Questions and Answers 05.pdf

PDF 261 KB Posted

Attached to
Construct Medical Readiness Facility Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W50S9F22R0001
Issued by
Department of the Army National Guard

About this file

This document provides details for a federal contract solicitation to construct a medical readiness facility. The solicitation seeks a single firm fixed-price contract to construct an 18,650 square foot, two-story facility at Dane County Regional Airport-Truax Field in Madison, Wisconsin. The work includes site utilities, grading, landscaping, erecting precast concrete panels, and new mechanical, electrical, plumbing and technology systems. The solicitation also includes nine options such as permeable pavers, asphalt bypass drive, and demolition of two existing buildings. The contract duration is 450 days with a magnitude of construction between $5-10 million. The NAICS code is 236220 and responses are due May 5th, 2022. The source selection process will consider technical, past performance and price factors, with award intended without discussions.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Construct Medical Readiness Facility, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions and Answers 04 R1.pdf PDF
SECTION 26 0573.19 ARC FLASH HAZARD ANALYSIS.pdf PDF
074213 23 compo wall panel.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 05 R1.pdf PDF
60613250_WIANG_TRUAX-MED-E_v19 - Sheet - E-601 - ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES.pdf PDF
W50S9F-22-R-0001_0004.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 04.pdf PDF
W50S9F-22-R-0001_0003.pdf PDF
Photograph Log.docx DOCX document
Bldg_307 Floor Layout.pdf PDF
Bldg_311 Floor Layout.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 03.pdf PDF
DEMO PLAN BLDG 311.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 01.pdf PDF
W50S9F-22-R-0001_0002.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 02.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Slides - Medical Readiness.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal Conference Minutes.pdf PDF
Site Visit Sign In Log.pdf PDF
W50S9F-22-R-0001_0001.pdf PDF
W50S9F-22-R-0001.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 08_SAP SINGLE SOURCE DETERMINATION ANDOVER.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT B SUBCONTRACTOR TEAM KEY PERSONNEL INFORMATION AND CONSENT FORM.doc DOC document
EXHIBIT F SUBCONTRACTING PLAN FORMAT.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT G PROPOSAL PRICE SCHEDULE.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 03_DRAWINGS Project No. XGFG139001 dated 14 MAY 2021.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 05_B307 ASBESTOS REPORT Project No. XGFG139001 dated 25 Nov 2019.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 09_SAP SINGLE SOURCE DETERMINATION MONACO.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 10_SAP SINGLE SOURCE DETERMINATION MARSHALL BEST.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 12 PRE PROPOSAL SITE VISIT_DROP OFF INSTRUCTIONS.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT D PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT E SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN FORMAT.docx DOCX document
ATTACHMENT 01_PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Vol 1 Project No. XGFG139001 dated 08 Jul 2021.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 02_PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Vol 2 Project No. XGFG139001 dated 08 Jul 2021.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 04_GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT Project No. XGFG139001 dated 08 Nov 2019.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 06_B311 ASBESTOS REPORT Project No. XGFG139001 dated 25 Nov 2019.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 07_SAP SINGLE SOURCE DETERMINATION ADVANTOR.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT 11_SFS FORM 12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EXHIBIT A PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY QUESTIONNAIRE AND SPECIALIZED COMPANY EXPERIENCE.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT C LETTER OF COMMITMENT.docx DOCX document
Show all 40

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Medical Readiness Q&A #05

60. Regarding the interior signage schedule listed on sheet A-615. In the list there are two sign types listed as follows. S1-B permanent room identification : S1-A Room identification The interior sign schedule states S1 but does not list A or B to clarify which sign type. Could you provide some clarification for me on this matter.

A. Questions sent to A/E for clarification

61. I’m not seeing a specific WOS called out in the spec’s. Can we get a brand/style that the designer would like to go with? If not, is the OBEX Bar system from Milliken acceptable?

A. The Government does not sole-source Walk-Off Systems. Provide a product based on the information provided.

62. A-112 shows a gypsum board ceiling at Copy Area 200.4. Can you provide a detail on how this ceiling is to be supported?

63. Can you provide the HPSB Scoresheet?

A. Refer to SECTION 01 3329 SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING.

64. The specifications list conflicting base working hours. Can you provide the preferred base working hours?

A. Base working hours for contractors is 0630-1430 CST.

65. Is the CWM 3rd party verifier provided by the government? If so, please provide contact information.

A. Construction Waste Management and Disposal is the responsibility of the Contractor. The Government collects the information provided for waste reporting.

66. Please confirm that the government will provide special tests and inspections. GC required to coordinate schedule only.

A. The contractor is responsible for special tests and inspections.

67. Is there underslab treatment for termites and underslab pests? If so, please provide more details and information.

A. N/A

68. Per Section 051200.2.06.B, Section 220501.1.03, and Section 220507.3.04B a unit price is required/called out. Where on the proposal schedule do these unit prices need to be shown? Or will unit pricing for these items, and any others listed, be agreed upon following award?

A. The Government does not have an interest in unit prices are referenced in these sections.

69. There are alternates/CLINs listed on both the proposal schedule and in the alternates form (Section

004323). Are we required to submit both forms?

A. Use the proposal schedule provided by the KO in the solicitation documents. Offerors are NOT required to submit the Section 00 4323.

70. The specs do not call for a NDL warranty for either the standing seam metal or EPDM roofs. Is this intentional?

71. 90mil self-adhering EPDM roofing is not available, is a fully adhered 60mil system an acceptable alternative?

72. Is it acceptable to use 2 layers of 2.6 ISO on the roof? This will achieve an R30 rating.

73. A “1-3/8” deep rainscreen metal panel, type 1” is shown on the drawings but no defined specifications could be found. Can you provide additional information on the desired rainscreen panel? (i.e. Manufacturer, Product, aluminum composite panels, etc.)

74. Attached file named “Rainscreen Metal Wall Panel” is a manufacturer and style to be considered for acceptable if no additional information can be provided.

75. Detail 6D shown on A-311, includes a transition that is not warrantable per the manufacturer’s.

Roofer is requesting the attached “Standing Seam Vertical Transition” file be considered.

76. Detail 6B on A-310 calls out a metal fascia panel on the drawings but no defined specifications could be found. Can you provide additional information on the desired metal fascia panel? i.e. Manufacturer and product info.

ALL QUESTIONS RECEIVED HAVE BEEN POSTED. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS WILL BE

REVIEWED.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .