Attach_0030_Past_Performance_Cover_and_Questionnaire_26Sep2018.pdf
PDF 114 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W31P4Q-17-R-0046
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and information about a forthcoming federal contract opportunity for the Hydra-70 Rocket System.
The past performance questionnaire seeks candid responses from contractors regarding their compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness including use of subcontractors, timeliness of performance, cost control on cost reimbursement contracts, and commitment to customer satisfaction on a previous Hydra-70 Rocket System contract. It requests ratings in these areas along with comments and identification of other past efforts and points of contact.
The related federal contract opportunity will be a single-source, five-year hybrid firm-fixed-price and cost-type contract issued by the U.S. Army Contracting Command-Redstone Arsenal for Hydra-70 Rocket System full rate production hardware and engineering services. The opportunity is restricted to National Technology and Industrial Base members and seeks the Mk 66 Mod 4 Rocket Motor along with various Hydra-70 rockets, warheads, containers and associated components, packaging, and engineering services to maintain capability.
Attachment 0030- Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION -- SEE FAR 3.104
G-1
Performance Risk Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within 3 days.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| 1881_001 |
| Hydra-70 Past Performance Questionnaire |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .