EXHIBITS A-F.docx
DOCX document 32 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Bridgeport BOSC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N6247322R3616
About this file
This document package contains exhibits and templates for a best-value solicitation seeking base operations support services. Key details include:
The solicitation seeks to award an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract to provide facilities maintenance and operations support at Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center in Bridgeport, California, Liberty Military Housing Complex in Coleville, California, and Hawthorne Army Depot. Services include facility investment, pest control, integrated solid waste management, grounds maintenance, pavement clearance, waste water management, water services, and vehicle and equipment maintenance. The period of performance involves both recurring and non-recurring work items over one base year and four option years. The solicitation requires submission of exhibits demonstrating corporate experience, technical approach, management approach, safety qualifications, and past performance by the closing date of April 15, 2022. The Navy Facilities Engineering Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EXHIBIT A
FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO: N62473-22-R-3616
(To be completed and submitted via secure email by the Financial Institution )
NAVFAC Southwest is currently considering award of a Navy contract to this firm. Prior to award, the Navy requests the financial information listed below with regard to this firm. In order to be responsive to the Navy’s needs, it is requested that you complete this financial questionnaire with regard to this firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire it is requested that you submit the completed questionnaire via email to abigail.c.ferdon.civ@us.navy.mil and rea.d.estrella.civ@us.navy.mil. The requested information must be received by the contractor no later than the proposal due date.
Prospective Contractor for which information is being requested:
Name: ______________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________________________________________ City/State/Zip: ________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________________________________________
Signature of Prospective Contractor or Contractor Representative Requesting Financial Information
Name of Financial Institution: ______________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _________________________________________________________ Account Number: __________________________________________ Type of Account: __________________________________________ Average Balance Figure: ___________________________________________ Does the Contractor have a line of credit? |_| Yes |_| No
What is the limitation? __________________ Remaining balance: ______________________
What is the Contractor’s relationship with the bank:
|_||_| Outstanding |_| Satisfactory |_| Other (explain): ________________________________
How long has the Contractor been a client? _______________________________
Signature of person providing the above information
Print Name and Title of person providing the above information
EXHIBIT B
FACTOR 1 - CORPORATE EXPERIENCE
This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Use this form (one per project) to provide supporting project information for Exhibit B – Factor 1, Corporate Experience. Offeror may submit a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 projects. Total page limit for each project shall NOT exceed 4 single-sided pages. This form must be completed in its entirety; see Factor 1, Corporate Experience for proposal submission requirements and basis of evaluation for details.
1. Offeror Name: JV Partner Name: (if applicable)
2. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:
Project Title:
Project Location:
3. Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Funded Period of Performance:
Project is _______% complete
4. Award Amount (including all options): $ Final Contract Price (including all options): $ If the Final contract price above is: |_| subcontract price Provide total project price: $
One (1) full year funded amount:
Amount billed/invoiced: $ _____________
5. Type of Contract (check one): |_| FFP |_| MASC |_| NON-BOSC IDIQ |_| BOSC
|_| OTHER
6. This project was Performance Based |_| YES |_| NO
7.Customer/Owner Name:
Point of Contact Name/Title: (person with project knowledge) POC Phone Number: POC Email Address:
| 8. Name of Firm that Performed the Work: | |
| This firm performed the work as (check one): |_| Prime Contractor | |_| Subcontractor* |
*provide the name of the prime contractor:
If the firm who performed this project differs from the Offeror submitting a proposal under this solicitation, identify the relationship to the Offeror below:
|_| Parent Company |_| Subsidiary |_| Affiliate |_| Sister Company |_| Predecessor Company |_| Satellite Office |_| First-Tier Small Business Subcontractor |_| Other
9. If this project was performed by other than the Offeror, provide a brief explanation how this office/person will participate in this contract; in addition, Offerors shall provide any supplementary documents required by Factor 1, Corporate Experience.
10. Percentage of work firm self-performed (see “self-perform” definition) on this project: _______% Provide detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project. If performed as subcontractor, provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed as a subcontractor on this project.
11. Identify annexes below that are relevant to this project (include dollar amount and % of work your firm self-performed).
Relevancy of this project to RFP Annex
Annex Number / Name
Contract Price Percentage of work your Firm self-performed
Yes - or - No
| 1502000 FACILITY INVESTMENT |
| $ |
| % |
1503020 PEST CONTROL
| 1503030 INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT |
| $ |
| % |
| 1503060 PAVEMENT CLEARANCE |
| $ |
| % |
| 1503050 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AND LANDSCAPING |
| $ |
| % |
| 1604000 WASTE WATER |
| $ |
| % |
| 1606000 WATER |
| $ |
| % |
| 1700000 BASE SUPPORT VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT |
| $ |
| % |
| ALL OTHER WORK |
| $ |
| % |
| TOTAL (Should equal block 4, Final Contract Price) - |
| $ |
| 100 % |
EXHIBIT C
FACTOR 2 - MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Submit Exhibit C (MANAGEMENT APPROACH) in accordance with solicitation submittal requirements. EXHIBIT C – FACTOR 2, MANAGEMENT APPROACH IS MANDATORY. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total page limit shall not exceed fifteen (15) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font. An Offeror may utilize different font types and sizes for the organizational chart and other charts and graphs as long as the information contained in those charts and graphs are legible. See Exhibit C – Factor 2, Management Approach for proposal submission requirements and basis of evaluation.
Workforce Management:
Quality Management:
Scheduling:
Phase-In Plan:
EXHIBIT D
FACTOR 3 - TECHNICAL APPROACH
Submit Exhibit D (TECHNICAL APPROACH) in accordance with solicitation submittal requirements. EXHIBIT D IS MANDATORY. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total page limit shall not exceed fifteen (15) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font. An Offeror may utilize different font types and sizes for charts and graphs as long as the information contained in those charts and graphs are legible. See Exhibit D – Factor 3, Technical Approach for proposal submission requirements and basis of evaluation.
Staffing Plan:
Technical Narrative:
Risk Mitigation Strategy:
EXHIBIT E
FACTOR 4 - SAFETY DATA & NARRATIVE
This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Use this form to provide safety information for the Safety factor. DART rates and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors, except as noted (in Factor 1 – Recent, Relevant Experience of the Firm) for Small Business Offerors utilizing first-tier Small Business subcontractor experience.
Joint Venture (JV) or Partnership: Complete Blocks 1 through 3 for each business entity who is part of the JV or partnership. Small Business Offerors utilizing first-tier Small Business subcontractor experience: Complete Blocks 1 – 3 for the Small Business Offeror and each first-tier Small Business subcontractor.
1. Offeror Name:
Name of JV member, partner, or first-tier Small Business subcontractor providing the information below (if applicable):
Offeror’s Five Previous Complete Calendar Years of Reported Safety Data:
Only complete year safety data will be considered. Indicate data rates as decimal figures, not whole numbers.
| 2. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate |
| 2017 |
| 2018 |
| 2019 |
| 2020 |
| 2021 |
Instructions for calculating the DART rate can be found in the solicitation.
2a. For DART Rates of 3.0 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:
2b. Explain any negative DART Rate trends and any corrective actions taken for improvement:
2c. If you do not have a DART Rate for a given year, state so here and explain why:
| 3. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Total Case Rate (TCR) | |
| 2017 | |
| 2018 | |
| 2019 | |
| 2020 | |
| 2021 |
Instructions for calculating the TCR can be found in the solicitation.
3a. For TCR of 4.5 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:
3b. Explain any negative TCR trends and any corrective actions taken for improvement:
3c. If you do not have a TCR for a given year, state so here and explain why:
EXHIBIT F
FACTOR 5 - NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | Entity Identifier Number: |
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (E) Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. |
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified. |
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract. |
| (M) Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner. |
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. |
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor negative. |
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________ TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT: PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
| a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) |
| E VG S M U N |
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract |
| E VG S M U N |
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Overall customer satisfaction |
| E VG S M U N |
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
| a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Government Property Control |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel |
| E VG S M U N |
| e) Utilization of Small Business concerns |
| E VG S M U N |
| f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines |
| E VG S M U N |
| g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes |
| E VG S M U N |
| h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) |
| E VG S M U N |
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
| a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? |
| E VG S M U N |
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
| b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns) |
| E VG S M U N |
| d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. |
| Yes No |
| e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below. |
| Yes No |
| f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. |
| Yes No |
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
| a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.) |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. |
| E VG S M U N |
7. GENERAL
| a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues). |
| E VG S M U N |
| b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) |
| E VG S M U N |
| c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) |
| Yes No |
| d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. |
| E VG S M U N |
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments, which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .