Amendment 0006 Open Discussions.pdf

ACQR6005200

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SUBJECT: N62473-23-R-3218, BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT CONTRACT FOR NAVAL AIR STATION FALLON, NEVADA

The purpose of this amendment is to Open Discussions

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 19

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Jan-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247323R3218

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

14-Aug-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Jan-2025

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

PW CONTRACTS CORE - FSC

CODE RAQ10-FSC

750 PACIFIC HIGHWAY

SAN DIEGO CA 92132-0001

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247323R3218

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0006

The RFP is hereby revised as follow:

1. Evaluation Notices were issued on January 27, 2025 identifying discussion items.

2. Period of Acceptance of Offers: The Offeror agrees to hold its offer firm until September 25, 2025.

3. Per the Evaluation Notices dated January 27, 2025 the revised proposal due date is no later than on February 07, 2025 at 2:00 P.M. (Daylight Time).

4. Update Factor 4, Quality Management System to now award credit only for projects deemed “relevant”.

5. The word “annually” has been added to the RFP, (2) Basis of Evaluation, (h)(ii) in order to enhance clarity and precision in the evaluation process.

6. Incorporate revised Wage determination:

DBA: General Decision Number: NV20250029 01/24/2025 SCA: WD 2015-5597 rev 26 dated December 23, 2024

PLEASE NOTE: DAVIS BACON WAGE DETERMINATIONS ONLY APPLY TO

CONSTRUCTION WORK THAT IS INCIDENTAL TO THE SERVICE BEING PROVIDED.

7. Notice to Offerors: Please thoroughly review your technical and price proposals and ensure all required documents are complete, accurate, and represent your firm’s intended proposal.

Please provide your response electronically via Department of Defense Solicitation Portal in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). If the proposal does not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content as provided in the solicitation, the proposal may be considered non-responsive and may render the offeror ineligible for award.

PIEE Solicitation Portal is the only electronic commerce method authorized for the submission of proposals in response to this solicitation. Submissions outside of the PIEE Solicitation Portal will not be considered.. The response to the questions and revisions to your proposal are subject to FAR 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors- Competitive Acquisition (Jan 2017).

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L.1 INQUIRIES

Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) can be submitted electronically using the Request for Proposal Information (RFI) form provided as Attachment J-L-01 of this solicitation. The point of contact (POC) for inquiries is Christopher Jennen and Chris Roundy at christopher.j.jennen.civ@us.navy.mil and Christine.a.roundy.civ@us.navy.mil . The Government cannot guarantee a response to inquiries received after 2:00 P.M. (PST) on September 19, 2024.

L.2 PROPOSAL DUE DATE

See Block #9 of STANDARD FORM 33 for details regarding the proposal due time and date.

L.3 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

The pre-proposal conference and site visit will be held at 10:00 A.M. (Pacific Time) on Tuesday, September 10, 2024. The pre-proposal conference location will be at the parking lot on the gate at NAS Fallon. Contractors must have approved installation access for NAS Fallon through the Navy Defense Biometric Identification System (DBIDS) program to attend the site visit.

Passes may be requested by submitting a completed SECNAV 5512/1 (May 2021) encrypted E-mail to Mark Merklein at mark.e.merklein.civ@us.navy.mil by 10:00 a.m. PST, Tuesday, 27 August 2024. Late submissions will NOT be accepted. Pass requests must include all pertinent information including Social Security Number AND Driver’s License Number. All personnel must be a U.S. Citizen. Mark Merklein can be reached via e-mail listed above or via phone 775-287-9017. Email requests should also copy Christopher Jennen and Chris Roundy at christopher.j.jennen.civ@us.navy.mil and Christine.a.roundy.civ@us.navy.mil.

NOTE: Due to security issues and time constraints, only those who register by 10:00 A.M. (Pacific Time), on Tuesday, August 27, 2024 deadline will be allowed to attend the pre-proposal conference and site visit. It is anticipated the pre-proposal conference and site tour will last up to 4 hours.

L.4 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION/DELIVERY

Proposals shall be submitted electronically via Department of Defense (DoD) Solicitation Portal in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). In order to submit a proposal through the PIEE Solicitation Portal, you must be registered as a Proposal Manager in the DoD PIEE Suite located at https://wawf.eb.mil/. PIEE Solicitation Vendor Access Instructions are provided as Exhibit I. Offeror must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal; if the proposal does not comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal may be considered non-responsive and may render the offeror ineligible for award.

Proposal due date and delivery location: Proposal due date information is identified in block 9 on the SF 33 and/or as amended on the SF 30. Refer to these documents for date and time of proposal submission. The Offeror Refer to these documents for date and time of proposal submission. The Offeror should address all evaluation factors and shall submit the proposal electronically using the PIEE Solicitation Portal at https://wawf.eb.mil/.r should address all evaluation. PIEE Solicitation Portal is the only electronic commerce method authorized for the submission of proposals in response to this solicitation. Submissions outside of the PIEE Solicitation Portal will not be considered.

L.5 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH FACTOR VOLUME 1 – PRICE

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

a. Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall complete and submit Files 1 through 8 and title each file as “Volume 1 – Price Proposal, File [#]”. Files 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 shall be submitted on Adobe Acrobat 10.0 (2010) or later version. File 3, the pricing portion of the proposal, shall be submitted using Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J-0200000-18 in a Microsoft Excel 2010 or later version. All unlocked cells shall remain unlocked upon submission of the spreadsheet and formula shall be traceable. In addition, Offerors shall not populate any cells within the ELIN schedule with ANY value exceeding to two decimal places. Offerors shall use Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J-0200000-18 to submit File #3.

Offerors that submit an ELIN schedule that does not comply with submittal requirements may be rejected.

FILE #1: Cover Letter. Include the following on the cover letter:

(1) Solicitation Number N62473-23-R-3218

(2) Name, address, telephone, and email address of the Offeror.

(3) Tax Identification Number (TIN), Unique Entity ID, and Cage Code.

(4) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

(5) Point(s) of contact with title, telephone, email address of person(s) authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.

(6) An alternate point of contact (POC) with whom the Government can correspond regarding the solicitation.

(7) The cover letter signed by an authorized representative.

(8) The Offeror shall agree to hold its offer firm until May 1, 2026.

FILE #2: SF 33 Solicitation, Offer and Award (SF 33):

Offeror to complete blocks 12 through 18.

FILE #3: Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J-0200000-18:

The ELIN Pricing Attachment shall be submitted electronically and must be compatible with Microsoft Office 2010 Excel. Proposed prices for Direct Labor Hours, Direct and fully burdened Labor Cost, for Management, Home and Field Office workforce, and shall be provided in the same level of detail for all requirements, whether the work is proposed to be accomplished as the prime contractor, subcontractor, or by other means. All formulas shall be traceable. Failure to submit offers for all line items listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

Note 1: Government generated excel formulas are NOT guaranteed to be accurate. It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure excel formulas used to calculate pricing are correct.

Note 2: All numeric entries are limited to no more than two (2) decimal places (e.g. $1.05, 9.75%, or 5.50)

Note 3: ELIN pricing for recurring services shall be applied as the cost basis for the increase/decrease of any recurring quantities from a specified ELIN and for non-recurring quantities of the same.

FILE #4: Completed Exhibit A: Financial Questionnaire

“Financial Questionnaire” from the Offeror’s (including Joint Venture partners, if applicable) banking institution. Exhibit A is MANDATORY.

FILE #5: Any Offeror proposing as a partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement (e.g. first-tier Small Business subcontractor), or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a listing of each entity within a “contractor team agreement” (as defined in FAR 9.601) and each corporate affiliate, parent, or subsidiary who is proposed to work on or support this project (each “Team Member”), including each entity’s corporate name (no abbreviations), address, point of contact, phone number, Unique Entity ID, and CAGE Code.

(2) Submit a letter of commitment (partnership or teaming agreement) from each Team Member.

The commitment letter shall clearly identify the expected relationship, role, and responsibility of the Team Member.

(3) Any offeror proposing as a joint venture shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement. If the joint venture is with a mentor-protégé, a copy of the relevant mentor-protégé agreement and the corresponding approval letter from the Small Business Administration shall be submitted.

FILE #6: Representations and Certifications:

All completed sections of solicitation section K - Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of Offeror including completed certifications from the System for Award Management, at the following website www.sam.gov.

FILE #7: VETS – 4212 Federal Contractor Reporting

The U.S. Department of Labor's Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) and Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs (OFCCP) have supported affirmative actions to employ and advance in employment of covered veterans since 2008. As legislatively mandated under 38 U.S. Code Section 4212, codified at 41 CFR 61-300, contractors and subcontractors that enter into, or modify a contract or subcontract with the Federal Government, and whose contract meets the criteria set forth in the above legislation/regulations, are required to report annually on their affirmative action efforts in employing veterans.

If subject to the reporting requirements, companies must file an annual VETS-4212 Report by September 30 of each year following a calendar year in which a contractor or subcontractor held a covered contract or subcontract. Upon the successful submission of a VETS-4212 report, federal contractors will receive an email confirmation of receipt notification for their records. Offerors shall include a copy of their confirmation notification email in their proposal as verification of submission for the current reporting period. If this requirement is not applicable to your firm, provide a statement that your firm does not have any contracts subject to this requirement.

FILE #8: CONTRACTOR PROPOSAL CERTIFICATION:

____________________________________________ (Name of Offeror) warrants that its proposal _____________________________ (of date or other identifier) incorporated herein by reference, including, but not limited to, proposed approaches, staffing, methodology, or work plans, will meet the performance objectives set forth in this contract during the execution thereof. The contractor is not excused from meeting such performance objectives in the event such proposal proves inadequate as conceived or executed to meet such performance objectives. The contractor understands that it bears all of the cost and performance risk associated with adopting acceptable additional (and/or alternative) means or methods of meeting the performance objectives.

(2) Basis of Price Evaluation:

a. The Government will evaluate price based on the Offeror’s proposed Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J-0200000-18 schedule at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) and elemental (Overhead, Direct Labor, Direct Material, Direct Equipment, etc.) level and the total proposed price. Total proposed price consists of the basic requirements the Base Period and all Option Periods as provided by the offeror in Annex 0200000-J, Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J-0200000- 18.

The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(v) And/ or any other methodology deemed appropriate by the Contracting Officer and consistent with FAR 15.404-1

b. As analysis is performed to determine a fair and reasonable price, the Government will seek to identify any pricing that is unreasonably high, including allocation to the ELIN/Sub-ELIN unit prices. Pricing may be considered unreasonably high when, despite an acceptable total proposed price, the price of one or more prices at the functional (Annex/Sub-annex, Spec Item, etc.) level, ELIN/sub- ELIN unit prices, or contract line items is significantly overstated.

An offer may be rejected if the proposed price is unreasonably high between line items or sub-line items within a pricing period, or between line items or sub-line items for the basic requirement and any option period.

c. Any suspected issues or concerns in the price proposal, including any inconsistent pricing submitted within Attachment D, Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) Pricing Attachment J- 0200000-18 Schedule must be clearly explained in the price proposal. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide all required documentation.

d. Any inconsistency, whether real or apparent, between proposed performance and price must be clearly explained in the price proposal. For example, if unique and innovative approaches are the basis for an apparently unreasonably high/inconsistently priced proposal, the nature of these approaches and their impact on price must be completely documented.

e. The analysis may consider whether prices are reasonable in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the Offeror’s proposal. A price that is found either unreasonably high in relation to the proposed work may be indicative of an inherent lack of understanding of the solicitation requirements and may result in the overall proposal not being considered for award.

VOLUME 2 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The Offeror shall submit a File for each of the Factors 1-5 and title each file as “Volume 2 – Technical Proposal, Factor [#]”. Factors 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 shall be submitted on Adobe Acrobat 10.0 (2010) or later version.

Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

The Offeror shall provide the following for evaluation on Exhibit B, Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Data Sheet.

(a) The offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of four (4) examples of recent, relevant projects that the offeror including partnerships, joint ventures, teaming arrangements (e.g. first-tier small business subcontractor), or corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies), performed as the prime contractor.

At a minimum, projects submitted by the offeror must aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing or managing Sub-annex 0501050 – Airfield Facilities, Sub-annex 1502000 – Facility Investment, and Sub-annex 1604000 – Wastewater. The Offeror may utilize the experience of a subcontractor that is committed to the performance of Sub-annex 1604000 – Wastewater on this contract to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of the services.

Meaningful involvement is considered 40% or more for Subcontractor involvement in the performance of each Sub-annex.

RELEVANT PROJECT: To be considered relevant, a project must demonstrate both recurring and non-recurring services similar in size, scope, and complexity to those described in the performance work statement/specifications of the RFP with a total annual contract value (see definition) of $10,000,000.00 or greater, and shall be:

(i) An ongoing project with at least 12 months of contract performance completed as of the initial RFP/solicitation issuance date, or a project whose performance was completed within five (5) years of the initial RFP/solicitation issuance date.

