AMENDMENT_0003_Attachment_8FO_9FO_-_FULL_OPEN_PPQ_Cover_Letter_PPQ.docx

Attachment 8FO Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Cover Letter

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

A. The contractor identified in Section 1 of this questionnaire is being considered in a Source Selection by the 767th Specialized Contracting Flight, Barksdale AFB, LA. You have received this questionnaire because you are a source of Past Performance Information for that offeror.

B. Please complete the attached questionnaire for the contractor and program described in Section 1. Send the completed questionnaire via e-mail tiffany.carter.6@us.af.mil AND jamey.hartsel@us.af.mil no later than 21 March 2019. Begin the subject line of the e-mail with “SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (SEE FAR 2.101 & 3.104)”.

DO NOT SEND THE COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTOR

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Jamey L. Hartsel, Lt Col, USAF Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Attachment 9 – Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Attachment 8FO Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Cover Letter

LETTERHEAD

(Date)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Contract Field Team (ROTARY WING MAINTENANCE CONTRACT CONSOLIDATION) Program Solicitation Concerning Contract Numbers(s) (CONTRACT AND ORDER NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) TO BE EVALUATED). The effort was performed by (SPECIFIC ENTITY THAT PERFORMED THE WORK) under (CAGE CODE).

(a) We are currently responding to AFICA/KG, Request for Proposal (RFP) FA8600-19-R-A002 for the Rotary Wing Maintenance Contract Consolidation Program Requirements. The RFP specifically requires that we, as an Offeror, send the attached questionnaire to several points of contact (POC) on recent and relevant efforts that we (or a proposed team member) have performed. As such, please take a few moments of your time to fill out the attached questionnaire.

(b) DO NOT RETURN THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO US. The information contained in the completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror. The completed Present/Past Performance Questionnaire should be sent directly to the Government not later than (DATE TO BE INSERTED BY OFFEROR). The questionnaires should be e-mailed to ATTN: Lt Col Jamey Hartsel AND Capt Tiffany D. Carter to the following addresses: jamey.hartsel@us.af.mil AND tiffany.carter.6@us.af.mil.

(c) If you have any questions regarding the source selection, contact the Contracting Officer, Lt Col Jamey Hartsel. If you have questions regarding the clarification of contract number, POC or program title on the questionnaire, please contact (CONTRACTOR’S POC AND PHONE NUMBER FOR PAST PERFORMANCE ISSUES).

(d) Thank you for your timely assistance.

Sincerely, (TITLE AND NAME OF COMPANY OFFICIAL)

Attachment 9FO

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________ (If multiple types (i.e. Firm-Fixed Price with Time & Material), list percentage and dollar amount of Firm-Fixed Price portion)

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1. Description of service provided: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: _________________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _________________________________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator’s e-mail: ___________________________________________________________________

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Based upon your knowledge and experience with the contractor’s performance, assign a rating consistent with the rating/description criteria below. Limit your assessment to the particular program referenced in Section 1. Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definition matrix below. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the rating levels:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

EXP EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s/customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG VERY GOOD – Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s/customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

SAT SATISFACTORY – Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

MAR MARGINAL – Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNS UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NEUTRAL - Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Staffing Plan

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Quality Control Plan

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Program Management

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Fleet Time Management

Comments:

Comments:

Aircraft/Weapons Maintenance Services

Comments:

Comments:

Comments:

Aircrew Flight Equipment

Comments:

Comments:

Price

Comments:

Comments:

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated MAR (Marginal) or UNS (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Does your contract have multiple sites? How many sites? Where? How many people at each site?

4. How many Corrective Action Requests and what levels have been issued on this contract? Does the contractor resolve these issues in a timely manner?

5. Is there anyone else we can send this questionnaire to? Please give us a POC and their contact information.

6. Are you aware of any like contracted efforts performed by this contractor? Please provide the contract number and a POC with contact information.

7. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Lt Col Jamey Hartsel AND Capt Tiffany D. Carter jamey.hartsel@us.af.mil AND tiffany.carter.6@us.af.mil