36C25518Q0169-00003007.pdf
PDF 6 MB Posted
- Attached to
- 657-18-1-1582-0008 Asbestos Lead Survey - STL
- Solicitation number
- 36C25518Q0169
About this file
36C25518Q0169 00003 08-14529 JC Bldg 08, 08A, and 11 Report.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT
ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT
John Cochran Division 915 North Grand Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri
Buildings 8, 8A, and 11
Prepared for:
St. Louis V. A. Medical Center 915 North Grand Boulevard
St. Louis, Missouri
Prepared by:
1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 P. O. Box 17867 Baltimore, MD 21209 Shreveport, Louisiana 71138-0867
(888) 776-0670 (318) 687-3771
INTRODUCTION
2008 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT
ST. LOUIS V. A. MEDICAL CENTER
JOHN COCHRAN AND JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISIONS
SCOPE OF WORK
1. The Inspector and Management Planner reviewed prior inspections and Management Plan information on file and compared this information with existing conditions for each facility.
2. This asbestos reinspection complies with the requirements of Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).
3. Each facility inspection was performed by an accredited inspector.
4. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:
a. Visually reinspected and reassessed the condition of all friable known or assumed
ACBM.
b. Visually inspected material that was previously considered non-friable Asbestos- Containing Building Material (ACBM) and touched the material to determine whether it has become friable since the last inspection.
c. Identified any homogeneous areas with material that has become friable since the last inspection or reinspection.
d. The inspector collected bulk samples for analysis of newly friable material that is already assumed (not sampled) to be ACBM or collected additional bulk samples to fully assess the suspect materials.
e. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed, and assessed the conditions of building materials that have been added to the facility since the last inspection or reinspection.
f. Assessed the condition of the newly friable material in areas where samples were collected and of newly friable material in areas assumed to be ACBM.
g. Reassessed the condition of friable known or assumed ACBM previously identified.
h. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.
5. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:
a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.
b. Reviewed the results of each reinspection and assessment.
c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.
d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.
6. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central office location.
a. The date of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed ACBM.
b. If samples were collected, the exact locations where samples are collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector who collected the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
c. Any assessments or reassessments made of friable material, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Reinspection.
These notes reference any deficiencies found in prior inspections, reinspections, and the current Management Plan.
1. Removal Priorities were developed for each homogeneous area. The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for further detail.
2. The current condition of material was listed for each homogeneous area. The condition, location, and potential for disturbance factors are used for the hazard ranking. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for the condition summaries.
3. Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan.
4. Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are required to attend a two-hour awareness training class. Records of training for new employees should be filed in the Management Plan.
5. The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress.
Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan.
6. Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Install warning labels in these areas as needed. Some older labels may have come loose and are no longer visible. Post the labels in a prominent location.
7. Review the enclosed 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.
8. Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspections is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same individual(s) for all facilities. An accredited inspector is not required, but is recommended. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed in both the administrative and facility Management Plans.
9. ”Reinspections” are required every three (3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan.
10. The existing Management Plan (original) is updated by this Three-Year Reinspection.
All procedures and methods listed in the Plan are still in effect and should be followed unless specifically updated or omitted by this inspection. This includes maintenance procedures, repairs to damaged material, response actions, record keeping, surveillance inspections, and training.
11. An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines. Certification paperwork should be filed in the training section of the Management Plan.
12. ACBM should only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan. Removal of limited amounts of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and trained individuals.
13. Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within the facility.
This should include such trades or services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning, and other construction work. A form should be created for this purpose and placed in the Management Plan.
14. New building construction and portable buildings added to a facility are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer, or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility”.
A copy of this letter is to be filed with the Management Plan at the facility. This letter will cancel the requirement for sampling.
15. Abatement Costs were developed for each homogeneous area and per facility. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The cost is based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, air monitoring, or project observation costs.
REPORT SECTION
This report includes the following sections:
ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings
This section provides a quick table reference to all asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the reinspection and drawings with the asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
Condition and Removal Priority Table
This section provides a table with the current condition, potential for disturbance, and removal priority for each homogeneous area.
Master Summary Table – Asbestos Bulk Samples
This table provides a listing of all asbestos bulk samples taken to date.
Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples
This table provides a listing of all asbestos-containing bulk samples.
2008 Reinspection – Inspection Logs
This section provides the field inspection logs for samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
Bulk Sample Location Drawings
This section provides drawings with sample locations for all asbestos bulk samples.
2008 Reinspection – Photographs
This section provides photographs of all asbestos bulk samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
2008 Reinspection – Laboratory Reports
This section provides all laboratory analytical results.
Certifications
This section provides certifications for all Inspectors, the Management Planner who reviewed this Management Plan, and the laboratory that performed the bulk sample analysis.
Periodic Surveillance Forms
This section includes the forms completed during the periodic surveillance inspections required every six (6) months.
Management Plan Updates
This section includes the records of any asbestos abatement activities that are completed at the subject site. Notifications, daily notes, drawings, etc., should be placed in this section. This would also include air-monitoring data from asbestos abatement projects.
Response Actions
This section includes the records of any internal asbestos abatement or operation and maintenance activities that may be completed by V. A. employees. This would include any drawings, field notes, and air monitoring that was completed.
Training Documents
This section includes the records of training for the Designated Person and accredited Supervisor, as well as the two-hour awareness training for the custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff.
Annual Notification Letters
This section includes copies of the annual Notification Letters provided to employees to inform them of the availability of the Management Plan.
Initial Inspection
This section contains the original asbestos inspection that was completed in 1994. This information was used to develop the 2008 Asbestos Reinspection.
CONTRACTORS
This 2008 Asbestos Reinspection was provided by:
Contractor: Subcontractor:
FINBACK 670, Inc. ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 10100 Woolworth Road Baltimore, MD 21209 Keithville, LA 71047
(888) 776-0670 (Office) (318) 687-3771 (Office)
(877) 776-0670 (Fax) (318) 687-9923 (Fax)
INSPECTORS:
Brandon Odom Donald R. Joiner LA Certificate No. 9I01392 LA Certificate No. 8I01348 LA Certificate No. 9I01348
Eric Clipps Joshua Anders LA Certificate No. 9I01588 LA Certificate No. 9I01589
Justin L. Holcomb LA Certificate No. 9I00306
MANAGEMENT PLANNER:
Roy W. Dowling LA Certificate No. 9I00213 – Inspector LA Certificate No. 9P00072 – Management Planner
Accreditation Agency: Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings
JOHN COCHRAN DIVISION
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
ACM HOMOGENEOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials Pump Room No ACM No ACM No ACM No ACM
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
1 No ACM No ACM No ACM No ACM
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
Mezzanine No ACM No ACM No ACM No ACM
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
1 No ACM No ACM HMA-01 Pipe Insulation No ACM
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
1 No ACM No ACM No ACM HMA-02 Window Caulk
Building 8A - 1st Floor (Chiller Plant)
Building 11 - 1st Floor (Gas Meter House)
Building 8 - Pump Room
Building 8 - Mezzanine
Building 8 - 1st Floor (Boiler Room)
1st FLOOR
ST. LOUIS V.A. MEDICAL CENTER
2008 THREE-YEAR REINSPECTION
THERMAL SYSTEM INSULATION (TSI) SUMMARY TABLE
Room # Description Qty S/LF Ftgs TH/DI 102-8A-JC magnesia pipe lagging 10 lf 0 4.00 102-8A-JC mudded joint fitting 0 ea 5 4.00
10 5
Building 8A
TOTALS
Condition and Removal Priority Table
Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating
Good 8, 9, 10
Fair 4, 5, 6, 7
Poor 1, 2, 3
Physical Disturbance Environmental Disturbance
Low 1, 2, 3
Medium 4, 5, 6, 7
High 8, 9, 10
Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating High 1, 2, 3
Medium 4, 5, 6, 7
Low 8, 9, 10
1 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Current Condition
2 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Potential for Disturbance
Assessment FactorsQualitative Ranking Numerical Rating
Description of Current Condition Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris.
Address with on-going maintenance procedures
Maintain in good condition
Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris..
3 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Removal Priority
Description of Current Condition Address short-term
Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damage; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.
Accessibility: accessibility during normal operations
Activities: activities that people do and how often they do them
Vibration: vibration from operating machinery, HVAC equipment, and so forth
Air/Dust: air currents strong enough to dislodge loose ACM; airborne dust that can erode material
Corrosive: corrosive atmosphere or liquids that can erode the covering or matrix
Water Damage: water damage from leaking roof, pipe or other source
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
CONDITION AND REMOVAL PRIORITY TABLE
Rating Based On Rating Based On
HMA-01 8A 1 Pipe Insulation Yes No 7 Damage 2 Access 6
HMA-02 11 1 Window Caulk No Yes 10 Intact 2 Access 9
Building 8 - Mezzanine No ACM
Building 8 - 1st Floor (Boiler Room)
Current Condition 1Friable Yes/No
Building 8 - Pump Room No ACM
Building 8A - 1st Floor 1st Floor (Chiller Plant)
Building 11 - 1st Floor (Gas Meter House)
Accessibility Yes/No
Restricted
Potential for Disturbance 2
Homogeneous Area No. Bldg Floor Material Description
No ACM
Removal Priority 3
Master Summary Table Asbestos Bulk Samples
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES TAKEN TO DATE
Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description
JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-F-102-001A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-F-102-002A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-F-102-003A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic JC8 01 101 JC-08-01-T-101-004A Boiler gasket JC8 01 101 JC-08-01-T-101-005A Boiler gasket JC8 01 101 JC-08-01-T-101-006A Boiler gasket JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-M-102-007A White 2x4 ceiling tile JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-M-102-008A White 2x4 ceiling tile JC8 01 102 JC-08-01-M-102-009A White 2x4 ceiling tile JC8 02 205 JC-08-02-T-205-010A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation JC8 01 101 JC-08-01-T-101-011A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation JC8 01 101 JC-08-01-T-101-012A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation JC8 03 301 JC-08-03-T-301-013A Exhaust stack, gray wrap, white block insulation JC8 03 301 JC-08-03-T-301-014A Exhaust stack gasket
JC8A 01 102 JC-08A-01-T-102-001A 2" elbow - white wrap, white block insulation JC8A 01 102 JC-08A-01-T-102-002A 2" horizontal - white wrap, yellow insulation
JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-001A White window caulk JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-002A White window caulk JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-003A White window caulk
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Purple = Abated ACM
Building 8
Building 8A
Building 11
1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection No Samples
2008 Asbestos Reinspection
Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
LIST OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING SAMPLES
Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description
JC8A 01 102 JC-08A-01-T-102-001A 2" elbow - white wrap, white block insulation
JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-001A White window caulk JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-002A White window caulk JC11 01 11 JC-11-01-M-11-003A White window caulk
Building 8A
Building 11
No ACM
1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection No Samples
2008 Asbestos Reinspection
Building 8
2008 Reinspection Inspection Logs
Client: Date: October 9, 2008 Location: Inspector(s): Brandon Odom and Eric Clipps Address: 915 North Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri
Note:
Sample ID Material Description Floor Room Location
JC-08-01-F-102-001A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic 01 102 Southwest quadrant of room 102
JC-08-01-F-102-002A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic 01 102 South side of room 102
JC-08-01-F-102-003A Blue 12x12 floor tile, yellow mastic 01 102 East side of room 102
JC-08-01-T-101-004A Boiler gasket 01 101 Northwest quadrant of room 101, northwest corner of boiler #3
JC-08-01-T-101-005A Boiler gasket 01 101 West side of room 101, northwest corner of boiler #2
JC-08-01-T-101-006A Boiler gasket 01 101 West side of room 101, northwest corner of boiler #1
JC-08-01-M-102-007A White 2x4 ceiling tile 01 102 West side of room 102
JC-08-01-M-102-008A White 2x4 ceiling tile 01 102 South side of room 102
JC-08-01-M-102-009A White 2x4 ceiling tile 01 102 East side of room 102
JC-08-02-T-205-010A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation 02 205 North side of room 205, north side of boiler
JC-08-01-T-101-011A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation 01 101 Southwest corner of room 101, west side of boiler
JC-08-01-T-101-012A Boiler tank, black wrap, gray block insulation 01 101 Southwest quadrant of room 101, east side of boiler
JC-08-03-T-301-013A Exhaust stack, gray wrap, white block insulation 03 301 North side of room 301
JC-08-03-T-301-014A Exhaust stack gasket 03 301 Center of room 301
ASBESTOS INSPECTION LOG
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Green = Non ACM (determined by Point Count analysis)
John Cochran Division - Buildings 8, 8A, and 11 St. Louis V. A. Medical Center
Building 8
Client: Date: October 9, 2008 Location: Inspector(s): Brandon Odom and Eric Clipps Address: 915 North Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri
Note:
Sample ID Material Description Floor Room Location
ASBESTOS INSPECTION LOG
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Green = Non ACM (determined by Point Count analysis)
John Cochran Division - Buildings 8, 8A, and 11 St. Louis V. A. Medical Center
JC-08A-01-T-102-001A 2" elbow - white wrap, white block insulation 01 102 South side of room 102
JC-08A-01-T-102-002A 2" horizontal - white wrap, yellow insulation 01 102 South side of room 102
JC-11-01-M-11-001A White window caulk 01 11 North side of building 11
JC-11-01-M-11-002A White window caulk 01 11 West side of building 11, north window
JC-11-01-M-11-003A White window caulk 01 11 West side of building 11, south window
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material Blue = Non Asbestos-Containing MaterialPlease use the following guidelines when reading this report:
Building 8A
Building 11
GOOD = Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris. FAIR = Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris. POOR = Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.
Material Category: F = Flooring S = Surfacing T = TSI M = Miscellaneous Friability: F=Friable NF=Non-Friable Condition: Good = 8, 9, 10 Fair = 4, 5, 6, 7 Poor = 1, 2, 3
Bulk Sample Location Drawings
PUMP ROOM
1st FLOOR
MEZZANINE
2008 Reinspection Photographs
BUILDING 8, 8A, and 11 sample does not contain asbestos
JC-08-01-F-102-001A JC-08-01-F-102-002A
JC-08-01-F-102-003A JC-08-01-T-101-004A
sample contains asbestos
JC-08-01-T-101-005A JC-08-01-T-101-006A
JC-08-01-M-102-007A JC-08-01-M-102-008A
JC-08-01-M-102-009A JC-08-02-T-205-010A
JC-08-01-T-101-011A JC-08-01-T-101-012A
JC-08-03-T-301-013A JC-08-03-T-301-014A
JC-08A-01-T-102-001A and JC-08A-01-T-102-002A
JC-11-01-M-11-001A JC-11-01-M-11-002A and JC-11-01-M-11-003A
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805129
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/10/08 5:45 PM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JC Building 8
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/13/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/13/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JC-08-01-F-102-
001A floortile 390805129-0001 blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Blue None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-F-102-
001A adhesive 390805129-0001A blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-F-102-
002A floortile 390805129-0002 blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Blue None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-F-102-
002A adhesive 390805129-0002A blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-F-102-
003A floortile 390805129-0003 blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Blue None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-F-102-
003A adhesive 390805129-0003A blue 12x12 ft w/ylw mastic
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JC-08-01-T-101-
004A 390805129-0004 boiler gasket Cream None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass96% Non-fibrous (other)4%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (17) mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805129
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/10/08 5:45 PM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JC Building 8
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/13/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/13/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JC-08-01-T-101-
005A 390805129-0005 boiler gasket Various None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass89% Non-fibrous (other)11%
JC-08-01-T-101-
006A 390805129-0006 boiler gasket Various None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass89% Non-fibrous (other)11%
JC-08-01-M-102-
007A 390805129-0007 wht 2x4 ct White None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose28% Min. Wool37%
Non-fibrous (other)7% Perlite28%
JC-08-01-M-102-
008A 390805129-0008 wht 2x4 ct White None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose28% Min. Wool37%
Non-fibrous (other)7% Perlite28%
JC-08-01-M-102-
009A 390805129-0009 wht 2x4 ct White None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose28% Min. Wool37%
Non-fibrous (other)7% Perlite28%
JC-08-02-T-205-
010A 390805129-0010 boiler tank/blk wrap/gray block ins
Various None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Min. Wool31% Non-fibrous (other)69%
JC-08-01-T-101-
011A 390805129-0011 boiler tank/blk wrap/gray block ins
Various None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose6% Min. Wool12%
Non-fibrous (other)82%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805129
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/10/08 5:45 PM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JC Building 8
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/13/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/13/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JC-08-01-T-101-
012A 390805129-0012 boiler tank/blk wrap/gray block ins
Various None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose6% Min. Wool12%
Non-fibrous (other)82%
JC-08-03-T-301-
013A 390805129-0013 exhaust stack/gray wrap/wht block ins
Various None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose7% Glass6% Min. Wool4%
Non-fibrous (other)83%
JC-08-03-T-301-
014A 390805129-0014 exhaust stack gasket
Various None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass96% Non-fibrous (other)4%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805131
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/10/08 5:45 PM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JC Building 8A
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/13/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/13/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JC-08A-01-T-102-
001A 390805131-0001
2" elbow/wht wrap/wht block ins
White Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Amosite7%Fibrous (other)6% Min. Wool25%
Non-fibrous (other)62%
JC-08A-01-T-102-
002A 390805131-0002
2" hz/wht wrap/ylw ins
Various None Detected
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Glass4% Min. Wool58%
Non-fibrous (other)38%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (2)
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805130
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/10/08 5:45 PM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JC Building 11
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/13/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/13/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JC-11-01-M-11-
001A 390805130-0001 wht window caulk White Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%
JC-11-01-M-11-
002A 390805130-0002 wht window caulk White Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%
JC-11-01-M-11-
003A 390805130-0003 wht window caulk White Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Chrysotile9%Non-fibrous (other)91%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (3)
Certifications
File details come from the government source that posted it.