36C25518Q0169-00002044.pdf
PDF 5 MB Posted
- Attached to
- 657-18-1-1582-0008 Asbestos Lead Survey - STL
- Solicitation number
- 36C25518Q0169
About this file
36C25518Q0169 00002 08-14529 JB Bldg 28 Report.pdf
View the file
Other files
Show all 48
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ASBESTOS ASSESSMENT
ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT
Jefferson Barracks Division 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive
St. Louis, Missouri
Building 28
Prepared for:
St. Louis V. A. Medical Center 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive
St. Louis, Missouri
Prepared by:
1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 P. O. Box 17867 Baltimore, MD 21209 Shreveport, Louisiana 71138-0867
(888) 776-0670 (318) 687-3771
INTRODUCTION
2008 ASBESTOS REINSPECTION REPORT
ST. LOUIS V. A. MEDICAL CENTER
JOHN COCHRAN AND JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISIONS
SCOPE OF WORK
1. The Inspector and Management Planner reviewed prior inspections and Management Plan information on file and compared this information with existing conditions for each facility.
2. This asbestos reinspection complies with the requirements of Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).
3. Each facility inspection was performed by an accredited inspector.
4. For each facility, the inspector performed the following tasks:
a. Visually reinspected and reassessed the condition of all friable known or assumed
ACBM.
b. Visually inspected material that was previously considered non-friable Asbestos- Containing Building Material (ACBM) and touched the material to determine whether it has become friable since the last inspection.
c. Identified any homogeneous areas with material that has become friable since the last inspection or reinspection.
d. The inspector collected bulk samples for analysis of newly friable material that is already assumed (not sampled) to be ACBM or collected additional bulk samples to fully assess the suspect materials.
e. Visually inspected, sampled, analyzed, and assessed the conditions of building materials that have been added to the facility since the last inspection or reinspection.
f. Assessed the condition of the newly friable material in areas where samples were collected and of newly friable material in areas assumed to be ACBM.
g. Reassessed the condition of friable known or assumed ACBM previously identified.
h. Recorded above information on field inspection forms for each facility.
5. A Management Planner reviewed the above information and performed the following required functions:
a. Reviewed each Management Plan for compliance with AHERA and verified that the plan reflects current conditions.
b. Reviewed the results of each reinspection and assessment.
c. Recommended in writing, the appropriate response actions.
d. Signed and dated the review documents, included the accreditation number of inspectors and planners, and submitted a copy to the Designated Person.
6. The following information was submitted to the Designated Person under AHERA, for inclusion in the Management Plan for each facility and, optionally, at a central office location.
a. The date of the inspection, the name and signature of the person making the inspection, state of accreditation, his or her accreditation number, and any changes in the condition of known or assumed ACBM.
b. If samples were collected, the exact locations where samples are collected during the inspection, a description of the manner used to choose sampling locations, the name and signature of each accredited inspector who collected the samples, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
c. Any assessments or reassessments made of friable material, the name and signature of the accredited inspector making the assessments, state of accreditation, and his or her accreditation number.
MANAGEMENT PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The following general notes are for all facilities inspected during the Asbestos Reinspection.
These notes reference any deficiencies found in prior inspections, reinspections, and the current Management Plan.
1. Removal Priorities were developed for each homogeneous area. The Removal Priorities are an indicator of priorities for future repair work or abatement work to be scheduled as financial budgets allow. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for further detail.
2. The current condition of material was listed for each homogeneous area. The condition, location, and potential for disturbance factors are used for the hazard ranking. Please see the 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for the condition summaries.
3. Records for custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff who have received two-hour awareness training should be filed in the Management Plan.
4. Any new custodial, janitorial, or maintenance staff that have the potential to come in contact with asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are required to attend a two-hour awareness training class. Records of training for new employees should be filed in the Management Plan.
5. The Designated Person is required to inform workers and building occupants at least once a year about the Management Plan. This includes information about inspections, response actions, and post-response action activities that are planned or in progress.
Provide a copy of the notification to each facility and include a copy in the Management Plan.
6. Maintenance areas (boiler rooms, janitor closets, etc.) are required to have warning labels where ACM are located. Install warning labels in these areas as needed. Some older labels may have come loose and are no longer visible. Post the labels in a prominent location.
7. Review the enclosed 2008 Reinspection Condition and Removal Priority Table for maintenance actions that may be required and to establish priorities and budgets for future repair and abatement work.
8. Periodic “Surveillance Inspections” are required every six (6) months. This inspection should indicate the condition of the material and provide recommendations for repair or potential removal. Consistency of inspections is desired and, therefore, should be performed by the same individual(s) for all facilities. An accredited inspector is not required, but is recommended. Records of Surveillance Inspections should be filed in both the administrative and facility Management Plans.
9. ”Reinspections” are required every three (3) years. Updated information should be added to the Management Plan.
10. The existing Management Plan (original) is updated by this Three-Year Reinspection.
All procedures and methods listed in the Plan are still in effect and should be followed unless specifically updated or omitted by this inspection. This includes maintenance procedures, repairs to damaged material, response actions, record keeping, surveillance inspections, and training.
11. An accredited “Supervisor” should be on staff or available on a contract basis per AHERA guidelines. Certification paperwork should be filed in the training section of the Management Plan.
12. ACBM should only be removed by licensed and accredited contractors in the State of Missouri. Response actions related to abatement activity should be filed in the Management Plan. Removal of limited amounts of asbestos is within the scope of the Management Plan by the accredited Supervisor and trained individuals.
13. Notification should be provided to “outside contractors” about ACM within the facility.
This should include such trades or services as telephone, electrical, plumbing, air conditioning, and other construction work. A form should be created for this purpose and placed in the Management Plan.
14. New building construction and portable buildings added to a facility are required to be inspected and sampled for ACM. In lieu of this, a letter from the architect, engineer, or manufacturer can be obtained that states “no ACM were specified or used in the facility”.
A copy of this letter is to be filed with the Management Plan at the facility. This letter will cancel the requirement for sampling.
15. Abatement Costs were developed for each homogeneous area and per facility. The estimated abatement cost is for budget purposes only. The cost is based on the area of material and estimated abatement costs for this material. The cost is for abatement only and does not include abatement design, air monitoring, or project observation costs.
REPORT SECTION
This report includes the following sections:
ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings
This section provides a quick table reference to all asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the reinspection and drawings with the asbestos-containing homogeneous areas found during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
Condition and Removal Priority Table
This section provides a table with the current condition, potential for disturbance, and removal priority for each homogeneous area.
Master Summary Table – Asbestos Bulk Samples
This table provides a listing of all asbestos bulk samples taken to date.
Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples
This table provides a listing of all asbestos-containing bulk samples.
2008 Reinspection – Inspection Logs
This section provides the field inspection logs for samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
Bulk Sample Location Drawings
This section provides drawings with sample locations for all asbestos bulk samples.
2008 Reinspection – Photographs
This section provides photographs of all asbestos bulk samples taken during the 2008 asbestos reinspection.
2008 Reinspection – Laboratory Reports
This section provides all laboratory analytical results.
Certifications
This section provides certifications for all Inspectors, the Management Planner who reviewed this Management Plan, and the laboratory that performed the bulk sample analysis.
Periodic Surveillance Forms
This section includes the forms completed during the periodic surveillance inspections required every six (6) months.
Management Plan Updates
This section includes the records of any asbestos abatement activities that are completed at the subject site. Notifications, daily notes, drawings, etc., should be placed in this section. This would also include air-monitoring data from asbestos abatement projects.
Response Actions
This section includes the records of any internal asbestos abatement or operation and maintenance activities that may be completed by V. A. employees. This would include any drawings, field notes, and air monitoring that was completed.
Training Documents
This section includes the records of training for the Designated Person and accredited Supervisor, as well as the two-hour awareness training for the custodial, janitorial, and maintenance staff.
Annual Notification Letters
This section includes copies of the annual Notification Letters provided to employees to inform them of the availability of the Management Plan.
Initial Inspection
This section contains the original asbestos inspection that was completed in 1994. This information was used to develop the 2008 Asbestos Reinspection.
CONTRACTORS
This 2008 Asbestos Reinspection was provided by:
Contractor: Subcontractor:
FINBACK 670, Inc. ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
1421 Clarkview Road, Suite 100 10100 Woolworth Road Baltimore, MD 21209 Keithville, LA 71047
(888) 776-0670 (Office) (318) 687-3771 (Office)
(877) 776-0670 (Fax) (318) 687-9923 (Fax)
INSPECTORS:
Brandon Odom Donald R. Joiner LA Certificate No. 9I01392 LA Certificate No. 8I01348 LA Certificate No. 9I01348
Eric Clipps Joshua Anders LA Certificate No. 9I01588 LA Certificate No. 9I01589
Justin L. Holcomb LA Certificate No. 9I00306
MANAGEMENT PLANNER:
Roy W. Dowling LA Certificate No. 9I00213 – Inspector LA Certificate No. 9P00072 – Management Planner
Accreditation Agency: Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
ACM Homogeneous Areas Summary Table and Drawings
JEFFERSON BARRACKS DIVISION
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
ACM HOMOGENEOUS AREAS SUMMARY TABLE
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
Basement No ACM No ACM No ACM No ACM
Floor Flooring Materials Surfacing Materials TSI Materials Miscellaneous Materials
1 No ACM No ACM No ACM No ACM
Building 28 - Basement
Building 28 - 1st Floor
Condition and Removal Priority Table
Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating
Good 8, 9, 10
Fair 4, 5, 6, 7
Poor 1, 2, 3
Physical Disturbance Environmental Disturbance
Low 1, 2, 3
Medium 4, 5, 6, 7
High 8, 9, 10
Qualitative Ranking Numerical Rating High 1, 2, 3
Medium 4, 5, 6, 7
Low 8, 9, 10
1 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Current Condition
2 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Potential for Disturbance
Assessment FactorsQualitative Ranking Numerical Rating
Description of Current Condition Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris.
Address with on-going maintenance procedures
Maintain in good condition
Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris..
3 Qualitative Rankings and Quantitative (Numerical) Ratings for Removal Priority
Description of Current Condition Address short-term
Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damage; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.
Accessibility: accessibility during normal operations
Activities: activities that people do and how often they do them
Vibration: vibration from operating machinery, HVAC equipment, and so forth
Air/Dust: air currents strong enough to dislodge loose ACM; airborne dust that can erode material
Corrosive: corrosive atmosphere or liquids that can erode the covering or matrix
Water Damage: water damage from leaking roof, pipe or other source
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
CONDITION AND REMOVAL PRIORITY TABLE
Rating Based On Rating Based On
Homogeneous Area No. Bldg Floor
No ACM
No ACM
Material Description Removal Priority 3
Building 28 - 1st Floor
Current Condition 1
Building 28 - Basement
Friable Yes/No
Accessibility Yes/No
Restricted
Potential for Disturbance 2
Master Summary Table Asbestos Bulk Samples
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
SUMMARY OF BULK SAMPLES TAKEN TO DATE
Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description
JB28 00 17 JB-28-00-S-17-01 Yellow hardwall plaster JB28 00 15 JB-28-00-M-15-02 4x8 brown fiber board panels JB28 00 15 JB-28-00-S-15-03 White/off-white skim coat plaster on concrete JB28 01 14 JB-28-01-M-14-01 Black grooved stair tread JB28 01 04 JB-28-01-S-04-02 White skim coat plaster on concrete JB28 01 01 JB-28-01-M-01-03 White/brown gypsum drywall JB28 01 02 JB-28-01-M-02-04 4" black cover base JB28 01 01 JB-28-01-S-01-05 Brown hardwall plaster JB28 01 03 JB-28-01-M-03-06 1x1 white fissured ceiling tile JB28 01 05 JB-28-01-M-05-07 Brown/white mastic on CT-1 ceiling tile
JB28 01 10 JB-28-01-F-10-001A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic JB28 01 10 JB-28-01-F-10-002A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic JB28 01 10 JB-28-01-F-10-003A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic JB28 01 12 JB-28-01-F-12-004A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic JB28 01 12 JB-28-01-F-12-005A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic JB28 01 12 JB-28-01-F-12-006A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic JB28 01 12 JB-28-01-F-12-007A White 9x9 floor tile, yellow mastic JB28 01 Roof JB-28-01-S-RF-008A Gray roof shingle, roofing felt
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Purple = Abated ACM
1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection
2008 Asbestos Reinspection
Asbestos-Containing Bulk Samples
2008 THREE-YEAR ASBESTOS REINSPECTION
LIST OF ASBESTOS-CONTAINING SAMPLES
Building Floor Room Sample ID Material Description
No ACM
1994 Initial Asbestos Inspection
2008 Asbestos Reinspection No ACM
2008 Reinspection Inspection Logs
Client: Date: October 10, 2008 Location: Inspector(s): Donald Joiner and Joshua Anders Address: 1 Jefferson Barracks Drive, St. Louis, Missouri
Note:
Sample ID Material Description Floor Room Location
JB-28-01-F-10-001A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic 01 10 Southeast corner under window
JB-28-01-F-10-002A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic 01 10 North quadrant in front of sink
JB-28-01-F-10-003A Gray 12x12 peel and stick floor tile, yellow mastic 01 10 Northwest quadrant in front of room 11
JB-28-01-F-12-004A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic 01 12 Northwest corner of room 12
JB-28-01-F-12-005A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic 01 12 Southeast corner of room 12
JB-28-01-F-12-006A Tan linoleum, yellow mastic 01 12 West quadrant of room 12 at entrance to the stairs
JB-28-01-F-12-007A White 9x9 floor tile, yellow mastic 01 12 Northeast corner of room 12 inside pantry
JB-28-01-S-RF-008A Gray roof shingle, roofing felt 01 Roof Northeast quadrant on roof
GOOD = Surfacing material has no visible damage or small amounts of damage; covering on thermal system insulation is intact or has small amounts of damage; miscellaneous materials intact; no visible debris or small amounts of debris. FAIR = Surfacing material has moderate but not extensive amounts of visible damage; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn, exposing moderate but not extensive amounts of insulation; moderate but not extensive damage to miscellaneous materials such as floor tile; moderate but not extensive amounts of visible dust and debris. POOR = Extensive damage to surfacing material; covering on thermal system insulation is cut or torn extensively and insulation itself is damaged; miscellaneous materials such as floor tile extensively damaged and underlying mastic exposed; extensive amounts of dust and debris.
Material Category: F = Flooring S = Surfacing T = TSI M = Miscellaneous Friability: F=Friable NF=Non-Friable Condition: Good = 8, 9, 10 Fair = 4, 5, 6, 7 Poor = 1, 2, 3
ASBESTOS INSPECTION LOG
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material Blue = Non Asbestos-Containing MaterialPlease use the following guidelines when reading this report:
Red = Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM) Blue = Non ACM Green = Non ACM (determined by Point Count analysis)
Jefferson Barracks Division - Building 28 St. Louis V. A. Medical Center
Bulk Sample Location Drawings
BASEMENT
1st FLOOR
2008 Reinspection Photographs
BUILDING 28
sample contains asbestos sample does not contain asbestos
JB-28-01-F-10-001A JB-28-01-F-10-002A
JB-28-01-F-10-003A JB-28-01-F-12-004A
BUILDING 28
sample contains asbestos sample does not contain asbestos
JB-28-01-F-12-005A JB-28-01-F-12-006A
JB-28-01-F-12-007A JB-28-01-S-RF-008A
2008 Reinspection Laboratory Reports
Sample Location Appearance % Type
AsbestosNon-Asbestos
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805155
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/13/08 8:00 AM
VAMC Reinspection VAMC Reinspection JB Building 28 1st Floor
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/14/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/14/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JB-28-01-F-10-
001A flooring 390805155-0001 grey 12x12/ym/wood
Gray None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JB-28-01-F-10-
001A adhesive 390805155-0001A grey 12x12/ym/wood
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%
JB-28-01-F-10-
002A flooring 390805155-0002 grey 12x12/ym/wood
Gray None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JB-28-01-F-10-
002A adhesive 390805155-0002A grey 12x12/ym/wood
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%
JB-28-01-F-10-
003A flooring 390805155-0003 grey 12x12/ym/wood
Gray None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JB-28-01-F-10-
003A adhesive 390805155-0003A grey 12x12/ym/wood
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose4% Non-fibrous (other)96%
JB-28-01-F-12-
004A flooring 390805155-0004 tan lino/ym Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose8% Glass6%
Non-fibrous (other)86%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (12)
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com http://www.pdffactory.com
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805155
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/13/08 8:00 AM
VAMC Reinspection VAMC Reinspection JB Building 28 1st Floor
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/14/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/14/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JB-28-01-F-12-
004A adhesive 390805155-0004A tan lino/ym Not Submitted
JB-28-01-F-12-
005A flooring 390805155-0005 tan lino/ym Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose8% Glass6%
Non-fibrous (other)86%
JB-28-01-F-12-
005A adhesive 390805155-0005A tan lino/ym Not Submitted
JB-28-01-F-12-
006A flooring 390805155-0006 tan lino/ym Tan None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose8% Glass6%
Non-fibrous (other)86%
JB-28-01-F-12-
006A adhesive 390805155-0006A tan lino/ym Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JB-28-01-F-12-
007A flooring 390805155-0007 white 9x9/ym White None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)100%
JB-28-01-F-12-
007A adhesive 390805155-0007A white 9x9/ym Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose2% Non-fibrous (other)98%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (12)
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390806132
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
10100 Woolworth Road Keithville, LA 71047
Customer PO:
Received: 12/10/08 8:00 AM
08-14529 St. Louis VA Reinspection JB
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
12/10/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 12/11/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
3029 S. Jefferson, Saint Louis, MO 63118 Phone: (314) 577-0150 Fax: (314) 776-3313 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JB-28-01-F-12-004A
390806132-0001
Ylw mastic (previously insufficient)
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)98% Quartz2%
JB-28-01-F-12-005A
390806132-0002
Ylw mastic (previously insufficient)
Yellow None Detected
Non-Fibrous Heterogeneous
Non-fibrous (other)98% Quartz2%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (2) mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com
% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy
390805164
Attn: Roy W. Dowling ALTEC Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2920 Truly Lane Shreveport, LA 71138
Customer PO:
Received: 10/13/08 8:00 AM
VAMC Reinspection 08-14529 VAMC Reinspection JB Building 28 1st RF EXT
Customer ID: ALT50
Fax: (318) 687-9923 Phone: (318) 687-3771 Project:
EMSL Order:
EMSL Proj:
10/14/2008Analysis Date:
Report Date: 10/14/2008
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123 Phone: (314) 845-8910 Fax: (314) 845-6459 Email: saintlouislab@emsl.com
JB-28-01-S-RF-
008A 390805164-0001 grey roof shingle/roofing felt
Gray None Detected
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Cellulose20% Glass11%
Non-fibrous (other)67% Quartz2%
Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory
PLM-1
Analyst(s)
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.
Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)
Sue Ferrario (1)
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com mailto:saintlouislab@emsl.com
Certifications
File details come from the government source that posted it.