Amendment 0007.pdf

ACQR6005200

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of amendment 0007 is to incorporate the follow ing changes and to address RFI responses:

1.) Extend the discussion closing date from February 07, 2025 to February 10, 2025 2.) Revise Discussion letter and Enclosure (1) - (3).

3.) Respond to RFI Questions received as show n in the summary of detail.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Feb-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247323R3218

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Aug-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Feb-2025

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

PW CONTRACTS CORE - FSC

CODE RAQ10-FSC

750 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-0001

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247323R3218

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0007

The purpose of Amendment 0007 is to incorporate the following changes and address RFI responses:

1.) Extension of Discussion Closing Date. The Discussion Closing Date is extended from February 07, 2025 to February 10, 2025.

2.) Revision of Discussion Letter and Enclosures. The Discussion Letter and Enclosure (1) through (3) have been revised. Please refer to your amended documents for the updated versions.

3.) Responses to the Requests for Information (RFI) received have been addressed and are included below. All offerors are encouraged to review these responses to ensure they have the most current information.

Q1: Does the Government want the entire proposal (13 files) re-submitted, even if nothing was changed in a file?

A1: Please ensure that each response is clearly referenced with the corresponding location (e.g., Tab No., Table No., Paragraph No., Page No.) in your revised Technical and Price proposals.

Submit all revisions as replacement pages, highlighting changes (e.g., bold, underline, or track changes). Do not repaginate, but if your revision exceeds the original page, use numeric-alpha pagination (e.g., 1a, 1b). A full resubmission of the non-cost/price factors is not required at this stage, but a clean copy may be requested later.

Q2: How does the Government want offerors to format revisions? With lines in the margin to indicate additions and cross-through content for deletions? Please clarify.

A2: See response to Q1

Q3: The Discussion Letter lists Enclosures (1) – (4) and provides (1), (2), and (4). The Letter references the SF30 as (Enclosure 3), but the signature line “Enclosures” references Enclosure (3) Revised ELIN Pricing Schedule. Please clarify.

A3: Please see revised Enclosures (1) - (3), the revised ELIN Pricing Schedule has been removed as this was an error.

N6247323R3218

Q4: Amendment 0006, Summary of Changes, Page 2 of 19, #4 states, “4. Update Factor 4, Quality Management System to now award credit only for projects deemed ‘relevant.’” Please clarify if the Government is actually referring to an update for Corporate Experience.

A4: See Amendment 0006 page 15 of 19 (vi), the word relevant (in green) has been added for clarity:

(vi) A Quality Management Program that has been successfully implemented for one (1) of the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1- Corporate Experience by the Offeror’s current Quality Control Manager may be rated significantly higher.

Q5: Regarding Technical Discussion Item, Factor 5, Safety, we are including reports in our Response that we hope will VERIFY that BSPS worked 0 hours in the U.S. during years 2019 – 2022; however, these consume 4 ½ pages. Please confirm that including this verification in our response to the Discussion Item is adequate, as there is no room in the proposal for these reports.

A5: Please see response to Q1. Providing verification in the response to Discussion Item is adequate.

Q6: The Government states our File #2 submission is not complete, but we have confirmed in PIEE that our File #2 is complete with Email Address and Unique Entity ID [though we did not include our Tax Identification Number (TIN) in block 15A as it is not required]. We did include our TIN in our Cover Letter (File #1) as required by the RFP. Can the Government please take another look at our File #2 uploaded to PIEE? If it is not viewing as completed on the Government’s side, then there must be a glitch in the system.

A6: See your revised Enclosure (2).

All other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

(End of Summary of Changes)