Attachment 04 A0001- Solicitation Question Template_Responses.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 36 KB Posted

Attached to
Turn-key Detention Facilities
Solicitation number
70CDCR26R00000026
Issued by

About this file

This file is a solicitation question and answer template documenting 30 questions from industry and government responses regarding RFP 70CDCR26R00000026 for turn-key detention facilities operated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The questions address critical operational and technical requirements across multiple facility locations (Denver, Miami, Philadelphia, and Seattle). Key clarifications include: log retention compliance with OMB M-26-14 standards (6 months active searchability, 12 months retrievable); cybersecurity authorization procedures allowing contractors to submit Cybersecurity Compliance Plans for six-month Authority to Operate (ATO) achievement if full ATO is not obtained at award; religious services accommodation through either dedicated or multi-purpose spaces based on vendor proposal and ICE approval; CPR/BLS certification requirements through American Heart Association approved vendors only; video surveillance specifications with facility-specific camera distance parameters to be determined post-award; facility care level assignment at minimum Level 3 with potential Level 4 designation; behavioral health professional qualifications including post-licensure clinical experience requirements; and psychological evaluation requirements for detainees. Additional responses clarify that ICE Design Standards do not apply to existing buildings but vendors should make improvements where practicable; FedRAMP authorization requirements for Electronic Health Records systems; utility cost responsibility assumptions; pricing template corrections for Case Processing Specialists (CPS) structured as labor hours rather than fixed monthly fees; and confirmation that government evaluation will not provide special consideration or cost normalization for incumbent facility owners versus new facility proposals, despite potential incumbent cost and schedule advantages.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 02 A0001 - Turnkey Facility PWS (IHSC) (Requirement D-Seattle) (1).pdf PDF
Attachment 01b A0001- Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement B_ Miami).pdf PDF
70CDCR26R00000026 A0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 A0001 Turn-key pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10b A0001- Anticipated Transportation Routes Requirement B (Miami).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 01 A0001 - Turnkey Facility PWS (Non-IHSC)(Requirements A- Denver_ B -Miami and C- Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 01a A0001- Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement A_ Denver).pdf PDF
70CDCR26R00000026 A0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 15 Turn-key pricing.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
70CDCR26R00000026 A0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 A0001 - Turnkey Facility PWS (IHSC) (Requirement D-Seattle).pdf PDF
Attachment 01 A0001 - Turnkey Facility PWS (Non-IHSC) (Requirements A- Denver B -Miami and C- Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 10a - Anticipated Transportation Routes Requirement A (Denver).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10b - Anticipated Transportation Routes Requirement B (Miami).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 04 - Solicitation Question Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 01 - Turnkey Facility PWS (Non-IHSC) (Requirements A- Denver B -Miami and C- Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 05 - PREA Regulations_2026AUG_.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Transportation Requirements_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 07 - Combating Trafficking in Persons_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 06 - Detention-Transportation Template_2026AUG.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 14 DSCS __ 20JAN2026 (v. 4.2).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10c1 - Enhanced Transport Requirements Requirement C (Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 09 - Physical Plant Requirements_2026AUG.docx DOCX document
Attachment 01b - Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement B Miami).pdf PDF
Attachment 01a - Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement A Denver).pdf PDF
Attachment 02b - Stationary Guards (Requirement D- Seattle).pdf PDF
Attachment 03 - QASP_PRS_NDS 2026_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 14b DSCS Handbook 2025 (v. 4.2).pdf PDF
Attachment 10c - Anticipated Transportation Routes Estimate Requirement C (Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 14a DSCS __ 20JAN2026 (v. 4.2)_Example.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 10d - Anticipated Transportation Routes Requirement D (Seattle).pdf PDF
Attachment 01c - Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement C Philadelphia).pdf PDF
Attachment 12 - Medical Services for Non-IHSC Facilities 2026_7.16.26.pdf PDF
Attachment 02a - Facility-Specific Requirements (Requirement D - Seattle).pdf PDF
Attachment 13 - Title 29 Labor Standards_2026AUG.pdf PDF
70CDCR26R00000026.pdf PDF
Attachment 02 - Turnkey Facility PWS (IHSC) (Requirement D-Seattle).pdf PDF
Attachment 08 - Privacy Rec Mgmt Safeguarding Info_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 03a - QASP_PRS_PBNDS_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 - Procedural Guidance for Complying with NEPA.pdf PDF
Attachment 03b - Contract Discrepancy Report Template_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Virtual Attorney Visitation_2026AUG.pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1 Attachment 4- Solicitation Questions Detention Facilities: Northwest, Denver/Aurora, Moshannon, and Broward

QuestionRFP AttachmentRFP Section/Page/ParagraphQuestionResponse
170CDCR26R00000026Section H.14(9) Required Protections for DHS/ICE Systems Hosted in Non-DHS/ICE Data Centers - Log Retention Terms and Conditions, p.30This section states that "Log files for all infrastructure devices, physical access, and anti-malware should be retained online for 180 days and offline for three years". The storage requirements for system logs far surpass the log retention requirements set forth in OMB 21-31 which contractors have always complied with and sets forth requirements based on log type.

Can contractors continue to comply with governmental standards for log retention and comply with the requirements set forth in OMB 21-31, which details specific timelines for different classifications of logs? No, OMB 21-31 was rescinded by OMB M26-14 as of May 22, 2026

M-26-14 requires:

Logs must be actively searchable for at least 6 months. Logs must be retrievable for at least 12 months.

2 70CDCR26R00000026

Attachment 08 Attachment 12 RFP Sections H.5 p. 15, H.10(1) p. 17, H.10(8) p. 20, H.10(9) p. 21, H.12 p. 25, and I.4 p. 54 Attachment 8 Sections G p. 15 and I p. 25 Attachment 12 Section 14.0 p. 28 This section states that "The Contractor shall not collect, process, store, or transmit CUI within a Federal information system until an ATO has been granted…".

Will the government provide a Provisional ATO upon award so work can be performed under the contract while in parallel the vendor pursues the FedRAMP ATO consistent with the requirement in section H.12 that an ATO be achieved within 6 months of contract award? The contractor shall obtain full authority to operate (ATO) in accordance with DHS Policy Directive 4300A, current revision and in accordance with 3052.204-72 Safeguarding of Controlled Unclassified Information of this document. Security deliverables must be submitted at time of award in support of ATO. If unable to meet the requirements, the contractor shall provide with the proposal a Cybersecurity Compliance Plan (CCP) to obtain ATO within six (6) months of the contract effective date, which includes incremental delivery of deliverables and supporting artifacts, as requested. The CCP shall include a completed Authorization Readiness Report, with artifacts, to provide overview of the system’s cybersecurity posture and current readiness of each deliverable. The Authorization Readiness Report, with artifacts, will be reviewed to support an interim ATO recommendation. The contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer (CO) immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, should the contractor encounter any delay that would necessitate the need to revise the compliance plan. Cybersecurity deliverables and the Authorization Readiness Report are provided in Attachment: “Cybersecurity Deliverables Sensitive Information Systems_HIGH_MOD 05.08.24."

Third-party cloud hosting environments/services (i.e. AWS, Azure) must be FedRAMP'd.

3 Attachment 01 Section 14 On-Call Guard Services, p.16 Section 14 of the PWS states one guard shall be authorized for off-site duty posts unless the COR specifies additional guards." Industry best practices require two guards to mitigate potential escape risk.

Will the government please consider revising the PWS to authorize two guards?The offeror can suggest justification for 2 guards in proposal documentation. No changes will be made to the PWS.
4Attachment 01Section 48 Detention Services
Subsection 3 Religious Services and Other Programming, p.92The PWS requires dedicated space for religious services. The design and operation of this space shall be consistent with the most recent version of the applicable ICE detention standards. One multiple purpose space for religious services is not sufficient. Existing turn-key facilities currently providing service to ICE under contract are permitted to use multiple purpose space for religions services due to existing space constraints.

Will the government consider revising this requirement to permit the use of multi-purpose space for religion services? ICE's intent is to ensure that there is sufficient space for religious services for detainees of mutliple faiths and to take into consideration different classification levels and gender.

ICE defers to the to the vendor to ensure that they can adequately meet the religious services need of a variety of faiths represented in the detainee populations as well as the different classification levels.

If the vendor can meet the goal of providing religious services for all the faiths and classifications through a multi space model, then ICE concurs.

The vendor can propose how they will meet the intent of the requirement for ICE consideration.

5Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services
Subsection 11, p.38The PWS states that CPR/BLS certification will be obtained through American Heart Association. Currently, contractors predominately use American Safety and Health Insitute (ASHI) as the vendor for certifications and T4T instructors.
Will ICE please confirm ASHI certification is acceptable for compliance with the requirement?Certification must be through American Heart Association approved vendors. ASHI certification is not acceptable.
6Attachment 01Section 17 Federal Facility Security and Control, p. 17
The Contractor shall maintain a copy of federal facility post orders for employee review within the areas of assignment and shall initiate responses to any incidents as outlined in the post orders.
Can the Government please clarify if "federal facility post orders for employee review" is the same as what is typically referred to as facility specific post orders?Yes, it’s the same thing.
7Attachment 01Section 33.10 Credentialing Requirements, p. 36We assume that the two years supervised experience for a psychologist includes internship and postdoctoral year.
Can the government please confirm this assumption? If internship and postdoctoral year are not included in supervised experience then we request the government to delete the requirementThe two years of required supervised experience is post-licensure; the government is willing to relax the requirement to one year post licensure experience.
8Attachment 01Section 21 Video Surveillance
Subsection 21.2, Camera Resolution, p. 20Section 21.2 requires cameras to capture video at a minimum resolution of 40 pixels-per-foot "at the target distance," and requires 100% coverage of perimeter, detention and high-security areas. The PWS does not define the target distance, state who establishes it, or give a maximum scene width. Camera count, lens selection, mounting, cabling and network infrastructure all vary substantially with that figure.

Will the Government define the target camera-to-subject distance or the maximum scene width against which the 40 pixels-per-foot requirement will be measured and accepted, for each of perimeter, detention and high-security coverage? All cameras (VSS) for each room throughout the facility are recommended to be full 360-degree coverage, high definition to monitor the entire room without blind spots, with bult-in IR for low lighted room, with continuous recording 24/7. Also, recommend for each room audio integration (holding rooms/interview rooms) two-way audio modules to monitor verbal altercations and or duress signals for immediate action.

The facility video surveillance system is typically a standalone system (with server, switches, etc.). The target camera-to-subject distance depends upon camera purpose, placement, and field of view, as well as the camera make/model contractor specifies/proposes. The cameras and camera control system can be inventoried, assessed, and authorized as part of the greater facility system boundary or separately.

tc={7990CC5B-402C-440F-A4DD-ECE5AE1E76AD}: [Threaded comment]

Your version of Excel allows you to read this threaded comment; however, any edits to it will get removed if the file is opened in a newer version of Excel. Learn more: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=870924

Comment:

@Cianci, Keith @Birdsong, Corey B

Can you all assist?

Reply:

I believe this is in OPRs AOR Reply:

@Bittle, Jessica H @Ingwersen, Steven T Reply:

@Bittle, Jessica H is this response ok now?

Reply:

@Baldauf, Jessica looks good to me.

9Attachment 01Section 21 Video Surveillance
Subsection 21.4, Maintenance, p. 21Section 21.4 provides that any critical component that becomes inoperable must be replaced or repaired and directs the reader to "(See table for repair times.)", and further directs the reader to "See Section 2.0 for Repair and Replacement Procedures." No table of repair times appears in Attachment 01, and Attachment 01 has no Section 2.0; its Section 2 is Background and Mission. The repair-time obligations, and any associated deductions, therefore cannot be identified or priced.
Will the Government provide the referenced repair-times table and identify the correct document and section for the Repair and Replacement Procedures, and confirm whether the repair clock runs from the Contractor's detection of the fault or from the Government's written approval of the repair quotation required later in Section 21.4?The PWS has been revised to remove references to previously specified table and update language regarding timeframes (eg, in Video Surveillance - Warranty). Please see updated PWS.
10Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services

Subsection 33.11 Basic Life Support (BLS) Certification, Medical Emergency Response, and Suicide Prevention, p. 38 The PWS requires completion of eight (8) hours of Suicide Prevention and Intervention training annually, including training on emergency use of cut-down tools and CPI (or equivalent) Nonviolent Crisis Intervention training.

Can the Government clarify whether the required eight (8) hours of Suicide Prevention and Intervention training are included within the annual training requirements or are intended to be in addition to the standard annual training hours? If the latter, will the Government consider the operational and staffing impacts associated with the additional training requirement?The 8 hours of training in suicide prevention and intervention is in addition to the annual training requirements table. Vendors should account for any particular additional staffing costs or impacts they anticipate in their proposals.
11Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services

Subsection 33.1 Facility Care Levels, pp 27-28 The PWS states that facility care levels will be determined based on the level of care required by ICE and that ICE/ERO/IHSC will define the applicable care level and baseline clinical capabilities. The contractor is required to provide staffing, facilities, equipment, and services consistent with the assigned care level.

Can the Government clarify which specific facility care level will be assigned to this contract? Since staffing models, clinical capabilities, equipment requirements, and resource planning are tied to the designated care level, this information is necessary for accurate proposal development and operational planning.Facilities will be assigned a minimum Facility Care Level 3; however, this may be increased to Facility Care Level 4 pending review of the vendors' proposals; staffing plans; and proposed facility design/ renovation.
12Attachment 01Section 11 Personnel Qualification Standards, p. 110NDS 2026 identifies the applicable age range as 18 through 56.
Can the Government confirm whether the age minimum of 21 years identified in the PWS will be revised to align with NDS 2026 requirements?The Government requires candidates to be at least 21 years of age for this requirement.
13Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services

Subsection 33.4 Health Services Overview (part a3), p. 30 The PWS requires pregnancy testing for female detainees ages 10 through 56.This requirement does not align with the National Detention Standards (NDS) 2026, which identifies the applicable age range as 18-56. Additionally, the facility does not anticipate housing 10-year-old female detainees.

Can the Government revise the age range to ensure consistency with NDS 2026 requirements?Yes, the age range has been updated in the latest PWS update.
14Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services

Subsection 33.7 Key Personnel (Medical), p. 36 The PWS requires Licensed Clinical Social Workers to possess a minimum of three years of post-independent licensure clinical experience, including independent assessment, DSM-V-TR diagnosis, and treatment plan

Will the Government consider removing the three-year post-independent licensure experience requirement to broaden the pool of qualified candidates while maintaining the required professional licensure and competency standards?The government will accept 2 years post-independent licensure clinical experience for LCSWs.
15Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services
Subsection 33.4 Health Services Overview, p. 29PWS requires on-site daily follow-up by licensed behavioral health professional; however, NDS 2026 requires on-site assessment to change level of watch or to discontinue watch. Research literature does not support the idea that in-person is superior to telehealth for assessment/treatment of those on watch.
Can the government modify the requirement to be consistent with NDS 2026 such that the on-site requirement only applies to changing level or discontinuing watch?ICE prefers these daily follow-ups to be in-person; changing level or discontinuing suicide watch requires in person/onsite assessment.
16Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services
Subsection 33.4 Health Services Overview (part f), p31The PWS requires "peer-support groups" which nececssitate a higher level of staffing and are difficult to implement given limited average length of stay.

Will the government consider deleting the requirement for "peer-support groups" given staffing and space constraints? Alternatively, will the government considering amending the language to " peer-support groups based on the needs of the population and existing staffing resources". Government agrees to amend the language related to peer support groups, as follows: The facility mental health program shall also include peer-support groups based on the needs of the population and existing staffing resources.

If the facility has a behavioral health unit, the peer support groups are required.

17Attachment 01Section 33 Health Services
Subsection 33.4 Health Services Overview (part c), p.30PWS requires documenting "which records specifically have been reviewed."
Will the government consider adding language clarifying that the requirement applies to records involving behavioral health treatment, psychiatric treatment, and most recent notes regarding the treatment of any chronic medical condition?All available medical records should be reviewed. The vendor is reponsible for documenting which records were reviewed.
18Attachment 08Section 2. Government Data Ownership, Data Rights, and Contractor Use Restrictions
Subsection 2.3 Intellectual Property and Vendor Lock-In Prevention, p.4This section states that "...custom-developed AI models, algorithms, and software created under this acquisition are owned by the U.S. Government, with no additional royalties or fees...the Government may require unlimited rights (including rights to source code, trained model files, and foundational artifacts) for certain deliverables to support long-term use, maintenance, and integration...".

Can the government provide clear guidelines about what AI usage will constitute government-ownership and also what uses for AI are allowed in support of this contract? The Government clarifies that any AI-based deliverable, including custom-developed models, algorithms, and associated source code/artifacts created specifically under this contract, is subject to the Government data ownership and rights clauses stipulated in Section 2.3.

AI may be used in support of this contract so long as it complies with all applicable federal, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) AI Policies, Directives, and Memos, as well as ICE AI governance requirements. All use of AI must be submitted to ICE's Chief Innovation and Artificial Intelligence Office (CAIO) as an AI use case. Use of AI that meet's OMB's definition of "high-impact" must undergo CAIO review and approval before deployment and must meet minimum risk management processes set in OMB M-25-21.

Regarding prohibited uses, the following uses of AI at DHS and uses of associated data are prohibited:

a) Relying on outputs of AI as the sole basis for a law enforcement action (which, for purposes of this Directive, include an arrest, search, seizure, or issuing a citation but does not include a referral to secondary screening), a civil enforcement action (including issuing a fine, injunction, or similar legal penalty), or denial of government benefits. Relying on AI for a support function for agency personnel, such as language translation or transcription, is not relying on AI output as a sole basis for agency action;

b) Using data associated with the use of AI at DHS, or deploying AI, to make or support decisions based on the unlawful or improper consideration of characteristics protected by Federal law, regulation, or government-wide or DHS policies, including this Directive;

c) Improperly profiling, targeting, or discriminating against any individual or entity based on the characteristics identified above or in retaliation for exercising Constitutional rights;

d) Using AI for improper (including unlawful or indiscriminate) systemic or large-scale monitoring, surveillance, or tracking of individuals, or predictions of emotional state or future behavior;

e) Providing DHS data, or outputs from the use of AI at DHS to third parties for uses of AI that are prohibited by applicable laws and government-wide and DHS policies, including this Directive; and

f) Other uses of AI or associated data that are prohibited by applicable laws and government-wide and DHS policies.

19Attachment 09 and Attachment 01Attachment 09
Attachment 01 Sections 9, 9.1, 9.2, 9.4 and 65.1The solicitation requires compliance with a number of documents, including the Contract Detention Facility Design Standards for Immigration and Customs Enforcement dated May 14, 2007 and its addenda (ICE Cabling Standards and Phone Specifications), the "CDF Design Standards - ICE - OPLA - Structured Cable Plant Standard," the ICE/OPLA Design Standards, the ICE/EOIR Design Standards dated June 2011, and the IHSC Design Standards.
Will the Government confirm the statement in Attachment 09 that "ICE Design Standards do not apply to existing buildings" and how that statement interacts with the cabling and communications requirements for an existing facility?Yes, ICE Design Standards do not apply to existing buildings and also applies to cabling and communications requirements for these existing facilities. The vendor shall make improvements where practicable to enhance ERO's mission. The vendor shall coordinate with ICE for any clarification/approval needed when making any enhancements.
20Attachment 09 and Attachment 01Attachment 09, ICE IT Equipment and Communication Equipment
Attachment 01 Subsections 21.2 (Camera Surveillance), p.20; and 65.1 (Property Accountability), p.126Attachment 09 and Section 65.1 require that the ICE IT system and the ICE communication system each be "a complete, independent and physically separate system" from the contractor's, serving ICE, OPLA and IHSC, with a further separate system for EOIR within EOIR IT space, and Section 21.2 refers to a "dedicated VSS network."
Will the Government confirm, for each facility, the number of physically separate cable plants, LAN and ADP rooms, uninterruptible power systems and carrier demarcation points required; identify which party owns, administers, patches and monitors each; and state whether logically separated infrastructure using VLAN or VRF segmentation is acceptable for any of them?ICE will provide this information after award as it is location specific. Each separate VSS, will have to be ATO (Authorized to Operate).
21Attachment 12Section 14.0. Electronic Health Record (EHR) Requirement — FedRAMP Compliance , p.28This section requires an active FedRAMP ATO for an EHR solution. If a contractor uses Sapphire for their EHR/EMR solution, which has an ATO under FISMA (ID: ICE-09540-MAJ-09540), will this be an acceptable solution for compliance with the requirement?The Sapphire ATO mentioned covers the current ICE-authorized Sapphire environment. It would not automatically extend to a separate contractor-operated Sapphire environment, and the FISMA ATO is not the same as FedRAMP authorization. FISMA and FedRAMP address related, but distinct authorization requirements. The existing Sapphire ATO applies to the current ICE-authorized environment and would not automatically transfer to a separate contractor-operated environment. If the vendor uses only ICE's authorized FISMA system, ID: ICE-09540-MAJ-09540 - AKA Sapphire, it would require a separate ATO for the security controls the vendor is responsible to implement - these usually include, at minimum, access control and privacy.
22Attachment 15Section L.4.4For facilities proposed under the Government-owned, contractor-operated/maintained (SPC) model, should the Offeror include a proposed facility purchase price for ICE acquisition of the facility? If yes, please clarify where this pricing should be reflected in the proposal and how it will be evaluated.No. The government is not requesting nor will it evaluate facility acquisition pricing.
23Attachment 15All RequirementsThe CLIN structure in Attachment 15 provides for firm fixed price for Case Processing Specialists (CPS) which is different from how CPS are currently deployed on other detention contracts. At other detention locations, CPS are hourly employees where the government pays for the hours worked under a time and materials structure.
Can the government please confirm that a fixed monthly fee is required for CPS at the Turn-Key facilities resulting in different pricing structures for CPS nationwide?Attachment 15 has been updated to reflect CPS' fee structure as labor hours.
24Attachment 15Requirement A (Denver) SPCThis tab is missing the line item for "Case Processing"Line item has been added.
25Attachment 15Requirement A (Denver) CDFThis tab is missing the "Detention Bed Day Rate" line itemLine item has been added.
26Attachment 15Requirement C (Seattle) SPCCell B1 should referenence SPC (not CDF)Revised.
27Attachment 15Requirement C (Seattle) SPCThe Attachment 15 Pricing Template does not include a CLIN X005.
Can the Government please clarify whether CLIN X005 was intentionally ommitted or is a typographical error?The Government cannot duplicate the issue. Requirement C (Seattle) SPC includes CLIN X005.
28Attachment 15 InstructionsSection 4 SPC Pricing Tab InstructionsInstructions direct vendors to remove utility costs from pricing. Can the government confirm that the intent is for the government to transition all utility accounts under government control and for the government to assume responsibility for all related payments?See revised attachment 15. Utility cost estimates are required.
29Solicitation SAM Record - 70CDCR26R00000026Classification - Set AsideBased on the Government’s market research and the anticipated participation of at least two responsible small business concerns capable of performing the requirement at fair market prices, will the Government consider conducting this acquisition as a total small business set-aside pursuant to FAR 19.502-2? If not, please explain the market-research findings supporting an unrestricted acquisition and whether the Government will consider a partial set-aside, reserve, or separate small-business award for one or more of the geographic requirements.The Government conducted market research and coordinated the acquisition strategy in accordance with the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) Part 19. Based on that market research, the Government determined that the acquisition approach reflected in the solicitation is appropriate for this requirement. The Government does not intend to revise the solicitation to establish a total small business set-aside, partial set-aside, reserve, or separate small-business award. Offerors shall submit proposals in accordance with the solicitation instructions and all applicable amendments.
30Attachment 01A - Facility Specific Requirements for Denver

Attachment 01B - Facility Specific Requirements for Miami Attachment 01A - Facility Specific Requirements for Philadelphia

Attachment 02A - Facility Specific Requirements for SeattleHistorical LocationThe historical facilities identified for these requirements, as well as potentially available incumbent facilities, appear to be owned or controlled by The GEO Group. Because the existing facility owner may avoid substantial site-acquisition, entitlement, design, construction, renovation, mobilization, and schedule costs that other offerors must incur, how will the Government structure its evaluation to ensure fair and equal consideration of competing proposals? Specifically, will ICE:
•Separately evaluate recurring detention-service pricing from facility acquisition, renovation, and transition costs;
•Normalize or otherwise account for incumbent-owned facility and schedule advantages;
•Provide sufficient mobilization time for offerors proposing replacement facilities;
•Consider separate awards or small-business set-asides by location; or
•Apply any legally permissible evaluation preference, credit, or price-adjustment methodology for small business offerors?
If no adjustment or alternative evaluation methodology will be used, please confirm that the Government intends to evaluate incumbent-facility and replacement-facility proposals on the same price and schedule basis despite the material cost and readiness advantages associated with ownership of the existing facilities.The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the evaluation factors, instructions, and terms and conditions stated in the solicitation.

@Cianci, Keith @Birdsong, Corey B

Can you all assist?

I believe this is in OPRs AOR

@Bittle, Jessica H @Ingwersen, Steven T

@Bittle, Jessica H is this response ok now?

@Baldauf, Jessica looks good to me.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .