EXHIBIT C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 545 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24224R0071
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a federal contract opportunity for the Department of Veterans Affairs to build a new Emergency Department at the Albany VAMC.
The key details are:
- The contractor is requested to send this questionnaire to past performance references and have them complete and return it directly to the Contracting Officer by August 26, 2024. The questionnaire covers the contractor's quality of work, timeliness, business practices, compliance, safety, and overall customer satisfaction on a previous project.
- The related federal contract opportunity is for the construction of a new Emergency Department at the Albany VAMC, with a period of performance of 550 calendar days. The contractor will be required to utilize the VISN 2 Autodesk Build construction management platform for all project communications and collaboration. There are detailed requirements for project staffing, scheduling, commissioning, and punch list completion.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 56 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Veterans Affairs
Network Contracting Office 4 1010 Delafield Road Pittsburgh, PA 15215
Past Performance Questionnaire for: 528A8-809 NEW EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ALBANY VAMC
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
Company Name
Street Address
Point of Contact (POC)
City
POC Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
| Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) |
| |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub-contractor |_| Key Personnel |
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named above is submitting a proposal for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract, and has sent this form to you as a past performance reference contact. Please complete the following pages in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Officer by emailing directly to:
Michael.Spivack@va.gov
Please return the completed form ASAP, but no later than 12:00 pm local time, August 26, 2024.
If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer: Elijah.mcintosh@va.gov
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 (Neutral) to 5 (Exceptional) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE OVERALL RATING in the Remarks section, below.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NEUTRAL |
| UNACCEPTABLE |
| MARGINAL |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| VERY GOOD |
| OUTSTANDING |
| No record of past performance, or not applicable or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met most contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance exceeded all contract requirements. There were no problems. |
| The Contractor … |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
QUALITY – MANAGEMENT & WORKMANSHIP
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified construction personnel during the contract period. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 3. |
| Provided and followed approved quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 4. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 5. |
| Submittals clearly identified the proposed item IAW the specifications and drawings. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 6. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
TIMELINESS AND ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULE
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 7. |
| Contractor provided timely notices of possible delays/schedule revisions. |
REMARKS:
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 8. |
| Timeliness in submitting submittals and reports and responding to agency inquiries, RFP's, etc. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 9. |
| Developed realistic and met approved progress schedules. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
BUSINESS PRACTICES/CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP AND ABILITY TO PERFORM
| 10. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 11. |
| How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance? |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 12. |
| Subcontractors / tradesmen were adequately managed and coordinated. Explain any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract(s). |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 13. |
| For contract changes, contractor provided timely and realistic change order proposals. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
COMPLIANCE & SAFETY
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 14. |
| Reports (i.e., daily, test, logs) / records were submitted completely and accurately satisfy the requirement. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 15. |
| Applicable to Federal Contracts –Contractor complied with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Construction Wage Rate Requirements – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Environmental Regulations and Use of Recovered Materials; Executive Order 13101 Greening the Government. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 16. |
| Contractor’s safety program was in compliance with federal regulations. Contractor implemented and followed their safety plan and ran a “safe jobsite”. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
INFECTION CONTROL
| 17. |
| Contractor had an Infection Control Process in place and complied with agency Infection Control Requirements. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
| 18. |
| Demonstrated reasonableness in modifications cost proposal. |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| 19. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| |_| |
| YES |
| |_| |
| NO |
| 20. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| |_| |
| YES |
| |_| |
| NO |
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING: |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
| |_| |
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
I hereby certify that the information that I have reported above is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Printed Name
E-mail address
Business Title
Signature
Date
1 | Page image1.png image10.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .