N4425519R6006_PWS_Attachment_M__JPHC-NHB_rev.1.doc
DOC document 66 KB Posted
- Attached to
- LTMOM
- Solicitation number
- N4425519R6006
About this file
This statement of work outlines long-term monitoring, operations, and maintenance requirements for Jackson Park Family Housing and Naval Hospital Bremerton sites in Bremerton, Washington. The contractor shall perform long-term groundwater and surface water monitoring, inspect and maintain remedial controls and vegetation, and prepare associated reports. Specific requirements include sampling seeps and outfalls, inspecting soil covers, shoreline stabilization, and vegetation on defined schedules, maintaining plantings and shoreline protections, and submitting draft and final monitoring reports, inspection reports, an annual report, and a land use control inspection checklist on specified deadlines throughout the period of performance from 31 March to 30 September each year. The contractor will be evaluated on quality, schedule, management, regulatory compliance, and safety based on criteria defined in the performance requirements summary table.
N4425519R6006_PWS_Attachment_M__JPHC-NHB_rev.1.doc
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N44255-19-R-6006 PWS Attachment M
JPHC LTMOM
ATTACHMENT M
Long-Term Monitoring and Operation & Maintenance for Jackson Park Family Housing and Naval Hospital Bremerton, Bremerton, Washington
STATEMENT OF WORK
LONG-TERM MONITORING, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (LTMOM)
Contract #: N44255-19-R-6006, PWS Attachment M, JPHC LTMOM Date: 25 March 2019
NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND NORTHWEST
1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE SUITE 203
SILVERDALE WA 98315 1101
Jackson Park Family Housing
Long-Term Monitoring/Operation and Maintenance
1.0 Introduction
Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest is requesting long-term monitoring and operation and maintenance services at Jackson Park Family Housing (JPFH) and Naval Hospital Bremerton (NHB) in support of the Navy Installation Restoration Program.
2.0 Background
The Record of Decision for Jackson Park Family Housing Operable Unit One (OU 1) requires periodic long-term monitoring, operation, and maintenance to ensure that the specified remedies are protective of human health and the environment.
3.0 Scope Objective
The objective of this task order is to perform the required long-term monitoring, operations, and maintenance required by the JPFH OU 1 Record of Decision and prepare reports documenting the results of the monitoring, inspections, and other activities performed.
4.0 Applicable Directives and Documents
The contractor shall adhere to the following documents in accordance with paragraph 5.0 - Performance Requirements
| Reference # |
| Title |
| Date |
| 1 |
| Final, Revision 1, Inspection and Maintenance Plan, Operable Unit 1, Jackson JPHC and Naval Hospital Bremerton |
| 1 August 2008 |
| 2 |
| Long-Term Monitoring Work Plan, Jackson Park Housing Complex and Naval Hospital Bremerton, Bremerton, WA |
| 18 January 2012 |
| 3 |
| Final Record of Decision JPHC/NHB Operable Unit 1 |
| August 2, 2000 |
| 4 |
| Final Land Use Control Plan, Jackson Park Housing Complex/Naval Hospital Bremerton |
| August 26, 2005 |
| 5 |
| Final Third Five - Year Review Jackson Park Housing Complex/Naval Hospital Bremerton, Bremerton, Washington |
| August 2015 |
5.0 Performance Requirements
The contractor shall provide all applicable plans, data, and reports (i.e. QC, SHSP, and Electronic Submittals) in accordance with Section C, General Contract Requirements, of the Basic Contract, plus provide the technical effort in the work areas listed below in accordance with the tasks and their associated schedules as described below.
The contractor shall complete all work in accordance with the performance requirements indicated in Table 5.1: "Performance Requirements Summary". The contractor shall also comply with the following:
5.1 JPFH LTM, Inspection and Maintenance
5.1.1 JPFH OU 1 Monitoring
5.1.1.1 The contractor shall sample 8 seeps and outfalls for the analytes shown in the Long-Term Monitoring Work Plan (Reference 2), Table 2-1, during the summer.
5.1.2 Jackson Park Housing Complex and Bremerton Naval Hospital OU-1 Remedy Inspections
5.1.2.1 The contractor shall inspect the JPFH/NHB OU-1 remedies for JPFH/NHB per the requirements of the Record of Decision (Reference 3) and Inspection and Maintenance (I & M) Plan (Reference 1) starting in the Spring. Remedy Inspections shall include the following activities:
--Inspection of soil cover and associated vegetation semi-annually
--Inspection of shoreline stabilization quarterly or semi-annually as specified in the I & M Plan.
--Inspection of shoreline vegetation quarterly, semi-annually, or annually as specified in the I & M Plan.
--Storm event inspection to be performed after a significant storm which is a 2-year storm defined as 1.37 inches of rain in a 6-hour period or 2.92 inches of rain in a 24-hour period.
--Inspection of warning signs along the shoreline.
5.1.2.2 The contractor shall utilize the revised checklists in Appendix C and the “Request for Additional Maintenance” form in Appendix B of the I & M Plan when performing the inspections. The checklists will be submitted with their corresponding inspection reports. The “Request for Additional Maintenance” form shall be submitted to NAVFAC Northwest within 24 hours of the inspection.
5.1.3 Reports
5.1.3.1 Provide a written report documenting the results of the long-term monitoring including data validation reports, relevant field notes, and deviations from the SAP. The report will include an internal draft submitted 90 days after sampling is completed, a draft submitted 14 days after receipt of Navy comments, and a final version submitted 21 days after receipt of Agency comments.
5.1.3.2 Provide a written report documenting the results of each inspection including checklists. Each report will include an internal draft submitted 20 days after completion of the inspection, an internal draft inspection report 30 calendar days after each inspection, a draft submitted 14 days after receipt of Navy comments, and a final version submitted 21 days after receipt of Agency comments.
5.1.3.3 Provide an Annual Inspection Report summarizing the results of the inspection reports. The internal draft shall be submitted thirty days after submittal of the final winter inspection report, a draft submitted 14 days after receipt of Navy comments, and a final version submitted 21 days after receipt of Agency comments.
5.1.3.4 Jackson Park Family Housing and Naval Hospital Bremerton Land Use Control Inspection
5.1.3.4.1 Perform inspection of the institutional controls per the Land Use Control Inspection Checklist in the Jackson Park Housing Complex/Bremerton Naval Hospital Final Land Use Control Plan (Reference 4). This inspection shall be performed concurrently with the Spring Remedy Inspection.
5.1.3.4.2 Submit the original completed checklist within 14 days of performing the inspection.
5.1.4 JPHC/NHB OU-1 Remedy Maintenance
5.1.4.1 The contractor shall maintain the plantings along the shoreline where there are controls on excavation or where Figure 1-1 of Reference 1 requires maintenance of shoreline protection. Trees and shrubs shall be trimmed, pruned or replaced as required, weeds removed, and the mulch maintained in accordance with Reference1.
5.1.4.2 Replace easily replaced rocks moved away from the shoreline stabilization in the areas in Figure 1-1 of Reference 1 specified “Maintain Shoreline Protection.”.
(Note 1: The Navy will provide written comments in electronic format on the Internal Draft and Draft Reports. The Navy will provide Agency Comments to the Contractor in both hard copy and electronic format. The Contractor shall provide formal written responses documenting Draft Report comment resolution and incorporate them into the Final Reports.)
5.2 Two draft and two final versions of documents for JPFH shall be delivered to the US EPA Project Manager via overnight delivery service. One draft and one final version of documents for JPFH shall be delivered to the Suquamish Tribe via overnight delivery service.
| TASK REF. |
| DELIVERABLE ITEM / EVENT |
| DURATION |
(days from award or prior task*) No. Hard / Electronic Copies
| 5.1.3.1 |
| Internal Draft JPFH Long-term Monitoring Report |
| 90 days from completion of sampling |
| 2/1 |
| 5.1.3.1 |
| Draft JPFH Long-term Monitoring Report |
| 14 days from receipt of Navy comments |
| 5/1 |
| 5.13.1 |
| Final JPFH Long-term Monitoring Report |
| 21 days from receipt of Agency comments |
| 6/2 |
| 5.1.3.2 |
| Internal Draft JPFH Inspection Reports |
| 20 days from completion of inspection |
| 2/1 |
| 5.1.3.2 |
| Draft JPFH Inspection Reports |
| 14 days from receipt of Navy comments |
| 5/1 |
| 5.1.3.2 |
| Final JPFH Inspection Reports |
| 21 days from receipt of Agency comments |
| 6/2 |
| 5.1.3.3 |
| Internal Draft JPFH Annual Inspection Report |
| 30 days after Winter inspection |
| 2/1 |
| 5.1.3.3 |
| Draft JPFH Annual Inspection Report |
| 14 days from receipt of Navy comments |
| 5/1 |
| 5.1.3.3 |
| Final JPFH Annual Inspection Report |
| 21 days from receipt of Agency comments |
| 6/2 |
*Days are calendar days
The submittal of all deliverables, sampling data and laboratory data packages, required under this Delivery Order shall be in accordance with the Navy’s most recent Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). An updated copy of the Gantt chart will be provided to the PM and COR via email on a monthly basis.
The Period of performance for this task order is from 31 March until 30 September of the following year.
6.0 Points of Contact
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest 1101 Tautog Circle
Silverdale, WA. 98315
Fax: (360) 396-0857
To be identified after award by separate correspondence.
Table 5.1: Performance Requirements Summary
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Unsatisfactory |
(Did not Meet AQL) Marginal
(Met AQL, but with difficulty) Satisfactory
(Met AQL) Very Good
(Exceeded AQL) Exceptional
(Greatly Exceed AQL)
| Quality |
| Inferior quality of service/deliverables such that deficiencies were a detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Marginal quality of service/deliverables with a substantial number of deficiencies without detriment to the Navy mission. |
| Acceptable quality of service/deliverable |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it enhanced the Navy’s mission beyond AQL. |
| Quality of service/deliverable was such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission beyond the AQL. |
| Schedule |
| Missed scheduled events/deliverable dates |
| Meet scheduled events/deliverable dates but required Navy intervention |
| Meet scheduled events and deliverables as specified in task. |
| Scheduled event/deliverable requirements occurred earlier than scheduled |
| Early scheduled event/deliverable requirements with beneficial results for the government. |
| Management |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were not able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management were able to fulfill contract/task performance requirements, but required Navy intervention |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so with actions/ideas that benefited the Navy beyond AQLs. |
| Contractor management and/or Project Management caused fulfillment of contract/task performance requirements and did so using actions/ideas that greatly benefited the Navy beyond the AQLs. |
| Regulatory Compliance |
| Lack of regulatory compliance resulted in the Navy receiving a notice of non-compliance or violation |
| Lack of regulatory compliance threatened the Navy’s compliance or placed the Navy at risk of non-compliance or violation |
| Complied with Regulations and Codes |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements to the benefit of the Navy |
| Exceeded Regulatory Compliance requirements such that it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission and/or relationship with Regulatory Agency |
| Safety |
| Loss time incidents occur without reporting MISHAP; demonstrated blatant disregard for safety of employees |
| Required excessive safety oversight and failed to fully implement EM-385-1-1. |
| Complied with EM 385-1-1 and contract requirements regarding safety |
| Contractor management and employees take active role in identifying, preventing and reporting safety mishaps, near misses, and good catches. |
| Safety Program exceeds expectations to the point where it greatly benefited the Navy’s mission. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .