Atch_19_Past_Performance_Questionairre.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA469019RA003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a template for evaluating contractors' past performance on prior contracts and assessing quality, timeliness, management and overall performance. It will be used to evaluate proposals for a Multiple Award Construction Contract at Ellsworth Air Force Base to provide new construction, renovation, alteration, demolition and repair work from 2019 to 2021. The solicitation number is FA469019RA003 and seeks proposals from Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses, SBA certified 8(a) Small Disadvantaged Businesses and HUBZone businesses. The NAICS code is 237990 and annual revenue cannot exceed $36.5 million. The minimum guaranteed award is $500 and maximum value for all awards is $18 million. Responses to the solicitation are due via FBO.gov on or around November 14, 2018.

FA469019RA003 Atch 19

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC), newest first.
File Type Posted
Atch_32_-_Follow_on_Q&A_Updated_1MAY19.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030011_SF_30.pdf PDF
Atch_20a_GIPR_23APR19.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030010_SF_30.pdf PDF
Atch_29_Follow_on_Q&As_23APR19.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030009_SF_30.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030008_SF_30.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030007_SF_30.pdf PDF
Atch_28_-_Follow_on_Q&As.pdf PDF
Attach_27_c_CE_Track_Manholes.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030005_SF_30.pdf PDF
Atch_26_X-XX_PROJECT_TITLE.dwg DWG drawing
Atch_24_Site_Visit_Minutes_24JAN19.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030002_SF_30.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA469019RA0030001_SF_30.pdf PDF
Atch_9_Submittal_Form_3000-1_Sep_03.pdf PDF
Atch_20a_GIPR_6NOV18.pdf PDF
Solicitation_-_FA469019RA003.pdf PDF
Atch_2_AF_Form_103_Work__BCE_Clearance_Request_-_1_Aug_94.pdf PDF
Atch_16c_-_WD_SD180001_Heavy-Highway_6_Apr_18.pdf PDF
Atch_13_NAFGeneral_Provisions-21Jan15.pdf PDF
Atch_20e_6_Percent_Limit_on_Design_Fee_for_Contractors.pdf PDF
Atch_18_Past_Performance_Information.docx DOCX document
Atch_22,_SECTION_M_-_EVALUATION_BASIS_FOR_AWARD_2JAN19.pdf PDF
Atch_5_Spec_Section_01800_-20_Aug_15.pdf PDF
Atch_11_Underground_Electrical_20Aug15.pdf PDF
Atch_16a_-_WD_SD180002_Residental-Penn_5_Jan_18.pdf PDF
Atch_1_Utility_Outages.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_7_Ellsworth_Fire_Protection.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_16d_-_WD_SD180033_Building-Meade_5_Jan_18.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20e_6_Percent_Limit_on_Design_Fee_for_Contractors.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20c_Drawing_1_Track_Utilities_Latrine_6NOV18.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_5_Spec_Section_01800_-20_Aug_15.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_2_AF_Form_103_Work__BCE_Clearance_Request_-_1_Aug_94.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_11_Underground_Electrical_20Aug15.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20g_AF_Form_3052.xls XLS spreadsheet
DRAFT_Atch_3_Submittal_Schedule_-20_Aug_15.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20f_Bid_Schedule-17_Oct_18.doc DOC document
DRAFT_Atch_13_NAFGeneral_Provisions-21Jan15.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_16e_-_WD_SD180035_Building-Penn_5_Jan_18.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20_FOPR_Construct_Bath_House.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Atch_18_Past_Performance_Information.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Atch_17_Determination_of_Resp.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_14_Contractor_Guide_-_16_Jun_15.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_9_Submittal_Form_3000-1_Sep_03.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_20a_GIPR_6NOV18.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_22_SECTION_M_Evaluation_Factors.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_16a_-_WD_SD180002_Residental-Penn_5_Jan_18.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_6_Design_CompatibilityStandards.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Atch_1_Utility_Outages.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Attachment: 27 Past Performance Questionnaire

The 28th Contracting Squadron of the United States Air Force is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) program. MACC is a multiple award, competitive design-build indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity construction acquisition based on a general statement of work further defined with each individual task order.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than [insert date].

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to bernard.clemens@us.af.mil and samantha.hough@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

(signed)
BERNARD W. CLEMENS JR.
Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Project Title:

F. Brief Construction Description:

G. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule: Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule: Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Delay attributed to (if applicable): ☐ Gov’t ☐ Contractor ☐ Both

H. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value: $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value: $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

I. Description of work performed:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Did the Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A
QUALITY
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

1. Provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures and corrected deficiencies in a timely manner to meet contract requirements?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

2. Complete all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
TIMELINESS
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

3. Provide timely design proposals?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

4. Provide on-time progress reports, progress schedules, material submittals, and payrolls as required?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

5. Meet established project schedules to complete the project on time?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

6. Provide timely resolution of warranty defects?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
MANAGEMENT
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

7. Demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

8. Hire quality subcontractors and effectively manage and coordinated their work?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

☐
☐
☐
☐
☐
☐

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

Were at least five (5) disciplines used to perform the work on this effort?

Please check which disciplines were utilized:

☐ A&E Design ☐ Carpentry ☐ Interior finishes ☐ Electrical ☐ Plumbing ☐ HVAC

☐ Sheet metal ☐ Fire suppression ☐ Roofing ☐ Demolition ☐ Masonry

☐ Excavation ☐ Structural ☐ Painting ☐ Fire Alarm

☐ Yes

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

bernard.clemens@us.af.mil and samantha.hough.2@us.af.mil For Official Use Only Page 5 of 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .