03 - BPM006864 Evaluation Tool BAFO.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Pest Control Services
- Solicitation number
- BPM006864
- Issued by
- Arizona
About this file
This is a proposal evaluation tool document for Arizona Department of Economic Security (ADES) Pest Control Services contract BPM006864, covering seven regional service areas across Arizona. The solicitation seeks comprehensive pest control services for ADES facilities statewide, with proposals evaluated across multiple criteria including capacity (500 points), experience (300 points), and cost (200 points) for a maximum of 1,000 points. The evaluation document presents detailed scoring results for multiple vendor proposals across all seven regions, with each region's evaluation broken down by individual evaluation criteria addressing rural service delivery, emergency response capabilities, treatment planning, chemical-sensitive options, licensing and certifications, technical expertise requirements, and pricing proposals. Bidders included BURNS Pest Management, KCSR INC, KOEHLER Enterprises, S & L Raymond, University Termite, City Wide Pest, and DSR Pest, with varying participation across regions. The evaluation follows a standardized scoring methodology with ratings of "Exceeds Expectations" (100 points), "Meets Expectations" (50 points), "Below Expectations" (25 points), and "Unacceptable" (0 points) applied consistently across all regions and vendors.
The pricing evaluation utilized a lowest-cost formula methodology where awarded cost points were calculated using the formula (L/V)*P, with L representing the lowest cost submitted, V representing each vendor's specific cost, and P representing total points possible for the cost section. S & L Raymond emerged as the highest-scoring vendor across most regions, with scores ranging from 767 to 874 points out of 1,000, followed by KOEHLER Enterprises with scores between 508 and 546. BURNS Pest Management and University Termite scored between 397 and 600 points, while KCSR INC consistently scored lowest across all regions between 212 and 317 points. Regional lowest cost bids ranged from $53.00 to $462.20, with vendor cost submissions varying significantly, directly impacting cost-based scoring. Notable weaknesses identified across vendors included failure to provide organizational charts, incomplete responses regarding emergency services, inadequate treatment plans for extensive facilities, insufficient licensing documentation, and gaps in describing additional service offerings. The evaluation document does not specify contract award decisions, contract terms, renewal options, or specific funding sources within the provided excerpts.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Overall Scoring
Max BURNS Pest
Management
KCSR INC
KOEHLER
Enterprises
S & L Raymond
University Termite
Capacity 500 225.00 75.00 300.00 400.00 250.00 Experience 300 150.00 75.00 150.00 300.00 150.00 Cost 200 68.20 61.48 70.94 156.60 200.00
1000.00 443.20 211.48 520.94 856.60 600.00
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
Proposal Evaluation for
1.0 Capacity
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
BURNS Pest Management
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror states they follow IPM and will carry a 30-day warranty, but will not guarantee a pest will never be seen. However, the offeror did not propose a treatment plan for an extensive facility. (PDF Page 1)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 225 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
B
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work.
M
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
B
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states they have been providing services to DES for 5 years. However, the offeror did not include experience in providing additional services, including performance. (PDF Page 1) The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states Cory Burns is the primary contact for the account. However, the offeror did not provide an organizational chart.
(200 Points Max)
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 68 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $138.33
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $405.67
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 68 of 200
Grand Total 443 of 1000
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
KCSR INC
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal states four franchises that cover 80% of Arizona and the Navajo Nation, accounting for 85% of revenue. However, the offeror did not describe how they will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardship. (PDF Page 2)
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 75 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
B 75 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses?
M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff? U
Comments: The offeror provided five applicator licenses and a printout of a table from the Pest Management division with applicable certifications.
However, the proposal did not submit licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (PDF 7-12)
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal states the offeror has pest controllers, pest control quality inspectors, and a VP of operations, and they have been providing services to the Navajo Nation, which is 85% of their business.
However, the response was minimal and did not address emergency services, nor did it include experience in providing minimunual levels of training, additional services, performance, an orgizaitonal chart or key points of contact. (PDF Page 2)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The proposal states the use of green chemicals. However, the offeror did not provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (PDF Page 4)
The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
B
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location. M
2.1.3
Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis. M
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work. B
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
U
Total 75 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 61 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $138.33
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $450.01
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 61 of 200
Grand Total 211 of 1000
The proposal stated pest controllers, pest control quality inspectors and VP of operations.
However, the response was minimal and did not address emergency services.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states they have been providing services to the Navajo Nation, which is 85% of
The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the
(200 Points Max)
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
KOEHLER Enterprises
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror has a dedicated team member assigned to rural areas, and they do not subcontract.
(PDF Page 4)
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror provided an example of a 15,000 sq ft facility (government) and listed an extensive approach to a cockroach and spider infestation. (PDF Page 4)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 300 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
M
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work.
M
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 71 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $138.33
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $390.00
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 71 of 200
Grand Total 521 of 1000
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
S & L Raymond
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal services to rual area is comprehensive including using subcontractors to provice services effiecntly. (PDF Page 6)
Comments: The propsal provides detailed examples of processes for their 24/7 Availabity, rapid response time, Coordination wth clients, documentation, reporting, follow-up and prevention. (PDF Page 8)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal provides and extensive explination with regards to the treament of Arizona State University - Poly Campus. Services inlcudes initial inspection, targeted treatment plan, interior and exterior treaments, monitoring surveillance and ongoing tretments.
M 50 points of 100
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 400 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
E 300 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
E
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
E
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
B
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
M
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror provided examples of a syllabus for techs and provided training for clients.
Also, the proposal listed key postions and detailed postion descriptions for each role. Finally, the proposal described a well structured company with years providing pest control management. (PDF Pages 1-5)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror provided key positions and detailed position descriptions for each role. (PDF Page 3)
The offeror provided year they were established.
However the offeror did not provide the corporate The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror provided examples of a syllabus for techs and provided training for clients. (PDF Page
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work.
E
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Total 300 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 157 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $138.33
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $176.67
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 157 of 200
Grand Total 857 of 1000
The offeror described a well structred company with years providing pest control management .
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
M 50 points of 100
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 1
University Termite
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 250 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
B
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work. M
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in
The offeror states all positions are necessary and expect to keep them all. However, the offeror did not provide a response to the question. (PDF Page 1)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The proposal states 30 years of expierience.
However, the proposal did not list any additional services provided. (PDF Page 1) The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 200 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $138.33
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $138.33
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 200 of 200
Grand Total 600 of 1000
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
BURNS Pest
Management
KCSR INC
KOEHLER
Enterprises
S & L Raymond
University Termite
Capacity 500 225.00 75.00 300.00 400.00 250.00 Experience 300 150.00 75.00 150.00 300.00 150.00 Cost 200 58.37 62.21 96.00 200.00 157.75
1000.00 433.37 212.21 546.00 900.00 557.75
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror states they follow IPM and will carry a 30-day warranty, but will not guarantee a pest will never be seen. However, the offeror did not propose a treatment plan for an extensive facility. (PDF Page 1)
Overall Rating
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
BURNS Pest Managem
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 225 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
B
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states they have been providing services to DES for 5 years. However, the offeror did not include experience in providing additional
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined experience regarding the scope of work.
M
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
B
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 58 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $140.00
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $479.67
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 58 of 200
Grand Total 433 of 1000
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states Cory Burns is the primary contact for the account. However, the offeror did not provide an organizational chart.
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Overall Rating
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
KCSR INC
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal states four franchises that cover 80% of Arizona and the Navajo Nation, accounting for 85% of revenue. However, the offeror did not describe how they will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardship. (PDF Page 2)
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 75 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
B 75 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses?
M
Overall Rating
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal states the use of green chemicals. However, the offeror did not provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (PDF Page 4)
Comments: The offeror provided five applicator licenses and a printout of a table from the Pest Management division with applicable certifications.
However, the proposal did not submit licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (PDF 7-12)
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal states the offeror has pest controllers, pest control quality inspectors, and a VP of operations, and they have been providing services to the Navajo Nation, which is 85% of their business.
However, the response was minimal and did not address emergency services, nor did it include experience in providing minimunual levels of training, additional services, performance, an orgizaitonal chart or key points of contact. (PDF Page 2)
2.1.1.1
What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
U
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
B
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location. M
2.1.3
Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis. M
2.1.4
Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work.
B
2.1.5
Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
U
Total 75 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 62 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $140.00
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $450.06
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 62 of 200
The proposal stated pest controllers, pest control quality inspectors and VP of operations.
However, the response was minimal and did not address emergency services.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states they have been providing services to the Navajo Nation, which is 85% of their business. However, the offeror did not include experience in providing additional services, including performance. (PDF Page 2)
The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
(200 Points Max)
The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
Grand Total 212 of 1000
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror provided an example of a 15,000 sq ft facility (government) and listed an extensive approach to a cockroach and spider infestation. (PDF Page 4)
Overall Rating
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
KOEHLER Enterprises
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror has a dedicated team member assigned to rural areas, and they do not subcontract.
(PDF Page 4)
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
U 0 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 300 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses?
M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff? M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location. M
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response fails to address the requirement(s) of the solicitation or fails to provide any experience related to the requirement(s) of the solicitation or elements of the proposal are unacceptable to the state.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
2.1.3
Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis. M
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work. M
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 96 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $140.00
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $291.67
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 96 of 200
Grand Total 546 of 1000
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) E 100 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
Overall Rating
Comments: The propsal provides detailed examples of processes for their 24/7 Availabity, rapid response time, Coordination wth clients, documentation, reporting, follow-up and prevention. (PDF Page 8)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal provides and extensive explination with regards to the treament of Arizona State University - Poly Campus. Services inlcudes initial inspection, targeted treatment plan, interior and exterior treaments, monitoring surveillance and ongoing tretments.
Overall Rating
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
S & L Raymond
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The proposal services to rual area is comprehensive including using subcontractors to provice services effiecntly. (PDF Page 6)
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 400 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
E 300 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
E
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
E
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
B
The offeror provided key positions and detailed position descriptions for each role. (PDF Page 3)
The offeror provided year they were established.
However the offeror did not provide the corporate
The offeror provided examples of a syllabus for techs and provided training for clients. (PDF Page
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror provided examples of a syllabus for techs and provided training for clients.
Also, the proposal listed key postions and detailed postion descriptions for each role. Finally, the proposal described a well structured company with years providing pest control management. (PDF Pages 1-5) in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
M
2.1.4 Brief overview of business operations, with an emphasis on experience regarding the scope of work.
E
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Total 300 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 200 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $140.00
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $140.00
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 200 of 200
Grand Total 900 of 1000
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror described a well structred company with years providing pest control management .
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 2
University Termite
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 250 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
B
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The proposal states 30 years of expierience.
However, the proposal did not list any additional services provided. (PDF Page 1)
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
(300 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) experience regarding the scope of work. M
2.1.5 Offeror's organizational chart relevant to the Contract, specifically identifying the key point of contact for all questions related to the submitted offer.
M
Total 150 of 300
3.0 Cost
3.1 Cost
Cost Formula 158 points of 200
(L/V)*P = A L = Lowest cost submitted Lowest Cost $140.00
V = Vendor's cost submitted P = Total points possible for cost section Vendor Cost $177.50
A = Awarded points to Vendor for cost
Total 158 of 200
Grand Total 558 of 1000
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined
BURNS Pest
Management
KCSR INC
KOEHLER
Enterprises
S & L Raymond
University Termite
Capacity 500 225.00 75.00 300.00 400.00 250.00 Experience 300 150.00 75.00 150.00 300.00 150.00 Cost 200 55.71 98.09 79.42 121.24 200.00
1000.00 430.71 248.09 529.42 821.24 600.00
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 3
1.1
Describe how the Offeror will provide services to rural locations and how the offeror will maintain an adequate staffing capacity, so it does not cause hardships. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.2) (Question 2)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.2 Describe how the Offeror proposes to respond to emergency treatment outside of the routine schedule requests as required in the Scope of Work paragraph 4.4. (Question 3)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.3
Provide an example of how the Offeror’s proposed treatment plan for an extensive facility has been effective for 30 days with Guaranteed results for 30 days to a year of treatments.
(Scope of Work 4.9.) (Question 4) B 25 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.4 Provide other pest solution options for individuals who are sensitive to chemicals. (Scope of Work paragraph 4.18) (Question 5)
Overall Rating
Comments: The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
Overall Rating
Comments: The offeror states they follow IPM and will carry a 30-day warranty, but will not guarantee a pest will never be seen. However, the offeror did not propose a treatment plan for an extensive facility. (PDF Page 1)
Overall Rating
BPM006864 Pest Control Services - REGION 3
BURNS Pest Managem
(500 Points Max)
Overall Rating
Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
1.5
Submit copies of all applicable certificates and licenses that support the Offeror’s ability to provide the related goods/services being proposed. (Scope of Work Paragraph 5.1) (Question 6)
M 50 points of 100
Exceeds Expectations 100 Meets Expectations 50 Below Expectations 25 Unacceptable 0
Total 225 of 500
2.0 Experience
2.1
Describe the minimum level of technical experts required by the Offeror for staffing and any additional certifications, expertise, or training the Contractor strives to have. Items to consider include: (Question 1 {1.1 through 1.5})
M 150 points of 300
Exceeds Expectations 300 Meets Expectations 150 Below Expectations 75 Unacceptable 0
2.1.1 Do technicians hold individual licenses, and which licenses? M
2.1.1.1 What are the minimal levels of training required for technicians and/or other staff?
M
2.1.1.2
What are the key positions that the Contractor always expects to have (such as Safety Manage Pest Control, Emergency Services (outside of regular business hours) Conducting emergency pest control as requested?
M
2.1.2 Provide a brief history of the Contractor, including the year it was established and the corporate office location.
M
2.1.3 Describe the offeror’s experience in providing the services listed in the Scope of Work, paragraph 4.6, including additional services that are required on an as-needed basis.
B
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the solicitation.
The offeror states they have been providing services to DES for 5 years. However, the offeror did not include experience in providing additional
The response meets the requirement(s) outlined in the…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .