PPI_Log_as_of_1-31-14_-_Release.pdf

SOLICITATION N69450-14-R-1756

P-100/P-099 NUCLEAR POWER TRAINING FACILITIES

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

13-Jan-14 PCCI, Inc. Page 6, Item # 0007, Option Item 6

This is a follow-up to Comment #27 on the draft solicitaion, as the issue remains unresolved. Please confirm that there is only one survival mooring system as part of this project - that for the submarine and not the IX-516 barge, and then correct the option description to remove the reverence to IC-516. Further either correct the description or the list of attachments for consistancy to either P099 (as in the Option description) or -100 as listed on page 13, whichever is correct.

There are two survival mooring systems. P100 includes an SMS for the ship as part of the base bid for P100. Option Item 6 to P099 is an SMS for the IX-516 barge.

Unfortunately, the final design for the SMS for the barge will be provided in a forthcoming amendment. It is much less complicated than the SMS for the ship but the final location had to be confirmed based on environmental and navigation factors, which impact the calculations, which affect the drawings. The specifications are the same as the ship SMS.

Y, Forthcoming

2 13-Jan-14 S&ME, Inc Which entity will be responsible for paying for the construction/laboratory material testing and/or Special Inspection for the referenced project?

The prime contractor. N

14-Jan-14 The McCarty Corporation 00202.III.F.3.b.1.a.1 In Section 00202.III.F.3.b.1.a.1, General Construction Experience, item (iv) concrete pile foundation, is listed as a significant feature in the basis of evaluation that prime contractors must demonstrate it has managed in a submitted project. However, we believe that this feature of work kshould be included in the subsequent section 2, Specialized Construction Experience, as a specialized subcontractor typically performs it much like the Pier/Whart work, Industrial Support Facilities and Facility Security. In our last 2 projects for the military, both over $140M, neither had concrete pile foundations. However, if they did, a specialized subcontractor would have performed this work. Please consider moving this feature of work into the Specialized Construction Experience factor so we can submit our specialized teaming subcontractor for this requirement.

The concrete and pile driving are critical pieces of this project. While we fully expect that there will be a specialized subcontractor actually performing the work, it is critical that the prime contractor has experience managing a project of the same magnitude that has dealt with these issues. We are not asking that the prime contractor self-performed this work, just that they have managed a project that included it.

N

15-Jan-14 M. C. Dean, Inc Pre-proposal Conference/Site Visit

Can you confirm that the base access form (form 74) is required to attend the Pre-proposal conference?

The base access form (form 74) is NOT required to attend the Pre-proposal conference which precedes the site visit. The base access form is required to attend the site visit that immediately follows the pre-proposal conference.

N

5 15-Jan-14 M. C. Dean, Inc Pre-proposal Conference/Site Visit

That these forms can be scanned and submitted to you electronically by COB, Friday, January 17, 2014

Only the NPTU Security Form can be sent electronically. The Base Access Form (Form 74) must be sent hardcopy.

N

15-Jan-14 M. C. Dean, Inc Pre-proposal

Conference/Site Visit More than one representative from our company can attend the pre-proposal conference, but only one person can enter the NPTU area

More than one representative from your company can attend the pre-proposal conference AND site visit, but only one person can enter the NPTU area.

N

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

Yellow = new response from previous posting White = received but no response provided at this time Page 1 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

15-Jan-14 M. C. Dean, Inc Pre-proposal Conference/Site Visit

The NPTU Security form has to be filled out and hand-delivered for access to the NPTU area

The base access form (form 74) must be sent hardcopy (FedEx, mail, etc.) and received by January 17, 2014. The NPTU Security form should be sent electronically and must be received by January 17, 2014.

N

16-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 00 01 15 Can Electronic CAD files of the site be released to the bidders? This would help provide more accurate quantity takeoff and better pricing from site contractors.

Electronic CAD files will be provided to the awardee only. They will not be released prior to contract award.

N

20-Jan-14 Ferguson Enterprises I would like to submit a piping product for prior approval on this project. Does this come to your attention?

The government is not accepting submittals for products for this solicitation. N

21-Jan-14 CTI Consultants, Inc The company I work for has served as the CxA on multiple federal projects for both NAVFAC and USACE in the past few years and I see that the Owner or the A/E firm will be hiring the CxA directly for this project. Would you be able to provide some insight as to how we would go about getting added to the pre-approved list of vendors to fulfill this role on projects where the Owner will hire the CxA directly?

There is not a pre-approved list of vendors. The CxA agent has already been hired through the AE design firm as part of the design contract.

N

21-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraph III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1)(ii) General Construction Experience (Page 19 of 97)

RFP Paragraph III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1)(ii) General Construction Experience (Page 19 of 97) states, “reinforced concrete high-bay (at least 45 feet high and 8,250 square feet) multi-story work.” Please consider revising this requirement to “at least 30 feet high” to allow more relevant project experience to be demonstrated in the proposal.

This has been considered. The factor remains. N

21-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraphs III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1) and III.F.3.(b)(1)(b)(1) General Construction Experience (Pages 19 and 20 of 97)

RFP Paragraphs III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1) and III.F.3.(b)(1)(b)(1) General Construction Experience (Pages 19 and 20 of 97) state that projects with less than 170,000 square feet of work will not be considered relevant or acceptable. Please consider revising this requirement to 100,000 square feet to allow more relevant project experience to be demonstrated in the proposal.

This has been considered. The factor remains. N

23-Jan-14 Apache Forest Products I am seeking the contact information to all the General Contractors bidding this job We do not maintain list of general contractors bidding on the project, however if you log into fedbizopps and go to the posting of the solicitation you can click on the interested vendors list and see who has identified themselves.

N

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 2 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

21-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraph III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1)(ii) General Construction Experience (Page 19 of 97)

RFP Paragraph III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1)(ii) General Construction Experience (Page 19 of 97) states, “reinforced concrete high-bay (at least 45 feet high and 8,250 square feet) multi-story work.” Please consider revising this requirement to “at least 30 feet high” to allow more relevant project experience to be demonstrated in the proposal.

This has been considered. The factor remains. N

21-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraphs III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1) and III.F.3.(b)(1)(b)(1) General Construction Experience (Pages 19 and 20 of 97)

RFP Paragraphs III.F.3.(b)(1)(a)(1) and III.F.3.(b)(1)(b)(1) General Construction Experience (Pages 19 and 20 of 97) state that projects with less than 170,000 square feet of work will not be considered relevant or acceptable. Please consider revising this requirement to 100,000 square feet to allow more relevant project experience to be demonstrated in the proposal.

This has been considered. The factor remains. N

23-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b)

Reference RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b). Please clarify whether or not the following portions of the proposal will count towards the overall 100 page limit:

• Transmittal Letter.

• Factor 3 – Draft Construction Schedule.

• Factor 4 – Pages indicating EMR and DART data requested.

• Factor 5 – Subfactor 5.A, pages providing performance evaluation ratings and SF294 pages.

• Factor 5 – Subfactor 5.B, Small Business Subcontracting Plan

• Factor 6 – CCASS and PPQ pages and any other past performance documentation

Transmittal letter does not count.

The three 11x17 sheets for the schedule do not count towards the page limit, but the narrative does.

EMR and DART rate data DO count towards the page limit Factor 5 documentation does NOT count towards the page limit CCASS and PPQ documentation does not count toward the page limit.

N

23-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b)(6)(i)

Reference RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b)(6)(i). Please confirm that a previously completed PPQ may be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ as long as the PPQ contains similar information to what is required on Attachment G and a copy of the PPQ is included in the proposal submission.

Yes. A previously completed PPQ may be submitted in lieu of requesting a new PPQ as long as the PPQ contains similar information to what is required on Attachment G and a copy of the PPQ is included in the proposal submission.

N

23-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b)(6)(i)

Reference RFP Paragraph III.F.3(b)(6)(i). Please confirm that PPQs for project submitted under Factor 1 (a)(2) Specialized Construction Experience are NOT required.

PPQs are to be submitted for all projects under Factor 1 including General and Specialized Experience.

N

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 3 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

23-Jan-14 Site Visit When and where should I obtain my badge from for the site visit? For those attending the site visit: You will need to pick up your badge from the Base Security Office prior to the pre-proposal conference. It is highly advised that you arrive at minimum 1 hour prior to the conference. The office opens at 0700. Your patience is appreciated as it will take time to process.

The Base Security Office is located off of Red Bank Road in Building #3. If you reach the Redbank Club you have gone too far. There is a big sign that says Base Security Bldg #3.

Ensure you have a form of Identification, proof of insurance as well as registration of your vehicle in the event you will need to drive on base.

The Redbank Club where the Pre-proposal conference will be held is located further down Redbank Road headed east. Base access is not required to access the Redbank Club.

Badges for NPTU Site access will be provided during the site visit.

N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.3

This section conflicts with the general layout drawing S529. Drg S529 depicts a "tie-rod style" column mounted jib crane. Para 1.2.4.3 specifies components used in a free standing, full cantelevered jib crane. Both designs will work in this application. But depending on which style is proposed, the offeror will not fully comply with both 1.2.4.3 and drg S529 as shown. Please clarify that either style is acceptable and that the specification and/or drawing S529 will be amended to reflect the specification for the design being supplied by the successful bidder.

Refer to 13 50 01 - 1.2.3.a, second sentence N

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 4 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 10, para 1.6.8; page12, para 2.2 protective coatings

These sections conflict with general layout drawing S529. Drawing S529, General Notes, Note #2 states "All steel shall be galvanized UNO." The specification clauses are written for carbon steel fabrication (not galvanized). The shore power boom structures are welded exposed steel structures. Welding on galvanized steel produces hazardous fumes and requires special equipment and procedures. Our experience on all shore power booms has been to use non-galvanized steel that is coated in accordance with SSPC SP 6/NACE No. 3. Please state if non-galvanized steel is allowed to be used to fabricate the shore power booms.

Generally, steel fabrications can be galvanized (hot-dipped) after all welding and fabrication has been completed.

N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.4.a

The cable saddles are welded steel structures, like the boom and mast. We recommend that carbon steel with a coating system conforming to SSPC SP 6/NACE No. 3 be allowed as another option to stainless steel or plating. Our experience shows that a saddle fabricated from properly coated steel holds up well in a marine environment.

Refer to PPI 21 N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.4.c We request that cable organizers made from Nylatron also be allowed. Nylatron is a cast Nylon material, is a good insulator, can be easily machined, and is impervious to weather conditions of a marine environment.

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.5.a

Last sentence states: "The torque reel shall provide a fail-safe condition such that the maximum payout of the strain relief cable is attained should the reel fail; thus preventing excessive tension in the shore power cables at the top of the ship."

Unfortunately, if this event occurs, and the torque reel is allowed to "free wheel" and go to a slack condition, the take-up saddle (shown on drawing S529) could free-fall onto the ship. The specification does not state if a fall-arresting means must be provided to either "catch" the take-up saddle or to allow its controlled decent onto the top surface of the ship Please clarify if this is a requirement

No shore power boom components, including the saddle, shall come in contact with the ship under any other condition.

N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 7, para 1.3.6

In lieu of designing the strain relief cable to fail (break) before reaching the yielding load capacity (10.5 kips) of the padeye attached to the ship, is it acceptable to design the "torque reel system" such that the strain relief cable can never see a load greater than 10.5 kips? If the strain relief cable breaks, the take-up saddle will shoot to the top and the shore power cables could be stretched.

The intent is to limit the attachment to the ship to 10.5 kips maximum load. How this is achieved can be established as part of system design. The specifications clearly state that the design load of the padeye is to be 3.5 kips.

N

23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 7, para 1.4 When performing maintenance and inspections from the pier, can it be assumed that a mobile man-lift will be used? Or must the shore power boom be designed with access ladder, service walkways, handrails, etc.?

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 5 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

27 23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.5.b

Is a galvanized steel strain relief cable acceptable in lieu of stainless steel? NO N

28 23-Jan-14 Bushman Equipment, Inc Section 13 50 01, pg 5, para 1.2.4.6.b

Is a galvanized steel lifting cable acceptable in lieu of stainless steel? NO N

29 27-Jan-14 Vendor - Power Systems, Inc. Drawing - ES552 Generator for Bldg. 2701, 550KW - What size day tank is required? What is the capacity for the Remote Tank, 3000 gallons or 4200 gallons?

27-Jan-14 Vendor - Power Systems, Inc. Drawings EP601 and

ES552

Drawing EP601, Generator for Bldg. 2626, calls for a 50KW. Drawing ES552, Fuel Tanks spec, calls for Bldg. 2626 to have an 80KW generator. Can you please clarify as to what the correct size should be?

31 27-Jan-14 CTI Consultants, Inc Could you tell me who is responsible for materials quality control. The owner or the General contractor?

The General Contractor N

32 Fluor Site Visit Can you do the site visit for the first of next week if it is going to be next week because I am in charge of a bid that bids on Feb. 6

The pre-proposal conference and site visit is scheduled for February 5, 2014. N

33 28-Jan-14 GS2 Engineering & Environmental Consultants

Site Visit Will my badge get me on base for the pre-proposal conference because I never filled out the forms?

Proper base access badging will get you on base. N

34 28-Jan-14 GS2 Engineering & Environmental Consultants is attendance at the pre-proposal conference is required to submit a bid on this project?

No N

28-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. Section 10 51 13 In building 2314, Security Women’s Locker Room, No. 237, on page A121 (Vol 5A), there are 25 lockers that have been relocated on the drawings. We are unable to ascertain where these lockers came from. Will they be provided by the Owner or do they have to be removed from another place in the building? Please advise where these lockers come from.

28-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. Section 10 56 15 Section 10 56 15 describes Pallets Racks in the project and are shown on the drawings on page A122 in Building 2701 (P100, Vol. 3A), but on the furniture drawings on page I112, they are listed as “Not In Contract.” Please clarify if the Pallets Racks are to be provided by the Contractor, whether they are in the FF&E contract, or if they are being provided by others.

The pallet racks are not part of the FF&E package. They are to be included in the building construction contract as built in equipment.

N

28-Jan-14 Caddell Construction Co. Section 12 51 00 This section describes wood case goods and tables that we are unable to identify and quantify in the Contract Drawings for any of the buildings. We do not see any of these items included in the FF&E package either. Where are these items located and who provides them?

Section 12 51 00 is not used and should not have been included in the contract documents.

Y, Forthcoming

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 6 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

29-Jan-14 Walsh Federal, LLC Soliciation;

00202.III.F.3.b.1.a

The RFP, Factor 1, asks for Construction Experience on "projects completed by the offeror as the prime construction contractor." Can an offeror submit construction experience/past performance for affiliates/subsidaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies? (this is allowed in Factor 5, Subfactor 5.A per note G, but it is not clarified if it is accepable for Factor 1).

29-Jan-14 Walsh Federal, LLC Soliciation; 00700 FAR Clause 5252.228-9306 is included, which requires a 8% Cashier's Check or a 10% Performance Bond as a Performance Guarantee on the project. The SF1442, Box 12A calls for Performance and Payment Bonds. FAR Clauses 52.228-15/52.228- 15.b are included and require: "(1) Performance bonds (Standard Form 25). The penal amount of performance bonds at the time of contract award shall be 100 percent of the original contract price. (2) Payment Bonds (Standard Form 25-A). The penal amount of payment bonds at the time of contract award shall be 100 percent of the original contract price." FAC 5252.228-9305 is included and calls for a 100% Performance (SF25) and Payment (SF25A) bond. Given the requirements for 100% P&P Bonds, can FAC 5252.228-9306 be omitted from the solicitation? (If it is not omitted, the Contractor will be required to provide a Performance Bond in the amount of 110% of the Contract Value).

Clause 5252.228-9306 will be removed from the solicitation. Y (Amendment 0003)

40 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 13

The freight car spec has a lot of passenger features specified (nickel-silver sills, etc.)

and the entrance section is written partially like a passenger elevator entrance (“stainless frame”) and partially like a freight elevator entrance (“gate type:… Vertical Rising [2-section]”). Please clarify the following:

41 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 13

a) Is the spec correct in asking for stainless doors and gates, or should they be powder coat?

42 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 13

b) If stainless doors and gates are required, should the doors just have stainless #4 fascia roomside for appearance reasons, or is stainless construction needed?

43 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 13 c) What is the Nema rating of the hoistway for this elevator? Is it standard Nema 1 or Nema 4/4x? The spec calls for stainless/aluminum everything, including entrances.

44 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 13

d) Is the freight car a true freight car, or does it need to be designed for passenger use?

45 29-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC 14 24 23 What is the hoistway size for the 2711 passenger car? It was not clearly shown on the drawings we received.

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 7 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

46 30-Jan-14 Unified AV Systems

I do not see the specifications on the AV systems (including soundmasking) Who can we contact concerning those components?

46 30-Jan-14 BL HARBERT INTERNATIONAL, LLC Site Visit

Do you expect the entire site visit to be over at noon per the RFP or was that just the portion at the Redbank Club?

It is anticipated that the entire site visit will be over by noon, however it is highly advised that you allow time for unexpected delays.

N

30-Jan-14 Kiewit Power Nuclear Pursuant to Evaluation Subfactor 5.A(g)

Is a Company allowed to use the “past performance information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies” related to utilization of small business concerns if the proposal clearly demonstrates the affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will have meaningful participation in the subcontracting of the Project. Similarly, Evaluation Factor 6 allows the “Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance.” Our interpretation of the Solicitation language is that it can utilize the past performance of affiliate companies for all experience and past performance criteria (“PP”) to the extent it can clearly demonstrate the affiliate companies will have meaningful participation on the Project. Could you confirm that this is allowed to utilize the PP of affiliate corporate entities throughout its proposal and whether any internal “teaming agreements” or other documentation is required for consideration of affiliate

PP.

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Demolition - Handling of Demo Material

Please confirm or clarify whether all demolition material from the existing finger pier at X-Ray North Pier and from X-Ray South Pier must be loaded to a barge and transferred off the site, or whether some or all of the materials may be transferred to the base of the pier and trucked to disposal through Jint Base Charleston.

49 31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Demolition - Equip.

Deliveries by Land

Are truck deliveries of demolition equipment allowed to the waterfront at X-Ray North Pier (such as loaders, concrete cutting equipment, etc..)

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Demolition - Pile Extraction

If an existing timber or concrete pile associated with the existing Finger Pier is not in conflict with the proposed new BPE, can the pile be cut off at mudline and removed rather than extracting the pile from below mudline? This would be similar to the piles left behind from the previous existing structure

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 8 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, G100 - General Notes, VIII Security, Paragraphs G & H

Paragraph G states, "All material deliveries shall be by a transport barge. All barges and materials shall be inspected by the government prior to being brought onsite inside the Port Security Barrier (PSB)." Paragraph H, note "d" states, "The inspections typically take one day but may take longer ..." For completing the concrete cast-in-place operations, are the concrete trucks and pump trucks required to be barged in to the site? If so, how will this work with the concrete set time and the time it takes to complete the barge & equipment inspections? Will the Contractor be allowed to deliver concrete in readimix trucks through the Base to a point where the concrete can be transferred to a barge located inside the Port Security Barrier (perhaps beside the Contractor laydown yard or a point on land located north of the Finger Pier)? Are loaded concrete readimix trucks permitted to deliver concrete by driving out on the existing X-Ray North Pier?

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Demolition -Items to be salvaged

After "Items to be salvaged" have been removed, what is required by the contractor to do with these items? Can they be transported on the existing pier to the base of the pier and from there onto land and then delivered to the appropriate location on Base?

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, SD101 X-Ray North, Demolition Notes

Note 2 states, "Approximate locations of previously demolished finger pier debris shown on NAVFAC Drawing Numbers 5203022 thru 5203027 and sub-bottom survey."

Have these documents been made available already? Where can we find them?

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, SG101 Overall Structure Site Plan

Are the (2) current ships, labeled as Current Ship 1 and Current Ship 2, at Piers, X- Ray North and X-Ray South going to be relocated prior to the start of construction?

Will the Contractor be required to (or allowed to) transport its barges alongside the berthed submarines when shuttling barges to and from the Pier?

55 31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, CN101 Dredging Plan

Where along the Port Security Barrier (PSB) will the contractor be allowed to enter and exit with crane and material barges?

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, CN101

Dredging Plan Dredging around the Current Ship 1 SMS will lower the existing ground level about 10

ft. This will likely expose the existing anchor pile depending on how far below the ground the anchor pile was driven. Is this the intent?

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, SM-004

Submarine Survival Mooring

How will the GFCI (Government Furnished, Contractor Installed) items be delivered to the contractor to install? Please clarify

31-Jan-14 Manson Construction Co. Plans, SD101 X-Ray

South, Demolition Notes

Note 1 states, "Existing Tide-Sling Mooring System shall be removed and stored for installation at the BPE Pier." Can details of the mooring system showing quantities and connections be provided to the contractor?

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 9 of 10

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA

Pre-Proposal Inquiry Log

Question/C omment

Question Date Contractor Name RFP Section/ Page/Paragraph

Question Response Requires Amendment Y/N

Color Coding:

Green = previously answered no change Orange = changed from previously response

White = received but no response provided at this time Page 10 of 10