Questions Answers 3_final~1.pdf

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 1 of 7

Questions & Answers #3 Questions submitted before 12/29/2025 at 12:00pm

Request for Proposal (RFP) S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire and Administrative Buildings

Question #1:

There are conflicting sections about underground 90 degree stub ups. Are we to install RMC elbows or PVC coated RMC for branch and/or feeder conduit stub ups?

Answer:

Use fiberglass or PVC coated RMC per 260533.3.1.F and 3.7.F.

Question #2:

E101 sheet note #1 says to coordinate delivery and installation of vault with CPI. Is CPI to provide the utility vault, or will that be the responsibility of the EC?

Answer:

See the Division of Responsibility Matrix on E001. CPI will order vault and lid, Contractor will coordinate delivery arrangements and install per CPI requirements.

Question #3:

What are your requirements for temp power? Service size? Location on site?

Answer:

Coordinate with CPI and Owner Project Manager. Design of temporary power for construction is the responsibility of the Contractor per 260000.3.1.D.

Question #4:

Will there be room on site for a job trailer?

Answer:

It is assumed that there will be room, this is ultimately Contractor responsibility to confirm once site walk has occurred.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 2 of 7

Question #5:

Are there any CAD files that we could use to perform earthwork and quantity takeoffs with for this project?

No, CAD files are not available until after award.

Question #6:

Contractor will provide the access control server, correct?

Yes.

Question #7:

How many client stations will be at this location? One

1. Will any of these be dedicated to the access control system? Yes (one)

a. Will contractor provide these computers, monitors, keyboards etc? No

See above answers in Blue.

Question #8:

Will there be a badge printer and client machine for printing.

a. Will a camera for capturing images be required? Owner Furnished.

Yes, bidders must include a badge printer that coordinates with the system noted in the specs.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 3 of 7

Question #9:

Does ODF have an existing access control system that they would like this building to be added to that system?

a. If so, please confirm that system.

b. If so, would they like this to be segmented?

No, this will be considered a standalone site.

Question #10:

For the access control system, will the card readers use OSDP or Wiegand technology?

OSDP is required, Wiegand is not acceptable for this project.

Question #11:

For the access control cards, what credential format are you currently using for access cards, or is there a standard you’d like us to align with (for example, MiFare, iCLASS, or SEOS)

a. How many cards are to be included in this quote?

iCLASS; 60 cards are to be included in bid.

Question #12:

Please confirm that there is only two exterior cameras on the technology drawing T201 and that will be all the cameras for the office building.

Confirmed.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 4 of 7

Question #13:

Will the contractor provide network switches for the cameras? Yes – camera switches must then utilize a single network port on the Owner switch.

a. Will these be managed switches? No

i. Is there a preferred manufacturer and or part number? No

See above answers in Blue.

Question #14:

Is there a call out for the cameras? Currently just the same icon for every camera location.

For example, If we spec a 180 camera on the outside of the fire shop and someone else specs a 2mp single lens camera then there would be a significant savings in the cost of the equipment, but that single lens camera would not be a good fit for that location.

No brand specific cameras. ODF requires 180 degree field of view, with a 4k resolution minimum.

Question #15:

Is there a network switch for the video in the Fire Shop Building, or will that cabling continue to the office building?

Each building is to return to their own Telecom Room.

Question #16:

There is no access control or intrusion in the Fire Shop Building. Please confirm that is accurate.

There should be a card reader at the Fire Shop south door, no intrusion.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 5 of 7

Question #17:

In the main office building there is a keypad for an alarm system but no intrusion is called out on the technical drawings.

Will a revised set of drawings be coming out with these devices called out? N/A

No intrusion system required at either building (office and fire shop).

Question #18:

Intrusion monitoring on separate contract?

Intrusion monitoring is not a requirement for this project.

Question #19:

There is an intrusion keypad on the South Office Entry door, but that is classified as public parking.

a. Should there be an additional keypad at the North Employee entrance?

b. Or should the original keypad be relocated to the North Employee entrance?

An intrusion system is not a requirement for this project.

Question #21:

Single Network Fire system to govern both buildings OR 2 independent system?

Network the fire alarm control panels together so that one monitoring contract is needed.

Question #22:

Updated bid set? Last one from 10/15/25

Bid set will be updated as soon as possible and uploaded to OregonBuys.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 6 of 7

Question #23:

Monitoring on separate contract?

Yes, monitoring would be done through a separate contract.

Question #24:

Project timeline?

See Section A.7 Key Project Dates in ITB Document.

Question #25:

Are any damaged buildings to be replaced still standing?

Existing building to be demolished and replaced have no previous fire damage.

Question #26:

Would there be need for asbestos work; sampling and/or abatement? ITB says the GC is responsible for the ACM survey and any abatement, correct?

Answer:

The building being removed was built in (or around) 1967. Successful bidder is responsible for survey of potentially hazardous materials, waste profile as required for legal disposal, and removal of the building in its entirety as outlined in the bidding documents.

Question #27:

ITB mentions buried Transit pipe in the specs but no quantification.

See ITB Addendum #2 and attached amended Specs/Drawings.

S-DASOBO-00015003 ODF Santiam Fire & Administrative Buildings Page 7 of 7

Question #28:

Note 2 M101 states to run power cables along with refrigerant and comm cables. Can we assume Division 26 is responsible for running their own power cables for the VRF Condensing Units? Are refrigerant lines and high voltage electrical to share the same conduit?

Answer:

Division 26 power conduit should be routed outside of the refrigerant conduit. Requirements indicated on electrical plans. The controls cable can either be routed in separate conduit or within the refrigerant line conduit as long as the method is per manufacturer requirements (a casing may be required due to expansion and contraction of refrigerant lines).

Question #29:

Is there a minimum required depth for the underground refrigerant piping trench? Could this trench be added to the civil drawings?

See M101, note 2 for required depth for the underground refrigerant piping trench.

Question #30:

There are requirements for “coordinated Shop Drawings” in the specifications. Will these need to be coordinated using BIM and will there be BIM coordination meetings? What LOD will be utilized?

Answer:

Mary F., LRS: The contractor will be responsible for method of coordinating their shop drawings including BIM coordination meetings, if required. The contractor can request the BIM model from the architect for their use (requiring an indemnification agreement). LOD is not specified.

Additional coordination drawing information is indicated in Section 01 3100.

END OF QUESTION & ANSWERS #3