(ii) For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as BOSC

Maintenance and Services (or equivalent) that encompasses at least two (2) of the following sub-annexes:

• 0501050 – Airfield Facilities requirements at a minimum include, but not limited to Bird Airstrike Hazard (BASH), Foreign Object Debris (FOD), Airfield Support Services, Departure Services, Airfield Operations, and General Aircraft Services.

• 1502000 - Facility Investment requirements at a minimum, include, but not limited to the completion of service orders, maintenance and repair of HVAC Systems, Fire Protection Systems, Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE), Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems, Generators, Facility Systems and Equipment, Airfield Surfaces, Grease Traps, Cranes, Specialty Doors, Airfield Lighting, Electronic Security Systems, Exhaust Hoods and Ducts, and Boilers and Unfired Pressure Vessels (UPVs).

• 1604000 – Wastewater requirements at a minimum include, but not limited to wastewater treatment facility operations and maintenance.

Complexity will be determined based on the projects contract type, facilities maintained (size, quantity and type), and the systems maintained (quantities and capacities).

NOTE: Projects submitted under Factor 1 - Corporate Experience must be the same projects submitted for Factor 2 - Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects.

(b) The Exhibit B – Factor 1- Corporate Experience is Mandatory. The Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form other than those documents listed under paragraphs (c) and (d) below. Individual blocks on Exhibit B - Factor 1 - Corporate Experience may be expanded. Exhibit B- Factor 1 - Corporate Experience shall be completed in its entirety; however, the total page limit for each project data sheet shall not exceed four

(4) single-sided pages.

(c) An offeror may rely on the prime contractor experience of corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister subsidiaries, sister companies and parent companies) to demonstrate experience, provided the offeror submits the following:

(i) A one-page narrative clearly clearly articulating the nature of the corporate relationship of the affiliates; and

(ii) An organization chart that visually demonstrates the corporate relationship of the affiliates.

(d) The Government will not consider the experience of proposed subcontractors other than first-tier small business subcontractors, except where used to demonstrate experience for Sub-annex 1604000 – Wastewater.

(i) The Offeror may utilize the experience of a first-tier small business subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater) that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor if the Offeror cannot independently demonstrate its own experience. The Offeror shall provide a letter of commitment from the first-tier small business subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater) that expressly commits them for the entirety of the contract (all task orders awarded). The letter shall also provide an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the first-tier small business subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater) will have in performance of this requirement; meaningful involvement is considered 40% or more for Subcontractor involvement in the performance of the respective Annex/Sub-annex

Note: The letter of commitment shall clearly identify the expected relationship, role, and responsibility of the first-tier small business subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), if any. Also, the Offeror may not utilize the experience of large business concerns to demonstrate experience under this evaluation factor (except for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater).

(2) Basis of Evaluation for Corporate Experience:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s demonstrated relevant corporate experience and depth of relevant corporate experience as a prime contractor directly responsible to the customer, its management of multiple subcontractors, and how it coordinated with multiple stakeholders. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant corporate experience, or proposed first-tier small business subcontractors (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), if any, will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(a) Under Factor 1 - Corporate Experience, the following will be removed from consideration:

(i) Projects that exceed the maximum four (4) projects allowed.

(ii) Projects for entire multiple award contracts and/or non-BOSC IDIQ ordering type contracts as a whole.

(iii) Projects that do not meet the definition of a relevant project.

(iv) Pages of Exhibit B- Factor 1 - Corporate Experience that exceed four (4) single-sided pages.

For multiple award service contracts (MASCs) or non-BOSC IDIQ ordering type contracts, the specific relevant task order, not the entire MAC or IDIQ contract, will be considered a project for evaluation purposes.

(b) Projects completed by the offeror or its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) in any capacity other than as prime contractor will not be considered relevant.

(c) Projects completed by a proposed subcontractor, other than a small business first-tier subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), if any, will not be considered relevant.

(d) With the exception of offerors covered by Mentor-Protégé Agreements approved by the

Small Business Administration, if the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), each member of the JV must demonstrate prime contractor experience on at least one relevant project. If each member of the Joint Venture does not have at least one relevant experience project, then the offeror will not be considered relevant.

(e) Projects submitted that utilize a corporate affiliate or a small business first-tier subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), and fail to demonstrate meaningful participation will not be considered relevant.

(f) Projects submitted that utilize the experience of a corporate affiliate to demonstrate experience under Factor 1 of this solicitation where the Offeror fails to provide either or both the one-page narrative and/or organizational chart from paragraph (c) for this solicitation will not be considered relevant.

(g) Projects submitted that utilize the experience of a first-tier small business subcontractor

(or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), to demonstrate experience under Factor 1 of this solicitation where the offeror fails to provide a letter of commitment from the first-tier small business subcontractor (or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater), for this solicitation will not be considered relevant.

(h) The degree to which the offeror demonstrates relevant corporate experience as related to this solicitation will be evaluated:

i. Proposals that do not aggregately demonstrate experience self-performing relevant corporate experience in sub-annexes 0501050 - Airfield Facilities, 1502000 – Facility Investment and 1604000 – Wastewater as related to this solicitation will result in a deficiency.

ii. Projects for which an offeror successfully demonstrates relevant corporate experience in performing and managing a large contract $14M or greater annually may be rated higher.

iii. Any single project that successfully demonstrates relevant corporate experience in sub-annexes 0501050 - Airfield Facilities, 1502000 – Facility Investment and 1604000 – Wastewater may be rated substantially higher.

iv. A project that successfully demonstrates relevant corporate experience in all sub-annexes related to Annex 0500000 - Air Operations and Annex 160000 – Utility as related to this solicitation may be rated substantially higher.

v. Offerors that demonstrate experience without relying on corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies) may be rated higher.

Factor 2, Past Performance:

Past Performance on Projects Submitted for Factor 1, Corporate Experience

Submit Exhibit C - Past Performance Questionnaires and CPARS evaluations immediately following each of the project data sheets in Factor 1. Submit any other past performance information under Factor 2.

If a Final CPARS evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for corporate experience. If a Final CPARS evaluation is not available, the most recent interim evaluation shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for corporate experience.

If there is not a Final or Interim CPARS evaluation, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (Exhibit “C”) for each respective project included in Factor 1 for Corporate Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal.

Offerors may use PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs, but Offerors must include these in the proposal and shall not incorporate these by reference. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. A PPQ will not be considered if a Final or Interim CPARS evaluation is available.

If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted via email directly to the Government’s points of contact, Chris Jennen at Christopher.J.Jennen.civ@us.navy.mil and Chris Roundy at Christine.a.roundy.civ@us.navy.mil prior to the proposal closing date.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors shall address any adverse past performance issues within Factor 2. Explanations shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total.

Performance awards or additional information submitted will not be considered.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information.

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

A copy of the blank Exhibit C- Past Performance Questionnaire to be used for requesting client references is included.

(2) Basis of Evaluation for Past Performance:

Past Performance on Projects Submitted for Factor 1 This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror’s Team performed on the recent, relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Offeror’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s Team’s past performance will be used as one of the means of evaluating the Offeror’s Team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Past Performance on All CPARS Evaluations for Services The Government may review all CPARS evaluations for Offerors, for projects other than those submitted under Factor 1, with specific focus on quality, schedule and management. CPARS evaluations that contain ratings for marginal to unsatisfactory for quality, schedule, and/or management may lower the overall confidence assessment rating. For offerors submitting as any type of teaming arrangement, when reviewing all CPARS evaluations the Government will review all available CPARS evaluations for the Offeror as a whole as well as any entities within the teaming arrangement.

In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through CPARS using all CAGE/UEI numbers of the Offeror’s Team, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive a Neutral Confidence rating. Past performance ratings of “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” hold more value than a “Neutral Confidence” rating and will be considered more favorably in the evaluation of past performance.

A past performance rating of “No Confidence” will be ineligible for award.

Factor 3, Key Personnel:

For Key Personnel, located in Annex 0200000 – Management and Administration, Spec Item 2.7.1, provide a 1-page resume that demonstrates experience and qualifications for each key personnel identified. Resumes shall include name, position, position description, work history and applicable educational and certification requirements. Personnel filling more than one role should be identified.

Offerors shall submit resumes and commitment letters for the Key Personnel listed below.

(a) Each resume is limited to one (1) single-sided 8.5” x 11” page, using minimum of 10-point font type. Resumes shall include name, position, position description, work history and applicable educational and certification requirements. The submitted resumes should not contain Privacy Sensitive or Personally Identifiable Information.

(b) Key Personnel should represent individuals that the offeror intends to provide for the associated positions. Each commitment letter is limited to one (1) single-sided 8.5” x 11” page, using minimum of 10-point font type, and must address the committed length of service in the designated position.

(c) Resumes and commitment letters shall be submitted for the following positions:

(i) Project Manager (PM): The PM shall have at least five (5) years of experience in managing a workforce providing services on contracts of similar size, scope and complexity.

(ii) Quality Manager: The Quality Manager or designated alternate shall have a current CMQ/OE certification and at least five (5) years of experience in preparing and enforcing QMS programs on contracts of similar size, scope and complexity. The Quality Manager or designated alternate shall not be the same person as the SSHO.

(iii) Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO): The SSHO must meet the requirements of EM 385-1-1 Section 1. The SSHO's training, experience, and qualifications shall be as required by EM 385-1-1 paragraph 01.A.17, entitled SITE SAFETY AND HEALTH OFFICER (SSHO), and all associated sub-paragraphs. The SSHO shall have completed five (5) years of satisfactory experience in preparing and enforcing safety programs on contracts of similar size and complexity in the past or three (3) years’ experience if (s)he possesses a Certified Safety Professional or safety and health degree. The SSHO shall have completed the OSHA 30-hour construction safety class or equivalent and maintain competency through 24 hours of formal safety and health related coursework every four (4) years. The SSHO shall not be the same person as the PM or QCM.

(iv) Environmental/Energy Manager: The Environmental/Energy Manager shall have a minimum two (2) years’ experience with environmental procedures similar to those of this contract; familiarity with Environmental Management Systems (EMSs); and knowledge of environmental regulations and federal energy laws and policy (including energy and water reduction requirements and renewable energy requirements) that are applicable to operations similar to those of this contract.

(2) Basis of Evaluation for Key Personnel:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Key Personnel as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(a) Under Factor 3 – Key Personnel, the following will be removed from consideration:

(i) Resumes submitted for other than the Key Personnel identified in Solicitation

Submittal Requirements, paragraph 1(c).

(ii) Resume pages that exceed one (1) single-sided 8.5” x 11” page.

(iii) Letter of Commitment pages that that exceed one (1) single-sided 8.5” x 11” page.

(b) The degree to which Key Personnel demonstrate the work experience, education, and qualifications per the requirements set forth in Solicitation Submittal Requirements, paragraph 1(c) will be evaluated:

(i) Failure to provide resumes and letters of commitment for all of the Key

Personnel listed in Solicitation Submittal Requirements, paragraph 1(c) will result in a deficiency.

(ii) Failure to provide any of the information requested in Solicitation Submittal

Requirements, paragraph 1 may be rated lower.

(iii) Key Personnel that are current employees with five (5) or more years of continuous work history with the offeror, its corporate affiliates (e.g., subsidiaries, sister subsidiaries, sister companies, and parent companies), or a small business first-tier contractor, with meaningful involvement and a letter commitment as established under Factor 1, may be rated higher. Current employees of corporate affiliates or small business first-tier subcontractors other than those with meaningful involvement and a letter commitment as established under Factor 1, will not be considered.

(iv) Key Personnel that are current employees with ten (10) or more years of continuous work history with the offeror may be rated significantly higher.

(v) Key Personnel that have experience of ten (10) years or more, in the respective positions for which they are being proposed, working on projects that are similar in scope, size (project dollar value), type and complexity to this solicitation and have the necessary technical knowledge, experience, training, skills, and applicable certifications to manage work may be rated higher.

(vi) Offerors that propose a Project Manager with project management experience for contracts with a total contract value of $200 million or more may be rated

Factor 4, Quality Management System:

The Offeror shall submit a Summary of its Quality Management System in a total page limit shall not exceed eight (8) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font, per the limitations set forth in paragraphs (1)(a) and (1)(b) below. An Offeror may utilize different font types and sizes for the organizational chart and other charts and graphs as long as the information contained in those charts and graphs is legible.

(a) Provide a summary of the Quality Control Program that includes the quality management processes and minimum controls that will be used to ensure full compliance with all performance objectives and standards as described in Section C 0200000 Management and Administration. The total page limit shall not exceed five

(5) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font.

(i) Explain the quality control program including an example of how the plan has worked for one (1) of the projects submitted under Factor 1- Corporate Experience or how the plan will work if it has not been used previously.

(ii) Describe specific quality control processes and procedures proposed for this contract to ensure successful performance for all deliverables of this contract.

(iii) Describe the methods to be used to document, measure, control, and improve the quality management processes.

(iv) Describe the plan for training employees in the quality management processes.

(v) Describe the processes that will be used to ensure consistent satisfactory performance of subcontractors.

(b) Provide a summary of the Quality Control Team that includes the key personnel responsible for implementing and sustaining the success of the Quality Management System. The total page limit shall not exceed three (3) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font. An Offeror may utilize different font types and sizes for the quality control process chart as long as the information contained in the chart is legible.

(i) Identify the quality control manager and any other key personnel responsible for the quality control program and a description of their roles and responsibilities.

(ii) Provide a quality control process chart showing the inter-relationship of the management and lines of authority for all quality management personnel.

(iii) For offerors who are joint ventures and/or teams with offices in a variety of locations, describe how the QC effort will be implemented across the various team offices. Describe from which office the QC program will be managed/coordinated and the plan/methods to ensure effective QC and communication between offices.

(2) Basis of Evaluation for Quality Management:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Quality Management System as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(a) Under Factor 4 – Quality Management System, the following will be removed from consideration:

(i) Pages of the Quality Control Program Summary that exceed five (5) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages using not smaller than 10-point Times New Roman font.

(ii) Pages of the Quality Control Team Summary Quality Control Team Summary that exceed three (3) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages.

(b) The degree to which the Quality Management System meets the requirements set forth in Solicitation Submittal Requirements, paragraphs 1(a and b) will be evaluated:

(i) Failure to provide any elements of the Quality Control Program Summary under paragraph 1(a) and/or Quality Control Team Summary under paragraph 1(b) in its entirety will result in a deficiency.

(ii) Failure to provide any of the information requested in requested in Solicitation

Submittal Requirements, paragraph 1 may be rated lower.

(iii) A Quality Management System that fails to demonstrate a sufficient response to quality controls may be rated lower.

(iv) A Quality Management System demonstrates an approach to quickly and successfully correct deficiencies in quality of performance may be rated

(v) An Offeror’s proven Quality Management Program that has been successfully run by its proposed Quality Manager for five (5) or more continuous years may be rated significantly higher.

(vi) A Quality Management Program that has been successfully implemented for one

(1) of the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1- Corporate Experience by the Offeror’s current Quality Control Manager may be rated significantly

(vii) An Offeror that receives a CPARS Overall Quality Rating of Very Good or better, or an average rating of Very Good or better in its Past Performance Questionnaire for Section 1. Quality, in conjunction with the success of its Quality Management Program for the project under ((b)(vi)) may be rated significantly higher.

Factor 5, Safety:

Submit Exhibit D – Factor 5, Safety Data and Narrative. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded.

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below.

For a partnership, joint venture, or subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each business entity who is part of the partnership/joint venture or the subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater; however, only one (1) safety narrative is required. Offerors who fail to submit DART rates and TCR for each business entity who is part of the partnership/joint venture or the subcontractor for the performance of Sub-annex 1604000- Wastewater will be assigned a deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable.

For a Small Business Offeror that is utilizing the experience of a first-tier Small Business subcontractor under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for the Small Business Offeror and for each first-tier Small Business subcontractor; however, only one (1) safety narrative is required. Small Business Offerors who fail to submit DART rates and TCR for the Small Business Offeror and each first-tier Small Business subcontractor (if applicable) will be assigned a deficiency and will be rated Unacceptable.

Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART rates and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors, except as noted above for Small Business Offerors utilizing first-tier Small Business subcontractor experience.

(a) DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. An acceptable/detailed explanation is required for any calendar year (CY) for which an Offeror has a moderate or higher risk that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(i) DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

(ii) Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

(b) TCR: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. An acceptable/detailed explanation is required for any calendar year (CY) for which an Offeror has a moderate or higher risk that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

(i) TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

(ii) Calculation of TCR: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

(c) Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

(i) Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the

SMS.

(ii) Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

(iii) Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance and accountability for the adherence to the safety requirements of the contract, for the subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

(iv) The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

(d) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to

OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(2) Basis of Evaluation for Safety:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any positive or negative rates and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(a) DART Rate: The board will evaluate rates over the last five (5) years considering changes that…