Solicitation_questions_through_December_18.doc

DOC document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
2013 Indiana MATOC Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W912L9-13-R-0002
Issued by
Department of the Army Indiana Army National Guard

About this file

Solicitation Questions through December 18 2012

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 2013 Indiana MATOC, newest first.
File Type Posted
Solicitation_questions_through_midnight_January_9.doc DOC document
Prototypical_questions_through_midnight_January_9.doc DOC document
W912L9-13-R-0002_SF30_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
W912L9-13-R-0002_Amendment_2_Conformed_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Solicitation_questions_through_3_PM_January_9.doc DOC document
W912L9-13-R-0002_SF30_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
W912L9-13-R-0002_Amendment_1_Conformed_Solicitation.doc DOC document
Prototypical_questions_through_December_30.doc DOC document
Prototypical_questions_through_December_30_for_Adv_Metering.doc DOC document
Solicitation_questions_through_January_3.doc DOC document
Prototypical_questions_through_January_3.doc DOC document
Solicitation_questions_through_December_30.doc DOC document
Prototypical_questions_through_December_18.doc DOC document
(7_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
Prototypical_questions_through_December_12.doc DOC document
(3_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
(1_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
(4_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
Prototypical_questions_through_December_7.doc DOC document
(2_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
(6_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
(5_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
Chapel_Building_Prototypical_Project_SOW.pdf PDF
Modification__1_Drawing_(2_of_7)_Chapel_Admin.pdf PDF
Pre-proposal_Conference_Slide_Show.pdf PDF
Sign-in_Sheet_for_conference.pdf PDF
Solicitation_questions_through_December_12.doc DOC document
Solicitation_questions_through_December_7.doc DOC document
REMINDER_Pre-Proposal_Conference.doc DOC document
Exhibit C Past Performance Evaluation.doc DOC document
Exhibit G Proposal Inquiry Form .doc DOC document
Exhibit E Prototypical Project Form.doc DOC document
Exhibit B Subcontractor Information and Consent Form.doc DOC document
Exhibit A Performance Relevancy Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Exhibit C Past Performance Evaluation.doc DOC document
Exhibit F Proposal Volume Contents Aid.doc DOC document
Exhibit B Subcontractor Information and Consent Form.doc DOC document
Exhibit F Proposal Volume Contents Aid.doc DOC document
Exhibit E Prototypical Project Form.doc DOC document
Exhibit G Proposal Inquiry Form .doc DOC document
Exhibit D Technical .doc DOC document
13R0002 FY13 MATOC.pdf PDF
13R0002 FY13 MATOC.pdf PDF
Exhibit D Technical .doc DOC document
Exhibit A Performance Relevancy Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Notice_of_Pre-Proposal_Conference.doc DOC document
Show all 46

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation questions through December 18

1. I am having problems opening both Amendment 1 and the originally posted Prototypical documents. It is stating that I need to fill out a DD2345 form, mail it in, and wait 30 days for approval. Is this right? Do I really need to mail it in? What do I do in the meantime?

Answer: Yes and no. Yes you should mail it in as the form states to the address listed on the form. It will take 30 days or more for this approval but you will still be able to access the prototypical documents without the approval for this project. The reason you should still mail it in and get your approval is if you need to access “locked export controlled” documents for any other solicitation, you would need this approval and better to get it started now than be in this situation again later. We will be posting these documents out unlocked so we won’t have this problem with this solicitation, since I mistakenly posted the documents with two different controls, which is why we are running into this problem.

2. Do you have a list of local qualified subcontractors and suppliers that are familiar with Camp Atterbury Procedures?

Answer: No, we do not keep a list of subcontractors or suppliers.

3. Do you have a list of local qualified subcontractors and suppliers that are certified MBE/WBE that have completed work on site on previous projects?

Answer: No, we do not keep a list of subcontractors or suppliers and we do not track what type of business the subs and suppliers are.

4. Do you have list of contractors/subcontractors that are currently approved to work on site based upon the previous MATOC contract system?

Answer: Our current MATOC contracts are: Dunlap & Co, Garmong Construction Services, Bruns-Gutzwiller Inc, Davis and Associates, Beau Mitchell Corp, Custom Mechanical Systems CMS, Driftwood Builders, Synergid Commercial, Patterson Horth, Hannig Construction, Graves Plumbing Co, Jungclaus-Campbell Co, CDI Inc, TMG Services Inc, JDH Contracting Inc, Roederer Construction, and Lee & Ryan.

5. Would the competing contractor for this new MATOC system be able to obtain copies of the lists above from questions 2, 3, or 4, if available?

Answer: The current MATOC list is above and there is no subcontractor list.

6. If these list above are available, could we receive copies of these lists?

Answer: See above

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .