RFP Attch 1 - Relevant Experience - MT Interstate FFS.pdf

Request for Proposal Attachment 1: Relevant Experience for

Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108

Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering & Full Facilities Services

Billings—Bozeman—Butte, MT

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY, SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (FAR 3.104)

INSTRUCTIONS: The offeror should provide information in this attachment to respond to the Relevant Experience evaluation factor in the RFP. The offeror may provide up to three (3) Similar Projects in response to the Relevant Experience evaluation factor. Section 3 is limited to no more than ten pages (standard page of approximately 8.5” x 11” or electronic equivalent). Offerors should reference the definition of “Similar Project(s)” in Section M.2.1 Definitions (which is reproduced below) in selecting the projects to submit in response to the Relevant Experience evaluation factor.

The Government will not evaluate any information beyond the ten page limitation for the Section 3 response to the Relevant Experience factor.

Important: Section 3 is limited to no more than ten pages total; DO NOT submit ten pages per project.

For the Past Performance and Relevant Experience factors “Similar Project(s)” means (in no order of importance) project(s) for which--

○ work primarily includes operations and maintenance services;

○ the offeror performed as the prime contractor;

○ the offeror performed for at least six consecutive months within the last seven (7) years prior to issuance of the RFP or the proposal submittal deadline;

○ work was performed primarily on a firm-fixed price basis; and

○ work was performed in a facility used for professional services (e.g., office buildings, hospitals, educational institutions, courthouses, hotels, laboratories, museums) not primarily related to retail sales, wholesales, manufacturing, warehousing, industrial, restaurants, or residential functions.

REMINDERS:

i. For each submitted Similar Project, offerors should address all aspects of how the submitted Similar Project meets the definition of “Similar Project”.

ii. Unless the question is specifically designed for a yes/no response or simple input (e.g. dates, square footage, number of facilities managed under the project, etc.), do not simply state the project includes experience for the part of the relevant experience presented in the question.

iii. When responding to questions in Section 3, offerors should avoid general statements in responses about its relevant experience. As a reminder, the Government may evaluate an offeror’s relevant experience on Similar

Projects more favorably to the extent the responses have a level of depth that substantiates its experience for the technical considerations described in Section 3 of this RFP Attachment 1 - Relevant Experience.

General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service Region 8 Project: Montana Interstate FE & Full Facilities Services RFP Attachment 1: Relevant Experience for 47PJ0024R0108 Billings-Bozeman-Butte, Montana

SECTION 1: BUSINESS INFORMATION

Legal Business Name:

System for Award Management (SAM) Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):

Business Address:

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION ON SIMILAR PROJECTS

Project 1 Name:

Does the project primarily include operations and maintenance services? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Did the business described in Section 1 perform the work for this Similar Project as the prime contractor? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Was work performed primarily on a firm-fixed price basis? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Is the project for work that required the management of facilities in locations at least 100 miles apart under one contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Are any of the real properties managed under this project listed on the National Register of

Historic Places (or other historic register)? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Were any of the real properties managed under this project undergoing any type of major renovations as part of a modernization project to replace, modify, and improve existing building equipment or systems? ☐ Yes ☐ No

What is the primary function of this facility (or facilities) (e.g. laboratories, office space, educational institutions, hospitals, etc.)?

Estimated quantity and value of unscheduled maintenance and repair activities per year:

Period of Performance

Start Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

Completion Date (mm/dd/yyyy):

General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service Region 8 Project: Montana Interstate FE & Full Facilities Services

Project 2 Name:

prime contractor? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Was work performed primarily on a firm-fixed price basis? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Is the project for work that required the management of facilities in locations at least 100 miles apart under one contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Are any of the real properties managed under this project listed on the National Register of

Historic Places (or other historic register)? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Were any of the real properties managed under this project undergoing any type of major

What is the primary function of this facility (or facilities) (e.g. laboratories, office space, educational institutions, hospitals, etc.)?

General Services Administration, Public Buildings Service Region 8 Project: Montana Interstate FE & Full Facilities Services

Project 3 Name:

prime contractor? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Was work performed primarily on a firm-fixed price basis? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Is the project for work that required the management of facilities in locations at least 100 miles apart under one contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Are any of the real properties managed under this project listed on the National Register of

Historic Places (or other historic register)? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Were any of the real properties managed under this project undergoing any type of major

What is the primary function of this facility (or facilities) (e.g. laboratories, office space, educational institutions, hospitals, etc.)?

SECTION 3: RELEVANT EXPERIENCE (DO NOT EXCEED FIVE PAGES FOR THIS SECTION)

When responding to the questions and prompts below for relevant experience, it is important for the response to provide specific details that substantiate how and why the experience is relevant to the scope and complexity of the National Operations &

Maintenance Specification for Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities Services (“the Specification”). It is strongly suggested that the response avoid broad, vague, and general statements. The offeror should demonstrate its experience with any supporting details from the Similar Projects listed in Section 2.

For the submitted Similar Projects, --

1. describe any experience with sustainability programs (e.g. water conservation, waste diversion, and energy efficiency) at the facility (or facilities). What were the programs and what was your role as the prime contractor?

2. describe any experience with quality management systems and, specifically, certain aspects of the quality management system that add value to the technical quality and service delivery.

3. do any of the Similar Projects demonstrate any experience in improving a predictive or preventive maintenance program beyond the client’s established requirements and standards? For instance, as the prime contractor, did you integrate any industry best practices or leverage any internal capabilities, expertise, or knowledge to improve the predictive or preventive maintenance program? Be sure to list any implemented best practices or applied internal expertise on this Similar Project.