SF30_47PJ0024R0108_0002.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

INSTRUCTIONS (Back Page):

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code). Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date).

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contracting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By). Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor). For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Items 9, (Amendment of Solicitation Number - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order Number - Dated). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data).

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries:

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B. The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting officer's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13. Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification).

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document.

Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

(i) Total contract price increased by $

(ii) Total contract price decreased by $

(iii) Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

(g)

(h)

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

(i) A reference to the letter determination; and

(ii) A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

U.S. General Services Administration

Amendment 0002 – Montana Interstate FE & FFS GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108

AMENDMENT 0002

MONTANA INTERSTATE FACILITIES ENGINEERING & FULL FACILITIES SERVICES FOR

RFP TO ESTABLISH A SINGLE-AWARD INDEFINITE-DELIVERY, INDEFINITE-QUANTITY CONTRACT

GSA SOLICITATION NO. 47PJ0024R0108

DATE AMENDMENT ISSUED: SEPTEMBER 17, 2024

Amendment 0002 to GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108 incorporates the following amendments—

1. Any instances that reference Section M in the Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities

Services, Request for Proposal to Award a Single-Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity Contract, Solicitation Number 47PJ0024R0108, is amended as follows—

FROM: Section M

TO: Part F

2. The Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities Services, Request for Proposal to Award a Single-

Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity Contract, Solicitation Number 47PJ0024R0108, Section F.6 Past

Performance, is amended, in part, as follows--

FROM: The term “relevant past performance” means past performance for “Similar Project(s)” as defined in the

Specification and Request for Proposal Section M.2.1.

TO: The term “relevant past performance” means past performance for “Similar Project(s)” as defined in the

Specification and Request for Proposal Section F.2.1

3. The solicitation announcement attachment for the Request for Proposal Attachment 1: Relevant Experience for

Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering & Full Facilities Services (RFP

Attachment 1: Relevant Experience) is replaced in its entirety by the revision 1 attachment, which is available for download through the System for Award Management, Contract Opportunities domain. The Government will accept offeror submittals for Relevant Experience completed on the previous version, but the Government will only evaluate the first five pages in response to Section 3 in the Request for Proposal Attachment 1: Relevant Experience.

Amendment 0002 amends the page limitation for the Section 3 responses described in the RFP Attachment 1:

Relevant Experience, revision 1, from ten (10) pages to five (5) pages. Amendment 0002 amends the reference to

Section M.2.1 Definitions to Section F.2.1 Definitions.

4. The Request for Proposal to Award a Single-Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity Contract, Solicitation

Number 47PJ0024R0108, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering & Full Facilities Services has various amendments to correct grammatical errors, format, layout, and font. The Request for Proposal to Award a Single-

Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity Contract, Solicitation Number 47PJ0024R0108, Montana Interstate

Facilities Engineering & Full Facilities Services, as amended September 17, 2024, contains these various amendments to correct grammatical errors, format, layout, and font.

The following requests for information and answer are hereby incorporated by reference as part of Request for Proposal documents for the Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering & Full Facilities Services, GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ024R0108.

41. What should offerors submit for the past performance evaluation factor given references are submitting the PPQ?

If the PPQs are to be sent directly to the [G]overnment, what is required in the proposal for the Past Performance section?

Solicitation, Page 75, F.5 requires an Attachment 1 – Relevant Experience for up to five (5) projects. Page 77, F.6 requires a completed Attachment 1 and an Attachment 2 – PPQ to be sent to each reference for the projects submitted in Relevant Experience.

Response: For submittal requirements, offerors should refer to Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full

Facilities Services, Request for Proposal to Award a Single-Award Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity

Contract, GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108, Part F: Evaluation Factors for Award, Section F.6 Past

Performance, Submittal Requirements. As part of its proposal, offerors may submit for each of its Similar Projects the following details: project name/identification, contract/project number (if applicable), reference name, and reference contact information. These details as part of the offerors proposal should be beneficial to the Government in cross referencing the Similar Projects that the Government should expect to receive from selected references for the offeror’s Similar Projects.

42. Which wage determination and health and welfare rate applies, $5.36 or $4.93?

Response: Please refer to the applicable collective bargaining agreement and prevailing wage determinations.

Offerors should carefully read any notes in the prevailing wage determinations and carefully review the provision and terms in the applicable collective bargaining agreement, and price their offers based on their own review of the collective bargaining agreement and prevailing wage determinations.

43. In [the Request for Proposal, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities Services, Solicitation

Number 47PJ0024R0108] reference to the Optional Submittals[,] do [offerors] have to submit a narrative for

BOTH Chiller Preventive Maintenance AND Fire Protection Preventive Maintenance? Or can [offerors] choose to submit ONE of the two along with all supporting documents?

Response: These are optional submittals. The Government leaves it to the discretion of the offeror to choose to submit documents requested under one, both, or neither optional submittals. Provided the offeror submits either one or both Optional Submittals, the Government may consider the Optional Submittals received with the proposal as part of the evaluation for the offeror's Quality Management System.

Please refer to the Request for Proposal, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities

Services, Section F.3 Quality Management System, Optional Submittals. Please refer to the Request for

Proposal, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities Services, Section F.3 Quality

Management System, Standard for Evaluation.

44. At the Mike Mansfield FB/USCH, [c]ontractors were not allowed access to FBI offices, conference rooms, breakrooms, etc. The Facility Manager states these areas consist of “typical offices.”

● Will these areas be included in the contract including operation/maintenance services and custodial services?

● If the answer is yes, please provide specific details of what is included in each FBI office/area.

● Please provide floor plans for these areas including room numbers.

Response: The FBI space will be included in the full services contract. An FBI clearance will be required for all staff working within this space. Floor plans for this area will not be released due to security restrictions. Service to be provided during normal working hours to ensure agency presence.

45. Are there special security certifications and considerations needed for Contractor employees to access the FBI areas?

Response: FBI clearance (LBI).

46. Will there be special security certifications and considerations needed for Contractor employees to access the sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF)?

Response: Only with FBI escort.

47. Will the Contractor be responsible for the automated external defibrillators (AEDs) on each floor of the buildings in all three (3) locations?

Response: No.

48. In the Mike Mansfield FB/USCH, Contractors were not allowed access to the doctor’s offices in the Military Entrance

Processing Station (MEPS) area . The Facility Manager stated those areas consist of “typical doctor’s offices.”

● Will these areas be included in the contract including operation/maintenance services and custodial services?

● If the answer is yes, please provide specific details of what is included in each MEP doctor’s office/area.

● Please provide floor plans for these areas including room numbers.

Response: MEPS space does not require additional security clearances. Services can be provided after normal working hours to alleviate interference with applicants’ testing.

49. In the Mike Mansfield FB/USCH, it was stated that [the Contractor] will maintain the Elevator Room, but not the actual [e]levators. Will the Contractor notify the elevator maintenance contractor of service needs? Or the Facility

Manager? Or both? Please clarify.

Response: The Building Engineer can call the elevator service provider for non-billable service calls or an emergency with occupant entrapment. Billable service requests must be requested by GSA.

50. On the external rear of the building, there were photovoltaic (PV) arrays on the wall above the loading dock. Are these to be included in the inventory list and part of the scope of maintenance?

Response: At the Bozeman Federal Building and U.S. Post Office - yes.

51. In relation to LEED, is the James F. Battin U.S. Courthouse in Billings, MT, utilizing Arc to capture/manage energy and water data?

Response: No.

52. The provided asset inventory indicates 5 generators[,] but during walkthrough there was only one identified and it was stated it was tenant maintained. Can [the Government] confirm the number of generators and how many are a part of this solicitation per facility?

Response: Billings - 2 generators, owned by GSA

Bozeman - 1 generator, owned by GSA

Butte - 1 generator owned and maintained by agency

53. For the optional submittals [described in Request for Proposal, Section F.3 Quality Management System], are the requested supporting documents included in the five page limitation?

Response: The narrative for both the Chiller Preventive Maintenance and the Fire Protection Preventive Maintenance are limited to no more than five (5) pages each (standard page of approximately 8.5” x 11” or electronic equivalent).

The Government will not evaluate any information provided that is more than the first five pages in each narrative. The

Government will not consider any section identifications, title pages, or cover pages as part of the 5 page limitation.

54. Are there required readings on the solar inverters?

Response: Refer to "Renewable Energy Production" found in the National Consolidated Facilities Engineering

Specification, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full Facilities Services, Exhibit 2 - Energy and Water

Efficiency Monthly Report, which is currently page 224 of the PWS Region 8 MT Interstate FE_FSS document.

55. How many underground fuel storage tanks are on the properties?

Response: None.

56. How many backflow preventers are on the property?

Response: Please refer to the asset inventory.

57. Are the tour sheets of every building turned in monthly using NCMMS?.

Response: Yes.

58. How many [e]mergency generators are there per building?

Response: Butte-1 that it is agency specific and not required maintenance per contract

59. Are there “As built drawings” for each location?

Response: Billings-partial, Bozeman-drawings exist, but not marked "as-built", Butte-partial

60. Please provide a list of pressure vessels.

Response: Please reference the equipment inventory.

61. Periodic testing? Please define a specific time frame for “periodic testing.”

Response: Please reference P100 and any applicable operational manuals and or manufacturer recommendations.

62. The [National Consolidated Facilities Engineering Specification, Montana Interstate Facilities Engineering and Full

Facilities Services, Section C.10.3 Snow and Ice Removal, which is currently on page 199,] states[, in part, that] “...[i]ce melt shall not be used to avoid proper removal of snow or ice.” Question: Is this a specific product Please clarify?

Response: Sodium Chloride (Rock Salt) ‒ The most common deicing salt, releases a large amount of chloride when it dissolves, which can damage masonry and metal.

Calcium Chloride ‒ Can damage masonry and concrete.

Products containing Ammonium Nitrate and Ammonium Sulfate should never be used.

If a de-icing salt is absolutely needed then it is best to use magnesium chloride; however, magnesium chloride is a salt and has the potential to cause damage to building materials. When using magnesium chloride, or any de-icing salt, be sure to:

● Use sand instead of salt, whenever possible

● Add sand to the magnesium chloride to add traction and limit the amount of magnesium chloride used

● Use as little as possible and use it as far away from the structure as possible

● Remove as much snow and ice as you can manually before applying de-icing salts (be careful not to chip the masonry when using metal tools), magnesium chloride should be a backup, not the primary method

● Avoid salt build-up against walls and curbs and regularly sweep up excess

● Remove the magnesium chloride from the proximity of the building or artwork as soon as it is warm enough

● Check the ingredients of the de-icer before use, packaged de-icers can be a mixture of different types of salt

This guidance was developed for historic structures, but it is applicable for all buildings, metal and masonry features.

63. How often are contractors (PM/Chief Engineer) required to meet with GSA?

Response: The Project Manager is required to meet with GSA on an as needed basis, but at a minimum weekly, to provide building and project updates.

64. If asbestos training is required, is an online course sufficient?

Response: GSA would need to approve specific training programs and certifications if not provided by the Government.

65. What MERV of filter is required?

Response: The required MERV is dependent on the equipment.

66. How often are the [e]mergency generators required to be tested to full capacity load?

Response: Reference GSA maintenance standards and manufacturer recommendations/manuals

67. Can [the Government] [p]rovide a copy of the equipment lists?

Will the [G]overnment provide equipment lists for each building?

Response: All equipment lists have been issued directly to the Offerors after the Government received a completed CUI form from offerors.

68. For each building, can [offerors] get the count of outside windows?

Response: Offerors need to estimate this number based on offeror's experience.

69. Can GSA provide the exact area of snow removal[?] [T]here are entry ramps and [it is] not [clear] where the line stops for Contractor’s responsibility [at] all (3) locations.

Response: Driving and walking surfaces must be snow free per the National Consolidated Facilities Engineering

Specification (performance work statement). Ramps are included as part of this PWS requirement. Billings and

Bozeman have snow melt systems.

70. Is there an accurate count of the Audio/Visual (strobe/speaker) counts?

Response: Offerors need to estimate this number based on offeror's experience.

71. Is the recycling handled by the contractor or GSA at the (3) locations?

Response: Bozeman-Contractor

Billings-GSA

Butte-Contractor recycles with exception of batteries

72. Is the dumpster located at the Billings location GSA or contractor?

Response: GSA.

73. Is the freight elevator in the Mike Mansfield Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse to be maintained by the Contractor?

Response: GSA has separate elevator contracts covering maintenance and repairs. The Contractor would not be required to maintain the freight elevator.

74. Can the recessed lighting on the vaulted ceiling in Mike Mansfield Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse be accessed from the top in the attic space to change?

Response: Yes.

75. Who is responsible for watering and maintaining the trees and flowers?

Response: Butte-Flowers have been planted and watered by CSOs Trees on City Property.

Bozeman and Billings-Contractor is responsible for landscaping duties.

76. There is a tilt-away gate at the Mike Mansfield Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse. [I]s this part of the[C]ontractor’s responsibility

Response: No. The gate is agency owned equipment.

77. Can the [G]overnment provide a current list of approved maintenance consumables [and] cleaning products?

Response: Federal agencies, including contractors, must comply with the sustainable purchasing requirements and the recommended specifications, standards, and ecolabels for each product category in the "Cleaning Products" section of the Green Procurement Compilation. Details may be found at the following links:

https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement https://sftool.gov/greenprocurement/green-products/5/cleaning-products/0

For most product categories in the Green Procurement Compilation, there are links to lists of brand name products that meet these requirements and recommendations. Maintenance consumables are required to be submitted to the

Government for approval if required.

78. At what time is the Contractor required to raise [and] lower flags? Daily? Does it include weekends?

Response: If a flag proclamation is released, then the flag operations is to reflect the directive before normal working hours and this requirement applies to weekend and Holidays.

79. [52.212-5] – Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes or Executive Orders, etc. In 2021

President Biden issued Executive Order (EO) #14055 [ensures] the service workers employed under Federal contracts cannot be displaced from their jobs due to a change in contractor engagement and must be retained in employment by a succeeding contractor[,] unless they are unqualified or fail to meet the specification of the contracting agency or other division of the Federal [G]overnment. This EO was made into a Federal regulation of the [Department of Labor (DOL)] and promulgated in December of 2023. Accordingly, any offeror winning contract award will need to extend the offer of employment to incumbent employees under a new contract. The only way that a new contractor could propose a new employee be introduced to the worksite is if – A) the incumbent employees are no longer available or do not want to continue working at the GSA locations, or B) do not meet the job qualification requirements or other specifications established by GSA. However, F. 4 of the

[Request for Proposal] requires[, in part,] that “...offerors should provide a staffing plan that include the following:

1. a table or chart all self-performed work that--

a. clearly shows all labor categories (job titles), and for each category, whether the position is full-time or part time;

b. for each labor category, clearly shows the annual standard hours, annual overtime hours, and number of FTEs at each building;

c. buildings where the FTEs are assigned; and

d. shows the overall totals for the annual standard hours, annual overtime, hours, and FTEs;

The technical staff on this contract must meet the requirements set within PWS C.1.2.10 - PWS C.1.2.11.8.

The only [business entity] that is able to accurately respond to this requirement and fulfill the demands of the new

DOL (Wage & Hour) regulation is the incumbent contractor.

Will the [G]overnment please: A) Release all valid and detailed information relating to the training, licenses, certifications, experience and education of the existing, incumbent employees, or B) Confirm that the incumbent employees, currently working at the GSA sites are either unqualified or will no longer be available for employment at the GSA site under the new contract?

Response: The right of first refusal clause referenced in the question, and the Department of Labor rules under 29 C.F.R.

Part 9 implementing the subject Executive Order 14055, are not applicable to this procurement. 29 C.F.R. Section 9.11(a).

80. Is the [G]overnment requiring multi-year (3-year, 5-year, etc.) preventive maintenance actions (electrical testing, sprinkler obstruction testing, eddy current, etc.) to be performed in the BASE period?

If not required in the BASE period, when was the last time multi-year (3-year, 5-year, etc.) preventive maintenance actions (electrical testing, sprinkler obstruction testing, eddy current, etc.) were performed in each facility?

Response: See C.5.9.3.1 Five Year Obstruction Test, C.6.4.4 Testing/Inspecting, and other PWS locations for this information.

81. Can the procedures for Key Control be provided as a separate deliverable and not part of the QMS System?

Response: See C.5.9.3.1 Five Year Obstruction Test, C.6.4.4 Testing/Inspecting, and other PWS locations for this information.

82. Please confirm that any regular (monthly) pest control services (application of chemical and non-chemical) are not part of the base contract. Based upon the PWS, the contractor only has to provide an initial assessment of the interior space / exterior grounds by a licensed IPM contractor.

Response: See the remainder of section 13 for pest control requirements.

83. What is the average annual cost of replacement plants supplied by the contractor?

Response: This information is unavailable.

84. Please confirm that there are no green roof maintenance requirements under this contract.

Response: Green roof maintenance requirements are not applicable under this contract.

85. Can the [G]overnment provide a total inventory of all towel and soap dispensers?

Response: This information is unavailable.

86. Please provide the control system of the Building Automation System (BAS) that is being utilized at each facility.

In addition, what software is each system using and who is it licensed to?

Response: Butte and Bozeman - JCI.

Billings - Alerton. Licensed to GSA.

87. Can the [G]overnment clarify if the generators listed for Butte FBCH (MT0004ZZ) in the inventory excel file are the contractor's responsibility since they are listed as "Agency Owned"? If not, are there any generators under the contractor's responsibility at the Mike Mansfield Federal Building and Courthouse?

Response: No generators located at the Mike Mansfield fall under this contract. The existing generator is agency owned and maintained.

88. If a Joint Venture submits a proposal and one venture partner has experience in operations and maintenance

(NAICS 561210) and the other partner has experience in janitorial/grounds maintenance, etc. (NAICS

561720/561730), how many past performance submittals will be needed for each NAICS category to be found relevant/favorable? For instance, two (2) O&M and one (1) janitorial or three (3) of each?

Response: This is a complete small business set aside, for NAICS code 561210. (See page 56 of the Request for

Proposals, GSA Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108 (RFP).) For the provision regarding how the Government will evaluate a proposal from an offeror that is a joint venture, see RFP paragraph "Contractor Teaming Arrangements and Joint Ventures (JV)." (See page 63 of the RFP.) For required submittals under the Past Performance factor, see the Part F: Evaluation Factors for Award, Section F.6 Past Performance, of the RFP.

Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of this Amendment by initialing or signing this Amendment 0002 for GSA

Solicitation No. 47PJ0024R0108 and submitting it with the proposal no later than the established deadline in the RFP.

(End of Amendment 0002)

PAUL G HATFIELD US COURTHOUSE

901 FRONT STREET SUITE 2300

HELENA, MT 59626 USA

1 Denver Federal Center PO Box 25546, Building 41 Denver, CO 80225-0546 USA NameandTitleSigner[0]: