EMSEC Program (Includes Schriever and Wing GSUs) Conducts EMSEC Assessments of all Info Systems that Process

Classified Data Maintains and Archives EMSEC Documentation for 106 Classified

Systems

Frequency Management Provides Spectrum Management and Consultation for 50 SW Host, Tenant Units and GSUs Wing Focal Point for Spectrum Support and Interference Resolution

The Sun Never Sets on the 50th SCS

SCQ-Wing Chief of Maintenance

Provides Maintenance and Logistics Management to the Network Operations Group Commander

Manages 50 SW Mission Maintenance Programs Maintenance Operations Center GSU Maintenance Management Maintenance Analysis Quality Assurance Material Control Maintenance Scheduling

Manages Wing Maintenance and Logistics Programs Directs Maintenance and Logistics Support to Managers and

Maintenance Technicians for AFSCN, GPS, and MILSTAR

SCQ--Maintenance Management

Ensures Communications and Satellite Systems Maintenance is Accomplished According to Air Force Instructions Tracks, Coordinates, and Reports Maintenance Activities and Provides

Support to 50 SW Units Directs and Manages Unscheduled Maintenance

Depot-Level Maintenance Support Requests Monitors 50 SW Depot-Level Maintenance

Provides Continuity for Operations and Maintenance Conflicts (Contractors, SMC, and Government Agencies) Adjudicates Challenges between Offices

SCQM– Maintenance and Logistics Support

Site Support Conducts Contract Over-Site and Award Fee Input for Network and Space

Operations and Maintenance, Satellite Control Network Monitors and Coordinates Depot-Level Repairs, Single Point-of-Failure Items, Mission Capable Supply Issues and Equipment Bench Stock for 50 SW Systems

Maintenance Control Services Collects System/Equipment Failure

Data Assigns, Tracks, and Documents Status for All Maintenance Requests Processes Urgent and Emergency

Depot-Level Maintenance Requests Tracks Equipment and Maintenance

Status Coordinates Maintenance and Supply

Requests

GPS IIF

SCQX– Maintenance Data Analysis

Hosts Integrated Maintenance Data Systems Database Managers for 50 SW and 13 GSUs

Advises Wing Chief of Maintenance of DLR and O&M Funding Tracks and Reports Maintenance, Performance and Trending

Data on all 50 Space Wing Mission Systems Data Provided to Chief of Maintenance and MAJCOM for

Management Decision Performs Special Studies to Identify Route Causes of Common

Failures Among System Components Data Used to Direct Funding for Parts, Initiate Component

Modifications/Upgrades to Correct Deficiencies

SCQA– Quality Assurance

Wing Technical Order Distribution Office (TODO) and Communications-Electronic Discharge Program

Wing evaluation entity for All 3D cyber-space personnel and C-E equipment

Group and Squadron Exercise Evaluation Team (EET)

Premier professionals … Superior Mission Assurance …

Global Effects!

AFSCN & GPS Locations - 23 SOPS

HULA

Kaena Point

(HTS)

COOK

Vandenberg

(VTS)

KWAJ

Kwajalein

GUAM

Guam

(GTS)

REEF

Diego Garcia

(DGX)

ARTS/Legacy Antenna

RBC Antenna/Upgrade In-Progress

MUE Antenna

GPS Antenna

Inactive Antenna

ARTS/Legacy Antenna

RBC Antenna/Upgrade In-Progress

CAMMO Sustainment

Agenda

• External Contract Integration

• Sustaining Engineering

• Special Engineering Studies

• Modifications

• Electronic Data Interchange

• Information Assurance

• AFSCN Test Bed

• Depot Level Maintenance

• Part Number Warehouse

• Repair

External Contract Integration

Don’el Collier

Several external contracts will impact CAMMO

• Systems Engineering & Integration (SE&I)

• RBC-Hybrid (RBCH)

• Enhanced High Power Amplifier (EHPA)

• Universal S-Band (USB)

• SE&I

– SE&I will develop requirements & architecture for AFSCN

– SE&I will provide IV&V for selected mods

– SE&I will develop DoD Information Assurance Certification &

Accreditation Process (DIACAP) packages for submission to

AFSPC/A6

– CAMMO will sustain/modify the network as required to meet SE&I defined/gov’t approved requirements

– CAMMO will produce IA artifacts supporting DIACAP development by SE&I

– Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA) will be required between SE&I and CAMMO

• RBC Hybrid (RBCH)

– Final RBCH expected to be complete in FY2019, resulting in 8 total systems

– Upon successful ops acceptance of an RBCH system, CAMMO will assume Operations, Maintenance, & Sustainment (OM&S) responsibility

• Enhanced High Power Amplifier (EHPA)

– EHPA (based on RBC Quad HPA) being developed to replace ARTS HPA at VTS-A under the Satellite Control Network Contract

(SCNC)

– An additional 3 EHPA systems are being planned

– CAMMO will assume OM&S responsibility upon successful ops acceptance

• Universal S-Band (USB)

– USB is projected to be in testing by FY15

– Consideration is being given to utilization of Transportable RBC

(TRBC) for testing

• CAMMO will retain maintenance responsibility for TRBC baseline

– Delays to Factory Compatibility Testing (FCT) schedule may result due to unavailability of resources

– Gov’t will adjudicate conflicting USB test & CAMMO FCT efforts

Sustaining Engineering

To implement, document and maintain a disciplined engineering approach for hardware and software sustainment infrastructure that ensures the successful design, documentation, integration, installation & checkout/test and lifecycle support of AFSCN systems and products with minimum downtime to the AFSCN and minimum negative impact to operations.

• Systems Engineering

• Deficiency Reporting

• Modeling and Simulation

• Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA)

• Environmental

• System Safety

• System Security Engineering

• Configuration Management

• Data Management

Special Engineering Studies

Special Engineering Studies

• Special studies/investigations

– Engineering Analysis/Projections under Systems

Engineering

• Obsolescence & Vanishing Vendor Resolution

• Life Extension Analysis and Requirements

– Additional Studies as Defined by Government via RFI/RFQ

• Types: feasibility studies, predictive performance measurements, detection & prevention of anomalies, impacts on space operations performance, risk assessments, & white papers

Modifications

• New capability modifications are not in-scope of

CAMMO

• Software modifications are considered in-scope of

CAMMO

• Hardware modifications considered in-scope include:

– Retain existing capability, extend service life, correct product quality deficiencies, or retain/restore functional baseline or performance specification

– Improve the operational availability of the item, transform or modernize defense business systems, or reduce ownership costs

– Satisfy an operational mission requirement by removing or adding capability/function/enhancing technical performance/operational suitability

• Requirement for System Modification starts via…

– Change Request Form (CRF) – used to introduce the deficiency to the AFSCN Community

– AF Form 1067, Modification Proposal – document used to obtain approval from A3/4/5 to initiate a modification action

– Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) – Government database used to track deficiency reports (DRs) within the AFSCN and follows TO 00-35D-54 guidance

RNL Modification Process Flow

• Hardware Modification Initiated with an RFP

– Government proposed specification changes will be provided along with associated AF1067s or DRs

– Contractor will provide proposal in accordance with modification RFP

– Modifications will vary in scope from simple Form-Fit-

Function (FFF) to complex sustainment modifications affecting multiple systems

Electronic Data Interchange

• Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

– AFSCN resource, providing access to a variety of technical information in support of the network

– Information is used by O&M personnel, engineers, logisticians, and other support functions in locations all over the world

– EDI hosts technical information accumulated over previous several years

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

• Multiple Sources Feed into EDI

– Central Data Library (CDL)

– Program Information Management System (PIMS)

– EDI secure environment

– TeamCenter (via secure site)

– Electronic Air Force Technical Order (E-AFTO)

– International Business Machines (IBM) Rational Suite web sites (via secure site)

– Document Management System (via secure site)

– wInsight

– eIRON

Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)

Information Assurance

Capt Christian Morgan

Information Assurance

• AFSCN Information Assurance (IA) Goal

• IA Government Perspective

• Secure Contractor Facility

• AFSCN Certification and Accreditation

• Artifact Creation and Maintenance

• IA Controls Validation Assessments

• Our goal is to ensure the AFSCN and its interfacing components maintain an appropriate level of security that ensures confidentiality, integrity, authentication, non-repudiation, and availability for the network as a whole. The ultimate objective is to guarantee network operation for user traffic during peacetime, crisis, conflict, and natural disaster

• Document, Improve, Secure, Strategize

AFSCN IA Goal

• IA is a requirement which must be integrated into SE processes like any other requirement

• IA considerations must be integrated across operational systems and project life cycles

• IA accreditation strategies require joint government and contractor teaming early and often

• COTS-based mission system and obsolescence issues make IA a challenge within AFSCN

IA Government Perspective

• Software development environment must meet IA control requirements

• All gov’t data must be secured appropriately for level of classification & isolated from contractor networks

• Subject to government assessment

• Software Assurance Best Practices (examples include air gaps, isolated coding terminals, etc.)

• Supply chain risk management

• DFARS Clause 252.204-7012: Safeguarding

Unclassified Controlled Technical Information

Contractor Facility

• 7 DIACAP Packages Impact the AFSCN’s Authority to Operate (ATO)

– ATOs must be re-accomplished every 3 years

– Interim ATO (IATO) may be issued for high/medium risks

(unmitigated) systems & are valid for 6 months

– Interim Authority to Test (IATT) varies with risk & test length

• CAMMO will support development of DIACAP Packages

– Provides IA artifacts to SE&I contractor (through the government)

AFSCN Certification & Accreditation

• Accurate & thorough IA/Engineering Artifacts support DIACAP packages

– Configuration management of artifacts required

– Clearly ID artifact owners & artifact contributors & how they contribute to quality DIACAP artifacts/processes

– Maintaining accurate system boundaries & components are vital

• Need the infrastructure/processes/people to be able to produce/maintain IA artifacts

– Documented mitigation, system configuration, hardware & software lists, scan results, drawings, Ports, Protocols, and Services Management (PPSM) reports, etc.

– IA-certified staff with defined roles & responsibilities

Artifact Creation and Maintenance

• Specific CAMMO IA Responsibilities

– All AFSCN mission systems will be analyzed for IA compliance on an annual basis based on a sampling of sites across the network

– Collected Controls Validation Assessment (CVA) data supports the Certification & Accreditation (C&A) process & is a driver for risk assessments

– Required to handle/process classified information according to Security Classification Guide (SCG)

IA Controls Validation Assessments

AFSCN Test Bed

Ms. Jamie Navarro

• The AFSCN Test Bed (ATB) is a group of test suites used to test, integrate, modify, & update equipment for the AFSCN systems before they are deployed to the RTSs, OCNs, & other locations

• The CAMMO Contractor will be responsible for maintaining ATB baseline & operating within specifications

• The government will adjudicate scheduling conflicts between CAMMO & external contractors requiring access to the ATB

• Components of the AFSCN Test Bed:

– Electronic Schedule Dissemination Test Bed (ESDTB) (ESD 2.7, aka ESD

Legacy, current system)

– Communications (Comm) Segment Sustainment Test Bed (CSSTB)

– Automated Remote Tracking Station (ARTS) Development and Modification

Test Bed (ADMTB) (may also be referred to as ARTS Development Modification Facility [ADMF])

– Remote Tracking Station (RTS) Block Change (RBC) High Powered Amplifier

(HPA)

– ARTS HPA (aka Legacy HPA)

– RBC Integration and Support Suite (RISS)

– ESDTB (ESD 3.0 future scheduling system)

– Orbital Analysis Subsystem (OAS) Secure Lab

– Miscellaneous Support Equipment

• The technical aspects of the test beds will be covered in more detail during the tour at HTSI this afternoon

Depot Level Maintenance

Capt John Nuttall

Depot Level Maintenance Provide responsive technical & maintenance support of systems, subsystems, services and/or special equipment to facilitate swift restoration of the space weapons system to its original operating condition. Provide reliable, accurate & timely support to the AFSCN operations & maintenance customers related to both scheduled & unscheduled on-site maintenance activities.

Duties

– Provide Depot Support to the 7 RTSs, EVCF*, & the 2 OCNs

– Respond to Emergency & Urgent Depot Level Maintenance requests (EDLMs & UDLMs)

– Accomplish Programmed Depot Maintenance Activities

* EVCF is not subject to EDLMs

• Provide Depot Support to 7 RTSs, EVCF, & 2 OCNs

– Depot support is required when the Operations & Maintenance (O&M) technicians have completed troubleshooting in accordance with technical orders & the equipment outage still is not resolved

– Level I & Level II maintenance & support must be delineated

• Respond to EDLMs & UDLMs

– Timely depot support for E/UDLMs is required to return the RTSs/OCNs to full mission capability following mission impacting outages

• Accomplish Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) Activities

– Accomplishment of PDMs per government approved schedule

Part Number Warehouse

Capt John Nuttall

Training

TMDE

Storage/ Modulars

Ship/ Rec

Repair Lab

HPA Repair Area •Less transport/handling of completed repairs = greater quality confidence •Quick access to TMDE •Current lab size 6180 ft2

Hands-on Training Workstations:

Trainees are required to perform hands-on assembly to demonstrate proficiency in learned techniques in order to complete certification.

4 Vertical Lift Modular Storage •Modulars have a 250 ft2 footprint •Each unit stores 6000 ft3 •Frees up of 5100 ft2.

Two mezzanines •Increase of 6850 ft2 in overall floor space

Depot Level Item Repairs

Michael Norton

• Depot Level Item Repair Provide off-site depot level repair to restore repairable equipment to appropriate levels of performance & return end items to a serviceable condition. This work includes:

– Type I National Stock Number (NSN) that are Expendability, Recoverability, Repairability Category (ERRC) “T” under the control of Ogden through Material Support Division (MSD)

– Part Number Repair assets

– Contractor Supported Weapon System (CSWS)Type II NSNs that are ERRC T

• MSD Item repair induction authority resides with Ogden-Air Logistics Complex (ALC)

• Part Number & CSWS induction authority resides with AFSCN Program Office

• Duties

– Provide Depot Level Repair for assets where repair capability exists in-house

– Provide Sub-Vendor capability to repair assets that cannot be repaired in-house

• Provide Depot Level Repair for assets where capability exists in-house

– Process repair actions on Type I NSNs that are ERRC T inducted by Ogden-ALC Item Manager (IM) under MSD

– Document repair in Government On-Line Database (GOLD)

– Provide storage of assets in Agile Combat Support (ACS) Warehouse locations

• Provide Sub-Vendor capability to repair assets that cannot be repaired in-house

– Process repair actions on Type I NSNs that are ERRC T that are inducted by Ogden-ALC Item Manager (IM)

– Document repair in Government On-Line Database (GOLD)

– Provide storage of assets in ACS Warehouse locations

Backup Slides

Systems Engineering

• Designing to include testing of the design

• Documenting

• Integrating and installing

Deficiency Reporting

• Recording

• Mitigating

• Tracking

Modeling and Simulation

• Designing

• Manufacturing

• Testing

RMA

• Tracking

• Reporting

• Analyzing

Environmental

• Regulation compliance

• Design

• Integration

System Safety

• Identifying and defining

• Determining probability of occurrence

• Assessment

System Security Engineering

• Information Assurance

• Risk Management

• Certifications and Accreditations (C&A)

Configuration Management

• Control

• Accounting

• Verification and audit

Data Management

• Maintaining

• Improvement recommendations

• Accessibility to Government

15 Minute Break

• We will now take a 15 minute break

• We will resume the briefings promptly on-time

Restrooms

• The closest restrooms to the conference:

Consolidated Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN)

Modifications, Maintenance, and Operations (CAMMO)

Acquisition

Mr. Bruno Mediate CAMMO Project Manager

719-556-7889

Programmatic Briefing 18 Feb 14

• CAMMO Purpose

• Contract Requirements Integration

• Performance Work Statement Summary

• Specific PWS Requirements

• Work Breakdown Structure

• Tasks, Standards, & Performance Incentive

Metrics (PIMs)

• Notional PIMs and Calculations

• Summary

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

CAMMO Purpose

• Vertically integrate all AFSCN contracted weapon system support services under a single acquisition to achieve synergy and incentivize efficiencies while maintaining mission effectiveness:

– Operations, operations support, all maintenance (L1/L2, H/W

& S/W), sustainment, sustainment support

– Item repair

– Replenishment spares procurement

– Space vehicle factory compatibility testing

– Sustainment modifications

– Special studies

• Leverage CAMMO for contracted services at AFSCN operating locations to retain efficiencies, minimize personnel footprint, and achieve savings (Defense Satellite Communication System [DSCS] terminals, Mission Unique Equipment [MUE], remote site services, etc)

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Contract Requirements Integration

50SW Contract:

Network & Space

Operations & Maintenance

(NSOM)

FA2550-08-C-8011

SMC Contract:

Satellite Control Network

Contract

(SCNC)

F04701-02-D-0006

SMC Contract:

Engineering, Development, & Sustainment

(EDS)

FA8818-06-D-0024

SMC Contract:

CAMMO

NOTE: CAMMO integrates those tasks associated with AFSCN weapon system services and/or services at AFSCN remote operating locations

Notional Performance Work Statement Summary

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Specific PWS Requirements:

Operations

PWS Paragraphs 3.1 through 3.2

• Operational performance is critical to mission success

• Operational Performance Score defined in 50SWI 10-220

• Contractor operators comply with commander (crew, site, squadron, etc) instructions and communicate/report through operational channels

• Includes operating transportable asset(s) if relocated to AFSCN operational site to perform mission

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Onsite Maintenance and Logistics Support

PWS Paragraphs 3.3.1 through 3.3.7; 3.4.1 through 3.4.7

• Main task areas associated with vertical integration concept to provide on-site product support for the AFSCN

• Government is seeking industry innovation to integrate these activities to meet system performance for operational mission success, via an efficient and affordable approach

• Potential for additional integration and efficiencies with PWS paragraph 3.2 (Operations) and/or paragraph 3.8 (Remote Site Services)

• Depot Maintenance Actions (paragraph 3.4.6) include configuration changes, equipment moves/removals, form/fit/function replacements, etc. which do not impact AFSCN baseline specifications

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Off-site Item Repair

PWS Paragraphs 3.4.8.1 through 3.4.8.5

• Three different designations of item repair:

– Stocklisted items: repair in support of government depot (OO-ALC) & funded via separate CLIN

– Non-stocklisted items: repair of non-stocklisted items as required to obtain required system performance; funded under FPIF CLIN

– Interim Supply Support items: repair of items not yet integrated into government supply support system, stocklisted, and assigned designated government depot repair; funded under FPIF CLIN

• Two different performance metrics

– In-house repair average less than 30 days

– Vendor repair average less than 80 days

– Metrics do not apply to stocklisted items, only repairs under FPIF CLINs

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Sustainment

PWS Paragraphs 3.5 through 3.6.5

• Standard weapon system sustainment services:

– Inventory management, maintenance planning, sustaining engineering, program management, information assurance, technical document management, configuration/data management, etc

– Includes Public-Private-Partnership requirements (Paragraph 3.6.3.17)

• Includes integration of information assurance requirements at AFSCN operating locations (paragraphs 3.6.4.1 through 3.6.4.15) and for AFSCN mission systems (paragraphs

3.6.4.16 through 3.6.4.21)

– Potential for additional integration and efficiencies associated with information assurance of contractor’s information technology systems (paragraphs 3.6.3.8 through 3.6.3.12)

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Factory Compatibility Testing (FCT)

PWS Paragraphs 3.6.6.1 through 3.6.6.5

• Satellite vehicle testing using AFSCN transportable system(s)

• Offerors will propose “menu pricing” for activities associated with FCT

• Each FCT will be separately proposed and contracted using the menu pricing established at contract award

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Continuing System Improvements

PWS Paragraph 3.7.1, Modification Projects

• Scope includes temporary modifications, low-cost modifications, and sustainment modifications

• Scope does not include major hardware capability mods

• All mods to be separately proposed during contract execution in response to RFP/RFQ PWS Paragraph 3.7.2, Special Studies

• Analyses, assessments, and investigations

• All special studies will be separately proposed during contract execution in response to RFP/RFQ PWS Paragraph 3.7.3, Software Sustainment/Maintenance

• Maintain, sustain, protect, assure, and improve system performance/capabilities via software releases, upgrades, and database updates

• Included as part of FPIF CLINs

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Remote Site Services

PWS Paragraph 3.8

• Contracted services at AFSCN operating locations

• Included to create synergy and efficiencies to minimize personnel footprint at remote locations

• Requirements vary by operating location

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Transition Phase-In

PWS Paragraphs 3.9.1.1 through 3.9.1.12

• Deliver Phase-In Plan 10 days after contract award

• Transition equipment and obtain accountability in 60 days

• All remote site personnel in place and ready to perform duties in 60 days (security clearance, country clearance, etc)

• All transition tasks completed in accordance with PWS paragraph 3.9.1 requirements (none exceed 180 days)

• Contractually responsible to perform all PWS tasks, meet standards, and begin calculation of PIMs at 60 day point

Notional Work Breakdown Structure (2nd Level)

Ref: OSD Operating & Support Cost Estimating Guide & DI-FNCL-81831 NOTIONAL WBS Structure for CAMMO WBS/CES Description PWS Reference

1.0 UNIT-LEVEL MANPOWER (SYSTEM LEVEL COST ONLY)

1.1 OPERATIONS MANPOWER 3.2.1.1-7, 3.2.2.1

1.2 UNIT-LEVEL MAINTENANCE MANPOWER 3.3.1.1-8, 3.3.2.1-15, 3.3.3.1-7, 3.3.7.1-5

1.3 OTHER UNIT-LEVEL MANPOWER 3.3.4.1-6, 3.3.5.1-2

2.0 UNIT OPERATIONS (SYSTEM LEVEL COST ONLY)

2.1 OPERATING MATERIAL 2.12 (Contractor provided materials, supplies, & equipment)

2.2 SUPPORT SERVICES 2.11.1, 2.13, 3.3.1.9, 3.4.7.1, 3.6.4.1-15;

2.3 TEMPORARY DUTY 2.11.2

3.0 MAINTENANCE

3.1 OVERHAUL OF END ITEMS 3.4.1.1, 3.4.2.1, 3.4.3.1, 3.4.4.1

3.2 DEPOT LEVEL REPARABLES (DLR) / REPAIR OF REPARABLES (ROR) 3.4.8.1-5

3.3 CONSUMABLES AND REPAIR PARTS 3.5.1.2

3.4 OTHER MAINTENANCE SERVICES 3.3.1.3, 3.4.5.1, 3.4.6.1, 3.5.3.3

3.5 PACKING, HANDLING, SHIPPING, AND TRANSPORTATION (PHS&T) 3.3.6.1, 3.5.2.1-4

4.0 SUSTAINING SUPPORT

4.1 SYSTEM SPECIFIC TRAINING 3.6.1.1-4, 3.6.3.18

4.2 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3.5.3.2

4.3 SUSTAINING/SYSTEMS ENGINEERING 3.5.3.1, 3.5.3.4, 3.6.2.1-12, 3.6.3.14-15, 3.6.4.16-21

4.4 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 2.1-6, 2.8, 2.10, 3.5.1.1, 3.5.1.3, 3.6.3.1-13, 3.6.3.16-17, 3.6.3.20-27

4.5 INFORMATION SYSTEMS N/A

4.6 DATA AND TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 3.6.5.1-3, 3.6.3.19

4.7 SIMULATOR OPERATIONS N/A

4.8 OTHER SUSTAINING SUPPORT 3.6.6.1-5

5.0 CONTINUING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS

5.1 HARDWARE MODIFICATIONS OR MODERNIZATION 3.7.1.1-2

5.2 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE OR MODIFICATION 3.7.3.1-7

5.3 Special Studies 3.7.2.1

6.0 INSTALLATION & PERSONNEL SUPPORT (SYSTEM LEVEL COST ONLY)

6.1 Installation Support 3.8.1-5

6.2 Personnel Support N/A

7.0 Transition

7.1 Phase-In 3.9.1

7.2 Phase-Out 3.9.2

Tasks, Standards, and Performance Incentive Metrics (PIMs)

PIMs was performance achieved?

Standards was quality service provided?

All Other Tasks was the work completed?

Incentive Plan

Notional PIMs from Incentive Plan

PIM

No. Description % of Overall

QPI

Score per Evaluation

Period Minimum Level of Performance

Monthly Performance Incentive Metrics

1 Ops Performance Score Source: PWS 3.1.1.1 24%

2% ≥ 0.998 1% ≥ 0.996 0% < 0.996

2 AFSCN AO

Source: PWS 3.1.1.1 12% 1% ≥ 87.0%

0% < 87.0%

3 MTTRF

Source: PWS 3.1.1.1 12% 1% ≤ 2.0 hrs

0% > 2.0 hrs Quarterly Performance Incentive Metrics

Scheduled vs Actual

Downtime Source: PWS 3.4.2.1

8% 2% within +/- 3%

0% outside +/- 3%

5 EDLM Response Source: PWS 3.4.3.1 4% 1% ≤ 24 hrs

0% > 24 hrs

6 UDLM Response Source: PWS 3.4.4.1 4% 1% ≤ 72 hrs

0% > 72 hrs

Off-Site In-House Repairs

Source: PWS 3.4.8.2, 3.4.8.3

4% 1% ≤ 30 days

0% > 30 days

Off-Site Vendor Repairs

Source: PWS 3.4.8.2, 3.4.8.3

4% 1% ≤ 80 days

0% > 80 days

9 CAR Response Time Source: PWS 3.6.3.26 16% 4% = 100%

0% < 100%

Software Delivery

Deficiencies Source: PWS 3.7.3.3, 3.7.3.4, 3.7.3.5 12%

3%

= 0 CAT-I DRs w/in 30 days of field evaluation for all releases

0%

> 0 CAT-I DRs w/in 30 days of field evaluation for all releases

• Pass/Fail metrics (except PIM 1)

• Calculated on monthly or quarterly basis

• Quality Performance Index (QPI) determined quarterly for profit payment associated with performance

NOTE: Annual profit adjusted based on cost performance associated with FPIF share ratio for underrun/overrun

Notional Calculation Scenarios

Standard ≥ 0.998 ≥ 0.996 ≥ 87% 86.00% 87.00% 88.00% 88.00% 90.00% 90.00% 91.00% 90.00% 89.00% 90.00% 90.00% 89.00%

≤ 2.0 hrs 1.8 hrs 1.9 hrs 2.3 hrs 1.3 hrs 0.8 hrs 1.1 hrs 1.8 hrs 0.9 hrs 1.2 hrs 2.4 hrs 1.3 hrs 2.1 hrs

≤ +/- 3.0% ≤ 24 hrs ≤ 72 hrs

≤ 30 days ≤ 80 days

= 0 CAT-I DRs

Score per Eval.

Per.

2% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 4% 3%

Quarterly QPI:

Overall QPI:

Resulting Score (by evaluation period)

Performance Metric Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1 - Ops Performance Score 1% 2% 0% 2% 2% 2%

2 - Operational Availability

3 - MTTRF

4 - Scheduled vs Actual Downti 2% 2% 2% 2%

2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2%

5 - EDLM Response 0% 1% 1% 1% 6 - UDLM Response 0% 1% 1% 1% 7 - Off-Site In-House repair 1% 1% 0% 1% 8 - Off-Site Vendor Repair 0% 1% 1% 1%

0% (17%) 25% 23% 23% 71%

9 - CAR Response Time 4% 4% 4% 4% 10 - Software Delivery Deficien 3% 3% 3% 3%

Measured Performance for each PIM (by evaluation period) Performance Metric Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

0.998 0.997 0.999 0.999 0.9991 - Ops Performance Score 0.997 0.998 0.995 0.998 0.998

2 - Operational Availability

3 - MTTRF

4 - Scheduled vs Actual Downti -1.20% 2.10% 1.80% -2.20%

0.9980.999

5 - EDLM Response 26 hrs 0 hrs (no EDLMs) 18 hrs 22 hrs 6 - UDLM Response 74 hrs 63 hrs 54 hrs 68 hrs 7 - Off-Site In-House repair 24 days 20 days 32 days 25 days 8 - Off-Site Vendor Repair 92 days 74 days 68 days 47 days 9 - CAR Response Time 100% 100% 100% 100% 10 - Software Delivery Deficien 0 CAT-I DRs 0 CAT-I DRs 0 CAT-I DRs 0 CAT-I DRs

Notional Calculation Scenarios

Target Cost (CLIN 1) $60,000,000 Quarter QPI Target Cost (CLIN 1) $60,000,000 Target Profit 10% $6,000,000 1 0% Target Profit 10% $6,000,000 Target Price $66,000,000 2 25% Target Price $66,000,000 Ceiling % 115% $69,000,000 3 23% Ceiling % 115% $69,000,000 Assigned Share Govt Ktr 4 23% Assigned Share Govt Ktr Under Target 70% 30% Overall QPI: 71% Under Target 70% 30% Over Target 30% 70% Over Target 30% 70%

$58,000,000 $62,000,000 $2,000,000 -$2,000,000

$600,000 -$1,400,000 71% 71%

$4,260,000 $4,260,000 $4,860,000 $2,860,000

$62,860,000 $64,860,000

Quarterly QPI

Total Profit Payment Total Gov Payment Final Contract Price

Over Run Scenerio

Actual Audited Allowable Cost Over run Ktr Share (70% of over run) Total Profit (QPI) %

Final Contract Price

Under run

Under Run Scenerio

Actual Audited Allowable Cost

Ktr Share (30% of under run) Total Profit (QPI) % Total Profit Payment Total Gov Payment

S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R S P A C E A N D M I S S I L E S Y S T E M S C E N T E R

Summary

• CAMMO Purpose

• Contract Requirements Integration

• Performance Work Statement

Summary

• Specific PWS Requirements

• Work Breakdown Structure

• Tasks, Standards, & Performance

Incentive Metrics (PIMs)

• Notional PIMs and Calculations

• Summary

Consolidated Air Force Satellite

Control Network (AFSCN) Modifications, Maintenance and

Operations (CAMMO) Solicitation No. FA8823-13-R-0009

SMC Industry Day:

Contracting Overview

18 Feb 2014

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO):

Christina A. Ming, SMC/PKL

■ Source Selection Objective

■ Notional Source Selection Approach

■ Notional Solicitation

• Contract Line Item Number (CLINs) and Contract Type

• Contract Length & Transition

• Special Contract Requirements

• Organizational Conflict of Interest

■ List of FedBizOpps Postings

■ Key Milestones

“The objective of source selection is to select the proposal that represents the best value”.

FAR 15.302

“The goal of this procedure is to ensure the Department’s source selection process delivers quality, timely products, and services to the Warfighter and the Nation at the best value for the taxpayer.”

DoD of Source Selection Procedures dated 4 Mar 11

Best Value: “The expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement.”

FAR 2.101

Source Selection Objective

Trade Off Source Selection Process IAW 15.101-1.

• Allows tradeoffs between non-cost factors and cost/price and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer.

• Used when in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror.

• An agency can obtain best value in negotiated acquisition by using any single or a combination of multiple source selection approaches.

Notional Source Selection Approach

Technical Capability & Past Performance Acceptability w/ Technical Risk & Price Trade-off

Risk & Price of Equal Importance Evaluation Factors: Technical Capabilities (Factor 1), Technical Risk (Factor 2), Past Performance (Factor 3), & Price (Factor 4)

Technical Capability: Rate as Acceptable/Unacceptable Technical Risk: Rate as Low/Moderate/High Past Performance: Rate as Acceptable/Unacceptable Price: Reasonableness & Balance

Notional Source Selection Approach (con’t)

Notional CLIN Structure & Contract Type

Fixed Price Incentive--Target Firm (FPIF):

Operations, Maintenance & Sustainment (OM&S)

• Target Profit: 10%

• Ceiling Price: 115%

• Share Ratio: Underrun - 70/30; Overrun - 30/70

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF): Transition & Special Studies Fixed Fee: 8%

FA28823-13-R-0009 Notional CLIN Structure CLIN Description Type Task Title PWS Paragraph(s)

1400 Transition - Phase-In CPFF Transition – Phase-In 3.9.1 (except 3.9.1.12) 1401 Travel for Transition - Phase-in CR Travel for Transition - Phase-In 3.9.1.12 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, Operations, Maintenance, and Sustainment (OM&S)

FPIF a) General Requirements

b) AFSCN Ops Performance Standards

c) Operations

d) Org Level Mx and Support

e) Depot Level Mx

f) Sustainment Logistics Support

g) Sustaining Support

h) Software Sustainment and Mx

a) 2.0 (except 2.11.2 and 2.12)

b) 3.1.1

c) 3.2.1 and 3.2.2

d) 3.3.1 through 3.3.7

e) 3.4.1 through 3.4.8 (except 3.4.8.1)

f) 3.5.1 through 3.5.3 (except 3.5.1.2)

g) 3.6.1 through 3.6.5

h) 3.7.3 (except 3.7.3.7)

1501, 1601, 1701, 1801, 1901, 2001, Government-directed Travel and Other Direct Costs (ODCs)

CR a) Reimbursable Travel

b) Local Purchase

c) Licenses, Service Contracts, Warranties, and Subscriptions

a) 2.11.2

b) 2.12

c) 3.7.3.7

1502, 1602, 1702, 1802, 1902, 2002, Remote Site Support (RSS) FFP Remote Site Support (RSS) 3.8

2400 Transition - Phase-out CPFF Transition – Phase-Out 3.9.2…