Exhibit C Past Performance Evaluation.doc
DOC document 109 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 2013 Indiana MATOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912L9-13-R-0002
About this file
Exhibit C Past Performance Evaluation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 46
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
IDIQ MATOC
RFP W91XXX-0X-R-00XX
EXHIBIT C PACKAGE INFORMATION AND FORMS - A “Final” Performance Evaluation (Construction) ( also referred to as CCASS Evaluation ) issued for a project may be included in lieu of sending out reference package for the project.
Instructions to Offeror for sending Reference Questionnaire Forms: Prepare and send a reference questionnaire package for each project listed on your Exhibit A, Performance Relevancy Questionnaires. For Government contracts, send to Contracting Officer or Technical Representative. For commercial references send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is your responsibility to follow-up and to encourage your references to send in their questionnaire. If you have multiple references at one location (Base etc.), Send one cover letter and questionnaire for each contract you want a reference for. Your questionnaire package should contain the following.
Cover Letter (See SAMPLE) (Exhibit C1)
Respondent Info Rating Sheets (Exhibit C2) (the next 4 pages) Offeror should put name in spaces indicated and ensure it is on every page for identification purposes
Suggested - Pre Addressed stamped envelope to return to Contracting Officer.
OFFEROR SHOULD PLACE THEIR NAME ON TOP OF EACH QUESTIONNAIRE PAGE!!!
OFFEROR SHOULD DELETE THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE SENDING OUT QUESTIONNAIRES
EXHIBIT C1
SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER
AND
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
Your Company Letterhead
Date: _________________
To: ______________________________________
We have listed your firm/agency as a reference for the work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm is submitting a proposal for a Multiple Award Construction Task Order Contract advertised by the USPFO for Indiana, Purchasing and Contracting Office. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), they will evaluate our firm's past performance. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process. We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. A “Final” Performance Evaluation (Construction) (also referred to as CCASS Evaluation) issued for a project may be included in lieu of completing the reference package for the project. Space is provided for comments. Understand that while the responses to this questionnaire may be released to the offeror, FAR 15.306 (e) (4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained. Only one response from each office is required.
Please send your completed questionnaire to the following address to arrive NOT LATER THAN January 16, 2013. DO NOT return them to our company.
Indiana National Guard-Camp Atterbury Attn: Erica Copeland, P&C
Bldg 244 Room 109 Eggleston St
Edinburgh, IN 46124 or email to int-nginuspfopcmatoc@ng.army.mil and erica.t.copeland2@us.army.mil and sheri.herrin@us.army.mil Your subject line should read: 2013 INDIANA MATOC or Fax: Attn: Erica Copeland 812-526-1648 If you have questions regarding the attached questionnaire, or require assistance, please contactint-nginuspfopcmatoc@ng.army.mil Erica Copeland 812-526-1738 or Sheri Herrin 812-526-1642 or by email at and erica.t.copeland2@us.army.mil and sheri.herrin@us.army.mil Your subject line should read: 2013 INDIANA MATOC. Email is preferred.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature and Title
EXHIBIT C2
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED*****NOT TO BE RELEASED OUTSIDE GOVERNMENT CHANNELS***** RETURN THIS PAGE WITH QUESTIONNAIRE
RATING DESCRIPTIONS: Use the following descriptions as guidance in providing ratings.
| RATING |
| DEFINITION |
| Outstanding (O) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Exceeded that required by the contract. |
| Above Average (A) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met All contractual requirements. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Essentially All contractual requirements. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Met Some of the contractual requirements. However, changes to the contractor’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Indicates the contractor’s performance record within the area of evaluation Failed to Meet the minimum Government requirements. |
| Unknown or Not Applicable (N/A) |
| The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation. |
RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION AND RATINGS
(Part 1 Contractor submitting Proposal fill-in)
Reference is provided for:
Contract Number:
Project Title:
Date of Award:
Project Completion Date:
Project Location:
| Dollar Value: |
| $ |
Brief Description of Proj:
Your role in referenced contract:
(Part 2 Person providing Reference)
Reference is provided by:
Company/Agency:
Business Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Project Completion Date:
Relationship to Contract:
If information in Part I is not accurate please indicate.
To obtain an electronic version of the form please contact: insert name phone and email.
THE QUESTIONNAIRE SHOULD BE SUBMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING MEANS to arrive NOT LATER THAN January 16, 2013. (Email is the preferred method)
By email to int-nginuspfopcmatoc@ng.army.mil and erica.t.copeland2@us.army.mil and sheri.herrin@us.army.mil Your subject line should read: Attention: RFP W912L9-13-R-0002 “Source Selection Sensitive Information”
By mail to:
Indiana National Guard-Camp Atterbury
Attn: Erica Copeland, P&C
Bldg 244 Room 109 Eggleston St
Edinburgh, IN 46124
Or by Fax: Attn: Erica Copeland 812-526-1648
Mark cover sheet: Attention: RFP W912L9-13-R-0002 “Source Selection Sensitive Information” Please provide evaluation of the following Performance Elements by placing an X in the appropriate column that corresponds to the rating definitions on the previous page.
QUALITY CONTROL
| Outstanding |
| Above Average |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Quality of Workmanship
Adequacy of the quality control plan
Implementation of the Quality Control Plan
Quality of the Quality Control Documentation
Storage of Materials
Adequacy of Materials
Adequacy of Submittals
Adequacy of Quality Control Testing
Adequacy of As-Builts
Use of Specified Materials
Identification/Correction of Deficient work in a timely manner
Comments on Quality Control:
TIMELY PERFORMANCE
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule
Adherence to Approved Schedule
Resolution of Delays
Submission of Required Documentation
Completion of Punchlist Items
Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules
Warranty Response
Comments on Timely Performance:
EFFECTIVENESS OF MANAGEMENT
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Cooperation and Responsiveness
Management of Resources/Personnel
Coordination and Control of Subcontractors
Adequacy of Site Clean Up
Effectiveness of Job-Site Supervision
Compliance with Laws and Regulations
Professional Conduct
Review/Resolution of Subcontractor Issues
Implementation of Subcontracting Plan
Comments on Effectiveness of Management:
COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Correction of Noted Deficiencies
Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted
Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations with Specific Attention to the Davis-Bacon Act and EEO Requirements
Comments on Compliance With Labor Standards:
COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Adequacy of Safety Plan
Implementation of Safety Plan
Correction of Noted Deficiencies
Comments on Compliance With Safety Standards:
| OVERALL RATING of PERFORMANCE |
| (O) |
| (A) |
| (S) |
| (M) |
| (U) |
| (N/A) |
Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere in this evaluation:
Thank you for your remarks. Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor you are providing a reference for.
OFFEROR NAME___________________________
Respondent Signature ________________________________Date Completed:______________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .