Questions and Answers No 3 for FRFP PAAC VI.pdf
PDF 160 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Program and Analysis Control (PAAC VI) Support Services - Final Request for Propopsal (RFP)
- Solicitation number
- 80GSFC24R0042
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document for the Final Request for Proposal (RFP) PAAC VI, solicitation number 80GSFC24R0042, dated November 17, 2025. The document addresses two key issues raised by potential vendors: (1) clarification about the number of instruments in the scenario, which was inconsistently referenced as 4 or 5 out of 12, and (2) confirmation of the requirements for Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs). The government responded that Amendment 5 will fully correct the RFP scenario regarding instrument references, and confirmed that PPQ respondents must be technical representatives and Contracting Officers with direct knowledge of the vendor's performance.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 75 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers #3 for Final RFP PAAC VI, 80GSFC24R0042 Note: The questions/comments that were produced in this document where typed as they were submitted.
November 17, 2025
# Final RFP Reference
Comment/Question/Vendor Recommendation
Government Response
Revised Responses from Questions and Answers posted on 9/29/2025 5 Final RFP
80GSFC24R0042
Terms and Conditions, Page L-21
The government advised in changes in the final RFP that the scenario has 4 instruments but on Page L-21 the scenario states 4 instruments and later in the scenario states "5 of 12" of the instruments. It appears the change made to 4 instruments was not made throughout the scenario. Would the government please confirm that there are only 4 instruments in the scenario and that references to more will be deleted from the scenario?
Amendment 3 revised the RFP scenario;
however, the amendment at the time, only corrected one section. Amendment 5 now fully corrects the PAAC VI RFP scenario.
22 RFP Terms and Conditions, page L-36
Per Section (b) Prior Customer Evaluations (PPQs), in the Past Performance Volume, please confirm that the government is expecting one PPQ for each contract cited, provided by either the CO or a technical representative with direct knowledge of our performance.
The questionnaire respondent shall be a representative from the technical customer and responsible Contracting Officer with direct knowledge of your firm's performance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .