Request for SF330 OR1_Atch 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 111 KB Posted

Attached to
C1DA--Amendment 0001 - Responses to Technical Questions National AE IDIQ MATOC On-Ramping Opportunity 1
Solicitation number
36C77626R0013
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC), related to a national Architect and Engineer (A-E) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) with solicitation number 36C77623R0005. The form is designed for clients to evaluate a contractor's performance across seven key areas: quality, schedule/timeliness, communication, management/personnel, cost/financial management, subcontract management, and an overall recommendation.

The PPQ provides a structured template for rating contractor performance using an adjectival rating system ranging from Outstanding to Unsatisfactory. The document is part of an on-ramping opportunity for an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract, specifically seeking to evaluate potential contractors' past performance for future A-E services. The form requires detailed information about the contract, including project specifics, contractor details, and a comprehensive performance assessment by the client, which will be incorporated into the SF330 submission for the Department of Veterans Affairs Technology Acquisition Center Austin.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VA PROGRAM CONTRACTING ACTIVITY CENTRAL ● 6100 OAK TREE BLVD SUITE 490 ● INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

SECTION 1

CONTRACT INFORMATION – Contractor to complete #1-3

1. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

NAME OF OFFEROR BEING EVALUATED: Click or tap here to enter text.

ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

POINT OF CONTACT: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

WORK PERFOMED AS: Click or tap here to enter text.

PERCENT OF PROJECT WORK PERFORMED: Click or tap here to enter text.

IF SUBCONTRACTOR, WHO WAS THE PRIME? Click or tap here to enter text.

2. CONTRACT INFORMATION

CONTRACT TITLE: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTRACT NUMBER AND DO/TO NUMBER: Click or tap here to enter text.

CONTRACT TYPE: Choose an item.

if other:

CONTRACT LOCATION: Click or tap here to enter text.

AWARD DATE: Click or tap to enter a date.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT ACCCEPTANCE (construction accepted) Date: Click or tap to enter a date.

ACTUAL CONTRACT ACCEPTANCE: Click or tap to enter a date.

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.

ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATION PRICE: Click or tap here to enter text.

ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE (all costs - design/installation/financing): Click or tap here to enter text.

FINAL CONTRACT PRICE (including modifications, if applicable): Click or tap here to enter text.

EXPLAIN DIFFERENCES: Click or tap here to enter text.

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

SCOPE INCLUDED IN PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.

HOW IS THIS PROJECT RELEVANT TO PROJECT OF SUBMISSION? Click or tap here to enter text.

SECTION 2

EVALUATOR INFORMATION – Client to complete

Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Program Contracting Activity Central (PCAC) is considering the Offeror identified above for award of an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract under the national Architect and Engineer (A-E) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) – 36C77623R0005.

Your comments would be appreciated regarding this firm’s past performance. The intent of this form is to evaluate the company’s ability to perform the work as described in the solicitation. Please verify the accuracy of the information in Section 1 and complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. VHA-PCAC may contact you in order to obtain any additional information regarding a contract award.

Please return your completed questionnaire to the Offeror to be incorporated into the SF330 submission. PPQs should NOT be submitted directly to VHA PCAC by the client. Refer to the solicitation for SF330 submission due date.

EVALUATOR INFORMATION

NAME OF EVALUATOR: Click or tap here to enter text.

POSITION: Click or tap here to enter text.

ADDRESS: Click or tap here to enter text.

PHONE: Click or tap here to enter text.

EMAIL: Click or tap here to enter text.

DESCRIBE YOUR ROLE IN THE PROJECT: Click or tap here to enter text.

*Please see Page 4 for Adjectival Ratings for the following:

1. QUALITY

Ability to meet quality design and/or construction standards specified for technical performance
Choose an item.
Comments:

2. SCHEDULE/ TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including timely submission of data deliverables (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below.)
Choose an item.
Comments:

3. COMMUNICATION

Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with client staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes and responsiveness to client requests)
Choose an item.
Comments:

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/ LABOR

Effectiveness of management, including suppliers, materials, and/or labor force (including the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the project)
Choose an item.
Continuity in the contractor’s personnel during execution of the contract (e.g., one person or team that stayed with the project throughout the contract)
Choose an item.
Comments:

5. COST/ FINANCIAL MANGEMENT

Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price
Choose an item.
Comments:

6. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Ability to manage subcontracting effort, including any subcontracting issues, and the contractor’s ability to resolve the problems without extensive customer guidance

Choose an item.

Comments:

7. SUMMARY

Would you hire or work with this firm again? If no, please explain below.
Choose an item.
Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Choose an item.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

EVALUATOR SIGNATURE:
DATE:

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

*THIS PAGE WILL BE REMOVED FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD THE SF330 PAGE COUNT – IT IS FOR PPQ COMPLETION PURPOSES ONLY*

Rating
Definition
Outstanding
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were highly effective.
Above Average
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the Client’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were effective.
Satisfactory
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Offeror were satisfactory.
Unsatisfactory
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflected a serious problem for which the Offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the Offeror’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract.

image1.tiff

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .